RESUMO
PURPOSE: To design and validate an objective practical assessment tool for diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy that would provide residents with a method to evaluate their progression in this field of surgery and to identify specific learning needs. METHODS: We designed and evaluated the shoulder Objective Practical Assessment Tool (OPAT). The shoulder OPAT was designed by us, and scoring domains were created using a Delphi process. The shoulder OPAT was trialed by members of the British Elbow & Shoulder Society Education Committee for internal consistency and ease of use before being offered to other trainers and residents. Inter-rater reliability and intrarater reliability were calculated. One hundred forty orthopaedic residents, of varying seniority, within 5 training regions in the United Kingdom, were questioned regarding the tool. A pilot study of 6 residents was undertaken. RESULTS: Internal consistency was 0.77 (standardized Cronbach α). Inter-rater reliability was 0.60, and intrarater reliability was 0.82. The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) between the global summary score for the shoulder OPAT and the current assessment tool used in postgraduate training for orthopaedic residents undertaking diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy equaled 0.74. Of the residents, 82% agreed or strongly agreed when asked if the shoulder OPAT would be a useful tool in monitoring progression and 72% agreed or strongly agreed with the introduction of the shoulder OPAT within the orthopaedic domain. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the shoulder OPAT fulfills several aspects of reliability and validity when tested. Despite the inter-rater reliability being 0.60, we believe that the shoulder OPAT has the potential to play a role alongside the current assessment tool in the training of orthopaedic residents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The shoulder OPAT can be used to assess residents during shoulder arthroscopy and has the potential for use in medical education, as well as arthroscopic skills training in the operating theater.
Assuntos
Artroscopia/educação , Competência Clínica , Internato e Residência , Artropatias/diagnóstico , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Ortopedia/educação , Projetos Piloto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , OmbroRESUMO
AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which patient demographics, clinical presentation, and blood parameters vary in Kingella kingae septic arthritis when compared with those of other organisms, and whether this difference needs to be considered when assessing children in whom a diagnosis of septic arthritis is suspected. METHODS: A prospective case series was undertaken at a single UK paediatric institution between October 2012 and November 2018 of all patients referred with suspected septic arthritis. We recorded the clinical, biochemical, and microbiological findings in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients underwent arthrotomy for a presumed septic arthritis. Of these, no organism was identified in 61 and only 25 of these were both culture- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative. A total of 36 patients did not undergo PCR analysis. Of the remaining 99 culture- and PCR-positive patients, K. kingae was the most commonly isolated organism (42%, n = 42). The knee (n = 21), shoulder (n = 9), and hip (n = 5) were the three most commonly affected joints. A total of 28 cases (66%) of K. kingae infection were detected only on PCR. The mean age of K. kingae-positive cases (16.1 months) was significantly lower than that of those whose septic arthitis was due to other organisms (49.4 months; p < 0.001). The mean CRP was significantly lower in the K. kingae group than in the other organism group (p < 0.001). The mean ESR/CRP ratio was significantly higher in K. kingae (2.84) than in other infections (1.55; p < 0.008). The mean ESR and ESR/CRP were not significantly different from those in the 'no organism identified' group. CONCLUSION: K. kingae was the most commonly isolated organism from paediatric culture- and/or PCR-positive confirmed septic arthritis, with only one third of cases detected on routine cultures. It is important to develop and maintain a clinical suspicion for K. kingae infection in young patients presenting atypically. Routine PCR testing is recommended in these patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):584-588.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/microbiologia , Kingella kingae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Neisseriaceae/microbiologia , Adolescente , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções por Neisseriaceae/cirurgia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common neonatal musculoskeletal condition. In 2008, the NHS Newborn and Infant Physical Examination committee added selective 'at risk' screening to the existing universal neonatal and general practitioner clinical hip screening guidelines. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of breech and family history risk factors in DDH. DESIGN: A 15 year prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study. METHOD: Breech presentation and evidence of a strong family history for DDH were the 'risk factors' studied. All infants referred were clinically and sonographically screened by one consultant paediatric orthopaedic surgeon. RESULTS: From a cohort of 64 670 live births, 2984 neonates/infants, 46.1 (95% CI 44.6 to 47.8) per 1000 live births, were referred and sonographically screened with these risk factors alone. 1360 were male, of which four were identified as having 'pathological' DDH (an incidence of 0.003 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.008)). 1624 were female, of which 45 were identified as having 'pathological' DDH (an incidence of 0.028 (95% CI 0.021 to 0.037)). This difference in incidence of 0.025 (95% CI 0.016 to 0.033) was statistically significant (p<0.001). From those who were clinically stable and screened with either or both of the two risk factors, four individuals were diagnosed with irreducible hip dislocation (0.06 (95% CI 0.024 to 0.159) per 1000 live births). All were females. CONCLUSIONS: This study questions the current UK screening policy for DDH in clinically stable males referred with risk factors, and may influence future DDH screening programme policy.
Assuntos
Luxação Congênita de Quadril/diagnóstico , Articulação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Apresentação Pélvica , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/epidemiologia , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/etiologia , Articulação do Quadril/anormalidades , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ultrassonografia , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Mycobacterium malmoense is an acid-fast non-tuberculous organism that most commonly causes pulmonary infection. Extrapulmonary infection has also been reported. With an increased emphasis being placed on the clinical importance of this organism, especially within Europe, we report the first case of septic arthritis of the shoulder caused by this organism. We also highlight the importance of considering atypical mycobacterium infection in the differential diagnosis of shoulder infection and issues surrounding the management of this entity.