Psychological safety and accountability in longitudinal integrated clerkships: a dual institution qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Psychological safety and accountability are frameworks to describe relationships in the workplace. Psychological safety is a shared belief by members of a team that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. Accountability refers to being challenged and expected to meet expectations and goals. Psychological safety and accountability are supported by relational trust. Relational continuity is the educational construct underpinning longitudinal integrated clerkships. The workplace constructs of psychological safety and accountability may offer lenses to understand students' educational experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study of 9 years of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates from two regionally diverse programs-at Harvard Medical School and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. We used deductive content analysis to characterize psychological safety and accountability from semi-structured interviews of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates. RESULTS: Analysis of 20 graduates' interview transcripts reached saturation. We identified 109 discrete excerpts describing psychological safety, accountability, or both. Excerpts with high psychological safety described trusting relationships and safe learning spaces. Low psychological safety included fear and frustration and perceptions of stressful learning environments. Excerpts characterizing high accountability involved increased learning and responsibility toward patients. Low accountability included students not feeling challenged. Graduates' descriptions with both high psychological safety and high accountability characterized optimized learning and performance. CONCLUSIONS: This study used the workplace-based frameworks of psychological safety and accountability to explore qualitatively longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates' experiences as students. Graduates described high and low psychological safety and accountability. Graduates' descriptions of high psychological safety and accountability involved positive learning experiences and responsibility toward patients. The relational lenses of psychological safety and accountability may inform faculty development and future educational research in clinical medical education.

Settling the Score: Injury Severity Score Fails to Capture Nuances in Pediatric Trauma.

OBJECTIVES: Recent work has questioned the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) in the pediatric population. We sought to determine mortality rates in pediatric trauma patients at ISSs considered "severe" in adults and whether mortality would vary substantially between adults and children sustaining injuries with the same AIS. METHODS: Univariate logistic regression was used to generate mortality rates associated with ISS scores, for children (<16 years of age) and adults, using the 2016 National Trauma Data Bank. Mortality rates at an ISS of 15 were calculated in both groups. We similarly calculated ISS scores associated with mortality rates of 10%, 25%, and 50%. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to compare the discriminative ability of ISS to predict mortality after blunt and penetrating injuries in adults and children. Mortality rates associated with 1 or more AIS 3 injuries per body region were defined. RESULTS: There were 855,454 cases, 86,414 (10.1%) of which were children. The ISS associated with 10%, 25%, and 50% mortality were 35, 44, and 53, respectively, in children; they were 27, 38, and 48 in adults. At an ISS of 15, pediatric mortality was 1.0%; in adults, it was 3.1%. A 3.1% mortality rate was not observed in children until an ISS of 25. On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the ISS performed better in children compared with adults (area under the curve, 0.965 vs 0.860 [P < 0.001]). Adults consistently suffered from higher mortality rates than did children with the same number of severe injuries to a body region, and mortality varied widely between specific selected AIS 3 injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ISS predicts mortality well, children have lower mortality than do adults for the same ISS, and therefore, the accepted definition of severe injury is not equivalent between these 2 cohorts. Mortality risk is highly dependent on the specific nature of the injury, with large variability in outcomes despite identical AIS scores.

Interest in Improving Access to Pediatric Trauma Care Through Telemedicine.

Despite improved outcomes at pediatric trauma centers (PTC), 90% of injured children are not treated at PTCs. Telemedicine may play a role in ensuring patients are transferred to the appropriate level of care. We aimed to determine the level of interest in trauma telemedicine with our PTC among referring facilities. A survey was conducted with the trauma program directors of 45 hospitals in Utah, which consisted of four multiple choice questions designed to determine interest in pediatric trauma telemedicine support, projected frequency of use, anticipated uses of telemedicine, and perceived barriers to implementation. Forty-one directors (91%) responded. 88% of directors were interested in developing a pediatric trauma telemedicine network. 20% estimated their center would use telemedicine more than once a week, 17% once a week, 24% once a month, and 37% a few times a year. The most frequently cited uses of a telemedicine program were triage/transfer decisions and provider support. Inadequate volume and insufficient funding were the most common perceived barriers. These data show there is a strong interest amongst hospitals in our state in pediatric trauma telemedicine. Inadequate volume to warrant a program and insufficient facility funding remain concerns for development of a program.

Talk to me.

While physicians and patients both turn to writing in order to reflect, heal and advocate for social change, few have the opportunity to write with one another. I met Ann Weber, a doctor in social psychology from Asheville, North Carolina, as a fourth year medical student on the wards. Both Ann and I continue to search for answers, but as inveterate learners and writers, we now heal and grow together. This piece offers insight into how simple actions during patient care can promote humanism and patient-centeredness in medicine.

Use of a statewide solid organ injury procotcol to optimize triage, treatment, and transfer for pediatric abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Utah Pediatric Trauma Network (UPTN) is a non-competitive collaboration of all 51 hospitals in the state of Utah with the purpose of improving pediatric trauma care. Created in 2019, UPTN has implemented evidence-based guidelines based on hospital resources and capabilities with quarterly review of data collected in a network-specific database. A blunt solid organ injury (SOI) protocol was developed to optimize treatment of these injuries statewide. The purpose of this study was to review the effectiveness of the SOI guideline. METHODS: The UPTN REDCap® database was retrospectively reviewed from 2021 through 2022. We compared admissions from the Level 1 pediatric trauma center (PED1) to non-pediatric hospitals (non-PED1) of children with low-grade (I-II) and high-grade (III-V) SOIs. RESULTS: In 2 years, 172 patients were treated for blunt SOI, with or without concomitant injuries. There were 48 (28%) low-grade and 124 (72%) high-grade SOIs. 33 (69%) patients were triaged with low-grade SOI injuries at a non-PED1 center, and 17 (35%) were transferred to the PED1 hospital. Most had multiple injuries, but 7 (44%) were isolated, and none required a transfusion or any procedure/operation at either hospital. Of the 124 patients with high-grade injuries, 41 (33%) primarily presented to the PED1 center, and 44 (35%) were transferred there. Of these, 2 required a splenectomy and none required angiography. Thirty-nine children were treated at non-PED1 centers without transfer, and 4 required splenectomy and 6 underwent angiography/embolization procedures. No patient with an isolated SOI died. CONCLUSION: Implementation of SOI guidelines across UPTN successfully allowed non-pediatric hospitals to safely admit children with low-grade isolated SOI, keeping families closer to home, while standardizing pediatric triage for blunt abdominal trauma in the state. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Routine Urology Consultation and Follow-up After Pediatric Blunt Renal Trauma is Likely Unnecessary.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the outcomes of high-grade renal trauma in pediatric patients and evaluates the intervention rate. In our hospital, we routinely consult urology on all high-grade injuries. We anticipated minimal intervention, casting doubt on the need for routine urology consultation and follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review at a single pediatric trauma center from January 2018 to June 2023, focusing on patients with severe (grade III-V) renal injuries. Data collected included demographics, trauma-related variables, hospital course, interventions, and follow-up. When the grade was not readily available in the electronic medical record, we had a board-certified pediatric radiologist review the imaging and provide the grade. Follow-up was included only if it was with a pediatric urologist. RESULTS: There were 92 patients that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 47 were grade III, 32 were grade IV, and 13 were grade V. Six (6.5%) patients required inpatient renal stent procedures. Follow-up occurred in 55/92 (60%) patients with a pediatric urologist. Follow-up by grade is as follows: 22/47 (47%) grade III, 22/32 (69%) grade IV, and 11/13 (85%) grade V. Overall 5.8% of patients required antihypertensive medications and this was more likely as injury grade increased. All stents were removed outpatient and there were 3 (3.3%) additional outpatient interventions, all in patients that were symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Given the low prevalence of interventions after discharge, routine consultation and follow-up with urology is likely unnecessary in the absence of an inpatient urologic procedure during the index hospitalization. Patients with high-grade injuries should instead follow up with a trauma clinic or general provider with urology follow-up based on symptoms. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Two-Stage Liver Transplantation and Tricuspid Valve Replacement After Blunt Trauma in a Pediatric Patient.

In cases of uncontrollable hepatic hemorrhage or acute hepatic failure after trauma, liver transplantation can be a lifesaving procedure. Traumatic tricuspid valve injuries are rare, and symptoms can range from indolent to acute right heart failure. When concomitant, traumatic liver transplant and tricuspid injuries have significant physiologic interplay and management implications. We present a 14-year-old male injured in an all-terrain vehicle accident, who sustained a devastating disruption of the common bile duct and celiac artery injury, leading to acute hepatic failure, necessitating a two-stage liver transplantation. He was subsequently found to have a severe traumatic tricuspid injury, which required tricuspid valve replacement. At 4 years post-injury, he is without major complications. This is the first case presentation of the cooccurrence of these complex pathologies. Importantly, we demonstrate the complex decision-making surrounding traumatic liver transplantation and timing of subsequent tricuspid valve repair, weighing the complex interplay of these 2 pathologies.

Optimizing patient selection for ECMO after pediatric hypothermic cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: In 2004, our level 1 regional pediatric trauma center created a protocol to activate ECMO for children with suspected hypothermic cardiac arrest based on inclusion criteria: serum potassium ≤9, submersion <90 min, and core body temperature <30 °C. In 2017, Pasquier et al. developed a model to help predict the survival of adults after hypothermic cardiac arrest (HOPE score) that has not been validated in children. We sought to apply this score to our pediatric patient population to determine if it can optimize our patient selection. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients cannulated onto VA ECMO for hypothermic cardiac arrest between 2004 and 2022. We used abstracted data points to calculate the HOPE score for our patient population, both with and without presumed asphyxia. RESULTS: Over 19 years, 18 patients were cannulated for suspected hypothermic arrest, with three survivors (17 %). The HOPE score survival prediction ranged from 1 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 6-98 % without presumed asphyxia. Survivor HOPE scores ranged from 9 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 42-98 % without presumed asphyxia. Non-survivors' scores ranged 1-29 % with asphyxia and 6-57 % without asphyxia. A cutoff of >5 % predicted survival with asphyxia for ECMO could have decreased our cannulations by half without missing survivors. CONCLUSION: ECMO can be a lifesaving measure for specific children after hypothermic arrest. However, identifying the patients that will benefit from this resource-intensive intervention remains difficult. HOPE score utilization may decrease the rate of futile cannulation in children, but multi-centered research is needed in the pediatric population.

A pediatric teletrauma program pilot project: Improves access to pediatric trauma care and timely assessment of pediatric traumas.

BACKGROUND: Geographic location is a barrier to providing specialized care to pediatric traumas. In 2019, we instituted a pediatric teletrauma program in collaboration with the Statewide Pediatric Trauma Network at our level 1 pediatric trauma center (PTC). Triage guidelines were provided to partnering hospitals (PHs) to aid in evaluation of pediatric traumas. Our pediatric trauma team was available for phone/video trauma consultation to provide recommendations on disposition and management. We hypothesized that this program would improve access and timely assessment of pediatric traumas while limiting patient transfers to our PTC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the PTC between January 2019 and May 2023. All pediatric trauma patients younger than 18 years who had teletrauma consults were included. We also evaluated all avoidable transfers without teletrauma consults defined as admission for less than 36 hours without an intervention or imaging as a comparison group. RESULTS: A total of 151 teletrauma consults were identified: 62% male and median age of 8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12 years). Teletrauma consults increased from 12 in 2019 to 100 in 2022 to 2023, and the number of PHs increased from 2 to 32. Partnering hospitals were 15 to 554 miles from the PTC, with a median distance of 34 miles (IQR, 28-119 miles). Following consultation, we recommended discharge (34%), admission (29%), or transfer to PTC (35%). Of those who were not transferred, 3% (3 of 97) required subsequent treatment at the PTC. Nontransferred teletrauma consults had a higher percentage of TBI (61% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) and were from farther distances (40 miles [IQR, 28-150 miles] vs. 30 miles [IQR, 28-50 miles], p < 0.001) compared with avoidable transferred patients without a teletrauma consult. CONCLUSION: Teletrauma consult is a safe and viable addition to a pediatric trauma program faced with providing care to a large geographical catchment area. The pediatric teletrauma program provided management recommendations to 32 PHs and avoided transfer in approximately 63% of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

The Utah Pediatric Trauma Network, a statewide pediatric trauma collaborative can safely help nonpediatric hospitals admit children with mild traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Created in 2019, the Utah Pediatric Trauma Network (UPTN) is a transparent noncompetitive collaboration of all hospitals in Utah with the purpose of improving pediatric trauma care. The UPTN implements evidence-based guidelines based on hospital resources and capabilities with quarterly review of data collected in a network-specific database. The first initiative was to help triage the care of traumatic brain injury (TBI) to prevent unnecessary transfers while ensuring appropriate care. The purpose of this study was to review the effectiveness of this network wide guideline. METHODS: The UPTN REDCap database was retrospectively reviewed between January 2019 and December 2021. Comparisons were made between the pediatric trauma center (PED1) and nonpediatric hospitals (non-PED1) in admissions of children with very mild, mild, or complicated mild TBI. RESULTS: Of the total 3,315 cases reviewed, 294 were admitted to a non-PED1 hospital and 1,061 to the PED1 hospital with very mild/mild/complicated mild TBI. Overall, kids treated at non-PED1 were older (mean, 14.9 vs. 7.7 years; p = 0.00001) and more likely to be 14 years or older (37% vs. 24%, p < 0.00001) compared with those at PED1. Increased admissions occurred post-UPTN at non-PED1 hospitals compared with pre-UPTN (43% vs. 14%, p < 0.00001). Children admitted to non-PED1 hospitals post-UPTN were younger (9.1 vs. 15.7 years, p = 0.002) with more kids younger than 14 years (67% vs. 38%, p = 0.014) compared with pre-UPTN. Two kids required next-day transfer to a higher-level center (1 to PED1), and none required surgery or neurosurgical evaluation. The mean length of stay was 21.8 hours (interquartile range, 11.9-25.4). Concomitantly, less children with very mild TBI were admitted to PED1 post-UPTN (6% vs. 27%, p < 0.00001) and more with complicated mild TBI (63% vs. 50%, p = 0.00003) than 2019. CONCLUSION: Implementation of TBI guidelines across the UPTN successfully allowed nonpediatric hospitals to safely admit children with very mild, mild, or complicated mild TBI. In addition, admitted kids were more like those treated at the PED1 hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.

Hanging and Strangulation Injuries: An Institutional Review From a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: We sought to define the incidence and outcomes of pediatric hanging and strangulation injuries to inform best practices for trauma triage and management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted that included all patients who presented after hanging or strangulation to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center from 2011 through 2021. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. All imaging modalities of the head and neck were reviewed to determine if a bony fracture or vascular injury was present. RESULTS: Over the 11-year study period, 128 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age of the cohort was 13 years [IQR: 8.5-15], most patients were male (60.9%), and the median GCS was 11 [3, 15]. There were 96 cases (75%) that were intentional injuries. 76 patients (59.4%) received imaging in the form of plain radiographs, CT, or MRI of the neck and cervical spine. No fractures were identified and there were 0 clinically significant cervical spine injuries. CT angiograms of the neck identified no cerebral vascular injuries. Mortality was high (32%), and 25% of patients with nonaccidental injuries had a documented prior suicide attempt. CONCLUSION: We identified no cervical spine fractures and no blunt cerebral vascular injuries after a hanging or strangulation in over 10 years at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. Use of CT and CT angiography of the neck and cervical spine should be minimized in this patient population without high clinical index of suspicion and/or significant mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Pediatric cervical spine clearance: A 10-year evaluation of multidetector computed tomography at a level 1 pediatric trauma center.

INTRODUCTION: Efficient and accurate evaluation of the pediatric cervical spine (c-spine) for both injury identification and posttraumatic clearance remains a challenge. We aimed to determine the sensitivity of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for identification of cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in pediatric blunt trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2012 to 2021. All pediatric trauma patients age younger than 18 years who underwent c-spine imaging (plain radiograph, MDCT, and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were included. All patients with abnormal MRIs but normal MDCTs were reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon to assess specific injury characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 4,477 patients underwent c-spine imaging, and 60 (1.3%) were diagnosed with a clinically significant CSI that required surgery or a halo. These patients were older, more likely to be intubated, have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <14, and more likely to be transferred in from a referring hospital. One patient with a fracture on radiography and neurologic symptoms got an MRI and no MDCT before operative repair. All other patients who underwent surgery including halo placement for a clinically significant CSI had their injury diagnosed by MDCT, representing a sensitivity of 100%. There were 17 patients with abnormal MRIs and normal MDCTs; none underwent surgery or halo placement. Imaging from these patients was reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon, and no unstable injuries were identified. CONCLUSION: Multidetector computed tomography appears to have 100% sensitivity for detecting clinically significant CSIs in pediatric trauma patients, regardless of age or mental status. Forthcoming prospective data will be useful to confirm these results and inform recommendations for whether pediatric c-spine clearance can be safely performed based on the results of a normal MDCT alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

Transgender Youth Experiences with Implantable GnRH Agonists for Puberty Suppression.

This descriptive study reports caregiver experiences with GnRH agonist implants among a cohort of youth followed in a pediatric hospital-based gender clinic. We administered a survey to 36 of 55 eligible caregivers ascertaining demographics and satisfaction, with a medical record review of any surgical complications. The overwhelming majority (97.1%) reported satisfaction with the procedure and would undergo the implant procedure again (94.4%). The most frequent challenges noted were about affordability (39.8%) and insurance denials (39.8%). Implantable GnRH agonist can be used successfully in pediatric patients with gender dysphoria. Future policy should seek to address concerns regarding insurance approval and reimbursement.

How safe is adolescent bariatric surgery? An analysis of short-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of childhood obesity in the U.S. has tripled over the last three decades. However, fewer than 1% of children with severe obesity undergo surgical weight loss interventions each year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients age 10 to 19 years old who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from 2015 through 2018 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. The primary outcomes were mortality and overall complications. Procedural trends, readmission and reoperation rates were also examined using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: Patients had a mean BMI of 47.3 kg/m2 and 80.0% were either 18 or 19 years old (n = 4,051). There were two reported deaths. Reoperation within 30 days occurred in 1.1% of patients, readmission in 3.5%, and complications in 1.2%. Among all readmissions, primary reasons included nausea/vomiting or nutritional depletion (41.3%) and abdominal pain (16.3%). RYGB was associated with higher odds for readmission (p = 0.006) and complications (p = 0.005). Higher BMI and younger age were not associated with an increased likelihood to experience poorer outcomes. The proportion of patients undergoing SG increased yearly over RYGB from 73.9% in 2015 to 84.3% in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery appears to be low risk for adolescents and SG has become the operation of choice. More research on early consideration of surgical therapy in adolescents with severe obesity is needed given the safety profile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pulling Back from the Brink: A Multi-Pronged Approach to Address General Surgery Resident Clinical Work Hour Adherence.

PURPOSE: The conflict between prioritizing education for surgical trainees, promoting trainee wellness, and maintaining optimal patient care has remained challenging since the introduction of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work hour restrictions in 2003. There is still a dearth of research examining which interventions successfully enable duty hour adherence. This study assessed the impact of a combination of strategic interventions on improving clinical work hour adherence. METHODS: Monthly clinical work hour submission rates were assessed for all general surgery residents at a single university-based residency program over a 3-year period (2018-2021). Interventions targeted 3 domains and were implemented between academic years 2018 to 2019 (control) and 2020 to 2021 (intervention): 1) improving the accuracy and transparency of work hour reporting, 2) facilitating more timely interventions, and 3) structural scheduling changes. All 80-hour work week and continuous work hour violations were assessed. Findings were also compared to the corresponding ACGME Resident Survey results. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of monthly work hour submissions pre- and postintervention (78% vs 75%, p = 0.057). However, the number of total reported monthly violations decreased significantly (mean 13.8 vs 2.4, p < 0.01), including decreases in both 80-hour work week and continuous work hour violations (mean 4.7 vs 1.6, p < 0.001 and 9.1 vs 0.8, p < 0.001, respectively). Reported compliance also increased on the annual ACGME resident surveys, where 61% vs 95% of residents felt they were compliant with the 80-hour work week and 71% vs 95% felt they were compliant with the continuous work hours (2018-19 vs 2020-21). CONCLUSION: Innovative strategies addressing schedule changes, the culture of work hour reporting, and early intervention significantly decreased the number of duty hour violations at our institution. Reported resident compliance also improved based on ACGME Resident Survey data. These data may inform similar multifaceted approaches at other institutions to improve overall work hour adherence.

Disrupting the Fellowship Match: COVID-19 and the Applicant Arms Race.

Resident and fellow selection carried out via "the Match" has historically relied upon in-person interviews to evaluate and rank candidates. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has required fellowship matches and the upcoming Main Residency Match® to become wholly virtual. The 2020 pediatric surgery match offers a unique case study in the benefits and shortcomings of a virtual process and begins a much-needed conversation regarding opportunities for innovation in candidate selection. For many candidates, the application cycle imposes considerable costs - financial, professional, and personal - which have only escalated over time. We draw on our experience from the most recent match cycle to discuss limitations of the traditional Match® and suggest potential solutions to improve the subspecialty interview process moving forward.

Use of angioembolization in pediatric polytrauma patients: WITH BLUNT SPLENIC INJURYAngioembolization in Pediatric Blunt Splenic Injury.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We sought to analyze the use of angioembolization (AE) after pediatric splenic injuries at adult and pediatric trauma centers (ATCs/PTCs). METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2015) was queried for patients (<18 years) who experienced blunt splenic trauma. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of AE with splenectomy. Propensity score matching was used to explore the relationship between trauma center designation and AE utilization. RESULTS: 14,027 encounters met inclusion criteria. 514 (3.7%) patients underwent AE. When compared to PTCs, patients were older, had a higher ISS, and more often presented in shock at ATCs (p<0.001 for all). Regression models demonstrated no difference in mortality between cohorts. Odds of splenectomy were lower for patients undergoing AE (OR 0.16 [CI: 0.08-0.31]), however this effect was mostly driven by utilization at ATCs. Using a 1:1 propensity score matching model, patients treated at ATCs were 4 times more likely to undergo AE and 7 times more likely to require a splenectomy compared to PTCs (p<0.001). Over 6 years, PTCs performed only 27 splenectomies and 23 AEs (1.1% and 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: AE was associated with improved splenic salvage at ATCs in select patients but appeared overutilized when compared to outcomes at PTCs. PTCs accomplished a higher splenic salvage rate with a lower AE utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III - Retrospective cohort study.