Initiation of noninvasive ventilation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to improve survival and symptom burden in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, limited data exist regarding the clinical and physiological parameters at the time of NIV initiation. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and respiratory physiological markers in a cohort of ALS patients with chronic respiratory failure. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with ALS assessed for NIV initiation between February 2012 and January 2021. NIV was initiated based on insurance eligibility criteria: daytime hypercapnia, defined by partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) >45 mm Hg using diurnal transcutaneous CO2 (TcCO2) as a surrogate, a maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) <60 cmH2O or forced vital capacity (FVC) <50% predicted normal. RESULTS: We identified 335 patients with ALS and chronic respiratory failure referred to an outpatient home ventilation clinic for NIV initiation. The mean age was 64 years ±11; 151 (45%) were female, 326 (97%) were white, and 100 (29%) had bulbar-onset ALS. At the time of NIV initiation, the mean FVC was 64% ± 19%, the mean MIP; 41 cmH2O ± 17, and diurnal TcCO2; 40 ± 6 mmHg. The most common reasons for NIV initiation were MIP <60 cmH2O (58%) and multiple concomitant indications (28%). Within 1 year of NIV initiation, 126 (37%) patients were deceased. DISCUSSION: We found that impairment in inspiratory force was the most common reason for NIV initiation and often preceded significant declines in FVC.

Preoperative alcohol interventions for elective surgical patients: Results from a randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: High-risk alcohol use is a common surgical risk factor. Stopping or reducing alcohol use in the weeks before and after surgery could improve surgical health and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of 2 interventions that address high-risk alcohol use in the context of surgery. METHODS: Participants included patients scheduled for elective surgeries at an academic health system in the Midwestern United States. Recruitment took place by phone and text. Participants were included if they were 18 to 75 years old, scheduled for elective surgeries, and scored ≥5 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Tool. Participants were randomized to either a low-intensity intervention, brief advice (10-minute phone-based psychoeducation plus feedback session), or a higher-intensity intervention, health coaching (two 45-minute sessions including education, feedback, motivational interviewing, and goal setting). Assessments took place at baseline and at 1-month and 4-month follow-ups. Alcohol biomarkers were collected the day of surgery. RESULTS: The final study sample included (n = 51) participants randomized to brief advice and health coaching conditions. Participants in both conditions rated interventions as satisfactory and personally relevant. Trial retention was high (86.3%) at 4 months. Attrition was significantly higher in brief advice (n = 6) relative to health coaching (n = 1). Average weekly alcohol use decreased 50% to 60% between baseline and follow-ups in both conditions. Biomarkers corroborated self-report. CONCLUSION: The trial demonstrated intervention feasibility and acceptability. Alcohol use changed in expected directions. The next steps include a randomized controlled trial to test intervention efficacy in reducing alcohol use and surgical complications.