RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy has been proposed as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of appendicitis. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, nonblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial comparing antibiotic therapy (10-day course) with appendectomy in patients with appendicitis at 25 U.S. centers. The primary outcome was 30-day health status, as assessed with the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health status; noninferiority margin, 0.05 points). Secondary outcomes included appendectomy in the antibiotics group and complications through 90 days; analyses were prespecified in subgroups defined according to the presence or absence of an appendicolith. RESULTS: In total, 1552 adults (414 with an appendicolith) underwent randomization; 776 were assigned to receive antibiotics (47% of whom were not hospitalized for the index treatment) and 776 to undergo appendectomy (96% of whom underwent a laparoscopic procedure). Antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy on the basis of 30-day EQ-5D scores (mean difference, 0.01 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.001 to 0.03). In the antibiotics group, 29% had undergone appendectomy by 90 days, including 41% of those with an appendicolith and 25% of those without an appendicolith. Complications were more common in the antibiotics group than in the appendectomy group (8.1 vs. 3.5 per 100 participants; rate ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.98); the higher rate in the antibiotics group could be attributed to those with an appendicolith (20.2 vs. 3.6 per 100 participants; rate ratio, 5.69; 95% CI, 2.11 to 15.38) and not to those without an appendicolith (3.7 vs. 3.5 per 100 participants; rate ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.43). The rate of serious adverse events was 4.0 per 100 participants in the antibiotics group and 3.0 per 100 participants in the appendectomy group (rate ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.50). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of appendicitis, antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy on the basis of results of a standard health-status measure. In the antibiotics group, nearly 3 in 10 participants had undergone appendectomy by 90 days. Participants with an appendicolith were at a higher risk for appendectomy and for complications than those without an appendicolith. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; CODA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02800785.).
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apêndice/cirurgia , Absenteísmo , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/complicações , Apêndice/patologia , Impacção Fecal , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mobile smartphone thermal imaging (MTI) devices correlate with blood flow, which makes them appealing adjuncts during reconstructive surgery. MTI was assessed in the setting of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) free flaps. We hypothesized that MTI can be a surrogate for blood flow to identify microvascular flow insufficiencies. METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent 30 DIEAP flaps for breast reconstruction. Images were obtained preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at instances of concern for flap viability. Three groups were evaluated: normal DIEAP flaps (NDFs), flaps with arterial insufficiency (AI), and flaps with venous congestion (VC). RESULTS: All flaps were successful. There were significant temperature increases from max ischemia (24.5 ± 2.1°C) to 1 min after anastomosis (27.2 ± 1.6°C, P < 0.001). NDFs continued to warm until the final MTI was taken when leaving the operating room. There were no differences between MTI flap temperatures before transfer to the chest and after completion of microanastomosis. With questionable flap viability, VC and AI temperatures were found to be significantly colder than the NDF group (28.3 ± 1.9°C versus 32.2 ± 1.8°C, P = 0.003) in the VC group and (27.2 ± 0.7°C versus 32.2 ± 1.8°C, P = 0.001) in the AI group. After correction of the identified flow insufficiency, VC and AI rewarmed and temperatures were no different compared with NDF. CONCLUSIONS: MTI recognizes microanastomotic failure and is a practical adjunct in the evaluation of free flap perfusion.
Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Mamoplastia , Microcirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Termografia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Artérias Epigástricas , Feminino , Humanos , Microvasos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , SmartphoneRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Complications from adhesions after intra-abdominal surgery accounts for ~6% of hospital admissions. Currently, hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose represents the main option to prevent postoperative adhesion formation. Human amniotic membrane contains inherent anti-inflammatory properties that mitigate adhesion formation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate adhesion generation after surgical trauma with amniotic membranes compared with standard intraperitoneal adhesion barriers. DESIGN: This study is a double-blinded, prospective evaluation. SETTING: This study was conducted at an animal research facility. ANIMALS: Forty male rats were studied. INTERVENTION: Laparotomy was performed with peritoneal disruption to the cecum. Animals were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 groups: sham, control, saline, hyaluronic acid membrane, or amniotic membrane. Animals were euthanized at 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Independent gross and histological assessments of adhesions were analyzed between groups by using adhesion scoring and microscopy. Scoring was based on the percentage of the cecum involved (0-4), vascularity of adhesions (0-3), strength (0-3), inflammation (0-3), and fibrosis (0-3). Adhered tissue was harvested for polymerase chain reaction analysis for gene regulation activity. RESULTS: All rats survived 14 days. Adhesions were observed in all animals. There were significantly fewer adhesions in the amniotic membrane group (2) versus hyaluronic acid (3) group (p = 0.01). The percentage of adhesion to the cecum was lower in the amniotic membrane group (29%) than in the hyaluronic acid group (47%, p = 0.04). Histological examination showed no significant difference between or within the 3 groups for inflammation or fibrosis. Genetic analysis of adhered tissues supported high rates of epithelialization and inhibition of fibrosis in the amniotic membrane group. LIMITATIONS: We are limited by the small sample size and the preclinical nature of the study. CONCLUSION: Human-derived amniotic membrane is effective at reducing intraperitoneal adhesion after surgical trauma and is superior to the current antiadhesion barriers. Amniotic membranes are well absorbed and demonstrate short-term safety. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A554.
Assuntos
Âmnio/transplante , Peritônio/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Animais , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Laparotomia , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , COVID-19 , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Neoplasias/complicações , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/provisão & distribuição , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento , Triagem/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current healthcare climate demands evaluation of treatment modalities in terms of costs and benefits. We compared the cost-effectiveness of two different strategies for bilobar colorectal liver metastases (bCRLM). METHODS: Patients with bCRLM treated with either resection/RFA or planned 2-stage hepatectomy at our institution between 1999 and 2011 were reviewed. A decision analysis model was populated with treatment probabilities, outcomes, survival, and costs (Medicare payment, 2011 US$). RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients underwent resection/RFA. Eighty-two patients were treated with planned 2-stage hepatectomy; 26 (32%) patients never completed a 2nd resection. In the 2-stage cohort, 50 patients underwent portal vein embolization (PVE). Overall complication rate and 90-day mortality for resection/RFA was 36% and 3.7%, and for 2-stage hepatectomy (both procedures combined) was 44% and 7.3%, respectively. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that resection/RFA cost $37,120 for 46.2-month survival, while planned 2-stage resection cost $62,198 for 35.9-month survival. If, hypothetically, all 2-stage patients completed both stages of resection, the per-patient cost was $72,644 for 40.3-month survival. CONCLUSIONS: Resection/RFA is associated with lower costs and longer survival when compared to 2-stage resection. This 1-stage approach for bCRLM should be viewed as an efficient use of resources for this challenging clinical scenario.
Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Hepatectomia/economia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Embolização Terapêutica , Feminino , Hepatectomia/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Veia Porta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although surgical residents are expected to be proficient in the diagnosis and management of anorectal pathology upon graduation, there is little data related to the timing and degree of proficiency acquired during training. METHODS: Prospective study of new patients presenting to a colorectal surgical clinic for evaluation of anorectal complaints over a 3-y period. Trainees performed an initial evaluation and recorded their exam findings, diagnosis, and treatment plan. A separate evaluation by a staff colorectal surgeon was performed, with results compared by an independent reviewer. RESULTS: A total of 236 patient evaluations were included. The accuracy of referral diagnosis was significantly better when originated from a surgeon than from all other referral sources (91.7% versus 59.1%, P = 0.031). The most common conditions were internal hemorrhoids (25%), anal fissures (22%), and external hemorrhoids (19.5%). Internal hemorrhoids were most commonly misdiagnosed as external hemorrhoids (58%). Anal fissures were missed 38% of the time, and were most often given the diagnosis of internal hemorrhoids (45%). Residents also demonstrated difficulty in identifying thrombosis in external hemorrhoids, with a 45% error rate. Medical students and residents had an overall correct primary diagnosis of 69.5%; however, there was a significant improvement in the accuracy of diagnosis from medical students and interns to upper level residents (62.9% versus 81.2%, P = 0.003). Medical treatment plans agreed between resident and staff in 74%, the surgical management agreed in 62%, and overall the residents had the correct diagnosis and corresponding treatment plan in 44%. Additional adjunctive procedures were proposed in 66 patients with residents stating the correct adjunct in 79%. The most frequently missed adjuncts were endorectal ultrasound (34%) and colonoscopy (28%). CONCLUSION: Surgical trainees demonstrated significant deficiencies in the ability to evaluate and manage anorectal pathology; however, marked improvement occurred with time in training. Common areas of misdiagnosis and therapeutic errors were identified which could aid in curriculum development.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência/normas , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: With increasing global unrest and military physician shortages potentially leading to a surgeon draft, we sought to evaluate the readiness of graduating general surgery residents to care for casualties of war. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the National Data Reports of Surgery Case Logs for general surgery residents from 2009 to 2018 to quantify experience with key procedures that provide critical skills required for wartime surgery. Reported cases from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for graduating residents from civilian and military residency programs were analyzed for 28 individual procedures determined to be critical for the care of combat casualties. These included central and peripheral vascular procedures, as well as neck, thoracic, abdominal, and peripheral interventions. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, there has been a significant decrease in wartime-relevant cases by graduating residents. Notably, these include aorto-iliac/femoral bypasses (50% reduction; 7.1%/year; P < .001), femoral-popliteal bypasses (60% reduction; 6.9%/year; P < .001), femoral-femoral bypasses (30% reduction; 2.6%/year; P < .001), upper extremity amputations (50% reduction; 6.4%/year; P = .016), fasciotomies for trauma (50% reduction; 4.5%/year; P = .013), open repair of ruptured infrarenal aorto-iliac aneurysms (70% reduction; 5.8%/year; P < .001), repair of traumatic aorta or vena cava injuries (70% reduction; 7%/year; P = .007), carotid endarterectomies (40% reduction; 4%/year; P < .001), lung resections (40% reduction; 3.7%/year; P = .001), trauma splenectomies/splenorrhaphy (30% reduction; 2.9%/year; P < .001), and repair of traumatic liver lacerations (30% reduction; 2.5%/year; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Graduating general surgery residents has limited exposure to wartime critical skills due to a significant reduction in open vascular, head and neck, thoracic, and operative trauma cases. As the threat of global war persists and new graduates continue to deploy worldwide, residency training must be augmented to ensure adequate preparation in case a surgeon draft is required to fulfill demand for military surgeons.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is an increasingly diagnosed breast lesion yet there remains a paucity of data regarding these findings and their clinical significance. By determining the pathologic concordance rate, we sought to evaluate the indications for surgical intervention for FEAs diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). METHODS: Using a retrospective review of an international pathology referral center database, we included all breast CNB specimens with FEA as the most advanced diagnosis that underwent surgical excision. Patient demographics, caliber of biopsy needle, and pathology results were then analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2009, 463 FEAs were diagnosed among 15,000 specimens referred for expert opinion. Twenty-four lesions (5%) met inclusion criteria. Sampling ranged from 8- to 18-guage needles. Two lesions (8.4%) were upgraded after surgical excision; one patient was found to have infiltrating ductal carcinoma and another with tubular carcinoma. Twelve patients who were diagnosed with FEA did not undergo surgical excision but had no immediate evidence of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 8.4% upgrade rate, FEA diagnosed on CNB requires follow-up surgical excision. Regardless of CNB caliber, the risk of sampling error precludes nonoperative management and FEA should be considered an at-risk lesion until more studies and pooled analysis prove otherwise.
Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Mama/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Mama/cirurgia , Doenças Mamárias/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Epitélio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Obtaining wellness and enhancing resilience will be increasingly more important for General Surgeons. Although these concepts are not new, the increased complexity of health care delivery has elevated the importance of these essential attributes. Instilling these practices should be emphasized during surgery residency and be modeled by surgical educators and surgeon leaders. The enhanced emphasis of wellness and resiliency is a positive step forward; however, more must be accomplished to ensure the well-being of a particularly group of vulnerable physicians. This chapter discusses the history and scientific theory behind wellness and resiliency, as well as practical suggestions for consideration.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia Geral , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Saúde Ocupacional , Resiliência Psicológica , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Esgotamento Profissional/diagnóstico , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgia Geral/métodos , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Cirurgiões/educação , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Clear and accurate communication is paramount in delivering high quality surgical care. Through the development of a mobile application, we provided patients with a source of education and instruction throughout the peri-operative period. METHODS: Patients >18 years old with a smart-phone undergoing elective general surgery procedures were eligible. Patients received perioperative educational materials and text message reminders of time-sensitive events via the application. A System Usability Scale and survey was administered. RESULTS: 100 patients were enrolled; 51% completed the survey. The average SUS score was 86, correlating with >90th percentile usability. 86% of patients felt that the application improved their surgical experience, 96% said the application provided essential reminders, and 90% felt that application clarified information. 84% of patients did not identify any inconsistency between the application and surgeon. CONCLUSION: Utilizing patient's smart phones to aid in perioperative education is feasible and improves patient satisfaction. This application has a high usability score, indicating ease of use.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Aplicativos Móveis , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Satisfação do Paciente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Smartphone , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Guide optimal standards on ideal senior medical student experiences for preparedness for general surgery internship DESIGN: Work product of task force, approved by the Association of Program Directors in Surgery CONCLUSION: General surgery rotations should mirror the learning and working environment of a surgical intern. Opportunities should mimic the next phase of learning to help guide informed decisions regarding entrustability for entry into residency training. These opportunities will also help identify students who may have an aptitude for pursuing a general surgery internship. Students should achieve entrustability in Association of American Medical Colleges Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs); curricula should align Core EPAs and modified American Board of Surgery EPAs to guide essential general surgery components. Experiences should include required night, holiday, and/or weekend shifts, a dedicated critical care experience, and a resident preparatory curriculum focusing on nontechnical and essential technical skills. We encourage the opportunity for additional surgical mentorship and subspecialty experience through Surgical Interest Groups or Surgical Honors or Specialty Tracks.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Internato e Residência , Estudantes de Medicina , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço , Aprendizagem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
No approved medical therapies prevent progression of low-grade prostate cancer. Rapamycin inhibits cell proliferation and augments immune responses, producing an antitumor effect. Encapsulated rapamycin (eRapa) incorporates rapamycin into a pH-sensitive polymer, ensuring consistent dosing. Here, we present results from a phase I trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of eRapa in patients with prostate cancer. Patients with Gleason ≤7 (3+4) disease (low and intermediate risk) under active surveillance were enrolled in a 3+3 study with three eRapa dosing cohorts (cohort 1, 0.5 mg/week; cohort 2, 1 mg/week; and cohort 3, 0.5 mg/day). Patients were treated for 3 months and followed for an additional 3 months to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, quality of life (QoL), immune response, and disease progression. Fourteen patients (cohort 1, n = 3; cohort 2, n = 3; and cohort 3, n = 8) were enrolled. In cohort 3, one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; neutropenia) and two non-DLT grade 1-2 adverse events (AE) occurred that resulted in patient withdrawal. All AEs in cohorts 1 and 2 were grade 1. Peak serum rapamycin concentration was 7.1 ng/mL after a 1 mg dose. Stable trough levels (â¼2 ng/mL) developed after 48-72 hours. Daily dosing mildly worsened QoL, although QoL recovered after treatment cessation in all categories, except fatigue. Weekly dosing increased naïve T-cell populations. Daily dosing increased central memory cell populations and exhaustion markers. No disease progression was observed. In conclusion, treatment with eRapa was safe and well-tolerated. Daily dosing produced higher frequencies of lower grade toxicities and transient worsening of QoL, while weekly dosing impacted immune response. Future studies will verify clinical benefit and long-term tolerability.Prevention Relevance: There is an unmet medical need for a well-tolerated treatment capable of delaying progression of newly diagnosed low-grade prostate cancer. This treatment would potentially obviate the need for future surgical intervention and improve the perception of active surveillance as a more acceptable option among this patient population.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Conduta Expectante , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome characterized by colorectal adenomas and a near 100% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prophylactic colectomy, usually by age 40, is the gold-standard therapy to mitigate this risk. However, colectomy is associated with morbidity and fails to prevent extra-colonic disease manifestations, including gastric polyposis, duodenal polyposis and cancer, thyroid cancer, and desmoid disease. Substantial research has investigated chemoprevention medications in an aim to prevent disease progression, postponing the need for colectomy and temporizing the development of extracolonic disease. An ideal chemoprevention agent should have a biologically plausible mechanism of action, be safe and easily tolerated over a prolonged treatment period, and produce a durable and clinically meaningful effect. To date, no chemoprevention agent tested has fulfilled these criteria. New agents targeting novel pathways in FAP are needed. Substantial preclinical literature exists linking the molecular target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway to FAP. A single case report of rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, used as chemoprevention in FAP patients exists, but no formal clinical studies have been conducted. Here, we review the prior literature on chemoprevention in FAP, discuss the rationale for rapamycin in FAP, and outline a proposed clinical trial testing rapamycin as a chemoprevention agent in patients with FAP.
Assuntos
Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/prevenção & controle , Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Cápsulas , Celecoxib/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/metabolismo , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Eflornitina/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Erlotinib/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Graxos não Esterificados/uso terapêutico , Genes APC , Humanos , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Sulindaco/uso terapêutico , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/metabolismo , Vitaminas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The clinical significance of isolated radial scars (RS) diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) remains unclear. By determining the pathologic concordance rate, we sought to define the indications for surgical excision for RS diagnosed on CNB. Between January 1994 and December 2007, 38 RS were diagnosed by CNB. Twenty-eight underwent surgical excision with 27 (96%) patients having further benign diagnoses. One patient, who was found to have invasive cancer on CNB, was also found to have malignancy on open biopsy. Fourteen lesions were diagnosed by 8-gauge, 13 lesions by 11-gauge, and one lesion by 14-gauge biopsy needles. Seven studies met inclusion criteria for analysis; 341 lesions with follow-on surgical biopsy were identified. Sixteen (5%) radial'scars were found to harbor malignancy and all were percutaneously biopsied with 14-gauge needles. With the inclusion of the current study, none of the isolated radial scars diagnosed by the larger 11- or 8-gauge biopsy needles resulted in upgraded lesions on follow-on surgical biopsy. Based on the current review, histologic radial scars are infrequently associated with occult malignancy and do not mandate surgical excision. Indications for excision include the mammographic diagnosis of RS and specimens associated with atypia that would otherwise require open biopsy.
Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Doenças Mamárias/cirurgia , Cicatriz/patologia , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Standardization of prescriptions after specific procedures (laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, inguinal/umbilical hernia repair) significantly reduces opioid prescriptions for these targeted procedures. We sought to determine the impact of increased attention to responsible opioid prescribing in the absence of protocolization. DESIGN: Prescription practices of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies and Roux-en-y Gastric Bypasses at a tertiary medical center (October 1, 2016-September 30, 2018) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into whether surgical intervention took place before or after institution of an unrelated opioid protocol in November 2017. Patients with chronic opioid use or extended hospital stay (>4 days) were excluded. Discharge prescriptions, oral morphine equivalents (OME), and need for repeat prescriptions were compared. SETTING: This study was set at Madigan Army Medical Center in Tacoma, Washington. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents engaged in clinical duties at our institution during the dates of the study were included. RESULTS: Study population included 187 patients, with 91 patients undergoing surgery prior to the protocol and 88 post-protocol. Preprotocol patients were provided an average of 413 OME (SD 103) and 5.5% required repeat opioid prescriptions within 3 months of surgery. The most common opioid prescription was 300 mL of oxycodone elixir (450 OME, 88%). Postprotocol, opioid prescriptions fell 61% to an average of 161 OME (SD 71, p < 0.001). Repeat opioid requirements remained statistically unchanged (8.0%, pâ¯=â¯0.562). The most common opioid prescription postprotocol included 20 oxycodone tablets (150 OME, 76%). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid reduction efforts reap benefits beyond those procedures specifically targeted. Focus on responsible opioid prescribing through standardization, even when limited to certain procedures, may result in a hospital culture change with global opioid prescription reduction.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Dor Pós-Operatória , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos , WashingtonRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Teaching assistant (TA) cases allow senior residents (SR) to gain autonomy. We compared the safety profiles of TA cases performed under direct vs. indirect staff supervision. METHODS: Prospective observational study of operative cases where a SR served as the TA between 7/2014-6/2017 (n = 161). Patient/operative characteristics, 30-day outcomes, and SR survey data were compared by level of supervision. RESULTS: Case mix included 68 laparoscopic appendectomies (42%), 49 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (30%), 10 I&Ds (6%), 10 umbilical hernia repairs (6%), 4 port placements (3%), and 11 others. Indirectly supervised cases were shorter (61 vs. 76 min, p < 0.01), with less blood loss (11 vs. 24 ml, p < 0.05), and lower conversion rates (0% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.05). Perceived difficulty was high in 20% of cases with indirect vs. 49% with direct supervision (p < 0.01). Mean SR comfort was high (4.4 vs. 4.6 out of 5) regardless of level of staff supervision. 30-day complications did not differ for indirect vs. direct supervision (all p = NS). DISCUSSION: Carefully selected TA cases offer SRs opportunities to practice autonomy without sacrificing operative time or patient safety.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Papel do Médico , Autonomia Profissional , Ensino , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Escharotomy is the primary effective intervention to relieve constriction and impending vascular compromise in deep, circumferential or near-circumferential burns of the extremities and trunk. Training on escharotomy indications, technique and pitfalls is essential, as escharotomy is both an infrequent and high-risk procedure in civilian and military medical environments, including low-resource settings. Therefore, we aimed to validate an educational strategy that combines video-based instruction with a low-cost, low-fidelity simulation model for teaching burn escharotomy. METHODS: Pre-hospital and hospital-based medical personnel, with varying degrees of burn care-related experience, participated in a one-hour training session. The first part of the training consisted of video-based instruction that described the indications, preparation, steps, pitfalls and complications associated with escharotomy. The second part of the training consisted of a supervised, hands-on simulation with a previously described low-cost, low-fidelity escharotomy model. Participants were then offered two psychometrically validated instruments to assess their learning experience. RESULTS: 40 participants were grouped according to prior burn care and surgical experience: attending surgeons (6), surgery and emergency medicine residents and fellows (26), medical students (5), and pre-hospital personnel (3). On two psychometrically validated questionnaires, participants at both the attending and trainee levels overwhelmingly confirmed that our educational strategy met best educational practices on the criteria of active learning, collaboration, diverse ways of learning, and high expectations; they also highly rated their satisfaction with and self-confidence under this learning strategy. DISCUSSION: An educational strategy that combines video-based instruction and a low-cost, low-fidelity escharotomy simulation model was successfully demonstrated with participants across a broad range of prior burn care experience levels. This strategy is easily reproducible and broadly applicable to increase the knowledge and confidence of medical personnel before they are called to perform escharotomy. Important applications include resource-limited environments and deployed military settings.
Assuntos
Queimaduras , Treinamento por Simulação , Queimaduras/cirurgia , Competência Clínica , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , HumanosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Surgery is a known gateway to opioid use that may result in long-term morbidity. Given the paucity of evidence regarding the appropriate amount of postoperative opioid analgesia and variable prescribing education, we investigated prescribing habits before and after institution of a multimodal postoperative pain management protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic appendectomies, laparoscopic cholecystectomies, inguinal hernia repairs, and umbilical hernia repairs performed at a tertiary military medical center from 01 October 2016 until 30 September 2017 were examined. Prescriptions provided at discharge, oral morphine equivalents (OME), repeat prescriptions, and demographic data were obtained. A pain management regimen emphasizing nonopioid analgesics was then formulated and implemented with patient education about expected postoperative outcomes. After implementation, procedures performed from 01 November 2017 until 28 February 2018 were then examined and analyzed. Additionally, a patient satisfaction survey was provided focusing on efficacy of postoperative pain control. RESULTS: Preprotocol, 559 patients met inclusion criteria. About 97.5% were provided an opioid prescription, but prescriptions varied widely (256 OME, standard deviation [SD] 109). Acetaminophen was prescribed often (89.5%), but nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescriptions were rare (14.7%). About 6.1% of patients required repeat opioid prescriptions. After implementation, 181 patients met inclusion criteria. Initial opioid prescriptions decreased 69.8% (77 OME, SD 35; P < 0.001), while repeat opioid prescriptions remained statistically unchanged (2.79%; P = 0.122). Acetaminophen prescribing rose to 96.7% (P = 0.002), and NSAID utilization increased to 71.0% (P < 0.001). Postoperative survey data were obtained in 75 patients (41.9%). About 68% stated that they did not use all of the opioids prescribed and 81% endorsed excellent or good pain control throughout their postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate preoperative counseling and utilization of nonopioid analgesics can dramatically reduce opioid use while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Patient-reported data suggest that even greater reductions may be possible.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BAI) remains a leading cause of trauma deaths, and off-label use of endovascular devices has been increasingly utilized in an effort to reduce the morbidity and mortality in this population. Utilizing a nationwide database, we determined the incidence of BAI, and analyzed both functional and survival outcomes at discharge compared with matched controls. METHODS: Patients with BAI were identified by International Classification of Disease-9 codes from the National Trauma Data Bank (Version 6.2), 2000-2005. Patients were analyzed based on aortic repair, associated physiologic burden, and coexisting injuries. Control groups were matched by age, mechanism, major thoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale score (AIS >/= 3), major head AIS, and major abdominal AIS. Outcomes were assessed using the functional independence measure (FIM) score and overall mortality. FIM scores were scored from 1 (full assistance required) to 4 (fully independent) for three categories: feeding, locomotion, and expression. RESULTS: During the study period, 3,114 patients with BAI were identified among 1.1 million trauma admissions for an overall incidence of 0.3%. One hundred thirteen (4%) were dead on arrival, and 599 (19%) died during triage. Of the patients surviving transport and triage (n = 2402), 29% had a concomitant major abdominal injury and 31% had a major head injury. Sixty-eight percent (1,642) underwent no repair, 28% (665) open aortic repair, and 4% (95) endovascular repair with associated mortality rates of 65%, 19%, and 18%, respectively (P < .05). Aortic repair independently improved survival when controlling for associated injuries and physiologic burden (odds ratio (OR) = 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24-0.54, P < .05). Compared with matched controls, BAI resulted in a higher mortality (55% vs. 15%, P < .05), and independently contributed to mortality (OR = 4.04; 95% CI, 3.53-4.63, P < .05). In addition, BAI patients were less likely to be fully independent for feeding (72% vs. 82%, P < .05), locomotion (33% vs. 55%, P < .05), and expression (80% vs 88%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: This manuscript is the first to define the incidence of BAI utilizing the NTDB. Remarkably, two-thirds of patients are unable to undergo attempts at aortic repair, which portends a poor prognosis. When controlling for associated injuries, blunt aortic injury independently impacts survival and results in poor function in those surviving to discharge.
Assuntos
Aorta Torácica/lesões , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Traumatismos Abdominais/mortalidade , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/mortalidade , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/cirurgia , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Ingestão de Alimentos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Locomoção , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/instrumentação , Comportamento Verbal , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/fisiopatologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Advanced topical hemostatic agents are increasingly utilized to control traumatic hemorrhage. We sought to determine the efficacy of three chitosan based hemostatic agents in a lethal groin injury model when applied by combat medic first responders. METHODS: After creation of a standardized femoral artery injury in a goat model, medics attempted hemorrhage control with standard gauze dressing followed by randomization to one of three hemostatic agents in this two tiered study. In the first tier, medics were randomized to either a chitosan based one-sided wafer (OS) or a dual-sided, flexible, roll (DS). In the second tier, medics were randomized to the flexible DS dressing or a chitosan powder (CP). Efficacy of gauze, each chitosan agent, proper application, and participant surveys were obtained and included for analysis using univariate techniques. RESULTS: From January 2007 to June 2007, 55 (45%) DS, 36 (29%) OS, and 32 (26%) CP agents were used to treat 123 actively bleeding arterial injuries in 62 animals. Standard gauze failed to stop hemorrhage in 122 (99%) groins. Although all three chitosan agents were marginally effective at 2 min, the recommended time for application, hemostasis improved after 4 min. The DS dressing was the most effective, controlling hemorrhage 76% at 4 min. Of the failures, 3 (23%) DS and 9 (53%) OS were due to improper application. End-user survey results demonstrated that medics preferred the DS dressing 77% and 60% over the OS and CP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Chitosan based bandages are significantly more effective at hemorrhage control compared to standard gauze field dressings. The dual-sided chitosan dressing demonstrated better hemorrhage control than the one-sided dressing and the chitosan powder, and was less likely to fail despite application errors.