Cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm): a comparative study of surgical management and follow-up treatment in a single institution.

PURPOSE: Liver resection (LR) of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increasingly been regarded as a viable option of enhanced efficacy for patients, but most studies have focused on comparing various tumor sizes and the outcomes of surgery. The study aim was to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of huge HCC with and without cirrhosis that underwent LR, and to delineate the treatment for recurrence. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with huge HCC who underwent hepatectomy from 2010 to 2019 were enrolled and reviewed. Clinicopathological findings, surgical outcomes of the entire cohort, and differences between the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty patients (60.3%) had huge HCC with cirrhosis. Clinicopathological findings were not different between the two groups, except tumor size ≥ 15 cm (40% in cirrhosis vs 17.4% in non-cirrhosis, p = 0.024) and major portal vein tumor thrombus were detected only in the cirrhosis group (11 patients, p = 0.006). Extended LR was performed in 13 cirrhotic patients (32.5%) and in 1 non-cirrhotic patient (4.4%) (p = 0.010). Operative data, postoperative complications including postoperative liver failure, and pattern of recurrence were not different between the two groups. For the entire cohort, mortality rate was 1.5%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 81%, 54%, and 39%. Multivariate analysis showed resection margin ≥ 0.1 cm was a good prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.247 (p = 0.017)). For tumor recurrence, local ablative treatment for liver recurrence and resection for lung recurrence provided good long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although huge HCC with cirrhosis has been a more unfavorable tumor, LR still provided long-term survival with acceptable risk morbidity and mortality.

Improving the Surgical Outcomes after Liver Resection with ERAS Program.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been accepted as the program to improve the surgical outcomes. This program has been increasingly utilized in liver resection. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of patients underwent liver resection by applying ERAS program. Material and Method: All patients underwent liver resection between January 2007 and April 2011 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included into the present study. Patients' characteristics, preoperative factors, operative data, postoperative care that correlated to ERAS components, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Outcomes including postoperative length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) stay, complications, rate of reoperation, interventional treatment, and mortality were compared between patients in ERAS group (applied ERAS components >4) and conventional group (applied ERAS components <4). Results: Three hundred forty seven patients were enrolled in present the study. There were 165 and 182 patients in ERAS and conventional groups, respectively. When compared between these two groups, ERAS group had better postoperative LOS (7 days vs. 10 days; p = 0.0001), ICU stay (0 days vs. 1 days; p = 0.0001), reoperation rate (1.2% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.047) and reintervention rate (15% vs. 27%; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in complication rate (31% vs. 40%; p = 0.096) and mortality rate (0.6% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.62). Conclusion: ERAS program improves the surgical outcomes in patients who underwent liver resection.

Orthotopic liver transplantation at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital: a report.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for various liver diseases including early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After the first successful LT in Thailand at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) in 1987, the number of LT has gradually been increasing in parallel with the improvement in patient survival. The recent outcomes of LT are reported herein. From January 1, 2002 to June 30, 2013, 120 cases of adult LT and 24 cases of pediatric LT were performed. The most common indication for LT was HCC in the adult whereas biliary atresia was the most common indication for LT in pediatric patients. As for the severity of liver disease, the average model of end stage liver disease (MELD) and pediatric end stage liver disease (PELD) scores were 19 in adult LT and 21.5 in pediatric LT respectively. The most common perioperative complication in adult LT was acute renal failure (25%). One-, five-year patient survival in adult LT and pediatric LT were 85%, 69% and 96%, 91%, respectively. In conclusion, the outcomes of LT at KCMH have gradually been improving close to the world standard, especially the patient survival.

Comparison of Three Inferior Vena Cava Reconstruction Techniques in Adult Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Result From King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand.

BACKGROUND: In orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), 3 caval reconstruction techniques are being performed worldwide. These are conventional, piggyback technique, and side-to-side cavocaval anastomosis (CCA). Each has its own advantages and drawbacks. Herein we report the result from our hospital comparing the 3 techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the detail of OLT performed from January 2008 to March 2020. Data being collected included type of caval reconstruction, blood loss, operative time, ischemic time, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital stay, and several postoperative complications. RESULTS: In the given period, 11 conventional, 90 piggyback, and 113 CCA caval reconstruction were done. There were no statistically significant differences in blood loss, operative time, cold ischemic time, and length of ICU and hospital stay. The CCA group had the lowest warm ischemic time (40 minutes) followed by the piggyback technique (43 minutes) and the conventional technique (47 minutes; P < .001). Regarding postoperative complications, there were no statistically significant differences in rate of primary nonfunction, early allograft dysfunction, hepatic artery/portal vein/biliary complication, or rate of acute kidney injury. The hepatic venous outflow complication rate was indifferent between 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no difference in outflow obstruction rate among the 3 techniques. The choice for reconstruction should rely on the preference of each institute and the suitability of each patient. The CCA technique may provide the lowest warm ischemic time.

Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection and Early Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplantation Still Negatively Affect Kidney Transplant Outcomes in the Era of Modern Immunosuppression and Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis.

Risk factors and consequences of urinary tract infection (UTI) post-kidney transplant have been variously reported by studies that were heterogenous in immunosuppressants and prophylactic protocols. We aimed to clarify the risks and consequences of UTI in kidney transplant recipients with post-transplantation cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in the context of modern immunosuppression. This retrospective cohort included kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisolone, and cotrimoxazole for bacterial UTI prophylaxis. Recipients were categorized into non-UTI and UTI groups. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) was screened in the first 3 months and was evaluated for association with UTI. Of 348 kidney transplant recipients, 129 were in the UTI group and 219 in the non-UTI group. UTI risk factors were female sex, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, and panel reactive antibody ≥ 50%. Recipients with recurrent UTI had inferior allograft function compared with non-UTI recipients. Patient survival was significantly lower in recipients with UTI in the first post-transplant month. Higher degree of immunosuppressions was associated with recurrent UTI and drug-resistant organisms. In conclusion, UTI continues to negatively affect graft function and survival of kidney transplant recipients. Treating ASB in the first 3 months did not reduce the UTI incidence in the first transplantation year.

Partial segments 4/5 liver resection facilitates the repair of complicated bile duct injuries: a technical challenge and long-term outcomes.

Adequate exposure with optimal anteroposterior view of the hilar plate is challenging and crucial in a surgical repair of complicated hilar bile duct injuries. A high-quality anastomosis depends on the ability to identify non-scarred, non-inflamed, non-ischemic bile ducts. This study provides operative details of the Partial Segments 4/5 Liver Resection with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (PS4/5LRHJ) and presents its long-term outcomes. 36 patients with the Strasberg type E bile duct injuries (BDIs) who underwent the PS4/5LRHJ from 2003 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of the surgical treatments were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 46.3 years. 22 patients underwent BDI repair as index operations and 14 patients as re-repair operations. Operative times between the index operation group and the re-repair group (396.6 min vs 391.3 min, respectively, p = 0.876) and blood loss (590.6 ml vs 640 ml, respectively, p = 0.587) were not statistically different. The mean length of hospital stay was 23 days. The median follow-up duration was 73 months. Major complications developed in 10 patients (27.8%), of which intra-abdominal collection was the most common (eight patients, 22.2%). Anastomotic stricture developed in one patient (2.8%). The mortality rate was zero. The overall 10-year patency rate was 95.2%. PS4/5LRHJ offered long-term patency with acceptable morbidity in the hilar bile duct injuries and re-repair operations.

Benefits of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal surgery and liver resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: Retrospective case-matched study.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer and liver tumors are accepted as alternative procedure to open surgery. However, few studies reported outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery of these two procedures. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2010 to December 2019, simultaneous laparoscopic cases were retrospectively matched (1:2) to open cases. Peri-operative and short-term outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Twelve patients in laparoscopic group were matched to 24 patients in open group according to age, gender, body mass index, american society of anesthesiologists physical status, preoperative laboratory data, number and size of liver metastases and extent of colorectal and liver resection, Most patients in each group had left-sided colon or rectal cancer and underwent wedge liver resection. The mean number of liver metastases was 1.3 vs 1.5 and size of liver metastases was 2.2 ± 1.4 vs 2.7 ± 1.1 cm in laparoscopic compared to open group. Estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in laparoscopic group. However, operative time was significantly longer in laparoscopic group. Peri-operative complication was not significant difference between both groups and there was no mortality. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal surgery and minor liver resection is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic approach has better peri-operative outcome in term of shorter length of hospital stay compared to open approach.

Combination of Euro-Collins and University of Wisconsin Solution: An Effective and Economic Substitute for Organ Procurement.

PURPOSE: Many types of preservation fluid were used in liver procurement. Undoubtedly, the gold standard is the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. But the solution is expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of combined acetated Ringer solution, Euro-Collins solution, and UW solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing adult liver transplantation from cadaveric donor during January 2013 to December 2017 in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included in this study. Donor and recipient characteristics, preservation fluid, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients receiving liver transplants were enrolled into the study. The mean age of donors was 34.2 years. The mean total ischemic time was 420.93 minutes. In recipients, posttransplantation complications were the following: (1) primary nonfunction in 1 patient (0.98%); (2) early allograft dysfunction in 23 patients (22.5%); (3) hepatic artery thrombosis in 3 patients (2.7%); (4) hepatic venous outflow obstruction in 2 patients (1.96%); (5) biliary leakage in 1 patient (0.98%); (6) biliary anastomosis stenosis in 4 patients (3.92%); and (7) biliary nonanastomosis stenosis in 1 patient (0.98%). No inhospital mortality was occurred. Overall mortality rate is 7.8% (8/102). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 95.9%, 91.5%, and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of acetated Ringer solution, Euro-Collins solution, and UW solution is effective and economic for liver preservation. Further study should be conducted.

Furosemide Stress Test as a Predicting Biomarker for Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) could worsen early and long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT). DGF is caused by several pre-transplantation and perioperative factors in both donors and recipients. At present, there are no biomarkers or tests during the immediate post-KT period that can accurately predict the development of DGF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in deceased donor KT (DDKT) at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand. All recipients underwent furosemide stress test (FST) by receiving a single dose of intravenous furosemide, 1.5 mg/kg at 3 h after allograft reperfusion. We determined the correlations between DGF (requiring dialysis within the first week after transplantation) and the values of urine volume recorded hourly after FST until 6 h, the parameters of postoperative dynamic tests, including resistive index (RI) of renal arteries and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). RESULTS: Of the 59 total DDKT recipients enrolled, 24 developed DGF. The FST is a more accurate biomarker than urine NGAL, RI of renal arteries, and ERPF in the prediction of DGF. The 4-h urine volume less than 350 mL (FST non-responsive) was the best cut-off value in predicting DGF with 87.5% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, and 82.5% accuracy. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed an odds ratio of 0.993 (0.986-0.999, p = 0.035) for the 4-h urine volume to predict DGF. CONCLUSIONS: The FST is a simple and accurate biomarker for predicting DGF in early post-KT period. Close monitoring and well prepared dialysis are suggested in patients with urine volume < 350 mL after 4 h of FST. The FST non-responsive patients could be the target for further DGF preventive intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03071536.