Optimizing perinatal wellbeing in pregnancy with obesity: a clinical trial with a multi-component nutrition intervention for prevention of gestational diabetes and infant growth and neurodevelopment impairment.

Pregnancy complicated by obesity represents an increased risk of unfavorable perinatal outcomes such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, preterm birth, and impaired fetal growth, among others. Obesity is associated with deficiencies of micronutrients, and pregnant women with obesity may have higher needs. The intrauterine environment in pregnancies complicated with obesity is characterized by inflammation and oxidative stress, where maternal nutrition and metabolic status have significant influence and are critical in maternal health and in fetal programming of health in the offspring later in life. Comprehensive lifestyle interventions, including intensive nutrition care, are associated with a lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Routine supplementation during pregnancy includes folic acid and iron; other nutrient supplementation is recommended for high-risk women or women in low-middle income countries. This study is an open label randomized clinical trial of parallel groups (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000052753, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000060194) to evaluate the effect of an intensive nutrition therapy and nutrient supplementation intervention (folic acid, iron, vitamin D, omega 3 fatty acids, myo-inositol and micronutrients) in pregnant women with obesity on the prevention of GDM, other perinatal outcomes, maternal and newborn nutritional status, and infant growth, adiposity, and neurodevelopment compared to usual care. Given the absence of established nutritional guidelines for managing obesity during pregnancy, there is a pressing need to develop and implement new nutritional programs to enhance perinatal outcomes.

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption during Pregnancy and Its Association with Maternal Oxidative Stress Markers.

Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption during gestation may lead to increased oxidative stress (OS) and could affect pregnancy outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the association of UPF consumption during pregnancy with circulating levels of OS markers. Diet was assessed (average of three assessments) in 119 pregnant women enrolled in the OBESO perinatal cohort (Mexico), obtaining quantitative data and the percentage of energy that UPFs (NOVA) contributed to the total diet. Sociodemographic, clinical (pregestational body-mass index and gestational weight gain) and lifestyle data were collected. Maternal circulating levels of OS markers (malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonylation (PC), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC)) were determined at the third trimester of pregnancy. Adjusted linear regression models were performed to analyze the association between UPFs and OS markers. UPFs represented 27.99% of the total energy intake. Women with a lower UPF consumption (<75 percentile°) presented a higher intake of fiber, ω-3, ω-6, and a lower ω-6/3 ratio. Linear regression models showed that UPFs were inversely associated with TAC and MDA. Fiber intake was associated with PC. UPF intake during pregnancy may result in an increase in oxidative stress. When providing nutrition care, limiting or avoiding UPFs may be an intervention strategy that could promote a better antioxidant capacity in the body.

Prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and clinical characteristics in Mexican women with infertility / Prevalencia de hiperprolactinemia y características clínicas en mujeres mexicanas con infertilidad

Abstract Background: Hyperprolactinemia is increased in women with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss; the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia in Mexican women with infertility is unknown. Objective: To know the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and the clinical-biochemical characteristics in Mexican women with infertility. Methods: This cross-sectional study included infertile women attending in a third-level hospital. All women had prolactin determination and a complete hormonal profile. Women with TSH > 2.5 mlU/L or those taking dopaminergic drugs were excluded. The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 869 women were included in the study. The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia was 9.6% (95% CI 7.7-11.7%). Of the 83 women with hyperprolactinemia, 52 (62.2%) had serum prolactin values between 25 and 40, 17 (20.4%) between 41 and 60, and 14 (16.8%) > 60 ng/m. The prevalence of one or more miscarriages in women with hyperprolactinemia versus those without hyperprolactinemia among women with secondary infertility was 19/20 (95%) versus 116/197 (58.9%), respectively, p = 0.002. The prevalence of anovulation and clinical hyperandrogenism was significantly higher in women without hyperprolactinemia. Conclusion: Hyperprolactinemia affects one of ten Mexican women with infertility. Women with hyperprolactinemia and secondary infertility showed a higher frequency of a history of one or more miscarriage.

Resumen Antecedentes: La hiperprolactinemia se incrementa en mujeres con infertilidad y pérdida gestacional recurrente. Se desconoce la prevalencia de hiperprolactinemia en mujeres mexicanas con infertilidad. Objetivo: Conocer la prevalencia de hiperprolactinemia y las características clínico-bioquímicas en mujeres mexicanas con infertilidad. Método: Estudio transversal que incluyó a mujeres con infertilidad en un hospital de tercer nivel. Todas las mujeres tenían determinación de prolactina y perfil hormonal completo. Se excluyeron mujeres con hormona estimulante de la tiroides > 2.5 mUI/l o que tomaban medicamentos dopaminérgicos. Se calculó la prevalencia de hiperprolactinemia con intervalo de confianza al 95% (IC95%). Resultados: En total se incluyeron 869 mujeres. La prevalencia de hiperprolactinemia fue 9.6% (IC95%: 7.7-11.7%). De 83 mujeres con hiperprolactinemia, 52 (62.2%) tenían valores de prolactina entre 25-40, 17 (20.4%) entre 41-60 y 14 (16.8%) > 60 ng/ml. La prevalencia de uno o más abortos espontáneos en mujeres con hiperprolactinemia vs. sin hiperprolactinemia entre mujeres con infertilidad secundaria fue: 19/20 (95%) versus 116/197 (58.9%), respectivamente (p = 0.002). La prevalencia de anovulación e hiperandrogenismo clínico fue significativamente mayor en mujeres sin hiperprolactinemia. Conclusiones: La hiperprolactinemia afecta a una de cada diez mujeres mexicanas con infertilidad. Las mujeres con infertilidad secundaria e hiperprolactinemia mostraron mayor frecuencia de antecedente de uno o más abortos.