Procedural Analgesia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Neonates perceive pain which also has adverse long-term consequences. Newborns experience several painful procedures a day. Various methods of analgesia may be used but are underutilized. The SMART aim of this project was to increase the use of procedural analgesia from 11.5 to 75% in 6 months by using quality improvement principles. STUDY DESIGN: After a baseline audit, a root cause analysis was done. Based on this, a series of interventions were done as Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. These included posters on analgesia, display of the pain protocol, orders for analgesia, a written test, small power point presentations on the importance of analgesia, and reminders on the trays used for procedures. At the end of each PDSA cycle, an audit was done to determine the proportion of times analgesia was used. Process indicators were also used when possible. Analysis was done by using the Chi-square test and the paired t-test. RESULTS: At baseline 11% of procedures were done after giving analgesia. This significantly improved to 40% at the end of the first PDSA, and 81% after third PDSA. This was sustained at 75% over the next 2 months. CONCLUSION: Procedural analgesia can improve and be sustained by using simple interventions. KEY POINTS: · Procedural pain in neonates can be decreased by the use of analgesia.. · However, most units do not utilize analgesia appropriately.. · This QI showed that simple interventions can optimize use of procedural analgesia..

Simulation training to improve aseptic non-touch technique and success during intravenous cannulation-effect on hospital-acquired blood stream infection and knowledge retention after 6 months: The snowball effect theory.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous cannulation is a common procedure and a valuable skill in the neonatal intensive care unit. Standardized procedure and personnel training are needed in the unit to prevent hospital-acquired blood stream infections. Hence, we evaluated the effect of training using a low-fidelity simulation on the improvement of the aseptic non-touch technique during intravenous cannulation and knowledge retention after 6 months. METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary care neonatal unit from June 2017 to July 2018. All the staff nurses and junior resident doctors posted in the neonatal intensive care were included in the study. A protocol and checklist score sheet was developed. The score sheet consisted of 23 items with a total score of 46. Participants were expected to obtain a minimum of 80%. A pre-test was conducted initially, followed by a formal training and then a post-test. The NITA newborn venous access mannequin was used to facilitate the training. A re-training for new nurses was conducted after 6 months. Data were analyzed using paired t-test. RESULTS: A total of 29 doctors and nurses were enrolled in the training. The mean pre-test score was 29.93 compared to 42.66 in the post-test scores (mean difference 12.24(95% confidence interval: 9.39-16.05), p < 0.01. The mean scores were higher when the simulation was conducted after 6 months. There was a significant decline in blood stream infection rates from 5.5 to 1.65 per 1000 patient days (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Simulation-based training of health care personnel is a good modality to improve aseptic non-touch technique during intravenous cannulation in the neonatal intensive care unit. Simulation-based training also helps in knowledge retention and standardization of training procedures.