In Vitro Activity of Ceftibuten-Avibactam against ß-Lactamase-Positive Enterobacterales from the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program.

Ceftibuten is an established, oral, third-generation cephalosporin in early clinical development in combination with an oral prodrug of avibactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis. We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against 1,165 Enterobacterales isolates selected from the 2016-2020 ATLAS global surveillance program based upon their ß-lactamase genotype, ß-lactam-susceptible phenotype, species identification, and specimen source (95.8% urine). MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL. Molecular methods were used to identify ß-lactamase genes. Ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 90% (MIC90) of ESBL-producing (n = 645), KPC-producing (n = 60), chromosomal AmpC-positive (n = 100), OXA-48-like-producing (n = 50), and acquired AmpC-producing (n = 110) isolates at concentrations of 0.12, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 µg/mL, respectively. At concentrations of ≤1 and ≤8 µg/mL, ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 98.4 and 99.2% of ESBL-positive isolates; 96.7 and 100% of KPC-positive isolates; 91.0 and 99.0% of chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates; 86.0 and 96.0% of OXA-48-like-positive isolates; and 85.5 and 91.8% of acquired AmpC-positive isolates. Against ESBL-producing, KPC-producing, chromosomal AmpC-positive, OXA-48-like-producing, and acquired AmpC-producing isolates, ceftibuten-avibactam was 256-, 128-, >64-, >32-, and > 16-fold more potent than ceftibuten alone. The potency of ceftibuten-avibactam was 4-fold greater than ceftazidime-avibactam against ESBL-producing (ceftibuten-avibactam MIC90, 0.12 µg/mL; ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL) and KPC-producing (0.5 µg/mL; 2 µg/mL) isolates, equivalent to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) against OXA-48-like-producing isolates, 2-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (1 µg/mL; 0.5 µg/mL) against chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates, and 4-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (4 µg/mL; 1 µg/mL) against acquired AmpC-producing isolates. Continued development of ceftibuten-avibactam appears justified.

Epidemiology of Resistance Determinants Identified in Meropenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales Collected as Part of a Global Surveillance Study, 2018 to 2019.

The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of resistance determinants in meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Enterobacterales isolates collected in 2018 and 2019 as a part of the ATLAS global surveillance program. Among a total of 39,368 Enterobacterales isolates collected in 2018 and 2019, 5.7% were MEM-NS (MIC ≥2 µg/mL). Among the different regions, the proportion of MEM-NS isolates ranged from 1.9% (North America) to 8.4% (Asia/Pacific). The majority of MEM-NS isolates collected were of the species Klebsiella pneumoniae (71.5%). Among the MEM-NS Enterobacterales isolates collected, metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL) were identified in 36.7%, KPC in 25.5%, and OXA-48-like in 24.1%. The predominance of resistance mechanisms among MEM-NS isolates varied by region: MBLs were dominant in isolates collected in Africa and Middle East (AfME, 49%) and Asia/Pacific (59.4%), OXA-48-like carbapenemases were predominant in Europe (30%), and KPC in Latin America (51.9%) and North America (53.6%). NDM ß-lactamases accounted for the majority of MBLs identified (88.4%). Of the 38 carbapenemase variants identified, NDM-1 (68.7%), KPC-2 (54.6%), OXA-48 (54.3%), and VIM-1 (76.1%) were the common variants within their respective families. Among the MEM-NS isolates, 7.9% co-carried two carbapenemases. Notably, the proportion of MEM-NS Enterobacterales increased from 4.9% in 2018 to 6.4% in 2019. The results of this study show a continuation of the trend of increasing carbapenem-resistance within clinical Enterobacterales with mechanisms of resistance varying across different regions. The existential threat to public health posed by the continued spread of nearly untreatable pathogens requires a multifaceted approach to prevent the collapse of modern medicine.

Determination of MIC Quality Control Ranges for Ceftibuten-Avibactam (Fixed 4 µg/mL), a Novel ß-Lactam/ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination.

Ceftibuten/ARX-1796 (avibactam prodrug) is a novel oral antibacterial combination in early clinical development for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pyelonephritis. ARX-1796 is the novel avibactam prodrug being combined with ceftibuten for oral dosing that is converted to active avibactam in vivo. A Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M23 (2018) tier 2 broth microdilution quality control (QC) study was conducted with ceftibuten-avibactam to establish MIC QC ranges. Ceftibuten-avibactam broth microdilution QC ranges were approved for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (0.016/4 to 0.12/4 µg/mL), E. coli NCTC 13353 (0.03/4 to 0.12/4 µg/mL), Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (0.06/4 to 0.25/4 µg/mL), K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705 (0.03/4 to 0.25/4 µg/mL), and K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-2814 (0.12/4 to 0.5/4 µg/mL) by the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in January 2022. Approved ceftibuten-avibactam QC ranges will support future clinical development, device manufacturers, and routine patient care.

Incidence of ESBLs and carbapenemases among Enterobacterales and carbapenemases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected globally: results from ATLAS 2017-2019.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the global and regional distribution of ESBLs in Enterobacterales and carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected from ATLAS (2017-2019) was determined per CLSI guidelines. Enterobacterales exhibiting meropenem MICs ≥2 mg/L and/or ceftazidime/avibactam and/or aztreonam/avibactam MICs ≥16 mg/L, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with aztreonam and/or ceftazidime MICs ≥2 mg/L, and P. aeruginosa with meropenem MICs ≥4 mg/L were screened for ß-lactamases by PCR and sequencing. RESULTS: Globally, ESBL-positive E. coli (23.7%, 4750/20047) and K. pneumoniae (35.1%, 6055/17229) carried predominantly the CTX-M-15 variant (E. coli: 53.9%; K. pneumoniae: 80.0%) with highest incidence in Africa/Middle East (AfME). Among carbapenem-resistant (CR) E. coli (1.1%, 217/20047) and Enterobacter cloacae (3.8%, 259/6866), NDMs were predominant (E. coli in AfME: 62.5%; E. cloacae in Asia Pacific: 59.7%). CR K. pneumoniae (13.3%, 2299/17 229) and P. aeruginosa (20.3%, 4187/20 643) carried predominantly KPC (30.9%) and VIM (14.7%), respectively, with highest frequency in Latin America. Among ESBL-positive Enterobacterales, susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (>90.0%) and amikacin (>85.0%) was higher than to piperacillin/tazobactam (>45.0%) and ciprofloxacin (>7.4%). In CR Enterobacterales, susceptibility to amikacin (>54.0%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (>31.0%) was higher than to ciprofloxacin (>2.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (>0.5%). CR P. aeruginosa similarly demonstrated higher susceptibility to amikacin (63.4%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (61.9%) than to ciprofloxacin (26.2%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (25.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Varied distribution of resistance genotypes across regions among ESBL-positive Enterobacterales and CR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa provide crucial insights on major resistance mechanisms and trends observed in recent years. Continued surveillance is warranted for monitoring global dissemination and resistance.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro.

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the ß-lactamase harboured. ß-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other ß-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: microbiology from clinical studies, and development of resistance during treatment.

As one of a series of thematically linked reviews of the primary pharmacology of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime/avibactam, this article reviews the microbiological findings in drug-exposed patients. Earlier articles in the series focused on basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52) and the development and mechanisms of resistance in vitro (J Antimicrob Chemother 2023: Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac449). In clinical trials of ceftazidime/avibactam, combined favourable microbiological responses for evaluable patients infected at baseline by susceptible Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 86.1% (851/988). The corresponding percent favourable among patients infected by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant pathogens was 58.8% (10/17), noting that the majority (15/17) of the resistant examples were P. aeruginosa. Microbiological response rates to comparator treatments in the same clinical trials ranged between 64% and 95%, depending on the type of infection and the analysis population. Uncontrolled case studies over a wide range of patients infected by antibiotic multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria have demonstrated that ceftazidime/avibactam can elicit microbiological clearance of ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible strains. In case studies where a matched cohort of patients had been treated with antibacterial agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam, microbiological outcomes were comparable between treatments, mostly being observationally more favourable for ceftazidime/avibactam (recognizing that numbers were too small for definitive superiority assessments). Development of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam during therapy is reviewed. The phenomenon has been reported multiple times, mostly in difficult-to-treat patients infected by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Molecular mechanisms, when determined, have frequently been observed previously in vitro, such as the 'Ω-loop' D179Y (Asp179Tyr) substitution found in KPC variant enzymes. In human volunteers exposed to therapeutic levels of ceftazidime/avibactam, faecal numbers of Escherichia coli, other enterobacteria, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, clostridia and Bacteroides spp. decreased. Clostridioides difficile was detected in the faeces, but this was of uncertain significance, because no unexposed controls were studied.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme.

OBJECTIVES: This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety in patients with infections caused by ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens across five Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicentre trials of ceftazidime/avibactam in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/pyelonephritis and nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: In each trial, RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3 (cIAI), REPRISE (cIAI/cUTI), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (NP, including VAP) patients were randomized 1:1 to IV ceftazidime/avibactam (plus metronidazole for patients with cIAI) or comparators (carbapenems in >97% patients) for 5-21 days. Clinical and microbiological responses at the test-of-cure visit were assessed for patients with ESBLs, and/or plasmidic and/or overexpression of chromosomal AmpC, and/or serine carbapenemases without MBLs identified in baseline Gram-negative isolates by phenotypic screening and molecular characterization in the pooled microbiological modified ITT (mMITT) population. RESULTS: In total, 813 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 389; comparator, n = 424) had ≥1 ß-lactamase-producing baseline pathogen identified, amongst whom 792 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 379; comparator, n = 413) had no MBLs. The most frequent ß-lactamase-producing pathogens across treatment groups were Escherichia coli (n = 381), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 261) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 53). Clinical cure rates in the pooled non-MBL ß-lactamase-producing mMITT population were 88.1% (334/379) for ceftazidime/avibactam and 88.1% (364/413) for comparators; favourable microbiological response rates were 76.5% (290/379) and 68.8% (284/413), respectively. The safety profile of ceftazidime/avibactam was consistent with previous observations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides supportive evidence of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ESBLs, AmpC and serine carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01499290; NCT01726023; NCT01644643; NCT01595438/NCT01599806; NCT01808092.

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparators against Pathogens Harboring OXA-48 and AmpC Alone or in Combination with Other ß-Lactamases Collected from Phase 3 Clinical Trials and an International Surveillance Program.

In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and key comparators against AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from four Phase 3 clinical trials and against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales with multiple resistance mechanisms from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program were evaluated. Susceptibility to CAZ-AVI and comparators was determined by reference broth microdilution methods. Clinical response at test of cure (TOC) was assessed in patients from Phase 3 trials with baseline OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales or AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa treated with CAZ-AVI or comparators. Against 77 AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolates from Phase 3 trials, meropenem-vaborbactam (98.7% susceptible [S]), CAZ-AVI (96.1% S), and meropenem (96.1% S) had similar in vitro activity and were more active than ceftolozane-tazobactam (24.7% S). Clinical cure rates in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales were 80.7% (n = 21/26) and 85.0% (n = 17/20) for CAZ-AVI and comparators. Against 53 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa isolates from Phase 3 trials, CAZ-AVI (73.6% S) was more active in vitro than ceftolozane-tazobactam (58.5% S) and meropenem (37.7% S). Clinical cure rates in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa were 85.7% (n = 12/14) and 75.0% (n = 9/12) for CAZ-AVI and comparators, respectively. Of 113 OXA-48-producing isolates from the ATLAS program, 99.1% were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. Four patients with baseline OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates treated with CAZ-AVI in Phase 3 trials were clinical cures at TOC and had favorable microbiological response. CAZ-AVI was among the most active agents against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and had greater in vitro activity against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales than meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other comparators.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology.

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established ß-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent ß-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2341-52).

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vivo translational biology and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD).

This review describes the translational in vivo and non-clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) research that supported clinical trialling and subsequently licensing approval of ceftazidime/avibactam, a new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination aimed at the treatment of infections by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The review thematically follows on from the co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40). Avibactam protected ceftazidime in animal models of infection with ceftazidime-resistant, ß-lactamase-producing bacteria. For example, a single subcutaneous dose of ceftazidime at 1024 mg/kg yielded little effect on the growth of ceftazidime-resistant, blaKPC-2-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae in the thighs of neutropenic mice (final counts of 4 × 108 to 8 × 108 cfu/thigh). In contrast, co-administration of avibactam in a 4:1 ratio (ceftazidime:avibactam) was bactericidal in the same model (final counts of 2 × 104 to 3 × 104 cfu/thigh). In a rat abdominal abscess model, therapy with ceftazidime or ceftazidime/avibactam (4:1 w/w) against blaKPC-2-positive K. pneumoniae resulted in 9.3 versus 3.3 log cfu/abscess, respectively, after 52 h. With respect to PK/PD, in Monte Carlo simulations, attainment of unbound drug exposure targets (ceftazidime fT>8 mg/L and avibactam fT>1 mg/L, each for 50% of the dosing interval) for the labelled dose of ceftazidime/avibactam (2 and 0.5 g, respectively, q8h by 2 h IV infusion), including dose adjustments for patients with impaired renal function, ranged between 94.8% and 99.6% of patients, depending on the infection modelled.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against levofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli collected from four geographic regions, 2012-2018.

BACKGROUND: Increases in resistance to fluoroquinolones have been correlated with the use of levofloxacin in the treatment of infections caused by Escherichia coli. The analysis presents the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against 10,840 levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates collected from four geographic regions (Africa/Middle East, Europe, Asia/South Pacific, Latin America) between 2012 and 2018. METHODS: Non-duplicate clinical isolates of E. coli were collected from participating centres and shipped to IHMA, Inc., (Schaumburg, IL, USA). Susceptibility testing was performed with frozen broth microdilution panels manufactured by IHMA, according to CLSI guidelines. Levofloxacin-resistance was defined at a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥ 2 mg/L. Isolates collected between 2012 and 2015 were tested for extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) activity by determining susceptibility to cefotaxime, cefotaxime-clavulanate, ceftazidime, and ceftazidime-clavulanate as recommended by CLSI guidelines. Isolates collected between 2016 and 2018 were identified as ESBL-positive by genotype using multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays. RESULTS: A total of 74.8% of levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates in the analysis were from three culture sources: urinary tract infections (N = 3229; 29.8%), skin and skin structure infections (N = 2564; 23.7%) and intra-abdominal infections (N = 2313; 21.3%). Susceptibility rates to ceftazidime-avibactam were consistently high in all regions against both ESBL-positive (97.0% in Asia/South Pacific to 99.7% in Africa/Middle East and Latin America) and ESBL-negative isolates (99.4% in Asia/South Pacific to 100% in Latin America). Susceptibility was also high in each region among ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative isolates to colistin (≥ 98.5%), imipenem (≥ 96.5%), meropenem (≥ 96.5%) and tigecycline (≥ 94.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam among levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates, including ESBL-positive isolates, collected from four geographical regions between 2012 and 2018 was consistently high. Susceptibility to the comparator agents colistin, tigecycline, imipenem and meropenem was also high.

Sex differences in gene expression in response to ischemia in the human left ventricular myocardium.

Sex differences exist in the prevalence, presentation and outcomes of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Females have higher risk of heart failure post-myocardial infarction relative to males and are two to three times more likely to die after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. We examined sex differences in human myocardial gene expression in response to ischemia. Left ventricular biopsies from 68 male/46 female patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery were obtained at baseline and after a median 74 min of cold cardioplegic arrest/ischemia. Transcriptomes were quantified by RNA-sequencing. Cell-type enrichment analysis was used to estimate the identity and relative proportions of different cell types in each sample. A sex-specific response to ischemia was observed for 271 genes. Notably, the expression FAM5C, PLA2G4E and CYP1A1 showed an increased expression in females compared to males due to ischemia and DIO3, MT1G and CMA1 showed a decreased expression in females compared to males due to ischemia. Functional annotation analysis revealed sex-specific modulation of the oxytocin signaling pathway and common pathway of fibrin clot formation. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis identified variant-by-sex interaction eQTLs, indicative of sex differences in the genotypic effects on gene expression. Cell-type enrichment analysis showed sex-bias in proportion of specific cell types. Common lymphoid progenitor cells and M2 macrophages were found to increase in female samples from pre- to post-ischemia, but no change was observed in male samples. These differences in response to myocardial ischemia provide insight into the sexual dimorphism of IHD and may aid in the development of sex-specific therapies that reduce myocardial injury.

Epidemiology of Carbapenem Resistance Determinants Identified in Meropenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales Collected as Part of a Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2017.

To estimate the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), a global collection of 81,781 surveillance isolates of Enterobacterales collected from patients in 39 countries in five geographic regions from 2012 to 2017 was studied. Overall, 3.3% of isolates were meropenem-nonsusceptible (MIC ≥2 µg/ml), ranging from 1.4% (North America) to 5.3% (Latin America) of isolates by region. Klebsiella pneumoniae accounted for the largest number of meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (76.7%). The majority of meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales carried KPC-type carbapenemases (47.4%), metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs; 20.6%) or OXA-48-like ß-lactamases (19.0%). Forty-three carbapenemase sequence variants (8 KPC-type, 4 GES-type, 7 OXA-48-like, 5 NDM-type, 7 IMP-type, and 12 VIM-type) were detected, with KPC-2, KPC-3, OXA-48, NDM-1, IMP-4, and VIM-1 identified as the most common variants of each carbapenemase type. The resistance mechanisms responsible for meropenem-nonsusceptibility varied by region. A total of 67.3% of all carbapenemase-positive isolates identified carried at least one additional plasmid-mediated or intrinsic chromosomally encoded extended-spectrum ß-lactamase, AmpC ß-lactamase, or carbapenemase. The overall percentage of meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales increased from 2.7% in 2012 to 2014 to 3.8% in 2015 to 2017. This increase could be attributed to the increasing proportion of carbapenemase-positive isolates that was observed, most notably among isolates carrying NDM-type MBLs in Asia/South Pacific, Europe, and Latin America; OXA-48-like carbapenemases in Europe, Middle East/Africa, and Asia/South Pacific; VIM-type MBLs in Europe; and KPC-type carbapenemases in Latin America. Ongoing CRE surveillance combined with a global antimicrobial stewardship strategy, sensitive clinical laboratory detection methods, and adherence to infection control practices will be needed to interrupt the spread of CRE.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Isolates from Respiratory and Blood Specimens from Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia, Including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), is increasingly associated with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study describes the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime, and relevant comparator agents against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with NP, including VAP, enrolled in a ceftazidime-avibactam phase 3 trial. Gram-positive pathogens were included if coisolated with a Gram-negative pathogen. In vitro susceptibility was determined at a central laboratory using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods. Of 817 randomized patients, 457 (55.9%) had ≥1 Gram-negative bacterial pathogen(s) isolated at baseline, and 149 (18.2%) had ≥1 Gram-positive pathogen(s) coisolated. The most common isolated pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.8%), and Staphylococcus aureus (11.5%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was highly active in vitro against 370 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, with 98.6% susceptible (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml) compared with 73.2% susceptible for ceftazidime (MIC90, >64 µg/ml). The percent susceptibility values for ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftazidime against 129 P. aeruginosa isolates were 88.4% and 72.9% (MIC90 values of 16 µg/ml and 64 µg/ml), respectively. Among ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Gram-negative isolates, ceftazidime-avibactam percent susceptibility values were 94.9% for 99 Enterobacteriaceae and 60.0% for 35 P. aeruginosa MIC90 values for linezolid and vancomycin (permitted per protocol for Gram-positive coverage) were within their respective MIC susceptibility breakpoints against the Gram-positive pathogens isolated. This analysis demonstrates that ceftazidime-avibactam was active in vitro against the majority of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolates from patients with NP, including VAP, in a phase 3 trial. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01808092.).

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates collected from Latin American centres between 2015 and 2017.

OBJECTIVES: We report the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators against 7729 Enterobacterales isolates and 2053 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from six Latin American countries between 2015 and 2017. METHODS: A central reference laboratory performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution panels according to CLSI guidelines. The presence of ß-lactamases was confirmed using multiplex PCR assays. RESULTS: Susceptibility rates among Enterobacterales were highest for ceftazidime/avibactam (99.3%, MIC90 = 0.5 mg/L), meropenem (95.4%, MIC90 = 0.12 mg/L) and amikacin (93.5%, MIC90 = 8 mg/L). High susceptibility rates were observed for ceftazidime/avibactam in all six countries. The majority of carbapenemase-positive isolates among Enterobacterales (N = 366, 4.7%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (86.9%), colistin (76.8%) and amikacin (60.9%); MBL-positive isolates (N = 49, 0.6%) were susceptible only to colistin (79.6%), with a minority susceptible to amikacin (49.0%), aztreonam and levofloxacin (both 30.6%). Highest rates of susceptibility among P. aeruginosa isolates were for colistin (99.2%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (86.6%), with rates of susceptibility to all other agents being <80.0%. MDR P. aeruginosa isolates (N = 712, 34.7%) had a high rate of susceptibility to colistin (98.9%); the rate of susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam was 61.4% and <50.0% to all other comparator agents. A total of 235 (11.4%) isolates of P. aeruginosa were carbapenemase positive and 148 (7.2%) were MBL positive; both subsets had high rates of susceptibility to colistin (98.3% and 100%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility rates in Latin American countries are stable and high; ceftazidime/avibactam can be an appropriate treatment for patients with infections caused by Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa and for whom treatment options may be limited.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against isolates of carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae collected during the INFORM global surveillance programme (2015-17).

OBJECTIVES: To report data for ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators against meropenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae collected globally (excluding centres in the USA) from 2015 to 2017 as part of the International Network For Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) surveillance programme. METHODS: MICs and susceptibility were determined using EUCAST broth microdilution methodology and EUCAST breakpoints. Isolates were screened to detect genes encoding ß-lactamases using multiplex PCR assays. MBL-positive isolates were those in which one or more of the IMP, VIM and/or NDM genes were detected. RESULTS: A total of 1460 meropenem-non-susceptible isolates were collected and, of the agents on the panel, susceptibility was highest to ceftazidime/avibactam, colistin and tigecycline [73.0%, 77.0% (1081/1403) and 78.1%, respectively]. Ceftazidime/avibactam was not active against MBL-positive isolates (n=367); these isolates showed the highest rates of susceptibility to colistin (92.1%, 303/329), tigecycline (71.9%) and amikacin (46.6%). A total of 394 isolates were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and, of the 369 isolates that were screened, 98.4% were found to carry a gene encoding an MBL enzyme. Among isolates that were identified as carbapenemase positive and MBL negative (n=910), susceptibility was highest to ceftazidime/avibactam (99.8%). Susceptibility was also highest to ceftazidime/avibactam among isolates that were carbapenemase negative and MBL negative (94/98, 95.9%). CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight the need for continued surveillance of antimicrobial activity as well as the need for new antimicrobials to treat infections caused by meropenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae, for which the options are extremely limited.

Longitudinal analysis of ESBL and carbapenemase carriage among Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected in Europe as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance programme, 2013-17.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the spread of ESBLs and carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Europe. METHODS: 45 335 Gram-negative bacilli were collected in 18 European countries as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance programme from 2013 to 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using broth microdilution, and 9546 isolates were screened for ß-lactamase genes by PCR and sequencing. RESULTS: ESBLs were identified in 35.5% of Klebsiella pneumoniae and 18.5% of Escherichia coli. ESBL carriage was lowest among isolates in Northern/Western Europe and highest in Eastern Europe. CTX-M-15 was the dominant ESBL in all countries except Greece, where SHV-type ESBLs were more common. Carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-48-like, GES, NDM and VIM) were found in 3.4% of Enterobacterales and were most common among K. pneumoniae (10.5% of those collected). Carbapenemase carriage was lowest in Northern/Western and highest in Southern Europe. KPC-positive Enterobacterales were most abundant but the percentages of OXA-48-like-, NDM- and VIM-positive isolates increased over time and were correlated with an increase in meropenem non-susceptibility. Carbapenemases (VIM, IMP, NDM and GES) were also identified in 5.1% of P. aeruginosa and were commonly found in Eastern Europe. Carbapenemase carriage and meropenem non-susceptibility among P. aeruginosa fluctuated over the 5 years studied and were not well correlated. CONCLUSIONS: ESBL and carbapenemase carriage varied by species and European subregion. Meropenem non-susceptibility in European isolates of Enterobacterales can be attributed to carbapenemase carriage and is increasingly caused by MBLs and OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Carbapenemases or other ß-lactamases are not a common cause of meropenem non-susceptibility in P. aeruginosa in Europe.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates collected in the Asia-Pacific region as part of the INFORM program (2015-2017).

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial Gram-negative pathogens is a cause for concern in the Asia-Pacific region. The aims of this study were to measure the rates of resistance among clinical isolates collected in Asia-Pacific countries, and to determine the in vitro antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against these isolates. METHODS: CLSI broth microdilution methodology was used to determine antimicrobial activity and EUCAST breakpoints version 9.0 were used to determine rates of susceptibility and resistance. Isolates were also screened for the genes encoding extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) or carbapenemases (including metallo-ß-lactamases [MBLs]). RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, this study collected a total of 7051 Enterobacterales isolates and 2032 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from hospitalized patients in Australia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Thailand. In the Asia-Pacific region, Enterobacterales isolates that were ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative (17.9%) were more frequently identified than isolates that were carbapenemase-positive, MBL-negative (0.7%) or carbapenemase-positive, MBL-positive (1.7%). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of P. aeruginosa were more commonly identified (23.4%) than isolates that were ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative (0.4%), or carbapenemase-positive, MBL-negative (0.3%), or carbapenemase-positive, MBL-positive (3.7%). More than 90% of all Enterobacterales isolates, including the ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative subset and the carbapenemase-positive, MBL-negative subset, were susceptible to amikacin and ceftazidime-avibactam. Among the carbapenemase-positive, MBL-positive subset of Enterobacterales, susceptibility to the majority of agents was reduced, with the exception of colistin (93.4%). Tigecycline was active against all resistant subsets of the Enterobacterales (MIC90, 1-4 mg/L) and among Escherichia coli isolates, > 90% from each resistant subset were susceptible to tigecycline. More than 99% of all P. aeruginosa isolates, including MDR isolates and the carbapenemase-positive, MBL-positive subset, were susceptible to colistin. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, amikacin, ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin and tigecycline appear to be potential treatment options for infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens in the Asia-Pacific region.

The Public's Perception of the Severity and Global Impact at the Start of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Crowdsourcing-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a rapidly developing threat to most people in the United States and abroad. The behaviors of the public are important to understand, as they may have a tremendous impact on the course of this novel coronavirus pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study intends to assess the US population's perception and knowledge of the virus as a threat and the behaviors of the general population in response. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with random volunteers recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, an internet crowdsourcing service, on March 24, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 969 participants met the inclusion criteria. It was found that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly differed between age groups (P<.001) and men and women (P<.001). A majority of study participants were actively adhering to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Though many participants identified COVID-19 as a threat, many failed to place themselves appropriately in the correct categories with respect to risk. This may indicate a need for additional public education for appropriately defining the risk of this novel pandemic.