Increased activity of interleukin-23/interleukin-17 proinflammatory axis in obese women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the concentrations of cytokines belonging to Th17 axis (interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23) and Th1 axis (IL-12 and interferon (IFN)-gamma) in obese and lean women, and to investigate their relationships with the proinflammatory adipokine leptin, proinflammatory cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and anthropometric and metabolic parameters of obesity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-six obese women (age 20-52 years, body mass index (BMI): 30-48 kg/m(2)) and 20 healthy lean women (age 23-46 years, BMI: 18-25 kg/m(2)). MEASUREMENTS: Plasma levels of cytokines and leptin, BMI, waist circumference (WC) and insulin resistance index HOMA (homeostatic model assessment). RESULTS: Blood concentrations of IL-17, IL-23, MIF and leptin, but not IL-12 or IFN-gamma, were higher in obese compared with lean women (P=0.002, 0.046, 0.006 and 0.002, respectively). There was a positive correlation between IL-17 and IL-23 (r(s)=0.530), which was at the border of statistical significance (P=0.065). Neither IL-17 nor IL-23 correlated with leptin or MIF, and there was no association between IL-17 and IL-23 levels with BMI, WC or HOMA index. CONCLUSION: Interleukin-23/IL-17 axis is stimulated in obese women independently of the increase in abdominal fat, insulin resistance, leptin and MIF levels.

Total ghrelin levels during acute insulin infusion in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Controversial data were reported concerning fasting ghrelin (decreased, normal or elevated) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of our study was to clarify ghrelin levels in non-obese, overweight, and obese PCOS patients; to investigate the effect of acute insulin infusion on ghrelin in PCOS as a chronic insulin-resistant state, with and without the impact of obesity, and to examine ghrelin-androgen interaction. In that order, we evaluated 1) ghrelin levels among 8 nonobese patients with PCOS [body mass index (BMI): 20.52+/-1.31 kg/m2], 8 overweight and obese patients with PCOS (BMI: 34.36+/-6.53 kg/m2) and their respective controls, 2) ghrelin suppression during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, and 3) ghrelin-androgen interrelationship. After overnight fast, 2-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, was performed in all investigated women. Fasting ghrelin was significantly lower in non-obese PCOS than in controls (64.74+/-25.69 vs 108.36+/-52.60; p<0.05) as well as in overweight and obese PCOS in comparison with controls (38.71+/-14.18 vs 98.77+/-40.49; p<0.05). Insulin infusion significantly suppressed ghrelin in all subgroups of investigated women. Analysis of variance for repeatable measures confirmed that there was no significant difference in pattern of response between PCOS and controls. In conclusion, women with PCOS had lower fasting ghrelin and decreased insulin sensitivity independently of their BMI, compared to the controls. In addition, there were no differences between fasting ghrelin levels among non-obese, overweight, and obese women with PCOS. During euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, ghrelin decreased in all studied groups to a similar extent, implying that, compared to chronic hyperinsulinemia, acute hyperinsulinemia reduces ghrelin levels independently of the degree of insulin resistance.

The effect of parathyroidectomy on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism - an never ending story?

Previous studies demonstrated insulin resistance and increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The effect of curative parathyroidectomy on insulin sensitivity was associated with conflicting results depending on which method for measuring the insulin sensitivity has been used. There was no improvement using HOMA and QUICKI while minimal model demonstrated significant improvement in insulin sensitivity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the insulin sensitivity before and after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT using a euglycemic clamp. 44 patients with PHPT and 11 age and body mass index matched healthy controls participated in study protocol. Before surgery M values and HOMA IR suggest insulin resistance in patients with PHPT. There was no difference in M index (3.74±1.89 vs. 4.62±2.27, p>0.05), HOMA IR (2.94±1.39 vs. 3.29±0.81, p>0.05), AUC glucose (863.0±261.3 vs. 842.3±165.5, p>0.05), AUC insulin (7068.7±4159.0 vs. 7229.6±2581.7, p>0.05), ISI (4.73±2.77 vs. 4.25±2.94, p>0.05) and AIR (47.89±32.05 vs. 38.96±21.20, p>0.05) between patients with PHPT and HC. There was significant improvement in insulin sensitivity after parathyroidectomy but both preoperative and postoperative M values were not significantly different in comparison to HC. There were no significant changes in HOMA IR, AUC glucose, AUC insulin, ISI and AIR before and after therapy. In conclusion, we observed significant improvement in insulin sensitivity after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT. There was no difference in parameters of insulin secretion before and after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT.

Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing peptide-6 and GH-releasing hormone in normal-weight and overweight patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) was found to be either decreased or normal. The recent introduction of a new and potent GH stimulus, GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), allowed further investigation of the functional properties of somatotropes in a variety of metabolic diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the response of GH to GHRP-6, GHRH, and GHRP-6 + GHRH in NIDDM patients. Twenty-one patients with NIDDM were divided into two groups: group A, normal weight (body mass index [BMI], 23.31+/-0.62 kg/m2); and group B, overweight (BMI, 27.62+/-0.72 kg/m2). Eight normal-weight control subjects (group C) were studied. Each subject received GHRP-6 (90 microg intravenously [i.v.]), GHRH (100 microg i.v.), and GHRP-6 + GHRH on three separate occasions. There was no difference between the GH response after GHRP-6 in groups A, B, and C in terms of the GH peak (50.95+/-11.55, 51.96+/-7.71, and 70.07+/-15.59 mU/L, P>.05) and the area under the curve (AUC) for GH (2,340.06+/-617.36, 2,684.54+/-560.57, 3,462.78+/-1,223.53 mU/L/120 min, P>.05). A decreased GH response to GHRH was found in group B in comparison to group A (B v A: peak GH response, 8.25+/-1.90 v 22.19+/-8.81, P<.05; AUC GH, 479.62+/-84.0 v 1,443.21+/-743.76, P<.05). There was no difference in the GH response between group A and group C (peak GH response, 22.19+/-8.81 v 26.42+/-6.71, P>.05; AUC, 1,443.21+/-743.76 v 1,476.51+/-386.56, P>.05). There was a significant difference between the same parameters in group B versus group C (8.25+/-1.90 v 26.42+/-6.71, P<.05; AUC, 479.62+/-84.0 v 1,476.51+/-386.56, P<.05). The combined administration of GHRP-6 + GHRH elicited a synergistic GH response in NIDDM patients and controls. There was a significant difference between groups A and B for the GH peak (96.49+/-9.80 v 68.38+/-8.25, P<.05), whereas there was no difference for the AUC (5,111.13+/-703.77 v 3,425.95+/-459.67, P>.05). There was no difference in the peak GH after the combined test between group A and group C (96.49+/-9.80 v 139.82+/-24.16, P>.05), whereas the peak GH in the same test was significantly decreased in group B in comparison to group C (68.38+/-8.25 v 139.82+/-24.16, P<.05). The AUC for GH after combined GHRP-6 + GHRH in group A versus group C was not significantly different (5,111.13+/-703.77 v 9,274.71+/-1,541.46, P>.05), whereas there was a significant difference for the same test between group B and group C (3,425.95+/-459.67 v 9,274.71+/-1,541.46, P<.05). Our results demonstrate that normal-weight NIDDM patients have a preserved GH response to GHRP-6, GHRH, and GHRP-6 + GHRH, and overweight NIDDM patients have a blunted response to GHRH and GHRP-6 + GHRH. The preserved GH response to GHRP-6 in both diabetic groups suggests that the secretory potential of somatotropes is preserved in NIDDM patients. The impairment of the GH response to GHRH in overweight NIDDM patients could be a functional defect due to the obesity, since it could be overridden by administration of GHRP-6.

Dual antiglioma action of metformin: cell cycle arrest and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.

The present study reports for the first time a dual antiglioma effect of the well-known antidiabetic drug metformin. In low-density cultures of the C6 rat glioma cell line, metformin blocked the cell cycle progression in G(0)/G(1) phase without inducing significant cell death. In confluent C6 cultures, on the other hand, metformin caused massive induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis associated with c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation, mitochondrial depolarization and oxidative stress. Metformin-triggered apoptosis was completely prevented by agents that block mitochondrial permeability transition (cyclosporin A) and oxygen radical production (N-acetylcisteine), while the inhibitors of JNK activation (SP600125) or glycolysis (sodium fluoride, iodoacetate) provided partial protection. The antiglioma effect of metformin was reduced by compound C, an inhibitor of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and was mimicked by the AMPK agonist AICAR. Similar effects were observed in the human glioma cell line U251, while rat primary astrocytes were completely resistant to the antiproliferative and proapoptotic action of metformin.

[Effects of dexamethasone on growth hormone response in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus]. / Dejstvo akutne stimulacije deksametazonom na lucenje hormona rasta kod bolesnika s dijabetesom melitusom zavisnim od insulina.

Growth hormone (GH) response to dexamethasone (DEX) in 10 poorly controlled insulin dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) without clinical evidence of diabetic complications and in 10 healthy controls, was studied. GH responses to DEX were compared with pituitary GH response to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH). Fasting GH values were not significantly higher in IDDM in comparison with the controls. The peak GH responses to GHRH and DEX were similar in the controls and IDDM patients (23.8 +/- 6.49 vs 38.87 +/- 7.26, p > 0.05 in GHRH test and 13.71 +/- 3.59 vs 17.33 +/- 5 23, p > 0.05 in DEX test). No significant difference between area under curve during GHRH (1386. +/- 490.69 vs 1966.89 +/- 561.46, p > 0.05) and during DEX test (1085.8 +/- 239 856 vs 501.87 +/- 847.16, p > 0 05) in the controls and IDDM patients, were established There was no significant correlation between basal and peak GH values and AUC during both tests, and HbA1C and duration of diabetes It is concluded that GH response to GHRH was normal and that our patients had preserved the integrity of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis, thanks to the suggested mechanism of dexamethasone action via somatostatin.

[Diabetes insipidus as a sequela of metastatic breast carcinoma]. / Insipidusni dijabetes kao posledica metastaziranja karcinoma dojke.

Hypothalamo-hypophyseal metastases are still a relatively unfamiliar entity. Mostly they are confirmed by autopsy. Rear clinical manifestations are presented by diabetes insipidus. In general, patients with endocrine breast carcinoma metastases are young, premenopausal women, with great tumour burden and widely disseminated tumor. We report 54-year-old woman with diabetes insipidus caused by solitary breast carcinoma metastasis, eight years after primary tumour was diagnosed. The operative and radiation therapy were effective.

Leptin levels and insulin sensitivity in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

The study was conducted to assess leptin levels and insulin sensitivity in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Twenty-two women with PCOS and 19 control healthy women were included in the study, divided into obese and non-obese groups. Leptin was determined using Linco Research radio-immunoassay while insulin sensitivity was calculated from intravenous glucose tolerance tests with frequent blood sampling using MINMOD analysis. Significantly higher basal leptin levels were found in obese compared to non-obese PCOS (31.76 +/- 3.06 vs. 10.42 +/- 2.31 ng/ml; p < 0.05) as well as in obese in comparison to non-obese controls (29.16 +/- 5.06 vs 8.51 +/- 0.88 ng/ml; p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between insulin sensitivity and leptin levels in both obese (r = -0.2480; p > 0.05) and non-obese PCOS groups (r = -0.4620; p > 0.05). In conclusion, high serum leptin, insulin and testosterone levels together with reduced insulin sensitivity were found in obese PCOS women, suggesting that high leptin levels could be a characteristic of the obese PCOS phenotype.

Growth-hormone response to combined stimulation with GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome before and after short-term fasting.

Controversial data were reported on GH response to different provocative stimuli in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of our study was to assess the effect of short-term fasting on GH response to combined stimulus with GHRH+GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in obese patients with PCOS and possible relation with leptin and insulin changes during fasting. Twelve obese PCOS women and nine obese control women participated in 3-day fasting. GH response, IGF-I, insulin and leptin were measured after GHRH+ GHRP-6, before and after short-term fasting. Obese PCOS patients had significantly greater GH peak after GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting. Enhanced response to GH stimulation was found after fasting without substantial differences between obese PCOS and obese controls. Insulin and leptin significantly decreased, while insulin sensitivity significantly improved in both groups during fasting. In conclusion, obese PCOS patients have peculiar type of GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting, possibly due to enhanced sensitivity of somatotrophs. Observed changes in insulin and leptin may participate in modulation of enhanced GH response after short-term fasting to GHRH+GHRP-6 in PCOS and obese controls.