Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 30, 2023 Jan 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36611133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin malignancy, with Australia having the highest reported incidence in the world. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding optimal management of this disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit conducted by reviewing existing medical records of MCC patients presenting to the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (PMCC) between 1980 and 2018. The primary endpoint was locoregional recurrence. The secondary endpoints were distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 533 patients were identified. Locoregional recurrence occurring at one, two and 5 years was 24, 31 and 32%, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS and DFS were 46% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 41-51%) and 34% (95% CI 30-39%) respectively. Older age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] per year = 1.07, 95% CI 1.06-1.07, p < 0.001), and larger primary tumour diameter (HR =1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, p = 0.019) were associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis. Positive or negative histopathological margin status was not associated with OS or DFS differences in patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, about a third of patients developed locoregional recurrence, distal recurrence or both, and there appears to be no change over the last four decades. If treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, there is no difference in OS or DFS with positive surgical margins. Findings should influence future guidelines.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante
2.
Sleep Med Rev ; 68: 101743, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36657366

RESUMO

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a significant healthcare burden affecting approximately one billion people worldwide. The prevalence of OSA is rising with the ongoing obesity epidemic, a key risk factor for its development. While in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA, it has significant drawbacks that prevent widespread use. Portable devices with different levels of monitoring are available to allow remote assessment for OSA. To better inform clinical practice and research, this comprehensive systematic review evaluated diagnostic performances, study cost and patients' experience of different levels of portable sleep studies (type 2, 3, and 4), as well as wearable devices and non-contact systems, in adults. Despite varying study designs and devices used, portable diagnostic tests are found to be sufficient for initial screening of patients at risk of OSA. Future studies are needed to evaluate cost effectiveness with the incorporation of portable diagnostic tests into the diagnostic pathway for OSA, as well as their application in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and other comorbidities that may affect test performance.


Assuntos
Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Humanos , Adulto , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico , Polissonografia , Comorbidade , Fatores de Risco , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA