RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the suitability of urine samples collected with cotton balls placed into diapers for routine laboratory chemistry analyses. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty pools of residual unpreserved urine samples were separated into control and treated aliquots. The treated samples were absorbed into 2 different brands of cotton balls, wrapped in 3 different brands of diapers, and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The urine-soaked cotton balls were placed into a syringe and expressed via plunger depression. Urine sodium, potassium, creatinine, urea, calcium, magnesium, inorganic phosphorus, albumin, and total protein were measured on all samples on 5 automated clinical chemistry platforms: Ortho Vitros 4600, Siemens Dimension Vista 500, Beckman Coulter AU5822, Roche Cobas 6000, and Abbott Architect c8000 at 5 separate hospital laboratories. Criteria used to exclude the presence of significant effects of urine from presoaked cotton balls in a diaper on the measurement of chemistry laboratory tests were R2 >0.95, slope of 0.9-1.1, and mean bias within ±10%. RESULTS: Albumin and total protein measurements demonstrated significant negative bias in urine from both brands of presoaked cotton balls with all brands of diapers on all 5 chemistry platforms compared with the control urine. We did not observe a significant effect of presoaking urine in cotton balls in a diaper on the measurement of sodium, inorganic phosphorus, and urea. The remaining tests demonstrated significant effects when measured in urine from presoaked cotton balls and/or diapers that were specific to the chemistry analyzer platform or diaper. CONCLUSIONS: Diaper and cotton ball-based urine collection significantly impacts the measurement of several common chemistry assays.
Assuntos
Fibra de Algodão , Manejo de Espécimes , Urinálise , Albuminas , Fraldas Infantis , Humanos , Fósforo , Sódio , Manejo de Espécimes/instrumentação , Ureia , Urinálise/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Biotin and streptavidin are commonly used reagents in clinical immunoassays. Several cases of biotin interference with immunoassay testing for patients taking biotin supplements have been reported, yet, not all analytes and platforms susceptible to biotin interference have been characterized. The objectives of this study are to characterize biotin interference with 21 immunoassays using the Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Vitros 5600, evaluate a biotin-depletion method, and apply risk mitigation strategies for biotin interference during routine clinical testing at our institution. METHODS: Residual serum without and with increasing concentrations of exogenous biotin were used to evaluate biotin interference with 21 immunoassays using the Vitros 5600. Biotin-depletion was evaluated by comparing measured analyte concentrations in serum with and without exogenous biotin and streptavidin-microparticle pretreatment. Focused education for healthcare professionals about biotin interference was performed in February 2018. Samples with suspected biotin interference were investigated using this biotin-depletion method, and analyte testing by alternate methodology for select samples. RESULTS: Exogenous biotin in serum caused dose-dependent negative biases in 15 immunometric assays, and dose-dependent positive biases in 6 competitive immunoassays. Streptavidin-microparticle pretreatment of serum containing exogenous biotin demonstrated recoveries 100⯱â¯15% of expected values for all 21 analytes. Physicians identified 21 samples suspicious for biotin interference over 11â¯months, and streptavidin-microparticle pretreatment verified 11 cases of biotin interference. CONCLUSIONS: Analytical bias caused by biotin interference is dependent on biotin concentration but independent of analyte concentration for immunometric methods using the Vitros 5600, and dependent on both biotin and analyte concentration for competitive immunoassays. Multi-disciplinary education and a lab streptavidin-microparticle pretreatment method help mitigate risk of erroneous results due to biotin interference for patient safety.
Assuntos
Artefatos , Biotina/administração & dosagem , Biotina/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Imunoensaio/normas , Segurança do Paciente , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Métodos Analíticos de Preparação de Amostras , Biotina/sangue , Reações Falso-Negativas , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Humanos , Estreptavidina/químicaRESUMO
A perimenopausal woman presented with palpitations, hirsutism, and inability to lose weight. Laboratory tests revealed an unusual endocrine hormonal profile including pituitary hormones (TSH, ACTH, and prolactin) below reference intervals and gonadal (testosterone) and adrenal (cortisol) hormones above reference intervals. Ultimately, after a comprehensive workup including a scheduled surgical procedure, abnormal laboratories were determined due to biotin interference. Biotin (vitamin B7) is a water-soluble vitamin and essential cofactor for the metabolism of fatty acids, glucose, and amino acids. The recommended daily intake of biotin for adults is 30 µg/d. Many over-the-counter products, particularly those marketed for hair, skin, and nail growth, contain biotin 100-fold of recommended daily intake. This case is unique due to the abnormalities observed not only in the well-described TSH "sandwich" immunoassay, but also in tests for gonadal steroids, adrenal, and pituitary hormones. Falsely high as well as falsely low results can be ascribed to biotin. Competitive immunoassays (Fig. 1A)- in this case, tests used initially for serum cortisol and testosterone- can demonstrate falsely high results. Interference falsely lowers the immunometric "sandwich" immunoassay (Fig. 1B)-in this case, TSH. Biotin effect on our patient's endocrine testing led to decidedly abnormal findings, unnecessary medical referrals and diagnostic studies, and comprehensible psychological distress. Interference with one immunoassay, TSH, persisted a full 2 weeks after discontinuation of biotin; indeed, some tests demonstrate sensitivity to lesser quantities of biotin. Improved communication between patients, health care providers, and laboratory professionals is required concerning the likelihood of biotin interference with immunoassays.