SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care.

STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient SCI care at a community hospital to participate in a 6-month tele-SCI intervention administered by SCI subspecialty board-certified physiatrists via iPad FaceTime. In addition to monthly follow up interview calls, psychosocial and Quality of Life (QoL) measures were collected at baseline and post-intervention. A program satisfaction survey was also collected post-intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in tele-SCI visits (Median [IQR]: 2.5 [2.0, 4.0]) for a total of 198 tele-SCI visits. Bladder and bowel concerns were the leading topics discussed during tele-SCI visits, followed by neurological, pain, and functional concerns. Tele-SCI users resided further away (Median miles [IQR] - 114[73-177] vs. 81[46-116], p = 0.023) and reported seeking more clinical advice (Median [IQR] - 1.5[0-4.0] vs. 0[0-1.0], p = 0.002) compared to non-tele-SCI users. All other clinical utilization, baseline characteristics, psychosocial measures, and QoL did not differ among those who used tele-SCI and those who did not. The satisfaction survey suggested satisfaction with the tele-SCI intervention (89%), study equipment (89%), staff responsiveness (100%), and improved motivation for self-monitoring of health (71%). CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that tele-SCI is a feasible modality for providing general SCI care. Further research is required to examine longer-term efficacy of remotely-provided care among individuals living with SCI.

The Time Burden of Specialty Clinic Visits in Persons With Neurologic Disease: A Case for Universal Telemedicine Coverage.

Objective: Those with chronic neurologic disorders are often burdened not only by the condition itself but also an increased need for subspecialty medical care. This may require long distance travel, while even small distances can be a hardship secondary to impaired mobility and transportation. We sought to examine the burden of time associated with clinical visits for those with chronic neurologic disorders and their family/caregivers. These topics are discussed as an argument to support universal coverage for telemedicine in this population. Design: Cohort Study. Setting: Specialty clinic at community hospital. Participants: 208 unique patients with chronic neurologic disability at physical medicine and rehabilitation or neurourology clinic over a 3-month period. Main Outcome Measures: Patient survey on commute distance, time, difficulties, and need for caregiver assistance to attend visits. Results: Approximately 40% of patients were covered by Medicare. Many patients (42%) perceived it difficult to attend their clinic visit with transportation difficulties, commute time, and changes to their daily schedule being the most commonly cited reasons. Most patients (75%) lived within 25 miles of our clinics and experienced an average commute time of 79.4 min, though 10% required 3 h or more. Additional family/caregiver assistance was required for 76% of patients, which resulted in an inclusive average commute time of 138.2 min per patient. Conclusion: Chronically neurologically-disabled patients and their caregivers may be burdened by the commute to outpatient appointments. To minimize this burden, increased emphasis on telemedicine coverage for those with chronic neurologic disability should be considered by all payors.