Evaluation of the frequency and intensity of COVID-19 in patients with ankylosing spondylitis under anti-TNF therapy.

BACKGROUND: Dear Editor, After the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the whole world, rheumatologists began to think about how COVID-19 will progress in patients with inflammatory conditions. High cytokine levels play a role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a proinflammatory cytokine known to have a key role in the pathogenesis of chronic immune-mediated diseases. AntiTNF therapy may cause an increase in active tuberculosis, other granulomatous diseases, and serious infections [1]. According to many studies, rheumatological diseases have not been identified as a risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection [2]. Should significantly increased cytokine levels during COVID-19 infection make us consider anticytokine therapies that may be used in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 a risk? We aimed to explore whether the frequency of COVID-19 infection increased, the effect of comorbidities on the frequency of infection, and whether the severity of the disease and need for intensive care support increased in patients who used anti-TNF agents. We performed a retrospective case-control study between March and December 2020 in Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital. Retrospectively, we evaluated whether there was a difference in the frequency and severity of COVID-19 in our patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 77 of whom were using anti-TNF and 49 of whom didn't use anti-TNF. Hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) requirements were evaluated as endpoints. In the anti-TNF group, patients used adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab, infliximab, and golimumab. Patients were questioned at an outpatient clinic in person or by phone. Seventy-seven patients with AS using anti-TNF agents (58 males, 19 females) and 49 patients with AS (38 males, 11 females) not using anti-TNF agents were included in the study (p = 0.943). Mean age of patients using antiTNF agents was 41.53 ± 10.38, and mean age of patients not using anti-TNF agents was 42.94 ± 10.86 (p = 0.468). Thirty-three (42.9%) patients were smokers in the antiTNF group, while 23 (46.9%) patients were smokers in the group not using TNFi (p = 0.791). There was 12 pack-year smoking in the anti-TNF group, and 14 pack-year smoking in not using TNFi (p = 0.623). The frequency of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), amiloidosis, familial mediterranean fever (FMF), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was similar in both groups (p = 0.403, p = 0.999, p = 0.521, p = 0.999, p = 0.999, respectively). Six patients using TNFi and 3 patients not using TNFi recovered from COVID-19 infection. However, this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.999). One patient using anti-TNF was hospitalized but with no need for admission to the ICU (p = 0.999). All 9 patients recovering from COVID-19 were male (p = 0.113). There were 2 (22.2%) smokers in the SARS-CoV-2 positive group and 54 (46.2%) smokers in SARS-CoV-2 negative group (p = 0.297). There was 37.5 pack-year smoking in SARS-CoV-2 positive group, and 12 pack-year smoking in SARS-CoV-2 negative group (p = 0.151). Nobody has comorbidities (DM, HT, amiloidosis, FMF, CAD, COPD) in SARS-CoV-2 positive group. There were patients with DM (5.1%), HT (15.4%), amiloidosis (1.7%), FMF (1.7%), CAD (0.9%) and COPD (0.9%) in SARS-CoV-2 negative group (p = 0.999, p = 0.356, p = 0.999, p = 0.999, p = 0.999, p = 0.999, respectively). Having comorbidities was not detected to be associated with frequency of COVID-19. 31 (40.3%) patients were using adalimumab, 25 (32.5%) patients were using etanercept, 13 patients were using (16.9%) certolizumab, 6 (7.8%) patients were using golimumab, and 2 patients (2.6%) were using infliximab in TNF group. Six patients using anti-TNF (2 adalimumab, 1 etanercept, 1 golimumab,2 infliximab) and 3 nonuser patients recovered from COVID-19 (p = 0.999). No statistically significant difference was found between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients in terms of the types of anti TNF they used. Patients were called in March 2020, and they were advised to terminate their anti-TNF therapy, when the COVID-19 pandemic began. Among those who used antiTNF, 2 (33.3%) people who had COVID-19 and 38 (53.5%) people who did not have COVID-19 interrupted treatment (p = 0.419). Anti-TNF users who did not have COVID-19 stopped taking the treatment for an average of 3 months (min 2-max 4 months) starting from March 2020, and the patients who had COVID-19 (p = 0.102) stopped taking the treatment for 1.5 months (min 1-max 2 months). Duration of interrupting TNFi was not significant for the risk of COVID-19. Comorbidities, older age, and the presence of active disease have been associated with worse outcomes in previous studies [3]. In our study, the anti-TNF using and the nonuser groups were similar according to age, sex, and comorbidities. Although comorbidities in COVID-19 are associated with severe disease in the literature, we did not find a significant difference in our study. This result is probably related to our insufficient number of patients. As a result, we found that the use of anti-TNF did not increase the frequency and severity of COVID-19. In a recently published multicenter study, it was stated that the use of biological DMARDs in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases was not significantly associated with a worse outcome of COVID-19. But unlike our study, having no comorbidities was associated with a decreased risk of a worse outcome [4]. There are currently studies investigating the therapeutic utility of infliximab and adalimumab in hospitalized COVID-19 patients [5]. The results of these studies are very important. The usability of TNFi in treatment and at which stage of the disease anti-TNF agents can be used are wondered. We will see the course of the disease all over the world after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccines, but we still need more information about effective and safe treatment. RESULTS: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. DISCUSSION: The authors did not receive support from any organization for this work.

Orbital Doppler ultrasonography evaluation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study is to compare patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a rheumatologic disease that can cause eye involvement and the normal population in terms of orbital Doppler findings, which is an inexpensive and easily applicable method that can be used in early diagnosis and follow-up. METHODS: The study was planned prospectively. The data of patients with AS were compared to those of age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. A total of 42 participants, 23 (54.8%) males and 19 (45.2%) females, with a mean age of 42.4±12.6 years were included in the study. In addition to demographic information, such as age and gender, the diameter, peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean velocity, resistive index, pulsatility index, and blood flow volumes of the central retinal artery of the left eye were measured using spectral Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: According to the comparison of the patients with and without AS according to orbital Doppler ultrasonography findings, the mean velocity, resistive index, and volume measurements of the patients with AS were significantly higher than those without AS (p=0.028, p=0.039, and p=0.038, respectively). However, in the subgroup analysis of the AS group, the Doppler findings did not significantly differ between the patients with and without anterior uveitis. CONCLUSION: In the patient group with AS, independent of anterior uveitis (AU), there was a difference in Doppler parameters and therefore in ophthalmic vasculature. In patients with AS, orbital vascularity changes can be detected with orbital Doppler US before clinical signs appear.

Case of MOG-IgG-associated disease with ankylosing spondylitis: A rare coexistence.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease (MOGAD) is an inflammatory neurological disease. It progresses with attacks by affecting the optic nerves and spinal cord. Bilateral or recurrent optic neuritis are the most common findings in adult patients. Its association with systemic autoimmune disorders such as Sjögren syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, autoimmune thyroiditis, and celiac disease is rare. The first and only case of MOGAD in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis with a history of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) use was reported. Herein, we present the coexistence of MOGAD in a patient with AS who did not have a history of anti-TNF-α therapy.

Can we predict thrombotic tendency in rheumatoid arthritis? A thromboelastographic analysis (with ROTEM).

The higher incidence of arterial and venous events is well established in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim here was to investigate whether there is a prothrombotic state in RA patients by using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) method and to demonstrate whether the disease variables play a role in this process. A total of 85 patients who met the 2010 RA classification criteria were consecutively included in the study. The patients with RA who have been using antiaggregant, anticoagulant, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and had a history of arterial or venous thromboembolism were excluded from the study. Their complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, D-dimer, and lipid profiles were measured, DAS-28 disease activation scores were calculated, and simultaneous ROTEM analysis was performed to determine the predisposition to thrombosis. Of the ROTEM parameters, clotting time (CT, seconds (s)), clot formation time (CFT, s), and maximum clot firmness (MCF) were evaluated. Having a shorter CT and/or CFT in intrinsic (I) or extrinsic (E) pathway and/or a longer MCF compared to the healthy controls was considered as "predisposition to hypercoagulability". The mean age of the 85 RA patients were 54.12 ± 13 years, and 77.6% of the patients were female (n = 66). Of the patients, 52.9% (n = 45) were using methotrexate (MTX) ± hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) ± corticosteroid (CS), while 43.5% (n = 37) were using anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ± MTX. Active steroid usage was ongoing in 64.7% of the patients (n = 55). When evaluated according to DAS-28, in those with higher disease activity, a shorter I-CFT and greater I-MCF were determined (p = 0.020 and p = 0.033, respectively). In those with higher disease activity based on the correlation analysis, I-CFT and E-CFT were shorter and I-MCF and E-MCF were longer, indicating a higher predisposition to thrombosis. Using linear regression, variables with a major effect on ROTEM parameters were identified as DAS-28, CRP, and platelet count. As the first study in the literature, we identified that disease activation is the most important risk factor for prothrombotic state in RA patients irrespective of the drugs used. ROTEM can be used in clinical practice to predict thrombotic events in RA patients.