Reductions in endometriosis-associated pain among women treated with elagolix are consistent across a range of baseline characteristics reflective of real-world patients.

BACKGROUND: Elagolix is an oral, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, that significantly reduces dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: Data were pooled from two 6-month, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (Elaris Endometriosis [EM]-I and II) in which 2 doses of elagolix were evaluated (150 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily). Pooled data from > 1600 women, aged 18-49, were used to evaluate the efficacy of elagolix and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in prespecified subgroups of women with various baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1686 women treated, 1285 (76.2%) completed the studies. The percentages of women with clinically meaningful reductions in dysmenorrhea and NMPP were generally consistent by subgroup. Significant treatment by subgroup interaction was demonstrated for dysmenorrhea response in baseline analgesic use (p < 0.01) and previous history of pregnancy (p < 0.05) subgroups, and for NMPP response in the baseline NMPP score (p < 0.05) and history of pregnancy (p < 0.05) subgroups. Patient-reported reduction in pain at month 3 was significant across all subgroups taking elagolix 200 mg BID, and significant across most subgroups with elagolix 150 mg QD. Women across subgroups experienced improvement within each domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30), although significant treatment by subgroup interactions were observed in several categories. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix was effective in reducing dysmenorrhea and NMPP, and improving HRQoL, compared with placebo across numerous subgroups of women with various baseline characteristics, covering a broad segment of the endometriosis disease and patient types. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01620528 ; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01931670 .

Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Pain with Elagolix, an Oral GnRH Antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent condition that causes dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain. Elagolix, an oral, nonpeptide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, produced partial to nearly full estrogen suppression in previous studies. METHODS: We performed two similar, double-blind, randomized, 6-month phase 3 trials (Elaris Endometriosis I and II [EM-I and EM-II]) to evaluate the effects of two doses of elagolix - 150 mg once daily (lower-dose group) and 200 mg twice daily (higher-dose group) - as compared with placebo in women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis and moderate or severe endometriosis-associated pain. The two primary efficacy end points were the proportion of women who had a clinical response with respect to dysmenorrhea and the proportion who had a clinical response with respect to nonmenstrual pelvic pain at 3 months. Each of these end points was measured as a clinically meaningful reduction in the pain score and a decreased or stable use of rescue analgesic agents, as recorded in a daily electronic diary. RESULTS: A total of 872 women underwent randomization in Elaris EM-I and 817 in Elaris EM-II; of these women, 653 (74.9%) and 632 (77.4%), respectively, completed the intervention. At 3 months, a significantly greater proportion of women who received each elagolix dose met the clinical response criteria for the two primary end points than did those who received placebo. In Elaris EM-I, the percentage of women who had a clinical response with respect to dysmenorrhea was 46.4% in the lower-dose elagolix group and 75.8% in the higher-dose elagolix group, as compared with 19.6% in the placebo group; in Elaris EM-II, the corresponding percentages were 43.4% and 72.4%, as compared with 22.7% (P<0.001 for all comparisons). In Elaris EM-I, the percentage of women who had a clinical response with respect to nonmenstrual pelvic pain was 50.4% in the lower-dose elagolix group and 54.5% in the higher-dose elagolix group, as compared with 36.5% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for all comparisons); in Elaris EM-II, the corresponding percentages were 49.8% and 57.8%, as compared with 36.5% (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively). The responses with respect to dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain were sustained at 6 months. Women who received elagolix had higher rates of hot flushes (mostly mild or moderate), higher levels of serum lipids, and greater decreases from baseline in bone mineral density than did those who received placebo; there were no adverse endometrial findings. CONCLUSIONS: Both higher and lower doses of elagolix were effective in improving dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain during a 6-month period in women with endometriosis-associated pain. The two doses of elagolix were associated with hypoestrogenic adverse effects. (Funded by AbbVie; Elaris EM-I and EM-II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01620528 and NCT01931670 .).

Achieving clinically meaningful response in endometriosis pain symptoms is associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and work productivity: analysis of 2 phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-related pain symptoms have a negative impact on health-related quality of life and productivity. In fact, as endometriosis-related symptom severity and the number of symptoms experienced increases, health-related quality of life decreases. Dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain are prominent symptoms experienced by women with endometriosis and were shown to have improved with the oral, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, elagolix. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this post hoc analysis was to address the question of if patients show a clinical response (in dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain), do they also have improvements in health-related quality of life and in productivity? STUDY DESIGN: This post hoc analysis used data from the Elaris Endometriosis-I and Elaris Endometriosis-II phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. A surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (in the past 10 years), premenopausal, aged 18-49 years, and moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were among the inclusion criteria for both trials. Women self-reported pain daily using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain); daily pain was assigned to either dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain based on self-reported bleeding on that particular day. In addition, their self-reported endometriosis-associated pain must have been an average of moderate or severe during the month leading to baseline for inclusion in the trial program. Patients were characterized as achieving a clinical response for dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain (ie, responder or nonresponder), which was defined as women who did not have an increase in analgesic use and who met the pain reduction score threshold at month 3. Pain reduction score thresholds were defined separately for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in the trial using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30; work productivity was assessed using the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire. RESULTS: Women enrolled in Elaris Endometriosis-I (n = 871) and Elaris Endometriosis-II (n = 815) were included in this analysis. Patients with a clinical response during treatment to dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain also experienced a meaningful improvement in all domains of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 at month 3. Patients who did not show a dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain clinical response at month 3 did not exhibit mean improvements in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 domain scores that indicate an Endometriosis Health Profile-30 responder. Productivity improved among dysmenorrhea clinical responders. In the Elaris Endometriosis-I study, clinical responders lost a total of 5.9 hours compared with a total of 13.0 hours for nonresponders of employment-related work at month 3 (P < .0001). Among women in the Elaris Endometriosis-II study, a total of 4.1 hours and 10.4 employment-related hours were lost at month 3 for dysmenorrhea responders vs nonresponders (P < .001). Similar results were obtained when analyzed by non-enstrual pelvic pain responder status. CONCLUSION: Women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain, who are clinical responders based on dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain, also experience significant and clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life and productivity as measured by the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire, respectively.

A multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys® anti-Müllerian hormone immunoassay for prediction of antral follicle count.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) corresponds to an antral follicle count (AFC) >15 for determination of ovarian reserve? DESIGN: A prospective study conducted at 13 US fertility clinics in women aged 21-44 years who presented for AFC evaluation by transvaginal ultrasound. Serum samples were collected at the time of AFC evaluation (menstrual cycle day 2-4). AMH concentrations were measured by the Elecsys® AMH immunoassay; oestradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were also measured. The serum AMH cut-off able to detect AFC >15 with high sensitivity was determined (derivation cohort). Clinical performance of the AMH assay at the derived cut-off was evaluated (validation cohort). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were also performed. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort (n = 306), an optimal serum AMH cut-off value of 1.77 ng/ml was determined to correspond to AFC >15 with 89.63% sensitivity and 69.01% specificity, using the Elecsys AMH assay. In the validation cohort (n = 856), this 1.77 ng/ml cut-off could identify women with an AFC >15 with a sensitivity of 88.34% and a specificity of 68.29%; corresponding positive predictive and negative predictive values were 75.19% and 84.34%, respectively. ROC analyses demonstrated that AMH performed better than oestradiol or FSH in predicting AFC, with area under the curves of 85.7%, 57.1% and 69.7%, respectively, in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The Elecsys AMH immunoassay provides a robust and fully automated method to measure serum AMH levels. Women with AMH values below the cut-off of 1.77 ng/ml are unlikely to have AFC >15.

GnRH agonist administration prior to embryo transfer in freeze-all cycles of patients with endometriosis or aberrant endometrial integrin expression.

Prolonged gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration before IVF with fresh embryo transfer to patients with endometriosis or aberrant endometrial integrin expression (-integrin) improves outcomes but may suppress ovarian response and prevents elective cryopreservation of all embryos. This retrospective cohort pilot study evaluates freeze-all cycles with subsequent prolonged GnRHa before embryo transfer in these populations. Patients from 2010 to 2015 who met inclusion criteria and received a long-acting GnRHa every 28 days twice before FET were evaluated. A subset underwent comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) after trophectoderm biopsy. Three groups were identified: Group 1: + CCS, +endometriosis (20 patients, 20 transfers); Group 2: +CCS, -integrin (12 patients, 13 transfers); Group 3: no CCS, +endometriosis or -integrin (10 patients, 12 transfers); Group 4: all transfers after CCS for descriptive comparison only (n = 2809). Baseline characteristics were similar among Groups 1-3 except that the mean surgery to oocyte aspiration interval was longer for Group 1 than Group 3. Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically similar among the three groups and compared favourably to Group 4. A non-significant trend towards improved outcomes was noted in Group 1. Prolonged GnRHa after freeze-all in these patients avoids excessive ovarian suppression and results in excellent outcomes.

Patient-completed or symptom-based screening tools for endometriosis: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: The objective of this review was to evaluate existing patient-completed screening questionnaires and/or symptom-based predictive models with respect to their potential for use as screening tools for endometriosis in adult women. Validated instruments were of particular interest. METHODS: We conducted structured searches of PubMed and targeted searches of the gray literature to identify studies reporting on screening instruments used in endometriosis. Studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria that followed the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study design) framework. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were identified, of which 10 described measures for endometriosis in general, 2 described measures for endometriosis at specific sites, and 4 described measures for deep-infiltrating endometriosis. Only 1 study evaluated a questionnaire that was solely patient-completed. Most measures required physician, imaging, or laboratory assessments in addition to patient-completed questionnaires, and several measures relied on complex scoring. Validation for use as a screening tool in adult women with potential endometriosis was lacking in all studies, as most studies focused on diagnosis versus screening. CONCLUSIONS: This literature review did not identify any fully validated, symptom-based, patient-reported questionnaires for endometriosis screening in adult women.

GnRH agonists in the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: a review.

The development of highly potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) allowed for a significant addition to options for the medical management of symptomatic endometriosis. Pituitary GnRH receptor down-regulation leads to a hypogonadotropic and secondary hypoestrogenic state resulting in lesion regression and symptom improvement. There may be an additional effect of these agents on the inflammatory processes associated with endometriosis as well. This is a review of critical milestones in the clinical application of these agents. Most initial trials of various GnRHa employed danazol as a control and demonstrated general equivalence in reducing symptoms and extent of lesions but without hyperandrogenic side effects and adverse metabolic changes induced by the latter. Short-acting GnRHa is administered intranasally or subcutaneously. Longer-acting preparations are administered intramuscularly or as subcutaneous implants. GnRHa also decrease symptom recurrence rates after surgical management. The hypoestrogenic side effects, including bone mineral density loss and vasomotor symptoms, have limited the duration of use of these agents alone to six months. The use of an appropriate add-back allows for the mitigation of side effects while maintaining efficacy and allowing extension of use for up to 12 months. There is a limited amount of data regarding the use of GnRHa in adolescents out of concern for the effect on developing bone. These agents should be used with caution in this group. The lack of dose flexibility, need for parental administration, and side effect profiles represent drawbacks to GnRHa use. The development of oral GnRH antagonists with short half-lives, variable dosing, and decreased side effects represents an exciting alternative.

Should diagnostic hysteroscopy be performed before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer?

The role of routine uterine cavity evaluation before an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle has not been uniformly accepted. Published trials have demonstrated a relatively high incidence of cavitary abnormalities diagnosed at outpatient hysteroscopy in patients with previous IVF-ET cycle failure, the correction of which markedly improves outcomes. The value of performing this procedure before an initial cycle in patients without previous implantation failure has not been definitively confirmed in prospective randomized trials, but would seem logical in an effort to minimize the number of cycles a patient must undergo. The incidence of cavitary abnormalities in this population varies. One large series has reported a 22.9% incidence of endometrial cavitary abnormalities diagnosed at pre-cycle office hysteroscopy in this patient group. Hysterosalpingography and baseline transvaginal ultrasonography are insufficiently sensitive alternatives. Sonohysterography with infusion of saline solution, in particular with 3-dimensional technology, may be a reasonable alternative to diagnostic hysteroscopy, although relatively few well-designed trials have addressed this issue. There are an insufficient number of prospective randomized trials to clearly demonstrate that surgical removal of all abnormalities improves IVF-ET outcome. However, investigators suggest a benefit for resection of submucosal leiomyomas, adhesions, and at least a subset of polyps. Appropriately designed trials are required before a definitive recommendation can be made.

Endometriosis-Related Pain Reduction During Bleeding and Nonbleeding Days in Women Treated with Elagolix.

OBJECTIVE: In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the impact of elagolix on dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain across menstrual period (bleeding days) and nonmenstrual (nonbleeding) days. METHODS: Data from two randomized, 6-month, placebo-controlled trials (Elaris Endometriosis (EM)-I and EM-II) of elagolix (150 mg once daily (QD) and 200 mg twice daily (BID)) in premenopausal women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (N = 1686) were pooled. Women recorded the presence of menstrual period and severity of dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain in a daily electronic diary. RESULTS: At baseline, women in the placebo group and both elagolix treatment groups reported moderate or severe dysmenorrhea, on average, 81% of their menstrual period days and moderate/severe nonmenstrual pelvic pain, on average, 56% of their nonmenstrual (nonbleeding) days. Compared with placebo at month 6, elagolix-treated women had a significantly lower mean (standard deviation (SD)) percentage of menstrual period days with moderate or severe dysmenorrhea (elagolix 150 mg QD = 52.4 (38.9), p = 0.002; elagolix 200 mg BID = 38.5 (43.6), p < 0.001, placebo = 61.3 (33.7)) and a significantly lower mean (SD) percentage of nonmenstrual (nonbleeding) days with moderate or severe nonmenstrual pelvic pain (elagolix 150 mg QD = 31.1 (35.8), p < 0.001; elagolix 200 mg BID = 19.7 (29.9), p < 0.001; placebo = 35.6 (33.9)). CONCLUSION: Following 6 months of elagolix treatment, women who still menstruated had a lower proportion of menstrual period days with moderate or severe dysmenorrhea compared with placebo, demonstrating pain reduction despite continued menses. Additionally, pain did not shift from dysmenorrhea to nonmenstrual pelvic pain, as the percentage of days with moderate or severe nonmenstrual pelvic pain was also reduced for elagolix-treated women compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Elaris EM-I study is registered with the US National Library of Medicine, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01620528. The Elaris EM-II study is registered with the US National Library of Medicine, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01931670. Both studies are registered with the EU Clinical Trial Register, www.clinicaltrialsregister.ed, 2011-004295-11.

Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques.

This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes from transfer of embryos cryopreserved at the pronuclear versus blastocyst stage following 'freeze-all' IVF cycles without fresh transfer for 87 consecutive IVF patients <40 years, who underwent cryopreservation of all viable embryos followed by at least one subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) between January 2003 and July 2007. Cryopreservation of all embryos from one oocyte retrieval was performed at either the pronuclear (1.5 mol/l propanediol and 0.1 mol/l sucrose) (group A) or blastocyst (10% glycerol) (group B) stage. Main outcome measures included survival, live birth and implantation rates. A total of 110 FET cycles were analysed. Live birth and implantation rates observed after the first FET were significantly higher (P=0.025 and P=0.002) in group B (67.7% and 40.8%) than in group A (41.1% and 21.5%) despite a higher survival rate in group A. After two FET cycles, 32.1% of group A had not conceived despite thaw of all available embryos, compared with 6.5% of group B. When freeze-all is necessary, blastocyst cryopreservation leads to higher implantation and live birth rates compared with pronuclear-stage cryopreservation despite lower survival rates. Prolonged embryo culture may allow for more optimal embryo selection.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and add-back therapy: what do the data show?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder that can lead to debilitating chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) have emerged as a primary medical therapy for patients with symptomatic disease, but secondary hypoestrogenic side effects may limit compliance. Add-back therapy is a means of surmounting this problem. RECENT FINDINGS: Progestins such as norethindrone acetate may be administered with or without addition of low doses of estrogens to safely and effectively extend GnRHa therapy while minimizing side effects. Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of add-back enhances compliance and duration of therapy. The initiation of an add-back should not be deferred given evidence demonstrating an increase in vasomotor symptoms and bone loss if not administered concomitantly. The subset of adolescents with endometriosis who require GnRHa therapy should be administered an add-back, but require careful monitoring of bone mineral density. SUMMARY: Implementation of an appropriately selected add-back will significantly reduce hypoestrogenic side effects, enhance compliance, and allow for prolongation of therapy without interfering with the efficacy of GnRHa in treating symptomatic endometriosis.

Patients' perspectives of endometriosis-related fatigue: qualitative interviews.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-related fatigue is common and negatively impacts multiple areas of many women's lives, particularly in day-to-day activities, social activities, physical activities, mood and emotions, relationships with family or partners, and work or school. Multiple studies have documented fatigue as a significant symptom of endometriosis. Additional research is needed to better understand endometriosis-related fatigue and its impacts on patients. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of individual in-person semistructured interviews conducted with 22 adult females reporting moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain. Women with self-reported, surgically confirmed endometriosis and moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain were recruited from qualitative research firms in two locations in the United States. Qualified subjects participated in semistructured interviews that lasted approximately 45 min each. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: All 22 participants reported experiencing fatigue related to their endometriosis. While the degree of severity of their endometriosis-related fatigue varied, 21 of the 22 participants stated that it was at least "somewhat bothersome." Most participants noted an impact from endometriosis-related fatigue on day-to-day activities, social activities, physical activities, mood and emotions, relationships with family or partner, and work or school. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented here indicate that endometriosis-related fatigue has a pervasive impact on the functioning of women living with this condition. Future studies should measure any changes in fatigue that may be associated with treatment for endometriosis.

Psychometric assessment of the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common problem in women of reproductive age and has impacts on health-related quality of life and productivity. Fatigue is an important part of the burden of endometriosis, it is not often included as an endpoint in clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: In a phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT01620528), women aged 18-49 years with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-related pain were randomized to elagolix 150 mg once daily, elagolix 200 mg twice daily, or placebo for 6 months. PROMIS Fatigue and dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores were assessed at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was assessed at months 1, 3, and 6. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), construct validity (convergent and known groups validity), and responsiveness were evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis included 871 women, mean age 31.5 years. Internal consistency supported a single concept (Cronbach's alpha 0.93). For the 238 patients with no change in PGIC at month 1, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the PROMIS Fatigue T-score was 0.7 and paired t-test statistically significant (2.84, p = 0.0049). Correlations with other measures were expected to be fairly low as concepts were not redundant. The PROMIS Fatigue discriminated among known groups with mean scores of 55.3, 62.3, and 65.8 at month 3 (PGIC improvement, no change, worsening, respectively). Statically significant discrimination, and change score responsiveness, were seen using clinically relevant anchors (dysmenorrhea and NMPP) at months 3 and 6 between responders and non-responders. Anchor-based (PGIC) responsiveness showed significant improvement from baseline to months 3 and 6 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS Fatigue has good reliability, validity, and responsiveness in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain.

Impact of Endometriosis Diagnostic Delays on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs.

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis symptoms are nonspecific and overlap with other gynecologic and gastrointestinal diseases, leading to long diagnostic delays. The burden of endometriosis has been documented; however, little is known about the impact of diagnostic delays on healthcare costs leading up to diagnoses. The purpose of this study was to examine the economic impact of diagnostic delays on pre-diagnosis healthcare utilization and costs among patients with endometriosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective database study of adult patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis from 1 January 2004 to 31 July 2016. Patients had continuous health plan enrollment 60 months prior to and 12 months following the earliest endometriosis diagnosis and ≥ 1 pre-diagnosis endometriosis symptom (dyspareunia, generalized pelvic pain, abdominal pain, dysmenorrhea, or infertility). Patients were assigned to short (≤ 1 year), intermediate (1-3 years), or long (3-5 years) delay cohorts based on the length of their diagnostic delay (time from first symptom to diagnosis). Healthcare resource utilization and costs were calculated and compared by cohort in the 60-month pre-diagnosis period. RESULTS: A total of 11,793 patients were included in the study, of which 37.7% (4446/11,793), 27.0% (3179/11,793), and 35.3% (4168/11,793) had short, intermediate, and long delays, respectively. Patients with intermediate or long diagnostic delays had consistently more all-cause and endometriosis-related emergency visits and inpatient hospitalizations in the pre-diagnosis period than patients with short delays. Pre-diagnosis all-cause healthcare costs were significantly higher among patients with longer diagnostic delays, averaging $21,489, $30,030, and $34,460 among patients with a short, intermediate, and long delay, respectively (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Endometriosis-related costs accounted for 12.5% ($3553/$28,376) of all-cause costs and followed a similar pattern. CONCLUSION: Patients with endometriosis who had longer diagnostic delays had more pre-diagnosis endometriosis-related symptoms and higher pre-diagnosis healthcare utilization and costs compared with patients who were diagnosed earlier after symptom onset, providing evidence in support of earlier diagnosis.

Real-World Characterization of Women with Diagnosed Endometriosis Initiating Therapy with Elagolix Using a US Claims Database.

PURPOSE: Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist approved in the United States for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. We performed a real-world evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis who were initiating elagolix therapy in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort database analysis included women 18-49 years of age with ≥1 pharmacy claim for elagolix between August 2018 and December 2019 from the Copyright © 2020 Truven Health Analytics LLC. All Rights Reserved. Women had continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment during the baseline period (year immediately preceding the index date [date of earliest elagolix claim]) and had ≥1 medical claim with endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 code [617.x and N80.x]) on or before the index date. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, ICD code-based endometriosis anatomic site, endometriosis-related treatments, and pain symptoms were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: The study included 2083 patients with mean age at baseline of 33.2 ± 8.1 years. Comorbidities most commonly recorded were non-cancer, non-endometriosis pain (59.5%), including arthritis/joint pain (43.7%) and back/neck pain (31.7%), and mental disorder (40.7%), including anxiety (32.7%). The majority of endometriosis diagnosis codes recorded referred to unspecified location (52.3%) and pelvic peritoneum (23.0%); 61.0% of patients received a medical endometriosis-related treatment in the baseline period, with the most common treatments being contraceptives (various routes of administration, 40.2%) and progestins (31.7%). Additionally, 35.4% of the patients received an endometriosis-related surgery during baseline, with the most common being laparoscopy (33.2% of all patients). Opioids were used during the baseline period by 57.3% of the patients. For pain symptoms, 71.5%, 30.4%, and 19.3% of the patients had claims for pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis therapies were used by a significant proportion of patients with endometriosis in the year immediately preceding elagolix initiation.

Impact of Elagolix on Workplace and Household Productivity Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis profoundly impairs women's workplace and household productivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of elagolix on endometriosis-related workplace and household productivity losses. METHODS: Data were pooled from two phase III trials of women aged 18-49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain treated for 6 months with elagolix 150 mg daily (QD), 200 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo. The Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire was administered at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6 to determine workplace and household absenteeism and presenteeism. Productivity changes from baseline were compared between placebo and elagolix doses via analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Workplace analyses included 1270 employed women and household analyses included 1565 women. At baseline, women reported average weekly losses of 16 workplace hours, 8.3 household work hours, 45% of scheduled work, and 64% of planned household chores. At Month 6, treatment with elagolix 150 mg QD or 200 mg BID increased productive workplace hours by 1.7 (95% CI 0.1-3.4; p = 0.041) and 5.4 h (95% CI 3.7-7.1; p < 0.001) relative to placebo, corresponding to gains of 5.2% (95% CI 0.7-9.7; p = 0.022) and 14.6% (95% CI 10.0-19.1; p < 0.001) of scheduled work, respectively. Both elagolix doses improved household productivity at Month 6 by 1.7 (95% CI 0.7-2.7) and 3.1 (95% CI 2.1-4.0) hours relative to placebo (both p < 0.001), with increases of 8.8% (95% CI 3.5-14.1; p = 0.001) and 20.4% (95% CI 15.1-25.6; p < 0.001) of planned household work. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with elagolix improved endometriosis-related workplace and household productivity impairments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ELARIS EM-I (NCT01620528) and ELARIS EM-II (NCT01931670).

Impact of elagolix treatment on fatigue experienced by women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist, for the reduction of fatigue in women with moderate or severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase III trial. SETTING: Clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 860 women treated with elagolix or placebo. INTERVENTION(S): Women received either elagolix at 150 mg daily (QD) orally, elagolix at 200 mg twice daily (BID) orally, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Change from baseline to month 1, 3, and 6 visits, in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 6a questionnaire T-scores. RESULTS(S): At baseline, 54%-74% of women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis reported having fatigue-related issues "quite a bit" or "very much," depending on the question asked. Fatigue extent was reduced to 29%-43% and 14%-29% for women treated with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively, at 6 months, compared with 35%-50% with placebo. The resultant decrease in fatigue T-scores was significant after elagolix treatment compared with placebo at 6 months, with changes of -2.21 and -5.90 with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively. Significant reduction in fatigue scores were observed among patients reporting clinically meaningful response "reduction" in dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyspareunia (-7.31, -6.62, and -4.31, respectively) compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSION(S): In women with moderate to severe endometriosis related pain, elagolix significantly reduces fatigue levels.

Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated with Endometriosis Among Women with Medicaid Insurance.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a painful chronic inflammatory disease caused by endometrial tissue implanting and growing outside the uterus, resulting in pelvic pain symptoms and subfertility. Treatment imposes a substantial economic burden on the patient and health care system. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate direct health care utilization and costs among women newly diagnosed with endometriosis compared with age-matched controls in a U.S. Medicaid population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified health care claims from the 2007-2015 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database. Women (aged 18-49 years) newly diagnosed with endometriosis (ICD-9-CM 617.xx) during January 2008 through September 2014 were identified (date of first diagnosis = index date). Age-matched women without endometriosis (controls) were selected from the database and assigned index dates matching the distribution for endometriosis patients. Direct health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs (medical and pharmacy) over the 12-month post-index period (2015 U.S. dollars) were computed by service category (hospitalization, emergency room visits, outpatient services, and prescriptions) and compared between study cohorts using the chi-square test for proportions and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: The final sample included 15,615 endometriosis patients and 86,829 matched controls. HCRU during the 12-month post-index follow-up period was significantly higher for endometriosis cases compared with controls in all measured categories. Hospital admissions occurred among 33.1% of cases and 7.2% of controls, and 65.8% of endometriosis patients were admitted for endometriosis-related surgery. Emergency room visits occurred in 71.5% of cases, and 42.2% of controls. Mean (SD) office visits were 10.4 (8.5) for endometriosis patients and 5.1 (6.9) for controls. Endometriosis patients had significantly more prescription claims than controls, 45.9 (42.0) versus 25.1 (39.1). Mean total direct health care costs were $13,670 ($29,843) for cases versus $5,779 ($23,614) for controls. All differences between cases and controls were significant at P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs and resource utilization in all measured categories were higher among endometriosis cases than controls. The economic burden of endometriosis among patients with Medicaid insurance is substantial, underscoring the unmet medical need for earlier diagnosis and cost-effective treatments. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AbbVie and conducted by Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company. AbbVie participated in developing the study design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and revisions, and approval for publication. Soliman and Vora are employees of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock/stock options. Surrey has served in a consulting role on research to AbbVie and is on the speaker bureau for Ferring Laboratories. Bonafede and Nelson are employees of Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company, which received compensation from AbbVie for the overall conduct of the study and preparation of the manuscript. Agarwal has served in a consulting role on research to AbbVie. Preliminary results of this study were previously presented in a podium session at the 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Scientific Congress and Expo; October 28-November 1, 2017; San Antonio, TX.

Impact of elagolix on work loss due to endometriosis-associated pain: estimates based on the results of two phase III clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of elagolix on work loss due to endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from the Elaris I and II clinical trials. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Employed women ages 18-49 years with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. INTERVENTION(S): In the two trials, participants were randomized to 6 months of treatment with placebo, elagolix 150 mg once a day, or elagolix 200 mg twice a day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data on planned work hours, presenteeism, absenteeism, and total work loss (absenteeism + presenteeism) at baseline and month 3 were collected using the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire. RESULT(S): This analysis included employed participants from EM-I (n = 672) and EM-II (n = 626). Between baseline and month 3, compared with participants treated with placebo, participants treated with elagolix 150 mg once a day gained > 2 hours total work/week (EM-I, 2.20 ± 1.03; EM-II, 2.65 ± 1.14). Participants treated with 200 mg twice a day gained > 4 hours total work/week (EM-I, 4.91 ± 1.04; EM-II, 4.64 ± 1.14). Both absenteeism and presenteeism were reduced, although most of the gain was due to reduced presenteeism. Estimated cost savings after 6 months of treatment with elagolix were > $1,500 U.S. at 150 mg once a day and > $3,300 U.S. at 200 mg twice a day. CONCLUSION(S): Compared with placebo, treating moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix reduced absenteeism and improved productivity in employed women, which should result in cost savings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER(S): NCT01620528 (EM-I) and NCT01931670 (EM-II).

Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of endometriosis and the need for treatment in the USA has led to the need to explore the contemporary cost burden associated with the disease. This retrospective cohort study compared direct and indirect healthcare costs in patients with endometriosis to a control group without endometriosis. METHODS: Women aged 18-49 years with endometriosis (date of initial diagnosis = index date) were identified in the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial database between 2010 and 2014 and female control patients without endometriosis were matched by age and index year. The following outcomes were compared: healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the 12-month pre- and post-index periods (including inpatient admissions, pharmacy claims, emergency room visits, physician office visits, and obstetrics/gynecology visits), annual direct (medical and pharmacy) and indirect (absenteeism, short-term disability, and long-term disability) healthcare costs during the 12-month post-index period (in 2014 US$). Multivariate analyses were conducted to estimate annual total direct and indirect costs, controlling for demographics, pre-index clinical characteristics, and pre-index healthcare costs. RESULTS: Overall, 113,506 endometriosis patients and 927,599 controls were included. Endometriosis patients had significantly higher HRU during both the pre- and post-index periods compared to controls (p < 0.0001, all categories of HRU). Approximately two-thirds of endometriosis patients underwent an endometriosis-related surgical procedure (including laparotomy, laparoscopy, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and other excision/ablation procedures) in the first 12 months post-index. Mean annual total adjusted direct costs per endometriosis patient during the 12-month post-index period was over three times higher than that for a non-endometriosis control [$16,573 (standard deviation (SD) = $21,336) vs. $4733 (SD = $14,833); p < 0.005]. On average, incremental direct and indirect 12-month costs per endometriosis patient were $10,002 and $2132 compared to their matched controls (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis patients incurred significantly higher direct and indirect healthcare costs than non-endometriosis patients. FUNDING: AbbVie Inc.