RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To study the causes of iron deficiency, laboratory findings and clinical manifestation of infants aged 6-12 months and children aged 1-3 years diagnosed with severe iron-deficiency anemia. PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective single tertiary center study between January 2015 and April 2022, which included 142 children. The control group (patients with no diagnosis of severe iron-deficiency anemia) included 71 patients and the study group (patients diagnosed with severe iron-deficiency anemia) included also 71 patients. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from hospital medical records. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 25.0 software. RESULTS: Seventy-one children had hemoglobin <7 g∕dL and low values of ferritin/serum iron (22 infants aged 6-12 months and 49 children aged 1-3 years). In both the study and control groups, the male gender was slightly more prevalent. Mother's age at birth and living standard is significantly lower in the study group. We note a higher frequency of premature births (14.08%) in children identified with anemia compared to control group (8.45%). We found a statistically significant distribution of cow's milk consumption among the two groups (p<0.001). Pearson's correlation test revealed a significant positive correlation, indicating that anemia is directly proportional to cow's milk consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent cause of iron-deficiency anemia in infants and children 1-3 years old was the consumption of cow's milk following incorrect diversification and incomplete prophylaxis of iron-deficiency anemia.
Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva , Anemia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Animais , Bovinos , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Anemia Ferropriva/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferro , Leite , Anemia/complicaçõesRESUMO
A male infant, one month old, weight 4000 g, breastfed only, no pathological history, was admitted to the 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Clinical Emergency County Hospital in Craiova with fever and cough. Clinical findings when he was admitted: fever 38.7°C, perioral cyanosis, spastic cough, expiratory dyspnea, intercostal retraction, polypnea, subcrepitant rales in the right lung area. The chest x-ray revealed pneumonia aspect in the right middle perihilar region. He was administered antibiotic treatment, HHC, antithermics, with a favorable evolution. The control x-ray, when the infant was in a fair general state, with no disease symptomatology, pointed out a cystic formation at the level of the right middle lobe. The pulmonary CT revealed cavitary lesion, with a diameter of about 40mm in the right lung, and with the presence of septa to the interior and air content. The infant was urgently transferred to Marie Curie Hospital in Bucharest, where the cyst formation was removed through a surgical procedure. The anatomo-pathological examination revealed a bronchogenic cyst. The evolution was favorable after the surgical procedure.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To accurately hypothesize the optimal frequency of psychosocial distress screening in patients undergoing radiation therapy using exploratory modeling of prospective data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2010 and May 2011, 71 RT patients underwent daily screening with the Distress Thermometer. Prevalences of Distress Thermometer scores ≥ 4 were recorded. Optimal screening frequency was evaluated by planned post hoc comparison of prevalence rates and required screening events estimated by numerical modeling, consisting of data point omission to mimic weekly, every-other-week, monthly, and one-time screening intervals. Dependence on clinical variables and chronologic trends were assessed as secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 2,028 daily screening events identified that 37% of patients reported distress at least once during the course of treatment. Weekly, every-other-week, monthly, and one-time screening models estimated distress prevalences of 32%, 31%, 23%, and 17%, respectively, but required only 21%, 12%, 7%, and 4% of the assessments required for daily screening. No clinical parameter significantly predicted distress in univariable analysis, but "alone" living situation trended toward significance (P = .06). Physician-reported grade 3 toxicity predicted distress with 98% specificity, but only 19% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Thirty-seven percent of radiation oncology patients reported distress at least once during treatment. Screening at every-other-week intervals optimized efficiency and frequency, identifying nearly 90% of distressed patients with 12% of the screening events compared with daily screening.