Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype and genomic microarray analysis: A multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To define the residual risk of morbidity-related outcome in fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) of 3.5 mm or more after normal genetic testing and mid-trimester anomaly scan. METHODS: A total of 114 fetuses with isolated NT of 3.5 mm or more, normal karyotype, and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) were included and divided in three groups: NT 3.5-4.5 mm, NT 4.5-6 mm, and NT greater than 6 mm. RASopathy testing and ultrasound follow up were performed in all fetuses. We evaluated: (1) incidence of genetic disorders; (2) incidence of structural abnormalities; (3) pregnancy outcome; (4) long-term pediatric outcome before (point 1) and after (point 2) a normal RASopathy testing and mid-trimester anomaly scan. RESULTS: After normal karyotype and array-CGH the residual risk of morbidity-related outcome was 24.64% for NT 3.5-4.5 mm, 25% for NT 4.5-6 mm and 76.47% for NT more than 6 mm. After a normal RASopathy testing and mid-trimester anomaly scan the residual risks decreased to 7.14%, 8.69%, and 33.3% in the three groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In fetuses with an NT of 3.5 mm or more and both normal karyotype and array-CGH, the rate of morbidity-related outcome depends on NT size. A normal RASopathy testing and mid-trimester ultrasound are reassuring but the residual risk of morbidity-related outcome is increased compared with the general population, particularly if NT is greater than 6 mm.

Elevated nuchal translucency, is it time to discuss the cut off?

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate pregnancy and postnatal outcomes of fetuses with NT between 95th and 99th percentile at first trimester and whether they could benefit from further investigations rather that routine scans. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective observational study which involved all cases with NT between 95th and 99th percentile from January 2015 to December 2020. Unfavorable outcome was considered as: miscarriage or intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), chromosomal abnormality/genetic syndrome, major malformation or neurodevelopmental delay. Study population outcomes were compared with general population. RESULTS: The rate of unfavorable outcome was 25.44% (167 out of 667). We reported: 6 (0.90%) second trimester miscarriage or IUFD, 90 (13.49%) chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes, 57 (8.55%) major malformations, 13 (1.95%) cases of neurodevelopmental delay. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes and major malformations were significantly higher (OR 6.99 (IC 95% 4.33-11.28), P < 0.001 and OR 17.77 (IC 95%7.22-43.75), P < 0.001 respectively) compared to the general population. The incidence of neurodevelopmental delay was not increased (OR of 0.64 CI 95% 0.33-1.24 P = 0.185). CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses with NT between 95th and 99th percentile have an increased risk of pregnancy and postnatal adverse outcomes. According to our data it is reasonable to consider a lower cut of NT (NT > 95th percentile) for offering further investigations such as detailed ultrasound scan, fetal echocardiography and counseling where the option of performing fetal karyotype and CGH array should be discussed.

Trophoblast microRNAs (miRNAs), preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small single-stranded non-coding RNA molecules that play a role in regulating gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. Placental miRNAs expression pattern dynamically changes during pregnancy influencing cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Changes of specific miRNA levels have been described in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders or gestational diabetes and a growing interest in understanding miRNA role on placental development and placental disorders is currently going on. The present review evaluates the possible roles of miRNAs in trophoblastic invasion and placental development as well as their potential role as biomarkers for the prediction of placental disorders focusing the attention on intrauterine growth restriction.

Primary toxoplasmosis acquired during early pregnancy: Is it currently overestimated?

OBJECTIVE: Toxoplasmosis acquired in early pregnancy is a potentially severe complication for the fetus. Evaluating the risk of transplacental infection in pregnant women accessing the Tuscany Reference Center for Infectious Diseases in Pregnancy during the last 20 years with suspected or confirmed toxoplasmosis acquired in early pregnancy was the aim of the study. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively enrolled all pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis for toxoplasmosis acquired in the first 16 gestational weeks in the period 1999-2019, comparing patients with certain acute infection (seroconversion occurred in pregnancy, CAIP) with those with suspected acute infection (IgG positive with low/intermediate IgG avidity index, SAIP). RESULTS: 237 patients were enrolled, 187 (78.9%) with SAIP and 50 (21.1%) with CAIP. Specific IgM was detected in 47.5% and 76.7% (p-value 0.001), and the mean IgG avidity index was 22.7% and 7.1% (p-value < 0.001) in the SAIP and in the CAIP group, respectively. The mean delay from diagnosis to antibiotic initiation was 14.6 in SAIP and 11 days in CAIP group. Toxoplasma DNA was detected in the amniotic fluid in one case in a patient with CAIP. Excluding 24 newborns with not available data, prevalence of congenital infection was 0.47% [1/213 (95% CI 0.08%-2.61%)], 0% [0/178 (95% CI 0%-2.11%)] in SAIP and 2.8% [1/35 (95% CI 0.51%-14.53%)] in CAIP group. CONCLUSIONS: Toxoplasmosis acquired in early pregnancy has a low risk of fetal infection. Actively discussing case-by-case amniocentesis indication with patients, especially when a recent toxoplasmosis is not properly confirmed, is desirable.