Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Occup Environ Med ; 74(5): 336-343, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27919058

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: With increasing emphasis on early and frequent mobilisation of patients in acute care, safe patient handling and mobilisation practices need to be integrated into these quality initiatives. We completed a programme evaluation of a safe patient handling and mobilisation programme within the context of a hospital-wide patient care improvement initiative that utilised a systems approach and integrated safe patient equipment and practices into patient care plans. METHODS: Baseline and 12-month follow-up surveys of 1832 direct patient care workers assessed work practices and self-reported pain while an integrated employee payroll and injury database provided recordable injury rates collected concurrently at 2 hospitals: the study hospital with the programme and a comparison hospital. RESULTS: Safe and unsafe patient handling practice scales at the study hospital improved significantly (p<0.0001 and p=0.0031, respectively), with no differences observed at the comparison hospital. We observed significant decreases in recordable neck and shoulder (Relative Risk (RR)=0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.00), lifting and exertion (RR=0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89) and pain and inflammation (RR=0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.00) injury rates at the study hospital. Changes in rates at the comparison hospital were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of a patient mobilisation initiative, a safe patient handling and mobilisation programme was associated with improved work practices and a reduction in recordable worker injuries. This study demonstrates the potential impact of utilising a systems approach based on recommended best practices, including integration of these practices into the patient's plan for care.


Assuntos
Movimentação e Reposicionamento de Pacientes/métodos , Dor Musculoesquelética/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/prevenção & controle , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Boston/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Esforço Físico , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade
2.
J Nurs Adm ; 33(11): 596-602, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14608218

RESUMO

In the past decade, many healthcare institutions have formed new partnerships, alliances, and networks. Collaboration among chief nursing officers and other leaders from affiliating institutions is essential to the success of these new organizational structures. The authors explore the nature of the collaboration among chief nursing officers and senior nurse leaders at 5 Harvard-affiliated teaching hospitals that provide cancer care. In particular, this article examines how collaborative relationships have been fostered and highlights the challenges, benefits, and outcomes of successful cross-institutional collaboration.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/organização & administração , Diretores de Hospitais/organização & administração , Comportamento Cooperativo , Reestruturação Hospitalar/organização & administração , Relações Interinstitucionais , Relações Interprofissionais , Enfermeiros Administradores/psicologia , Boston , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Humanos , Modelos de Enfermagem , Enfermeiros Administradores/organização & administração , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Comitê de Profissionais/organização & administração , Desenvolvimento de Programas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA