Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Emerg Radiol ; 19(4): 317-22, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22419058

RESUMO

Mineral foreign bodies (stones) are infrequent findings in clinical and radiological practice. However, a growing number of reports indicate that they raise clinical and diagnostic concern in ophthalmology, neurosurgery, maxillofacial surgery, otolaryngology, gastroenterology, and vascular surgery. Dense finding in the soft tissue without clear history of foreign body penetration may represent diagnostic challenge mimicking calcifications or bony fragments. The aim of this work is to analyze the appearance of stone foreign bodies on radiographs and computed tomography. A collection of minerals and rocks was used for analysis. The clinical case of a stony foreign body which penetrated into the soft tissue of the leg is used to demonstrate the diagnostic challenge and management. Available literature describing imaging characteristics of stones was reviewed. The results of this work will help in diagnostic interpretation and assessment of stone foreign body composition.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Acidentes por Quedas , Adolescente , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Corpos Estranhos/cirurgia , Humanos , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
2.
Healthc Q ; 12 Spec No Patient: 15-22, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19667773

RESUMO

The use of computed tomography (CT) is growing, and, consequently, the associated radiation dose to patients is increasing as well. There is also increasing evidence linking the radiation dose within the range of diagnostic CT with a significantly increased risk of malignancy. These two factors combine to make radiation dose from diagnostic CT a public health concern. In order to practise to the best of our abilities and avoid harming patients, the radiation dose from CT must be minimized. Administrators, technologists, radiologists and other physicians are encouraged to work toward this goal through the use of education and a multi-faceted team approach. The objective of this paper is to educate healthcare professionals about the radiation dose from diagnostic CT, including utilization rates, typical examination doses and the risks of this radiation. Our experience in Saskatchewan is discussed. Suggestions regarding CT dose management and optimization are highlighted.


Assuntos
Administradores Hospitalares/educação , Doses de Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Canadá , Humanos , Neoplasias/etiologia , Medição de Risco
3.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 60(2): 71-8, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19433037

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the effective dose from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans in Saskatchewan, Canada, and compare with other reported dose levels. METHODS: Data from CT scans were collected from 12 scanners in 7 cities across Saskatchewan. The patient age, scan type, and selected technique parameters including the dose length product and the volume computed tomography dose index were collected for a 2-week period. This information then was used to calculate effective doses patients are exposed to during CT examinations. Data from 2,061 clinically indicated CT examinations were collected, and of them 1,690 were eligible for analysis. Every examination during a 2-week period was recorded without selection. RESULTS: The average provincial estimated patient dose was as follows: head, 2.7 mSv (638 scans; standard deviation [SD], +/-1.6); chest, 11.3 mSv (376 scans; SD, +/-8.9); abdomen-pelvis, 15.5 mSv (578 scans; SD, +/-10.0); abdomen, 11.7 mSv (80 scans; SD, +/-11.48), and pelvis, 8.6 mSv (18 scans; SD, +/-6.04). Significant variation in dose between the CT scanners was observed (P = .049 for head, P = .001 for chest, and P = .034 for abdomen-pelvis). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the estimated dose from diagnostic CT examinations was similar to other previously published Canadian data from British Columbia. This dose varied slightly from some other published standards, including being higher than those found in a review conducted in the United Kingdom in 2003.


Assuntos
Doses de Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cabeça/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Abdominal/métodos , Radiografia Abdominal/estatística & dados numéricos , Saskatchewan , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA