Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in pregnancy to prevent perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus still occurs despite immunoprophylaxis in approximately 9% of children from highly viraemic mothers. Antiviral therapy in this setting has been suggested, however with limited evidence to direct agent choice. METHODS: We conducted a multi-centre, prospective, opt-in observational study of antiviral safety and efficacy in pregnant women with high viral load (>7 log IU/ml); lamivudine was used from 2007 to 2010 and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from late 2010. Outcomes of treated and untreated cohorts were compared. RESULTS: 120 women with 130 pregnancies used TDF (58), lamivudine (52 including four who switched due to TDF intolerance) and no therapy (20). 96% were HBeAg positive, with baseline viral load mean 7.8 log IU/ml (±0.72) and ALT median 25 U/L (18.75-33). Duration of antiviral theraphy before birth was mean 58 days (±19) TDF and 53 (±14) lamivudine. Viral load declined by 3.64 log IU/ml (±0.9) TDF and 2.81 log IU/ml (±1.33) lamivudine. Virologic failure (birth viral load >7 IU/ml) occurred in 3% and 18% respectively. Congenital abnormality rate and neonatal growth centiles were similar across cohorts. Perinatal transmission reduced significantly to 2% and 0% in TDF and lamivudine cohorts, compared with 20% in untreated. CONCLUSIONS: TDF in this setting is safe, effective and more potent than lamivudine. Antiviral therapy did not adversely impact obstetric or infant parameters. More TDF intolerance occurred than expected. Perinatal transmission was significantly reduced in antiviral therapy cohorts.

Serious infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha therapy: an Australian and New Zealand experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) medications are effective in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) and serious infections. The aim of this study was to examine the Australian/New Zealand experience of serious infections and TB in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy from 1999-2009. METHODS: Serious infections, defined as 'requiring hospital admission' and TB cases in patients receiving, or within 3 months following, anti-TNF-α therapy were analyzed across Australia and New Zealand. Patient demographics, IBD medications, duration of anti-TNF-α therapy, and infection details were collected. RESULTS: A total of 5562 IBD patients were managed across the centers. Of these, 489 (16.8%) Crohn's disease and 137 (5.2%) ulcerative colitis patients received anti-TNF-α therapy. There were three cases of latent TB that received prophylaxis prior to anti-TNF-α therapy. No cases of active TB were reported. Fourteen (2.2%) serious infections occurred. Seven occurred in patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy for less than 6 months, including two cases of primary Varicella zoster (VZV), two cases of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, two cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and one severe flu-like illness. Six patients were taking additional immunosuppressive medications. The other seven infections occurred after 6 months (mean 32.6 ± 24.3 months) and included one case of primary VZV, one flu-like illness, and five bacterial infections. All infections resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION: TB is a very rare complication of anti-TNF-α therapy in Australia and New Zealand. Serious infections are uncommon but early opportunistic infections with Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia suggest a need for vigilance in patients on multiple immunosuppressive medications. VZV vaccination prior to immunosuppressive therapy should be considered in VZV-naïve patients.