Chronic allograft nephropathy--a clinical syndrome: early detection and the potential role of proliferation signal inhibitors.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) leads to the majority of late graft loss following renal transplantation. Detection of CAN is often too late to permit early intervention and successful management. Most current strategies for managing CAN rely on minimizing or eliminating calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) once CAN has become established. The proliferation signal inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus have potent immunosuppressive and antiproliferative actions, with the potential to alter the natural history of CAN by reducing CNI exposure whilst avoiding acute rejection. Whilst data will be forthcoming from a number of clinical trials investigating this potential, we discuss early detection of CAN and the rationale for a role for this class of agent.

[Editorial].

The main objective of the Italian National Transplant Center (CNT) is to increase the number, the quality and the safety of transplants by promoting special programs in cooperation with Italian Regions. Data show that the number of deceased subjects that are reported for organ or tissue donation is largely lower than it could potentially be, and that great variations exist among different Regions. In order to increase the number of performed transplants, the CNT is planning to move in three main directions: (1) promoting transplants from deceased donors, (2) promoting transplants from living donors and (3) optimising the way organs are stored, distributed and utilised across the country.

Building Kidney Exchange Programmes in Europe-An Overview of Exchange Practice and Activities.

BACKGROUND: Considerable differences exist among the living donor Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEPs) that are in use and being built in Europe, contributing to a variation in the number of living donor transplants (Newsletter Transplant; International figures on donation and transplantation 2016). Efforts of European KEPs to exchange (best) practices and share approaches to address challenges have, however, been limited. METHODS: Experts from 23 European countries, collaborating on the European Network for Collaboration on Kidney Exchange Programmes Cooperation on Science and Technology Action, developed a questionnaire to collect detailed information on the functioning of all existing KEPs in Europe, as well as their opportunities and challenges. Following a comparative analysis, results were synthesized and interpreted by the same experts. RESULTS: The practices, opportunities and challenges reported by 17 European countries reveal that some of the 10 operating programs are mature, whereas others are in earlier stages of development. Over 1300 transplants were performed through existing KEPs up to the end of 2016, providing approximately 8% of their countries' living kidney donations in 2015. All countries report challenges to either initiating KEPs or increasing volumes. Some challenges are shared, whereas others differ because of differences in context (eg, country size, effectiveness of deceased donor program) and ethical and legal considerations (eg, regarding living donation as such, nonrelated donors, and altruistic donation). Transnational initiatives have started in Central Europe, Scandinavia, and Southern Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange of best practices and shared advancement of national programs to address existing challenges, aided by transnational exchanges, may substantially improve access to the most (cost) effective treatment for the increasing number of patients suffering from kidney disease.

Circulating levels of adhesion molecules in chronic kidney disease correlate with the stage of renal disease and with C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) suffer from a series of complications linked to the atherosclerotic process in which the endothelial dysfunction mediated by the activation of some adhesion molecules plays an important role. This study aims to evaluate circulating levels of intercellular adhesion molecules-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecules-1 (VCAM-1) in patients with predialysis CRF, on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and after kidney transplantation (KTx) and to correlate them with some inflammation and nutritional indexes. METHODS: Thirty two patients with predialysis CRF, 30 on maintenance HD, 36 after KTx and 28 subjects as a control group (C) were included in this study. Circulating levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 were assayed using a specific sandwich ELISA kit. As inflammation indexes, TNFalpha and C-reactive protein (CRP) and, as nutritional indexes, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, cholesterol, triglycerides, and fibrinogen (F) were evaluated. RESULTS: Serum levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 were progressively higher from C to KTx patients, to those with CRF and those on HD (ANOVA for both; p <0.001). TNFalpha values were lower in HD subjects than in CRF patients, even if in both groups TNFalpha levels were greater than in Tx and control subjects. F and CRP were higher in CRF and HD vs. Tx and control subjects (ANOVA for both p <0.001). No significant correlations were observed between soluble adhesion molecules, albumin and cholesterol, whereas significant correlations were found between CRP and ICAM-1 (r = 0.41; p <0.01), CRP and VCAM-1 (r = 0.39; p <0.01) and between CRP and TNFalpha (r = 0.42; p <0.01). These correlations remained statistically significant even after adjustment for age and blood pressure (all p <0.01). BMI did not differ in the three patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating levels of adhesion molecules in our study correlated positively with the stage of disease and with one of the inflammatory indexes (CRP), but not with nutritional indexes such as BMI, cholesterol and albumin. The clinical significance of our findings warrants further investigation.

[Italian Registry Dialysis and Transplant 2011-2013]. / Report del Registro Italiano di Dialisi e trapianto relativo agli anni 2011-2013.

UNLABELLED: The Italian Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation (RIDT) has recently resumed the collection of data of patients on RRT in Italy. Data were requested to Regional Registries for the years 2011-2013 and they contributed according to their possibilities. Eighteen Regions or autonomous Provinces provided data with various degrees of completeness and this made possible to bridge the gap between the current and the previous census (referring to 2010). RESULTS: Incidencedata were associated to a sample with a coverage of 77% of the national population (46/60 million inhabitants). Patients who started dialysis in these three years were, respectively, 168, 166 and 160 patients pmp. If we project this data to the national population is reasonable to think that 9500-10000 patients per year start the dialytic treatment. PREVALENCE: The prevalence of patients on dialysis in Italy range, in the 10 years of RIDT, between 750 and 825 patients pmp. Based on this we can reasonably estimate that in Italy there are 45-49000 dialysis patients. Incidence and prevalence vary widely in different regions. Mortalityon dialysis in Italy during the period 2011-2013 was on average 16.2 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 16.1-16.7) with regional variation smaller than that observed in incidence and prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, data analysis are presented in a direct and non comparative manner. However, it provides information on the status of the RRT in Italy and the temporal consistency of the data is a proof of their validity. Registry data were published in the official site of Italian Registry that can be reached through the website of SIN (www.sin-italy.org).

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation (MYSS): a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil has replaced azathioprine in immunosuppression regimens worldwide to prevent graft rejection. However, evidence that its antirejection activity is better than that of azathioprine has been provided only by registration trials with an old formulation of ciclosporin and steroid. We aimed to compare the antirejection activity of these two drugs with a new formulation of ciclosporin. METHODS: The mycophenolate steroids sparing multicentre, prospective, randomised, parallel-group trial compared acute rejections and adverse events in recipients of cadaver-kidney transplants over 6-month treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine along with ciclosporin microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids (phase A), and over 15 more months without steroids (phase B). The primary endpoint was occurrence of acute rejection episodes. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 168 patients per group entered phase A. 56 (34%) assigned mycophenolate mofetil and 58 (35%) assigned azathioprine had clinical rejections (risk reduction [RR] on mycophenolate mofetil compared with azathioprine 13.7% [95% CI -25.7% to 40.7%], p=0.44). 88 patients in the mycophenolate mofetil group and 89 in the azathioprine group entered phase B. 14 (16%) taking mycophenolate mofetil and 11 (12%) taking azathioprine had clinical rejections (RR -16.2%, [-157.5% to 47.5%], p=0.71). Average per-patient costs of mycophenolate mofetil treatment greatly exceeded those of azathioprine (phase A 2665 Euros [SD 586] vs Euros 184 [62]; phase B 5095 Euros [2658] vs 322 Euros [170], p<0.0001 for both). INTERPRETATION: In recipients of cadaver kidney-transplants given ciclosporin microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil offers no advantages over azathioprine in preventing acute rejections and is about 15 times more expensive. Standard immunosuppression regimens for transplantation should perhaps include azathioprine rather than mycophenolate mofetil, at least for kidney grafts.

Risk of de novo cancers after transplantation: results from a cohort of 7217 kidney transplant recipients, Italy 1997-2009.

To assess incidence and risk factors for de novo cancers (DNCs) after kidney transplant (KT), we carried out a cohort investigation in 15 Italian KT centres. Seven thousand two-hundred seventeen KT recipients (64.2% men), transplanted between 1997 and 2007 and followed-up until 2009, represented the study group. Person years (PY) were computed from 30 days after transplant to cancer diagnosis, death, return to dialysis or to study closure. The number of observed DNCs was compared to that expected in the general population of Italy through standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). To identify risk factors, incidence rate ratios (IRR) were computed. Three-hundred ninety five DNCs were diagnosed during 39.598PYs, with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD), particularly non-Hodgkin' lymphoma (NHL), lung, kidney and prostate as the most common types. The overall IR was 9.98/1.000PY, with a 1.7-fold augmented SIR (95% CI: 1.6-1.9). SIRs were particularly elevated for KS (135), lip (9.4), kidney carcinoma (4.9), NHL (4.5) and mesothelioma (4.2). KT recipients born in Southern Italy were at reduced risk of kidney cancer and solid tumors, though at a higher KS risk, than those born in Northern Italy. Use of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) exerted, for all cancers combined, a 46% significantly reduced risk (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). Our study findings confirmed, in Italy, the increased risks for cancer following KT, and they also suggested a possible protective effect of mTORi in reducing the frequency of post transplant cancers.

Everolimus with very low-exposure cyclosporine a in de novo kidney transplantation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In combination with everolimus (EVL), cyclosporine A (CsA) may be used at low exposure, so reducing the risk of renal dysfunction in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We evaluated whether higher exposure of EVL could allow a further reduction of CsA. METHODS: De novo RTR were randomized to standard exposure EVL (C0 3-8 ng/mL) with low-concentration CsA (C2 maintenance levels 350-500 ng/mL, group A) or higher EVL exposure (C0 8-12 ng/mL) with very low-concentration CsA (C2 maintenance levels 150-300 ng/mL, group B). The primary endpoints were 6-month creatinine clearance (CrCl) and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate. After 6 months, patients were followed up (observational extension) to 12 months. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five RTR (97% from deceased donors) were enrolled. Two patients per group died (1.4%). The 6-month death-censored graft survival was 90.2% in group A and 97.9% in group B and was unchanged at 12 months (P=0.007). There was no significant difference between groups at 6 months in CrCl (59.9 vs. 57.8 mL/min) and BPAR rates (14.7% vs. 11.9%) and also at 12 months (CrCl 62.5+/-20.7 vs. 61.3+/-22.0 mL/min, BPAR 14.7% vs. 14.1%). No significant differences were seen in treated acute rejections, steroid-resistant acute rejections, treatment failures, or delayed graft function, although there was a trend to better results in group B. CONCLUSIONS: EVL given at higher exposure for 6 months plus very low CsA concentration may obtain low acute rejection rate and good graft survival in De novo renal transplantation. However, there was no difference between groups in CrCl.

Use of proliferation signal inhibitors in the management of post-transplant malignancies--clinical guidance.

Increasing success in renal transplantation and longer patient survival has meant that post-transplant malignancies are having an increasing impact on long-term graft and patient survival. Choice of the immunosuppressive agents provides one of the controllable risk factors for the development of malignancies in this population. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are associated with an increased incidence of cancers, whereas the proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), everolimus and sirolimus have demonstrated anti-oncogenic effects in pre-clinical models and are currently being investigated as anti-cancer agents in clinical trials. There is increasing evidence demonstrating a lower incidence of post-transplant malignancies in renal transplant recipients receiving PSI-based immunosuppression compared with those receiving CNIs. Conversion from CNIs to PSIs has been shown to lead to the regression of Kaposi's sarcoma in renal transplant recipients and is now part of accepted standard care for this tumour in this setting. The anti-cancer properties of PSI-based regimens have the potential to combine the dual benefits of immunosuppression without the use of CNIs and the direct anti-oncogenic effects through their inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway. In the absence of formal clinical trial evidence on the best way to use PSIs in this setting, a workshop was held to provide practical guidance on immunosuppressive strategies in the context of malignancy, given the current state of knowledge.

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplantation: the MYSS follow-up randomized, controlled clinical trial.

The Mycophenolate Steroids Sparing (MYSS) study found that in renal transplant recipients who were on immunosuppressive therapy with the cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was not better than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection at 21 mo after transplantation and was 15 times more expensive. The MYSS Follow-up Study, an extension of MYSS, was aimed at comparing long-term outcome of 248 MYSS patients according to their original randomization to MMF (1 g twice daily) or azathioprine (75 to 100 mg/d). Primary outcome was estimated GFR at 5 yr after transplantation. Mean 5-yr GFR difference between azathioprine and mycophenolate was 4.67 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43 to 9.77 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.07). GFR from month 6 (mean +/- SEM: 54.3 +/- 1.6 versus 53.9 +/- 1.5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.83) to month 72 after transplantation (49.5 +/- 2.2 versus 47.3 +/- 2.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.50); GFR slopes (mean +/- SEM: -1.10 +/- 0.56 versus -1.23 +/- 0.31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year; P = 0.83); and 72-mo patient mortality (4.0 versus 4.0% [P = 0.95]; HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.28 to 3.31; P = 0.95), graft loss (6.8 versus 6.1% [P = 0.82]; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.32 to 2.46; P = 0.83), incidence of persistent proteinuria (25.0 versus 27.4%; P = 0.72), late (>6 mo after transplantation) rejections (25.3 versus 21.2%; P = 0.53), and adverse events were similar on azathioprine (n = 124) and MMF (n = 124), respectively. Outcomes in the two groups were comparable also among patients with or without steroid therapy, considered separately. In kidney transplantation, the long-term risk/benefit profile of MMF and azathioprine therapy in combination with cyclosporine Neoral is similar. In view of the cost, standard immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplantation should perhaps include azathioprine rather than MMF.

Conversion to a proliferation signal inhibitor in a patient with coronary artery disease--a case report.

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) ciclosporin (CsA) and tacrolimus are currently an important part of immunosuppressive regimens, but are associated with increased cardiovascular risk factors, including hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Conversion from CNI-based regimens to proliferation signal inhibitors or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, such as everolimus and sirolimus, has been associated with an improvement in cardiovascular risk. This case study describes a 59-year-old renal transplant recipient who presented with angina pectoris while receiving immunosuppression with CsA, azathioprine and steroids. The patient developed angina pectoris 5 years after receiving a cadaveric renal transplant. At the time, the patient was obese, with hypertension controlled with diuretics and calcium channel blockers, and hyperlipidaemia controlled with statins. A scintigram revealed plurisegmental myocardial ischaemia, and a coronary angiogram showed the presence of occlusions in the left anterior descending artery and circumflex coronary artery. The patient also had 70% stenosis of the right coronary artery, which was corrected by angioplastic percutaneous intervention. The patient was converted from azathioprine to sirolimus 2 mg/day (trough blood level, 6-10 ng/ml), while the CsA dose was tapered and withdrawn. The angina pectoris subsequently resolved, no progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been observed during follow-up and stable renal function has been maintained throughout. Conversion to an immunosuppressive regimen of sirolimus with CsA withdrawal, along with angioplastic percutaneous correction of right coronary artery stenosis, therefore led to the complete resolution of angina pectoris and no progression of the CAD was noticed in this obese renal transplant patient with drug-controlled hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.

Open prospective multicenter study of conversion to tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant patients experiencing ciclosporin-related side-effects.

The hyperlipidemic and hypertensive effects of ciclosporin constitute a cardiovascular risk. Cosmetic side-effects are known to reduce patients' quality of life. This was a 6-month, open, prospective, multicentre study in 296 adult kidney transplant patients to evaluate the conversion from ciclosporin to a tacrolimus-based regimen. Primary indications for conversion were hyperlipidemia (n =77), hypertension (n = 72), hypertrichosis (n = 32) and gingival hyperplasia (n = 115). At month 6, hyperlipidemia and hypertension were at least moderately improved in 59.1% and 63.5% of patients, and strongly or completely resolved in 29% and 25%. Gingival hyperplasia and hypertrichosis were strongly or completely resolved in 73% and 72% of patients. Mean total cholesterol was reduced from 255 to 218 mg/dl. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced from 152.9 to 137.5 mmHg and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 90.7 to 85.8 mmHg. Ciclosporin-related side-effects resolved or improved after conversion to tacrolimus.

Performance of different prediction equations for estimating renal function in kidney transplantation.

Numerous formulas have been developed to estimate renal function from biochemical, demographic and anthropometric data. Here we compared renal function derived from 12 published prediction equations with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement by plasma iohexol clearance as reference method in a group of 81 renal transplant recipients enrolled in the Mycophenolate Mofetil Steroid Sparing (MY.S.S.) trial. Iohexol clearances and prediction equations were carried out in all patients at months 6, 9 and 21 after surgery. All equations showed a tendency toward GFR over-estimation: Walser and MDRD equations gave the best performance, however not more than 45% of estimated values were within +/-10% error. These formulas showed also the lowest bias and the highest precision: 0.5 and 9.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Walser), 2.7 and 10.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (MDRD) in predicting GFR. A significantly higher rate of GFR decline ranging from -5.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (Walser) to -7.4 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (Davis-Chandler) was estimated by all the equations as compared with iohexol clearance (-3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year). The 12 prediction equations do not allow a rigorous assessment of renal function in kidney transplant recipients. In clinical trials of kidney transplantation, graft function should be preferably monitored using a reference method of GFR measurement, such as iohexol plasma clearance.