The Development and Evaluation of an Educational Video for Breast Cancer Patients Requiring Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.

Patient education and informed consent are required prior to adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for early breast cancer (EBC), and include the role, rationale, potential toxicities and practicalities of the treatment process. Current education of patients about RT is verbal, in the form of a consultation by a radiation oncologist, often supplemented with print or online materials. This approach is limited by its doctor-dependency and non-standardised nature. Video education is being recognised increasingly as an opportunity to remediate this and appeal to patients' preference for visual learning. The purpose of this study was to design and produce a video as an educational adjunct for EBC patients' viewing prior to adjuvant RT, and to evaluate its acceptability through content analysis of three online focus group discussions, among ten participants with EBC requiring RT. After qualitative content analysis of the focus group transcripts, data were summarised into three main categories: (1) understanding of RT, (2) ease of engagement with the video and (3) anxiety and preparedness for RT. The 18-min video was positively received by all participants, and discussion feedback was used to inform improvements to the video. This focus group study demonstrated that the video was well understood, informative and acceptable to EBC patients in preparing them for RT. The effectiveness of the video in improving knowledge and alleviating distress in preparation for therapy will be further evaluated in an ethics-approved biphasic quasi-experimental study.

Impact of the EndoPredict genomic assay on treatment decisions for oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer patients: benefits of physician selective testing.

PURPOSE: Genomic tests improve accuracy of risk prediction for early breast cancers but these are expensive. This study evaluated the clinical utility of EndoPredict®, in terms of impact on adjuvant therapy recommendations and identification of parameters to guide selective application. METHODS: Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, and early-stage invasive breast cancer were tested with EndoPredict®. Two cohorts were recruited: one consecutively and another at clinical team discretion. Systemic treatment recommendations were recorded before and after EndoPredict® results were revealed to the multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: 233 patients were recruited across five sites: 123 consecutive and 110 at clinical team discretion. In the consecutive cohort 50.6% (62/123) cases were classified high risk of recurrence by EndoPredict®, compared with 62.7% (69/110) in the selective cohort. A change in treatment recommendation was significantly more likely (p < 0.0001) in the selective cohort (43/110, 39.1%) compared to the consecutive group (11/123, 8.9%). The strongest driver of selective recruitment was intermediate grade histology, whilst logistic regression modelling demonstrated that nodal status (p < 0.001), proliferative rate (p = 0.001), and progesterone receptor positivity (p < 0.001) were the strongest discriminators of risk. CONCLUSION: Whilst molecular risk can be predicted by traditional variables in a high proportion of cases, EndoPredict® had a greater impact on treatment decisions in those cases selected for testing at team discretion. This is indicative of the robust ability of the clinical team to identify cases most likely to benefit from testing, underscoring the value of genomic tests in the oncologists' tool kit.

Diagnosis and management of phyllodes tumours for the surgeon: An algorithm.

A Phyllodes Tumour (PT) is an uncommon fibroepithelial lesion, with three histological grades - benign, borderline and malignant. PTs cause significant challenges in diagnosis, management and prognostication. Recent publications have clarified the definitions and prognostication of PTs. Contemporary data currently challenge international guidelines on PT management. We performed an in-depth literature review to develop a best-practice management algorithm for PTs. Diagnostic recommendations are that neither current imaging techniques, nor fine-needle biopsies, can reliably diagnose a PT. Core needle biopsy is the optimal diagnostic technique. Indeterminate or suspicious lesions are recommended to undergo an excisional biopsy due to the inherently heterogeneous nature of PTs. Management guidelines are that benign PTs should be completely excised, although an involved margin is acceptable in select situations. Borderline PTs should have a clear margin on excision due to their higher risk of recurrence, as well as the potential for a recurrence to progress to a malignant PT. In malignant PTs, a margin of 3 mm is acceptable as there is no reduction in recurrence risk if margins are >3 mm. Routine axillary surgery is not indicated in PTs, with axillary surgery only indicated in a histologically-confirmed positive axilla. Adjuvant treatment recommendations are that borderline and malignant PTs should be discussed at MDT, with radiotherapy considered in both. Chemotherapy should be discussed in malignant PT patients. In summary, we have developed an up-to-date simple algorithm to guide the surgeon's management of patients diagnosed with PTs and reduce excessive surgery.

Patient education using virtual reality increases knowledge and positive experience for breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Improved access to technology in the radiation therapy (RT) workforce education has resulted in opportunities for innovative patient education methods. This study investigated the impact of a newly developed education tool using the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system on patients' RT knowledge and anxiety. METHOD: Breast cancer patients were recruited into a control group (CG) (n = 18) who underwent the standard pre-RT education package at a targeted cancer therapy centre, followed by a VERT group (VG) (n = 19). VG patients attended a VERT-based education session detailing RT immobilisation, planning and treatment. All patients completed questionnaires at four time points throughout their treatment, with survey sub-sections on RT knowledge, experience and anxiety. RESULTS: For both groups, anxiety levels were highest at time point 1(T1 after initial radiation oncologist consultation) (CG, 41.2; VG, 43.1), with a gradual decrease observed thereafter at time points before simulation, at the beginning of treatment and at the end of treatment (p > 0.05). The VG's RT knowledge scores were statistically significantly higher than those of the CG scores at all time points following VERT education (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study reports the high value of VERT breast cancer-targeted education programs in improving RT knowledge and perhaps decreasing patient anxiety. Continued efforts are required to improve patients' accessibility to VERT in Australia, and to better understand the effect of VERT's unique educational features on patients' emotional and physical needs throughout their RT.

Breast Cancer Patients' Perceptions of a Virtual Learning Environment for Pretreatment Education.

The process and technicalities of radiation therapy (RT) for cancer treatment can be challenging for patients to understand as RT involves complex procedures, highly specialised equipment, and radiation itself has limited sensory characteristics. Hence, it is imperative that education programs are specifically planned and developed to suit the needs of patients, address radiation as an entity and include salient visual aids. In this context, the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system, primarily created for RT practitioner simulation, may provide unique opportunities for patient education. This article reports on patient feedback of a newly developed breast cancer patient education program, which integrates the VERT system as the focal education tool. The education program content included RT immobilisation, simulation, planning and treatment components, along with an introduction to the VERT system. Nineteen breast cancer patients (n = 19) completed an evaluation questionnaire at the completion of their VERT education program. Open-ended questions were used to detect the least and most useful aspects of the education session. Patient feedback indicated a high regard for the comprehensiveness of the education program, with particular acknowledgement of the three dimensional visual features of the VERT system. It is proposed that VERT's high visual impact should be exploited in tailored patient education programs in order to obtain maximum patient engagement and make significant gains in effective knowledge transfer.

Long-term outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: To summarize data on long-term ipsilateral local recurrence (LR) and breast cancer death rate (BCDR) for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who received different treatments. METHODS: Systematic review and study-level meta-analysis of prospective (n = 5) and retrospective (n = 21) studies of patients with pure DCIS and with median or mean follow-up time of ≥10 years. Meta-regression was performed to assess and adjust for effects of potential confounders - the average age of women, period of initial treatment, and of bias - follow-up duration on recurrence- and death-rates in each treatment group. LR and BCDR rates by local treatment used were reported. Outside of randomized trials, remaining studies were likely to have tailored patient treatment according to the clinical situation. RESULTS: Nine thousand four hundred and four DCIS cases in 9391 patients with 10-year follow-up were included. The adjusted meta-regression LR rate for mastectomy was 2.6 % (95 % CI, 0.8-4.5); breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy (RT), 13.6 % (95 % CI, 9.8-17.4); breast-conserving surgery without RT, 25.5 % (95 % CI, 18.1-32.9); and biopsy-only (residual predominately low-grade DCIS following inadequate excision), 27.8 % (95 % CI, 8.4-47.1). RT + tamoxifen (TAM) in conservation surgery (CS) patients resulted in lower LR compared to one or no adjuvant treatments: LR rate for CS + RT + TAM, 9.7 %; CS + RT(no TAM), 14.1 %; CS + TAM(no RT), 24.7 %; CS(alone), 25.1 % (linear trend for treatment P < 0.0001). Compared to CS + RT + TAM, a significantly higher invasive LR was observed for CS(alone), odds ratio (OR) 2.61 (P < 0.0001); CS + TAM(no RT), OR 2.52 (P = 0.001); CS + RT(no TAM), OR 1.59 (P = 0.022). BCDR was similar for mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery with or without RT (1.3-2.0 %) and non-significantly higher for biopsy-only (2.7 %). Additionally, the 15-year follow-up was reported where all like-studies had ≥ 15-year data sets; the biopsy-only patients had a meta-analysed total LR rate of 40.2 % and the invasive LR rate was 28.1 %. The biopsy-only patients had a ≥ 15-year BCDR (that included women with metastatic disease) of 17.9 %; the ≥ 15-year BCDR was 55.2 % for those with invasive LR. CONCLUSIONS: More local intervention was associated with greater local control for patients with DCIS at long-term follow-up. For patients undergoing breast-conservation, invasive LR was significantly lower when two rather than one adjuvant treatment modalities were given.

DIBH reduces right coronary artery and lung radiation dose in right breast cancer loco-regional radiotherapy.

To determine whether deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) reduces dose to organs-at-risk (OAR), in particular the right coronary artery (RCA), in women with breast cancer requiring right-sided post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) including internal mammary chain (+IMC) radiotherapy (RT). Fourteen consecutive women requiring right-sided PMRT + IMC were retrospectively identified. Nodal delineation was in accordance with European Society for Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) guidelines and tangential chest wall fields marked. Patients were planned with Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm using free-breathing (FB) and DIBH datasets. Dose was calculated using Acuros External Beam algorithm. FB and DIBH dose comparisons were analyzed for heart, RCA and right lung, as were chest wall and IMC planning target volumes (PTVs). DIBH vs FB resulted in median decreases of: the RCA mean dose by 0.6Gray (Gy) (interquartile range (IQR) 0.1, 1.9) (p = 0.002), RCA max dose by 1.8Gy (IQR 0.8, 6.1) (p = 0.002), and V5Gy by 2.9% (IQR 0.0, 37.2) (p = 0.016). RCA data indicated no statistically significant dosimetric reduction ≥10Gy. A median reduction of 1.7Gy (c -0.0, 7.1) (p = 0.019) in maximum heart dose was recorded with DIBH vs FB; no significant difference was observed in other heart and left anterior descending coronary artery parameters. The median reduction in right lung mean dose was 2.8Gy for DIBH vs FB plans (IQR 1.6, 3.6) (p = 0.001); significant median reductions of V5Gy, V20Gy, and V30Gy were all achieved with DIBH. Chest wall PTV coverage did not significantly differ between DIBH and FB plans; IMC dosimetric coverage improved with use of DIBH (V47.5Gy, V45Gy, V42Gy). DIBH reduced OAR dose in right-sided PMRT + IMC patients. A novel finding was that DIBH decreased RCA dose. Heart and right lung dose were also decreased with DIBH, whilst optimally dosed PTVs were maintained.

Quantification of breast lymphoedema following conservative breast cancer treatment: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Breast lymphoedema is a possible side effect of breast conserving surgery, but it is poorly understood. This is due, in part, to difficulty assessing the breast. This systematic review described outcome measures that quantify breast lymphoedema signs and symptoms and evaluated the measurement properties for these outcome measures. METHOD: Seven databases were searched using terms in four categories: breast cancer, lymphoedema and oedema, clinician reported (ClinROM) and patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and psychometric and measurement properties. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies and completed quality assessments. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology was used for studies including measurement property evidence. RESULTS: Fifty-six papers were included with thirteen questionnaires, eight patient-reported rating scales, seven physical measures, seven clinician-rating scales and four imaging techniques used to quantify breast lymphoedema. Based on COSMIN methodology, one ClinROM had sufficient reliability, ultrasound measuring dermal thickness. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measuring local tissue water had promising reliability. Four questionnaires had sufficient content validity (BLYSS, BLSQ, BrEQ and LYMQOL-Breast). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is recommended to reliably assess breast lymphoedema signs. No PROM can be recommended with confidence, but BLYSS, BLSQ, BrEQ and LYMQOL-Breast are promising. Further research is recommended to improve evidence of measurement properties for outcome measures. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There are many approaches to assess breast lymphoedema, but currently, only ultrasound can be recommended for use, with others, such as TDC and questionnaires, showing promise. Further research is required for all approaches to improve evidence of measurement properties.

Reliability and Measurement Error of Breast Volume Calculation Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.

Background: Breast lymphedema after breast cancer is challenging to quantify. Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging is one available technique to measure breast volume, however, the measurement properties of available software programs have not been fully determined. The aim of this study was to determine equivalency of measurements with two software programs as well as reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change (SDC). Methods and Results: Retrospective three-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) of 100 breasts taken before or after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer were retrieved for reliability analysis. Three assessors followed a standardized measurement technique using two software programs, Vectra® 3D Analysis Module (VAM) and Breast Sculptor®. Mean breast volume was 489.9 ± 206 cc using VAM and 480.1 ± 229.1 cc using Breast Sculptor. Lin's concordance showed poor agreement between programs (0.81-0.88). Measurements using VAM had excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability with SEM = 4.1% for one assessor and 8.7% for multiple assessors. Breast Sculptor also had excellent intra-rater and substantial inter-rater reliability but the SEM was much larger at 14.5% (intra-rater) and 19.1% (inter-rater). The SDC value was lowest for VAM and a single rater with 56 cc indicating a meaningful change beyond measurement error. Conclusion: Breast volume measurements captured with 3D-SI using VECTRA-XT are highly reliable, but the volumes, SEM, and SDC varied between the two software programs. Measurement error was lowest with VAM software. Although the usefulness of VECTRA-XT and VAM software to detect change in breast volume is promising, further solutions to reduce measurement error are required to improve clinical utility to measure breast lymphedema.

Women's views about current and future management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS): A mixed-methods study.

Management of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial, with clinical trials currently assessing the safety of active monitoring amidst concern about overtreatment. Little is known about general community views regarding DCIS and its management. We aimed to explore women's understanding and views about low-risk DCIS and current and potential future management options. This mixed-method study involved qualitative focus groups and brief quantitative questionnaires. Participants were screening-aged (50-74 years) women, with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and no personal history of breast cancer/DCIS, recruited from across metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Sessions incorporated an informative presentation interspersed with group discussions which were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Fifty-six women took part in six age-stratified focus groups. Prior awareness of DCIS was limited, however women developed reasonable understanding of DCIS and the relevant issues. Overall, women expressed substantial support for active monitoring being offered as a management approach for low-risk DCIS, and many were interested in participating in a hypothetical clinical trial. Although some women expressed concern that current management may sometimes represent overtreatment, there were mixed views about personally accepting monitoring. Women noted a number of important questions and considerations that would factor into their decision making. Our findings about women's perceptions of active monitoring for DCIS are timely while results of ongoing clinical trials of monitoring are awaited, and may inform clinicians and investigators designing future, similar trials. Exploration of offering well-informed patients the choice of non-surgical management of low-risk DCIS, even outside a clinical trial setting, may be warranted.

Verification using in vivo optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry of the predicted skin surface dose in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether dose to the skin surface underneath bolus, was accurately predicted by a 3D treatment planning system (TPS) in patients receiving 50 Gy/25# postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) using optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry (OSLD) for verification. In vivo dosimetry using OSLDs was performed in 20 consecutive patients receiving PMRT. An array of 9 OSLDs were applied to the chest wall or neobreast in a grid arrangement. Dosimetry data were recorded on 3 separate treatment fractions, averaged, and extrapolated to 25 fractions. On the 3D TPS, the predicted dose was calculated using the departmental planning algorithm at points corresponding to the OSLDs. The mean within patient difference between the planned and measured dose at each of the 9 points was calculated and Bland-Altman limits of agreement used to quantify the extent of agreement. Paired t-tests were used to test for evidence of systematic bias at each point. The coefficient of variation of the 3 OSLD readings per patient at each of the 9 points was low for 8 points (≤4.4%) demonstrating comparable dose received per fraction at these points. The mean ratio between the in vivo measured extrapolated OSLD (IVME OSLD) dose and the planned TPS dose ranged between 0.97 and 0.99 across all points (standard deviation range 0.05 to 0.08). The mean within patient difference between the IVME OSLD and planned TPS was <1 Gy at 7 of the 9 points and the t-test for evidence of systematic bias was significant (p = 0.03) at only 1 of the 9 points. Our commercially available 3D TPS closely predicted PMRT skin surface dose underneath bolus as verified by OSLDs. At all sites, the average ratio of delivered to predicted dose was >0.97 but <1. This practical and feasible OSLD assessment of only 3 of 25 fractions facilitates quality assurance of a TPS in predicting skin surface dose under bolus.

Feasibility of arm-draining lymph node-sparing radiotherapy of breast cancer: A pilot planning study.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphoedema following axillary radiotherapy for breast cancer causes significant morbidity. Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility of sparing the lymph node that drains the arm's lymphatics (ARM node) while achieving standard dose constraints for whole breast and comprehensive lymph node irradiation. METHODS: Six patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT CT to identify the breast sentinel node (SN) and ARM node. The ARM node was contoured on the SPECT CT and deformably registered to the radiotherapy treatment planning CT. Radiotherapy plans (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with VMAT technique were generated, with the aim to spare the ARM node (Mean dose <25 Gy) and achieve adequate coverage to the remaining axilla. The plan required the breast SN site (clip + 10 mm surrounding the clip) to achieve D98% > 47.5 Gy, and axillary nodal CTV excluding ARM node to achieve D90% > 45 Gy. RESULTS: In one patient, the ARM node was within the volume of breast SN site and sparing was not possible. For the remaining 5 patients, an ARM node-sparing plan could be successfully generated; the mean dose to the ARM node ranged from 11.2 to 23.1 Gy (median 13.8 Gy). In these 5 subjects, D90% > 45 Gy of axillary nodal CTV (range, 44.9-48.5 Gy, median 46.2 Gy) and D98% > 47.5 Gy of breast SN site were achieved. CONCLUSION: In this planning study, ARM node-sparing VMAT of the breast and lymph nodes was feasible, while maintaining adequate dosimetric coverage. However, in some individuals, localization of the ARM node in close proximity to breast SN site precluded the generation of an ARM node-sparing treatment plan.

Patient-Specific Heart Constraint: A Tool for Optimization and Evaluation of Mean Heart Dose in Breast Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Our institution introduced a patient-specific heart constraint (PSHC) and a mean heart dose (MHD) constraint of 4 Gy for all patients receiving breast radiation therapy (RT) with a simultaneous boost (SIB). This was introduced as a method to calculate the predicted MHD before optimizing IMRT fields. We sought to determine whether the introduction of a PSHC reduced MHD, while maintaining optimally dosed treatment plans. MATERIAL/METHODS: Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups, pre- and postintroduction of the PSHC. The breast and SIB Planning Target Volumes (PTVs) were prescribed to 50 Gy and 57 Gy, respectively, in 25 fractions. Plans were generated using a hybrid IMRT technique, 30 Gy using an open tangential field arrangement, and 27 Gy using IMRT fields. The PSHC was calculated using MHD of open tangential field × 2. A paired t test compared PTV coverage and heart doses between cohorts (P < .05 significant). RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were included (138 pre-PSHC and 126 post-PSHC) with 137 right-sided and 127 left-sided treatments. MHD was significantly reduced across both right-sided (-0.4 Gy, P < .0001) and left-sided (-1.2 Gy, P < .0001) treatments overall. Left-sided treatments were further examined between free breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). DIBH showed reduction in MHD, although it was not significant (-0.46 Gy, P = .34). Heart V5 Gy showed reduction in right-sided (-1%, P = .002) and left-sided (-9.2%, P < .0001) treatments overall. Left-sided free breathing showed significant reduction (-8.8%, P < .0001), and DIBH also showed significant reduction (-5.1%, P = .0034). Tumor bed doses remained above the 54.15 Gy (95% of 57 Gy) threshold for all plans. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a PSHC can reduce MHD and V5 Gy for patients receiving whole breast RT with SIB while maintaining optimally dosed plans, with the greatest benefit shown for left-sided, free-breathing treatments.

Radiation-induced oesophagitis in breast cancer: Factors influencing onset and severity for patients receiving supraclavicular nodal irradiation.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine dosimetric factors, such as mean dose and oesophageal length, which may influence the incidence and severity of oesophagitis in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy to the supraclavicular nodes. METHODS: This was a single-arm prospective observational study. Toxicity grading was undertaken twice weekly to determine the onset of grade 2 oesophagitis in consecutive patients prescribed IMRT to the breast or chest wall and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) nodes. Recorded variables included mean and maximum doses to the oesophagus, oesophageal length and pharynx length within the treatment area. Multivariate logistic regression and Fishers' exact test were used with a 0.05 significance level to compare the onset of grade 2 oesophagitis with these variables. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in the study. Twenty-four (31%) patients reported grade 2 oesophagitis. There was a higher incidence of grade 2 oesophagitis in patients receiving a mean oesophageal dose of ≥31 Gy compared to those receiving < 31 Gy (18/24 versus 6/24, respectively, P = 0.025). There was a significant difference in the onset of grade 2 toxicity in patients who had ≥ 1 cm of pharynx included in SCF fields compared with those with <1 cm (15/24 versus 9/24, respectively, P = 0.0116). The odds ratios for developing grade 2 oesophagitis were 3.2 (95% CI = 1.05-9.62, P = 0.04) for a mean dose of ≥31 Gy and 3.4 (95% CI = 1.19-9.5, P = 0.022) for ≥1 cm of pharynx in the SCF field. CONCLUSION: By limiting the mean dose to the irradiated oesophagus to <31 Gy during the planning process and ensuring that <1 cm of pharynx is included in the radiation field, oesophageal toxicity may be minimised.

Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about overtreatment, with at least 3 clinical trials underway internationally assessing the safety of active monitoring for low-risk DCIS. This study aimed to understand healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views on the management options for patients with DCIS. METHODS: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the diagnosis and management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis method. RESULTS: Twenty-six HCPs including 10 breast surgeons, 3 breast physicians, 6 radiation oncologists, and 7 breast care nurses participated. There was a strong overall consensus that DCIS requires active treatment. HCPs generally felt uncomfortable recommending active monitoring as a management option for low-risk DCIS as they viewed this as outside current standard care. Overall, HCPs felt that active monitoring was an unproven strategy in need of an evidence base; however, many acknowledged that active monitoring for low-risk DCIS could be appropriate for patients with significant co-morbidities or limited life expectancy. They believed that most patients would opt for surgery wherever possible. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the important need for robust randomised controlled trial data about active monitoring for women with low-risk DCIS, to provide HCPs with confidence in their management recommendations and decision-making.

Contouring consensus guidelines in breast cancer radiotherapy: Comparison and systematic review of patterns of failure.

Adequate coverage of sites harbouring potential microscopic disease is paramount, where the clinical decision has been made to include regional lymph node radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer. This must be achieved in balance with minimising dose to normal tissues. Several international consensus guidelines detailing clinical target volumes (CTVs) are available, but there is currently no agreement as to which is most appropriate for a given clinical situation. Contouring guidelines are beneficial for routine practice and essential for clinical trial quality assurance. The aims of this study were as follows: to provide a single point of comparison of four commonly used contouring guidelines, including one used in a current Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial; and to undertake a systematic review of existing studies which map sites of breast cancer recurrence against contouring guidelines. Two international consensus guidelines (European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) were compared with two clinical trial guidelines (TROG 12.02 PET LABRADOR and the Proton/Photon trial NCT02603341 RADCOMP). Comprehensive literature search for patterns of failure studies was undertaken using Embase and Pubmed. We detail the small but significant differences between the breast consensus guidelines, particularly the supraclavicular (SCF) and internal mammary chain CTVs. Seven series were found mapping recurrence patterns. These results are discussed in the context of the contouring guidelines. Several studies found the SCF CTV is the area at greatest risk of geographical 'miss'. This review will facilitate further discussion about guideline selection and modification, particularly for future clinical trials in Australia and New Zealand.

Location of arm draining lymph node in relation to breast cancer radiotherapy field and target volume.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoedema of the arm following axillary surgery or radiotherapy remains a significant side effect affecting some women after breast cancer treatment. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique used to identify the lymph node draining the arm (ARM node). Our study aim was to examine the location of the ARM nodes in relation to target volumes and treatment fields for breast cancer radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen breast cancer patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy of contralateral arm (left 10, right 8) and SPECT CT scan on a research study. Patient position for the SPECT CT scan approximated the position used for radiotherapy. Using MIM software™, the ARM node for each subject was contoured on the SPECT CT and verified by a nuclear medicine physician. The CT component of the SPECT CT was then transferred to ECLIPSE™ radiotherapy planning software, and the contralateral breast and axilla were contoured on this CT scan according to the ESTRO contouring guideline. Two radiotherapy plans were generated for each subject using standard tangential IMRT technique at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, one treating contralateral breast alone, the other treating contralateral breast and contralateral axilla level 1-4. The ARM node was considered "within the radiotherapy field" if the mean dose received by the ARM node was more than 50% of the prescribed dose: i.e., 25 Gy. RESULTS: One right-sided subject had 2 ARM nodes, all others had 1 ARM node. All ARM nodes (left 10, right 9) were located within level 1 of the axilla. For the subject with 2 ARM nodes, the node that received a higher dose was used for the analysis. The mean dose received by the ARM node in the whole breast radiotherapy plans ranged from 0.8 to 45.5 Gy, with a median of 10.9 Gy. The mean dose received by the ARM node in the whole breast and axilla plans ranged from 43.4 to 52.5 Gy, with a median of 49.3 Gy. In the whole breast radiotherapy plans, only 5 out of 18 ARM nodes were found to be "within radiotherapy field", and only 2 ARM nodes received more than 40 Gy. In the breast and axilla plans, all 18 ARM nodes were "within radiotherapy field" and all received more than 40 Gy. To better visualise the locations of ARM nodes, all left sided ARM nodes were then mapped onto a CT set from one of the left-sided subjects, and all the right sided ARM nodes mapped onto one of the right-sided subjects, and digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) for radiotherapy fields were produced. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the vast majority of ARM nodes (72%) are outside the tangential whole breast radiotherapy fields. In our study, all the ARM nodes were within the axillary radiotherapy fields covering level 1-4 axillary volumes according to the ESTRO contouring guideline, and complete shielding of the humeral head according to the EORTC consensus did not lead to sparing of the ARM nodes. A prospective study is needed to examine the oncological safety of ARM node-sparing axillary radiotherapy and its potential to reduce the risk of arm lymphoedema.

Quality of breast imaging reports falls short of recommended standards.

Initial diagnosis and treatment of women with breast cancer is based on the imaging findings. Anecdotal experience suggests that the quality of breast imaging reports is variable; however, systematic evaluation of the content of reports has not been documented to date. We present an audit of the breast imaging reports of all new breast cancer cases referred to a multidisciplinary breast centre during 2004, based on 244 imaging reports from 253 cases. We focus on the quality of imaging reports from the perspective of completeness, concordance with standards, and provision of information considered relevant to clinical decision-making. The audit shows that many reports do not provide key information, and that there are substantial variations in the quality of reports between breast screening services (as part of a coordinated national programme) and community-based radiology services. About one-quarter of all reports do not provide an imaging diagnosis, and only half of all imaging reports are concordant with standards for structured reporting. The least reported variables were breast density category (reported in 24%), lesion depth (37%), lesion shape (55% for mammography, 39% for ultrasound), and location (59%). The most frequently provided information was mammography lesion type (99.6%), sonographic lesion size (90.4%), and recommendation for further investigation (89%). The vast majority of reports from screening services used structured reporting, and these were more likely to provide the information recommended in standards than were reports from community-based radiologists. This work indicates that the quality (content and completeness) of breast imaging reports, particularly community-based radiology reports, is not in line with standards. The clinical implications of these findings warrant further study.

Life after breast cancer.

This thirteenth article in our series on breast disease explores the many concerns that patients face after completion of their breast cancer treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer is an ordeal for women on a number of levels. Similarly, there are often a multitude of issues and concerns raised after the completion of treatment. Having an awareness of these medical and survivorship issues allows the general practitioner to provide important support to both the patient and her family.

Left-sided breast cancer loco-regional radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-hold: Does volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy reduce heart dose further compared with tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy?

INTRODUCTION: Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy has been associated with an increase in cardiac mortality. This study investigated the potential heart-sparing effect of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). We compared VMAT to tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) in the loco-regional treatment of left-sided breast cancer, including internal mammary nodal irradiation, based on deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB). METHODS: Radiotherapy for 15 patients was re-planned. Four plans were compared: t-IMRT-DIBH; VMAT-DIBH; t-IMRT-FB; VMAT-FB. Prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. T-IMRT plans were generated using tangentially orientated fields. VMAT plans were generated using two partial arcs (average arc 190°). RESULTS: Mean heart dose (MHD) was 5 ± 2.4 Gy, 5.7 ± 1.4 Gy, 9.7 ± 3.3 Gy and 8.1 ± 2.0 Gy for t-IMRT-DIBH, VMAT-DIBH, IMRT-FB and VMAT-FB respectively. The difference in MHD between IMRT-DIBH and VMAT-DIBH was not significant (P = 0.14). VMAT-DIBH significantly spared the volume of heart irradiated to doses of 20 Gy and above (p < 0.05), however, resulted in a significantly higher V5 Gy (P < 0.001), compared to t-IMRT-DIBH. VMAT-DIBH resulted in higher combined lung mean (11 ± 0.8 Gy vs. 8.8 ± 1.1 Gy, P < 0.001) and higher contralateral breast mean dose (5 ± 1 Gy vs. 1.6 ± 1.2 Gy, P < 0.001) compared with t-IMRT-DIBH. CONCLUSIONS: On average, there was no significant difference in MHD between VMAT-DIBH and t-IMRT-DIBH. However, VMAT-DIBH was found to benefit a select group of patients. For patients in whom the MHD was >6.3 Gy with t-IMRT-DIBH, the use of VMAT-DIBH resulted in a benefit in reducing the MHD.