Colorectal cancer survivors' long-term recollections of their illness and therapy up to seven years after enrolment into a randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: As a consequence of effective treatment procedures, the number of long-term survivors of colorectal cancer is ever increasing. Adopting the method of a previous study on breast cancer patients, the goal of the present research was to investigate colorectal cancer patients' recollections of their illness and treatment experiences up to seven years after they have been enrolled in a randomised controlled clinical trial on the direct improvement of quality of life (RCT DIQOL). METHODS: Colorectal cancer survivors in Bavaria, Germany were mailed a questionnaire on average 78·3 months after the start of their therapy and enrolment into RCT DIQOL. The questionnaire enquired about their worst experience during the colorectal cancer episode, positive aspects of the illness, and any advice they would give to newly diagnosed patients. Patient responses were categorised by two independent raters and cross-checked by a third independent rater. Frequencies of these categories were then quantitatively analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 146 remaining survivors initially enrolled in RCT DIQOL, 96 (66%) returned the questionnaire. The majority (33%) of statements regarding the worst experience was referring to "psychological distress", followed by "indigestion and discomfort during defecation" (17%), and "cancer diagnosis" (16%). Among survivors with history of a stoma, the majority (36%) regarded "stoma" as their worst experience. With 45%, "change in life priorities" has been the most frequent positive category before "support by physicians/ nurses" (25%). 43% of the survivors deemed "fighting spirit" as most important advice to overcome the disease. CONCLUSION: Even after many years, colorectal cancer survivors clearly remember experiences from the time of their illness. Echoing the results of the previous breast cancer survivors' study, "psychological distress", "change in life priorities" and "fighting spirit" emerged as prominent concepts. In addition, some aspects like the impact of a stoma are of specific importance for colorectal cancer survivors. These findings can be used to inform programmes to improve patient- and quality of life centred aftercare of tumour patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT04930016, date of registration 18.06.2021.

Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of a pathway with quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapy has been already demonstrated in an earlier randomized trial (RCT) in patients with breast cancer. We refined the pathway by developing and evaluating an electronic tool for QoL assessment in routine inpatient and outpatient care. METHODS: In a single-arm study, patients with breast cancer with surgical treatment in two German hospitals were enrolled. QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) was measured with an electronic tool after surgery and during aftercare in outpatient medical practices (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months) so that results (QoL-profile) were available immediately. Feedback by patients and physicians was analyzed to evaluate feasibility and impact on patient-physician communication. RESULTS: Between May 2016 and July 2018, 56 patients were enrolled. Physicians evaluated the QoL pathway as feasible. Patients whose physician regularly discussed QoL-profiles with them reported significantly more often that their specific needs were cared for (p < .001) and that their physician had found the right treatment strategy for these needs (p < .001) compared with patients whose doctor never/rarely discussed QoL-profiles. The latter significantly more often had no benefit from QoL assessments (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The QoL pathway with electronic QoL assessments is feasible for inpatient and outpatient care. QoL results should be discussed directly with the patient. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT04334096, date of registration 06.04.2020.

Breast cancer survivors' recollection of their illness and therapy seven years after enrolment into a randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the subjective experience of breast cancer survivors after primary treatment. However, these experiences are important because they shape their communication about their illness in everyday life, usage and acceptance of healthcare, and expectations of new generations of patients. The present study investigated this topic by combining qualitative and quantitative methods. METHODS: Breast cancer survivors in Bavaria, Germany were mailed a questionnaire up to seven years after enrolment into a randomised controlled clinical trial and start of their therapy. This enquired about their worst experiences during the breast cancer episode, positive aspects of the illness and any advice they would give to newly diagnosed patients. A category system for themes was systematically created and answers were categorised by two independent raters. Frequencies of key categories were then quantitatively analysed using descriptive statistics. In addition, local treating physicians gave their opinion on the response categories chosen by their patients. RESULTS: 133 (80%) of 166 eligible patients who survived up to seven years returned the questionnaire. The most prominent worst experience reported by survivors was psychological distress (i.e. anxiety, uncertainty; prevalence 38%) followed by chemotherapy (25%), and cancer diagnosis (18%). Positive aspects of the illness were reported by 48% with the most frequent including change in life priorities (50%) and social support (22%). The most frequent advice survivors gave was fighting spirit (i.e. think positive, never give up; prevalence 42%). Overall, physicians' estimates of the frequency of these responses corresponded well with survivors' answers. CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians' understanding of breast cancer patients was good, psychological distress and chemotherapy-related side effects were remembered as particularly burdensome by a substantial part of survivors. On the one hand, patients' quality of life needs to be assessed repeatedly during medical follow-up to identify such specific complaints also including specific recommendations to the physician for targeted psychosocial and medical support. On the other hand the advices and positive aspects of the disease, reported by the survivors, can be used to promote positive ways of coping with the illness.

Diagnosing deficits in quality of life and providing tailored therapeutic options: Results of a randomised trial in 220 patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of quality of life (QoL) concepts in routine care, is still an open matter. We followed the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions to implement a model of QoL diagnosis and therapeutic options, and investigated its effectiveness in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: This randomised, single-blind, multicentre, clinical trial enrolled patients diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer aged 18 years or older who were surgically treated in one of four recruiting hospitals in Germany. All patients received aftercare from one of 178 coordinating practitioners (CPs) who had access to 75 healthcare professionals providing tailored therapies. QoL was measured (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29) in all patients after surgery (baseline) and during aftercare (3, 6, 12, 18 months). Patients were randomised (1:1) into two groups: a care pathway, including QoL-profiles consisting of 13 QoL scales plus specific therapeutic recommendations forwarded to the patient's CP or standard postoperative care adhering to the German national guideline for colorectal cancer (control). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in each group with a need for QoL therapy 12 months after surgery. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02321813 and closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Jan 13, 2014, and Oct 28, 2015, 220 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (n = 110 per group). At baseline (in hospital after surgery), a need for QoL therapy was diagnosed in 92/103 (89%) of intervention and 86/104 (83%) of control group patients. At 12 months (primary endpoint) the proportion of patients with a need for QoL therapy was 35/83 (42%; 95% CI 31-54%) in the intervention group versus 50/87 (57%; 95% CI: 46-68%) in the control group (p = 0·046, number needed to treat = 7; 95% CI 3-225). INTERPRETATION: Patients profited from the diagnosis of QoL deficits and tailored therapeutic options in their treatment of colorectal cancer. This trial confirmed the results of a previous RCT in breast cancer patients. The implementation of QoL concepts should become standard in treatment guidelines on cancer care. FUNDING: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; grant no. 01GY1339). CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT02321813.

Quality of life diagnosis and therapy as complex intervention for improvement of health in breast cancer patients: delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements (modeling).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A system for quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapy in breast cancer patients was developed according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework of complex interventions. Along MRC's five phases in the continuum of evidence, the present paper deals with phase I: modeling (i.e., delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements). BASIC ELEMENTS: Theoretical background is a new conceptualization of QoL that provides a rational basis to diagnose "diseased" QoL. A care pathway as the central part of modeling is composed of the following interrelated structural elements: patients (n = 170), clinicians (n = 10), experts in a quality of life unit (n = 5), coordinating practitioners (n = 38), local opinion leaders (n = 12), and professional therapists for QoL enhancing therapies (n = 75). Networking of these structural elements was achieved by clinical algorithm. In the clinical center, the patient and doctor delivered a questionnaire (EORTC) and health status report. The QoL unit transformed it into a profile and experts' report. The coordinating practitioner transformed the latter into a decision on QoL therapy and the care pathway ended with the professional therapists. Implementation of this system used a multifaceted strategy including educational outreach visits, local opinion leaders, and quality circles. CONCLUSION: The suffering cancer patient is the main focus of this QoL diagnosis and therapy system. It will have to pass the rigorous test of a definitive randomized trial.

[Interventions to improve quality of life in oncological patients]. / Lebensqualitätsinterventionen in der Onkologie.

The assessment of quality of life is a central aspect in the current debate in support groups, certified cancer centres, benefit assessment, and also in palliative care. Accordingly, quality of life has become an essential part of clinical trials for more than two decades. But most of the time results are presented in a descriptive manner without any concrete therapeutic consequences for the improvement of quality of life. Likewise, there are no uniform recommendations for considering quality of life data in the decision-making process. Therefore, a guide with recommendations for the assessment of quality of life in trials has been developed. Its implementation is illustrated by a complex intervention for a targeted diagnosis and therapy of quality of life in patients with breast cancer or colorectal cancer. The basis is a standardised quality of life assessment and the presentation of results in an intelligible fashion as well as the close collaboration of all healthcare providers to create regional network structures for the targeted support of patients in both the inpatient and outpatient sector.

Breast cancer survivors` recollection of their quality of life: Identifying determinants of recall bias in a longitudinal population-based trial.

BACKGROUND: The recollections of survivors of breast cancer are an important source of information about the disease for their family, friends, and newly diagnosed patients. So far, little is known about these memories. This study investigated how accurately survivors of breast cancer remember their past quality of life (QoL) during the disease and if this memory is modified by women`s present QoL and negative affect. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The longitudinal population-based study included 133 survivors of breast cancer (response rate 80%). Participants were asked for their present QoL and to recall their baseline QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) that had been assessed about seven years ago before discharge from hospital. The dependent variable was recall bias in ten QoL dimensions. Present QoL and negative affect (PANAS) were investigated as predictor variables. RESULTS: Overall, baseline QoL was retrospectively underrated on seven out of ten scales whereas no significant overestimation was found. In multiple linear regression analyses, controlling for confounders, a stronger underrating of QoL was significantly predicted by a lower present QoL on nine out of ten scales and by higher negative affect on six scales. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of breast cancer tend to underestimate their past QoL during the disease when asked about seven years later. Lower present QoL and higher negative affect contribute to this recall bias. This needs to be considered when interpreting retrospectively reported QoL data. Results are discussed in relation to theory of change or stability and mood congruency theory.

[Diagnosis and therapy of illness-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. Protocol of a randomized clinical trial at the Regensburg Tumour Centre]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der krankheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität bei Patientinnen mit Mammakarzi- nom. Protokoll einer randomisierten klinischen Studie am Tumorzentrum Regensburg.

BACKGROUND: The project conducted at the Tumour Centre in Regensburg aims to integrate quality of life (QL) diagnostics with the therapy of breast cancer patients and to evaluate the efficacy of QL diagnostics in the context of a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: The Regensburg Tumour Centre provides the infrastructure of the present project (telemedicine, project groups, quality circle). The treatment of breast cancer patients is based on the recent national breast cancer therapy guideline, including assorted QL-enhancing therapy options such as pain therapy, physiotherapy and lymphatic drainage, psychotherapy, social counselling and rehabilitation, nutrition and sports. During an implementation phase a new method of QL diagnostics has been developed. Five experts with varying professional background use the individual patient's QL profile and clinical and socio-demographic information in order to generate a QL report including a treatment recommendation. The study is designed as a two- arm randomized clinical trial with one test group (communication of the QL findings to the co-ordinating physician) and a control group (no communication). Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who are treated in the study region by one of the co-ordinating doctors will be included in this randomized study. At designated points in time QL assessments (EORTC QLQ-C30 plus BR23) will be conducted over a 12-months period. EXPECTED RESULTS: We expect that patients in the test group will experience a lower amount of QL deficits at the end of the study period (M = 1, SD = 2) than patients in the control group (M = 2, SD = 2). The statistical confirmation of this expected effect requires a total sample size of N = 200 (n = 100 vs. n = 100, alpha = 5% [two-tailed], beta = 10%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate a new form of QL diagnostics in the complexity of a real patient care environment, and it promises to make the inclusion of the quality of life concept into the current breast cancer treatment guideline more tangible.

Direct improvement of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients using a tailored pathway with quality of life diagnosis and therapy (DIQOL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment in patient-centred care in oncology is broadly managed and regulated in terms of guideline development, cancer centres, and quality assurance by cancer registries. In contrast to this quality management cycle (PDCA), there are no equal standards for patient-reported outcomes like quality of life (QoL). Therefore, the Tumour Centre Regensburg e.V., a population-based regional cancer registry covering a population of more than 2.2 million people in the Upper Palatinate and Lower Bavaria, Germany, designed and implemented a QoL pathway. In a complex intervention with QoL diagnosis and therapy (multidimensional therapeutic network), effectiveness for patients with breast cancer has been demonstrated. To provide local tailored QoL diagnosis and therapy to other cancer patients as well, external validity needs to be extended by adapting the QoL pathway to another tumour entity. METHODS/DESIGN: The QoL pathway will be tested for colorectal cancer patients in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Two hundred twenty primary colorectal cancer patients, surgically treated in one of four hospitals, will be included. QoL is measured in all patients 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29). In the intervention group, QoL scores are transformed into a QoL profile. This is sent to the coordinating practitioner (general practitioner, internist, or oncologist) with an expert report including treatment recommendations for QoL deficits. The control group receives routine follow-up care attending the guideline recommendations for colorectal cancer without profile or expert report. At the primary endpoint (12 months), the rates of patients with diseased QoL in both groups are compared. DISCUSSION: This randomised trial is the first complex intervention investigating the effectiveness of an intervention with QoL diagnosis and tailored QoL therapy in colorectal cancer patients. The results will show if this QoL pathway improves the patients' QoL during follow-up care of their disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02321813 (registered December 2014).