High Response Rate and Prolonged Survival of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer Treated With a New Combination Therapy Consisting of Intraarterial Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy.

SYNOPSIS: A new combination therapy consisting of intraarterial chemotherapy plus radiotherapy was demonstrated to have the potential to improve the response rate and survival time in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer. PURPOSE: We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness and safety of a new combination therapy consisting of intraarterial chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (AI+RT), which may have the potential to improve unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 52 BTC cases treated with AI+RT and analyzed the anti-tumor effect, survival time and adverse events. The AI+RT regimen consisted of one-shot intraarterial chemotherapy (AI) at the first angiography session, almost 6 months of reservoir AI (5-FU and cisplatin, q/week) and external radiation with a maximum dose of 50.6 Gy. RESULTS: The response rate and disease control rate were high, at 40.4% and 96.2%, respectively, and the median overall and progression-free survival time were 463 and 431 days; thus, long-term survival was achieved. A univariate analysis identified 12 prognostic factors, and a performance status of 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.82, p=0.02), jaundice (HR: 3.22, p<0.01), peritoneal dissemination (HR: 22.5, p<0.01), number of AI (HR: 0.35, p=0.01) and response to AI+RT (HR: 0.23, p<0.01) were extracted as significant prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. The following: grade ≥3 adverse events occurred: leucopenia (11.5%), neutropenia (1.9%), anemia (15.4%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), anorexia (3.8%), gastroduodenal ulcer (25.0%), and cholangitis (23.1%). There were no cases of treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: AI+RT was shown to contribute to a high response rate and prolonged survival in patients with unresectable BTC. A sufficient number of AI and the response to this therapy were thought to be significant prognostic factors in patients receiving AI+RT. Advances in multidisciplinary therapies, such as AI+RT, which was described in the present study, are also considered to be important for the future.

Intraluminal low-dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy and biliary stenting for unresectable extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of combined-modality therapy, including external beam radiotherapy, intraluminal (192)Ir, and biliary stenting for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1998, 93 patients with unresectable extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma underwent definitive radiotherapy. The dose of external beam radiotherapy was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Low-dose-rate (192)Ir was delivered at a dose of 27-50 Gy (mean 39.2) at 0.5 cm from the source. An expandable metallic endoprosthesis was used to establish an internal bile passage. RESULTS: The median survival was 12 months, with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate of 50%, 10%, and 4%, respectively. Tumor length, hepatic invasion, and distant metastasis significantly affected survival. Ninety-six percent of patients could successfully remove external drainage catheters. The actuarial biliary patency rate for these patients at 1, 3, and 5 years was 52%, 29%, and 18%, respectively. Tumor length, tumor diameter and T stage were significantly associated with the patency rate. Mild-to-severe gastroduodenal complications were observed in 32 patients and were significantly associated with the active length of (192)Ir and linear source activity. Eight patients had treatment-related biliary fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Our combined-modality therapy provided reasonable local control and improved the quality of life of patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Because none of the treatment characteristics had any impact on survival or biliary patency, lower dose levels and/or a localized target volume are recommended to minimize morbidity.

A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of external radiotherapy for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck in Northern Japan.

PURPOSE: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed in northern Japan to analyze the outcome of external radiotherapy as the definitive treatment modality for localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck treated by external radiotherapy at nine institutions of the Northern Japan Radiation Therapy Oncology Group between 1980 and 1999 were enrolled in this study. Radiotherapy alone was performed in 21 patients, and the remaining 10 patients received postoperative radiotherapy for gross residual tumors. The fraction size of radiotherapy varied from 1.5-13.8 Gy, with the total dose ranging from 32-64 Gy (median, 50 Gy). The follow-up periods ranged from 1-214 months (median, 16 months). RESULTS: Complete or partial responses were observed in 9 patients (29%) and 18 patients (58%), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 patients (41.9%) and distant metastasis occurred in 11 patients (35.5%). Most incidences of local recurrence and distant metastasis developed within 2 years after the initial treatment. Overall cause-specific survival rates of patients at 1 and 3 years were 73% and 33%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that high dose per fractionated radiotherapy doses (>or=3 Gy) was associated with better prognosis for both local control (p = 0.048) and survival (p = 0.045). Multivariate analysis indicated that age (better prognosis in younger patients, p = 0.046) was the only significant factor. Radiotherapy for gross residual lesions after surgery did not seem to impact the significant gain of local control and survival. We observed two fatal late complications of mucosal ulcer and bleeding in the high dose per fractionated radiotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy at a dose of 3 Gy or more per fraction was effective in gaining local control in patients with localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck, and subsequently better survival was possible, especially in younger patients.

[Percutaneous transhepatic central venous port implantation via the middle hepatic vein: a case report].

Percutaneous transhepatic central venous access with a subcutaneous infusion port was performed in a 34-year-old woman with extensive third-degree burns whose peripheral vessels were not available because of infection or dermatoplastic sites. This procedure could be done in the same way as the usual PTCD maneuver without serious complications. The infusion system functioned well, and the patient's alimentation could be carried out.