Prolonged use of thromboprophylaxis may not be necessary in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing colorectal resections are considered high risk for developing thromboembolic disease. We postulate, however, that the rapid recovery and swift mobilization after laparoscopic resections reduce this risk and that these patients therefore do not need prolonged thromboprophylaxis. This hypothesis was tested in this paper. METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our Colorectal Surgical Unit in the period from June 1991 until January 2010 were entered into a prospective database. The entire database was reviewed, and incidence of thromboembolic disease and significant bleeding complications were noted. RESULTS: Three thousand, three hundred sixty-four patients were laparoscopically operated on for colorectal disease and were entered in the database. Two thousand, one hundred twenty-seven patients were operated on for benign disease; 1,230, for colorectal cancer, and four, for other malignancies. Two deep venous thromboses were encountered (0.059%), and ten patients had pulmonary embolism (0.30%). The combined venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk for the overall group of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal operations is 0.36%. The combined VTE risk was 0.57% (7/1,230) in patients with colorectal cancer and 0.24% (5/2,127) in patients with benign disease (p = 0.118). Bleeding complications occurred in 44 patients (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In our group, the combined VTE risk for the overall group of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal operations is 0.36%. Therefore, we postulate that the prolonged use of thromboprophylaxis is not indicated in the vast majority of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In particular, patients undergoing laparoscopic resections for benign disease and without other risk factors have such a low VTE risk that prolonged prophylaxis is probably not warranted.

The effect of obstruction and perforation on colorectal cancer disease-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Obstruction (OBSTR) and perforation (PERF) in colorectal cancer impact adversely upon outcomes, and cancer-related survival may also be affected. However, data are sparse, particularly on disease-free survival (DFS) where the cancer is both obstructed and perforated (OBS-PERF). METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospectively collected database of 1876 colorectal cancer patients managed and followed up at the Royal Brisbane Hospital from 1984 to 2004. The patients who had curative surgery (n = 1426) were classified as OBSTR (n = 153), PERF (n = 53), OBS-PERF (n = 19), and uncomplicated (UNCOM; n = 1201). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality within 30 days of surgery was 1.5% (n = 22) and the overall complication rate was 40.8% (n = 582). However, only 7.2% (n = 102) required reoperations. The median survival time was 71 (IQR = 64.9-77.1) months and the median follow-up for DFS was 37.5 (IQR 14-68) months. The overall recurrence rate was 32.7% (n = 466), the local recurrence rate was 9.4% (n = 135), and local and distant recurrences occurred in the same patient in 4.7% (n = 67). Male gender, OBSTR, PERF, OBS-PERF, emergency operation, major medical and surgical complications, reoperation, TNM staging, tumor grading, and tumor venous invasion adversely affected DFS (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that OBS-PERF (p = 0.008), major medical complications (p = 0.011), reoperation (p = 0.018), TNM staging (p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.018), and venous invasion (p = 0.002) were independently associated with a poorer DFS. CONCLUSIONS: OBS-PERF colorectal cancer is associated with a poorer DFS, which may be worse than either OBSTR or PERF alone.