Bevacizumab with peri-operative epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) in localised gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a safety report.

BACKGROUND: Peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery is a standard treatment of localised oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma; however, the outcomes remain poor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ST03 is a multicentre, randomised, phase II/III study comparing peri-operative ECX with or without bevacizumab (ECX-B). The primary outcome measure of phase II (n = 200) was safety, specifically gastrointestinal (GI) perforation rates and cardiotoxicity. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were randomised between October 2007 and April 2010. Ninety-one/101 (90%) ECX and 86/99 (87%) ECX-B patients completed pre-operative chemotherapy; 7 ECX and 9 ECX-B patients stopped due to toxicity. Gastrointestinal perforations (3 ECX, 1 ECX-B), cardiac events (1 ECX, 4 ECX-B) and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs, 8 ECX, 7 ECX-B) were uncommon. Arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident) were more frequent with ECX-B (5 versus 1 with ECX). Delayed wound healing, anastomotic leaks and GI bleeding rates were similar. More asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) falls (≥15% and/or to <50%) occurred with ECX-B (21.2% versus 11.1% with ECX). Clinically significant falls (≥10% to below lower limit of normal, LLN) occurred in (15.3%) and (8.9%) respectively, with no associated cardiac failure (median 22 months follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bevacizumab to peri-operative ECX chemotherapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity and no negative impact on surgical outcomes.

Initial dose intensity has limited impact on the outcome of ABVD chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): data from UKLG LY09 (ISRCTN97144519).

BACKGROUND: This analysis was undertaken to assess the relationship between the dose intensity (DI) of initial chemotherapy and outcome in a large cohort of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated in a randomised controlled trial, in which detailed dose data were collected prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-hundred and eighty patients randomly assigned to receive standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine who underwent at least two cycles of treatment were studied. With a median follow-up of 6.9 years, progression-free survival (PFS) from the end of cycle 2 was analysed according to DI during those cycles. RESULTS: During the first two cycles, 25% of patients received >97% of planned DI, 37% received between 86% and 97% and 38% received <86%. DI during the first two cycles was correlated with DI during the remainder of the course, but there was no evidence that early DI influenced PFS (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.11; P = 0.265). Multivariate analysis also failed to confirm the influence of early DI on PFS or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: At the range of DI delivered in a multicentre trial using conventional therapy, there is no clear evidence that early DI influences outcome. This should be tested in a prospective study.

Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy is effective treatment for stage I seminoma, but is associated with a risk of late non-germ-cell cancer and cardiovascular events. After good results in initial studies with one injection of carboplatin, we undertook a large randomised trial to compare the approaches of radiotherapy with chemotherapy in seminoma treatment. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2001, 1477 patients from 70 hospitals in 14 countries were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy (para-aortic strip or dog-leg field; n=904) or one injection of carboplatin (n=573; dose based on the formula 7x[glomerular filtration rate+25] mg), at two trial centres in the UK and Belgium. The primary outcome measure was the relapse-free rate, with the trial powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year rates of more than 3%. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN27163214. FINDINGS: 885 and 560 patients received radiotherapy and carboplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 3.0-4.9), relapse-free survival rates for radiotherapy and carboplatin were similar (96.7% [95% CI 95.3-97.7] vs 97.7% [96.0-98.6] at 2 years; 95.9% [94.4-97.1] vs 94.8% [92.5-96.4] at 3 years, respectively; hazard ratio 1.28 [90% CI 0.85-1.93], p=0.32). At 2 years' follow-up, the absolute differences in relapse-free rates (radiotherapy-chemotherapy) were -1.0% (90% CI -2.5 to 0.5) by direct comparison of proportions, and 0.9% (-0.5 to 3.0) by a hazard-ratio-based approach. Patients given carboplatin were less lethargic and less likely to take time off work than those given radiotherapy. New, second primary testicular germ-cell tumours were reported in ten patients allocated irradiation (all after para-aortic strip field) and two allocated carboplatin (5-year event rate 1.96% [95% CI 1.0-3.8] vs 0.54% [0.1-2.1], p=0.04). One seminoma-related death occurred after radiotherapy and none after carboplatin. INTERPRETATION: This trial has shown the non-inferiority of carboplatin to radiotherapy in the treatment of stage I seminoma. Although the absence of disease-related deaths and preliminary data indicating fewer second primary testicular germ-cell tumours favour carboplatin use, these findings need to be confirmed beyond 4 years' follow-up.

Mathematical modelling of survival of glioblastoma patients suggests a role for radiotherapy dose escalation and predicts poorer outcome after delay to start treatment.

AIMS: The outcome of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains extremely poor. We have developed a mathematical model, using pathological and radiation biology concepts, to assess the detrimental effect of delay to start radiotherapy, the possible benefit from dose escalation, and to extract biological data from clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survival data were available for 154 adult patients with GBM treated in our centre with curative intent to a dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions between 1996 and 2002. Survival data for 129 patients from the 60 Gy arm of the MRC BR02 randomised trial of radiotherapy dose were obtained for comparison. The model generates the equivalent of individual patients with a brain tumour, and produces an explicit outcome, either death or survival. The tumour, assumed to be growing exponentially, causes normal cell damage in the brain, and death occurs when the number of normal brain cells falls below a critical level. The outcome for an individual patient is determined by values of the variables assigned by the model. Parameters for the single patient include tumour doubling time, surviving fraction of tumour cells after each fraction of radiotherapy, and a waiting time from presentation to the start of radiotherapy. A surrogate for performance status is implemented, using a rule that rejects patients whose tumours are too advanced at presentation to be suitable for radical radiotherapy. Values for the parameters that determine individual patient outcome are randomly assigned from a set of probability distributions, using Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation constructs survival results for a population, typically 2000 individuals. The descriptors of the probability distributions that are used to determine the parameters that define the patient characteristics are adjusted to optimise the fit of the modelled population to real clinical data, using a combination of folding polygon and simulated annealing techniques. RESULTS: The model fits the clinical data well. The results suggest that the surviving fraction of tumour cells after a radiation dose of 2 Gy (SF2) does influence patient outcome. The mean in vivo SF2 for the Addenbrooke's data is 0.80, implying that hypoxia is a serious problem in radiotherapy for GBM. The Addenbrooke's data suggest a mean tumour doubling time of 24 days, so that a delay to start radiotherapy would be expected to have an adverse effect. Considering patients by treatment intent, median survival plummets as delay increases, and almost no patients survive long term after a 70-day delay. Radiotherapy dose escalation has an important predicted effect on survival. Assuming that the treatment could be delivered safely, a dose of 74 Gy, given at 2 Gy/fraction, would extend the survival of all patients. The proportion of long-term survivors would increase, from 2.4% with 60 Gy, to 6.4% with 74 Gy. The model can be used to derive gamma50, which has a value of 0.42, lower than the typical value of 1-2. CONCLUSION: Using the model, we have extracted biological information from clinical data. The model could be used to assess the potential benefit, or lack of benefit, from a proposed radiotherapy trial, and to estimate the necessary size. It shows that a single modality is unlikely to achieve a major improvement in long-term survival, although radiotherapy dose escalation should have a role, provided it can be given safely. The model could be extended to include chemotherapy, bio-reductive drugs, or gene therapy.

Impact of the treating institution on survival of patients with "poor-prognosis" metastatic nonseminoma. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Collaborative Group and the Medical Research Council Testicular Cancer Working Party.

BACKGROUND: Because metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer is a rare but treatable cancer, we have explored whether there is an association between the experience of the treating institution with this disease and the long-term clinical outcome of the patients, particularly patients with a poor prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed data on 380 patients treated in one of 49 institutions participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/ Medical Research Council randomized trial of four cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin followed by two cycles of etoposide-cisplatin versus three cycles of bleomycin-vincristine-cisplatin followed by three cycles of etoposide-ifosfamide-cisplatin-bleomycin, both treatment regimens given with or without filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Institutions were divided into four groups based on the total number of patients entered in the trial. The groups were compared by use of the Cox proportional hazards model stratified for treatment with filgrastim and for patient prognosis as defined by the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification Group. With the use of this classification, only 65 % of the patients had a poor prognosis. RESULTS: Patients treated in the 26 institutions that entered fewer than five patients into the trial had an overall survival that was statistically significantly worse (two-sided P = .010; hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% confidence interval = 1.16-3.03) than that of patients treated in the 23 institutions that entered five patients or more. Overall survival and failure-free survival were similar among institutions that entered at least five patients. The observed effect may be related to differences in adherence to the chemotherapy protocol and in the frequency and extent of surgery for residual masses, although only the differences in dose intensity achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated in institutions that entered fewer than five patients into the trial appeared to have poorer survival than those treated in institutions that entered a larger number of patients with "poor-prognosis" nonseminoma.

Short-course adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: a Medical Research Council report.

PURPOSE: This United Kingdom Medical Research Council (UK-MRC) study prospectively evaluated efficacy and long-term toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis (NSGCTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those identified by the local histopathologist as having features confirmed in MRC surveillance studies to indicate an approximate 50% risk of relapse. Central histopathology review was undertaken. Chemotherapy consisted of two courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, bleomycin 30 mg weekly x 3, and etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3, every 21 days (BEP). RESULTS: One hundred fourteen eligible cases were enrolled. Median time of follow-up was 4 years, with 93 patients followed-up for at least 2 years. There have been two relapses, including one patient who did not have a germ cell tumor (GCT), according to the reference histopathologist. This patient is alive with active disease, the other has died. There was one death after a cerebrovascular accident during treatment. Assessment of fertility, lung function, and audiometry pretreatment and more than 9 months posttreatment indicated no clinically significant changes. A mean decrease in transfer factor coefficient (KCO) of 15% of the predicted value was noted, but no patient had symptomatic respiratory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: There have been only two relapses among 114 cases of high-risk stage I NSGCTT treated with two courses of adjuvant BEP chemotherapy. The 95% confidence interval (CI) excludes a true relapse rate of more than 5%. Of 104 patients confirmed on histopathology review to have GCT, there has been only one relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy is free from significant long-term toxicity, offering an effective alternative to surveillance or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) followed by surveillance, and may be preferred by some patients.

Medical Research Council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratoma. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumors Working Party.

PURPOSE: A prospective study of surveillance after orchidectomy alone in patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumor (NSGCT) was performed to determine the relapse-free rate and to identify the histologic criteria that predict for relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred ninety-six patients from 16 United Kingdom and one Norwegian centers were entered onto the study between January 1, 1984 and October 1, 1987 of whom 373 were eligible for analysis. In a previous retrospective study, we defined a prognostic index based on histologic criteria that identified a group of patients with a high risk of relapse. This index was based on the presence of venous and lymphatic invasion, undifferentiated cells, and the absence of yolk sac elements in the primary tumor. RESULTS: The 2-year actuarial relapse-free rate after orchidectomy was 75% (95% confidence interval, 71% to 79%), and the rate at 5 years was 73%. Five patients died of tumor or treatment-related complications, which resulted in a 5-year survival of 98%. The relapse-free rate in patients with three or four risk factors was 54%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety of surveillance as a method of management and identifies a group of patients with a high risk of relapse. A prospective phase II study has been initiated to determine whether two courses of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy will prevent relapse in these high-risk patients.

The Second Medical Research Council study of prognostic factors in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumour Working Party.

PURPOSE: To assess prognostic factors in a large population of patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) arising in gonadal or extragonadal sites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 795 patients treated with chemotherapy between 1982 and 1986 in 13 centers were analyzed. Particular emphasis was placed on exact tumor measurements (eg, size of nodal masses, number of lung metastases), and the diagnostic pathology was also reviewed. Cox regression analysis was performed on these data. The patients were treated with a variety of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens, 86% of which included etoposide. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 45 months, overall 3-year survival is 85%. The independently adverse features proved to be (1) the presence of liver, bone, or brain metastases; (2) raised marker levels (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] level greater than 1,000 kU/L or beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG] greater than 10,000 IU/L [corrected]); (3) the presence of a mediastinal mass greater than 5 cm in diameter; (4) the presence of 20 or more lung metastases; (5) increasing age; and (6) absence of undifferentiated teratoma (embryonal carcinoma) or fibrous tissue from the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The first four factors were used to define a simple prognostic classification. A good-prognosis group having none of these features comprised 67% of our patient population and had a 3-year survival of 93%. The remaining 33% of patients having at least one of these features had a 3-year survival rate of 68%. These patient groups are currently the subjects of international randomized clinical trials.

Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a Multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial.

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (CEB) versus cisplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (BEP) in first-line chemotherapy of patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1989 and May 1993, a total of 598 patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors were randomized to receive four cycles of either BEP or CEB. In each cycle, the etoposide dose was 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and the bleomycin dose was 30 U on day 2. BEP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 or 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2. For CEB patients, the carboplatin dose was calculated from the glomerular filtration rate to achieve a serum concentration x time of 5 mg/mL x minutes. Chemotherapy was recycled at 21-day intervals to a total of four cycles. RESULTS: Of patients assessable for response, 253 of 268 (94.4%) of those allocated to receive BEP achieved a complete response, compared with 227 of 260 (87.3%) allocated to receive CEB (P = .009). There were 30 treatment failures in the 300 patients allocated to BEP and 79 in the 298 allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 26.9; P < .001), which led to failure-free rates at 1 year of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88% to 94%) and 77% (95% CI, 72% to 82%), respectively. There were 10 deaths in patients allocated to BEP and 27 in patients allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 8.77; P = .003), which led to 3-year survival rates of 97% (95% CI, 95% to 99%) and 90% (95% CI, 86% to 94%), respectively. CONCLUSION: With these drug doses and schedules, combination chemotherapy based on carboplatin was inferior to that based on cisplatin. This BEP regimen that contains moderate doses of etoposide and bleomycin is effective in the treatment of patients with good-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma.

Randomized trial assessing the addition of interferon alpha-2a to fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha) on the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FUra) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to FUra/LV alone or FUra/LV plus IFN alpha. All patients received: LV 200 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 hours, then FUra 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus plus 400 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 22 hours, all repeated on day 2. Treatment was every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Patients randomized to IFN alpha received 6 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously every 48 hours throughout. Objective response (OR) and toxicity were assessed conventionally; in addition, palliative benefit and adverse effects were assessed using quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. RESULTS: There were no differences in OR rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival. OR rates in assessable patients were as follows: FUra/LV alone (n = 104), complete or partial response (OR) = 27%, no change (NC) = 34%; FUra/LV/IFN alpha (n = 101), OR = 28%, NC = 30%. Median survival was 10 months in both arms. Dose-limiting FUra toxicities were not significantly increased by co-administration of IFN alpha, and the delivered FUra dose-intensity was not significantly reduced. However, QoL was adversely affected: patients on IFN alpha were less likely to report improvement in pretreatment physical and psychologic symptoms, and more likely to report new or worsening symptoms. CONCLUSION: IFN alpha, at a dose that impaired QoL, did not improve the efficacy of FUra/LV. The power of this trial is sufficient to exclude with 95% confidence a benefit of 15% in OR or 10 weeks in median survival. Accordingly, we cannot recommend the use of IFN alpha as a clinical modulator of FUra/LV in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Optimal planning target volume for stage I testicular seminoma: A Medical Research Council randomized trial. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumor Working Group.

PURPOSE: To compare relapse rates and toxicity associated with para-aortic (PA) strip or PA and ipsilateral iliac lymph node irradiation (dogleg [DL] field) (30 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) for stage I testicular seminoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and May 1993, 478 men with testicular seminoma stage I (T1 to T3; no ipsilateral inguinoscrotal operation before orchiectomy) were randomized (PA, 236 patients; DL, 242 patients). RESULTS: Median follow-up time is 4.5 years. Eighteen relapses, nine in each treatment group, have occurred 4 to 35 months after radiotherapy; among these, four were pelvic relapses, all occurring after PA radiotherapy. However, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in pelvic relapse rates excludes differences of more than 4%. The 3-year relapse-free survival was 96% (95% CI, 94% to 99%) after PA radiotherapy and 96.6% (95% CI, 94% to 99%) after DL (difference, 0.6%; 95% confidence limits, -3.4%, +4.6%). One patient (PA field) has died from seminoma. Survival at 3 years was 99.3% for PA and 100% for DL radiotherapy. Acute toxicity (nausea, vomiting, leukopenia) was less frequent and less pronounced in patients in the PA arm. Within the first 18 months of follow-up, the sperm counts were significantly higher after PA than after DL irradiation. CONCLUSION: In patients with testicular seminoma stage I (T1 to T3) and with undisturbed lymphatic drainage, adjuvant radiotherapy confined to the PA lymph nodes is associated with reduced hematologic, gastrointestinal, and gonadal toxicity, but with a higher risk of pelvic recurrence, compared with DL radiotherapy. The recurrence rate is low with either treatment. PA radiotherapy is recommended as standard treatment in these patients.

Randomised consent designs in cancer clinical trials.

In 1977, Zelen proposed a new design for clinical trials with the aim of increasing recruitment by avoiding some of the problems associated with obtaining informed consent. These 'randomised consent' designs have proved controversial, and have not often been used. This paper explains the statistical aspects of single and double randomised consent designs and reviews some of the ethical issues. All identified published cancer treatment trials using a randomised consent design are considered in some detail. Reasons for and against the use of these designs are summarised.

Radiotherapy after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma--a diminishing role. MRC Testicular Tumour Working Party.

In a retrospective study, data from 302 patients with metastatic testicular seminoma treated with chemotherapy between 1978 and 1990 in 10 European centres were analysed to evaluate the role, if any, of postchemotherapy treatment with irradiation. The primary endpoint of this study was the progression-free survival rate after chemotherapy with or without additional radiotherapy. This was related to the type of primary chemotherapy, sites and sizes of pre- and postchemotherapy masses, the extent of surgical resection after chemotherapy and the use of radiotherapy. 174 patients had residual disease at the end of chemotherapy. The most important prognostic factors for progression were the presence of any visceral metastases or raised LDH prechemotherapy, and the presence of residual disease at visceral sites after chemotherapy. Approximately half the patients with residual masses underwent postchemotherapy radiotherapy, with selection based predominantly on institutional practice. In patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, no significant difference was detected in progression-free survival whether or not radiotherapy was employed. Patients receiving BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) had a progression-free survival rate of 88% (95% CI, 80-96%) uninfluenced by postchemotherapy radiotherapy. In patients with residual masses confined to the abdomen after platinum-based chemotherapy, the absolute benefit to radiotherapy was estimated to be 2.3%. The potential benefit of postchemotherapy radiotherapy is minimal, and so it is concluded that the use of adjuvant radiotherapy to residual masses after platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma is unnecessary.

Prognostic factors for patients with advanced seminoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Prognostic factors for 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) were defined in 286 patients with advanced seminoma treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy at 10 European oncology units (no prior treatment: 236; prior radiotherapy: 50). Previously irradiated patients displayed a 69% PFS as compared to 87% in those presenting with advanced seminoma at the time of diagnosis (P = 0.009). In the univariate analysis, the extent and site of disease before chemotherapy and the level of serum LDH (< 2.0 versus > or = 2.0 x upper limit of normal) correlated with PFS in previously non-irradiated patients, but not in patients with prior radiotherapy. The multivariate analysis was, therefore, restricted to previously non-irradiated patients. The presence of non-pulmonary visceral metastases and a serum LDH level of > or = 2 x normal (N) proved to be independent prognostic factors. Based on these variables, two prognostic models were constructed and validated in an external data set of 166 comparable patients. For clinical use, Model 2 is recommended. The good-prognosis group comprises non-irradiated patients with stage II seminoma and any LDH level at presentation, or stage III and IV patients (with lung metastases only) whose serum LDH level is < 2 x N. These patients display a 94% 3-year PFS. The poor prognosis group includes all other patients with a 56% PFS. With this prognostic model, individualisation of the therapeutic approach may be considered in patients with advanced seminoma and a high risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Primary chemotherapy after orchidectomy for stage I and II nonseminoma.

The effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in advanced germ cell cancer has led to re-evaluation of treatment approaches in early disease. For patients with stage I nonseminoma it became possible to contemplate an observation policy, relying on chemotherapy to rescue those who relapsed. Subsequently it has been shown that two cycels of adjuvant chemotherapy can prevent relapse in those at high risk. For patients with stage II nonseminoma, a policy of primary chemotherapy postorchidectomy leads to high cure rates, with avoidance of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and only a minority of patients requiring lymphadenectomy. The excellent prognosis of these patients increases the importance of minimising risks of any long-term treatment toxicity.

A randomized study of CCNU with and without benznidazole in the treatment of recurrent grades 3 and 4 astrocytoma. Report to the Medical Research Council by the Brain Tumor Working Party.

In a randomized, double-blind study, 44 patients with recurrent high grade malignant glioma were allocated to chemotherapy of CCNU, with or without benznidazole (BENZO). Of 42 eligible patients, 23 received CCNU alone, and 19 CCNU received BENZO. Only 8 patients received the full 6 courses of treatment. The mean number of courses given was 2.8 for placebo and 3.4 for benznidazole patients. Progressive disease caused termination of treatment early for the majority of patients. There was no evidence of increased toxicity-leucopenia, anemia or thrombocytopenia-in the BENZO group, and only one patient in each treatment group had chemotherapy terminated because of toxicity. The BENZO group did not demonstrate any survival advantage: median survival time was 25 weeks in the BENZO group and 30 weeks in the placebo group. The confidence interval for the treatment difference is wide but excludes a BENZO-related addition of more than 7 months to the median survival time.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for poor prognosis malignant glioma: matched pair survival analysis with MRC controls.

PURPOSE: To assess the survival benefit of palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with poor prognosis high grade glioma by a matched comparison to conventionally treated controls. METHOD: Ninety-two elderly and/or disabled patients with high grade glioma with poor prognostic features received palliative partial brain radiotherapy to a dose of 30Gy in six fractions over 2 weeks. Patients were matched for WHO histological grade, performance status and age from a cohort of patients treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 60Gy in 30 fractions in an Medical Research Council (MRC) BR05 trial. RESULTS: Patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy had a median survival of 5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 12% from diagnosis. The median survival of case-matched controls was estimated to be 2.5-4.5 months longer. Following hypofractionated radiotherapy, Barthel score was improved or remained stable in 68% of patients. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated partial brain radiotherapy is a well-tolerated regimen with palliative benefit. Comparison with matched controls suggests lesser survival benefit than would be obtained with radical radiotherapy. However, this is compensated by lower intensity and duration of irradiation induced side effects. It is postulated that there may not be a significant difference in good quality survival or 'quality adjusted survival' between the two regimens and this requires testing in prospective trials.

Attitudes and practice in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Britain. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the UK Medical Research Council.

Evidence-based medicine is widely held to be the essential basis of modern therapeutics. The principle of adopting into clinical practice those treatments proved to be of value in randomized trials, or in the systematic review of several trials, in encouraging a welcome proliferation of clinical research and meta-analysis. However, many things affect clinical practice; quantifiable therapeutic benefit is only one of them. Furthermore, in many situations, clear evidence of the best treatment is not available. When discussing ideas for a new trial in advanced colorectal cancer that was launched in 1996, the MRC Colorectal Cancer Working Party carried out a survey of the attitudes and practice of surgeons and oncologists who were treating this condition. This revealed substantial diversity of practice amongst experts in the treatment of this common disease, and prompted us to review the factors that affect clinical practice and to discuss the implications.

Thirty years of Medical Research Council randomized trials in solid tumours.

This paper reviews the survival outcome from the randomized Phase III trials in solid tumours published on behalf of, or in collaboration with, the Cancer Therapy Committee (CTC) of the British Medical Research Council over a 30-year period to 31 December 1995. We review briefly the innovations in statistical methodology that have occurred over the period. We also note the ways in which standards of reporting the trials have improved, with more recent publications including, for example, estimates of the size of effect and confidence intervals. In all, 32 trials, involving over 5000 deaths in more than 8000 patients, have been published. Tumour types have included bladder, bone, brain, cervix, colon and rectum, head and neck, kidney, lung, ovary, prostate and skin. This paper presents a bibliography of these trials and gives details of the treatment comparisons made, the numbers of patients randomized and included in the analysis for each treatment arm, the observed numbers of deaths, and an estimate of the hazard ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. The bibliography also indicates the main endpoint of each trial, whether recurrence-free survival or survival, and whether the trial was aimed at finding a difference or showing equivalence. The MRC trials have made an impact on both clinical practice and research activities. For example, the lung cancer programme has helped to establish the role of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer and has developed better palliative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Trials of the radiosensitizer misonidazole have demonstrated that it has no role in the treatment of a number of cancers, trials of hyperbaric oxygen have defined the biological activity of this approach, and the appropriate dose of radiotherapy in patients with brain tumours has been found. The individual trials recruited between 44 and 824 patients (median 213). A better measure of the information in a trial is the number of deaths reported, which varied from 28 to 661 (median 145). A large proportion of the comparisons (8/29 or 28%) anticipating a survival difference, demonstrated such a difference at the 5% level of significance. Despite this, it is concluded that some of the trials should have been larger. In such cases, hindsight suggests either that an overoptimistic view of the anticipated survival benefit was taken at the design stage, or, for equivalence trials, the planned confidence interval was too wide for definitive statements to be made. As a consequence, the current CTC profolio of ongoing randomized trials open to patient accrual at 1 January 1996 have a projected median size of 600 and range from 120 to 2000 patients.

A short fractionation radiotherapy treatment for poor prognosis patients with high grade glioma.

Thirty-two patients prospectively identified as having poor prognosis high grade glioma, with a MRC prognostic score >25, were treated with a short palliative course of radiotherapy. A total dose of 36 Gy in 12 fractions was given to the tumour, including oedema and a 2 cm margin, using parallel pair fields prescribed to the midplane with MV photons. Twenty-eight patients completed treatment as planned, while four failed to complete treatment because of clinical deterioration or death. The median survival for the whole group was 16 weeks, with seven patients surviving for more than 6 months. Approximately two-thirds of the surviving patients remained at home after the completion of treatment. A matched case-control comparison with data from patients in previous MRC studies who had received a 6-week course of treatment shows that, for this group of patients, survival is similar (hazard ratio 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.74). The 95% CI for the difference in median survival time excludes a reduction of more than 7 weeks with the 36 Gy course. This shortened radiotherapy regimen may therefore be satisfactory for most poor prognosis patients. However, patients with performance status 3 gained little benefit from treatment, and it is suggested that this group should have a trial period of assessment at home prior to a decision on treatment.