Diastereoselective construction of tetracyclic chromanes via a triply annulative strategy.

A triple Michael/aldol cascade reaction has been established to construct tetracyclic chromanes in a diastereoselective fashion (≥5 : 1 dr). The polycyclic products were generated in 50-78% isolated yields under mild and metal-free conditions. Five reactive sites of enolate-tethered divinyl ketones were sequentially utilized to form four C-C bonds in a one-pot operation, leading to a construction of three new rings. Up to six consecutive stereocenters, including two quarternary stereogenic centers, were created in this domino process.

Stereoselective Synthesis of Dihydrofuranoindoles via the Friedel-Crafts Alkylation/Annulation Cascade Process.

A stereoselective annulation protocol was developed to construct dihydrofuranoindoles from readily available starting materials. In the presence of a bifunctional squaramide, the Friedel-Crafts alkylation/annulation cascade process occurred smoothly to provide dihydrofuranoindoles in 26-95% isolated yields exclusively as trans-diastereomers (38-99% ee). This catalytic protocol was compatible with a range of structurally distinct hydroxyindoles bearing the hydroxyl group at different positions, providing four kinds of dihydrofuranoindoles. Moreover, gram-scale synthesis and further synthetic manipulation of the product were also demonstrated.

Treatment of Vedolizumab With Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (Crohn Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Study).

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing studies confirming the efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in Crohn's disease (CD), improving the responses to this biologic agent remains challenging in clinical practice. In this article, we investigated the efficacy of combined treatment of VDZ and 16-week exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in moderately to severely active CD. METHODS: From October 2020 to October 2023, 81 patients with moderately to severely active CD treated with VDZ from 2 inflammatory bowel disease centers were retrospectively selected. Forty-one patients received treatment of VDZ with concomitant 16-week EEN (VDZ + EEN cohort), and 40 patients received VDZ treatment alone (VDZ cohort). Clinical and biological outcomes were evaluated. Endoscopic response and mucosal healing were assessed by colonoscopy at weeks 16 and 52. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between 2 groups at baseline for demographic and clinical characteristics. Compared with patients treated with VDZ alone, patients in the VDZ + EEN cohort achieved higher rates of clinical response (84.2% vs 40.0%), clinical remission (81.6% vs 30.0%), endoscopic response (91.4% vs 34.6%), including mucosal healing (85.7% vs 26.9%) at week 16. The superiority of VDZ + EEN treatment sustained in maintenance, with 76.7% (vs 33.3%) clinical response, 70.0% (vs 26.7%) clinical remission, 76.9% (vs 33.3%) endoscopic response, and 61.5% (vs 26.7%) mucosal healing at week 52. None of the patients experienced severe adverse events. DISCUSSION: VDZ with concomitant 16-week EEN might be an effective and optimized approach with solid efficacy in the induction and maintenance treatment of active CD.

Real-world evidence of combined treatment of biologics and exclusive enteral nutrition in patients with ileum-dominant Crohn's disease: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although biologics were prescribed to achieve and maintain clinical remission of active Crohn's disease (CD), almost half of patients experienced a loss of response or intolerance. Here, we investigated the efficacy of combined treatment of biologics and 16-weeks exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in moderate-to-severe CD patients with small intestine lesions. METHODS: This was a real-world, multicenter retrospective study, from October 2016 to March 2023, medical records of patients registered at three IBD centers were reviewed for patients with ileal or ileocolonic CD in moderate-to-severe activity. All patients received treatment of biologics with concomitant 16-week EEN (BioEEN) or biologics alone (Bio). The clinical outcomes and endoscopic outcomes were assessed at week 16 and 52. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between Bio (97 patients) and BioEEN group (100 patients) at baseline for demographic and clinical characteristics. Compared to treatment with biologics alone, patients with BioEEN treatment achieved higher rates of clinical response (95.0% vs. 66.0%), clinical remission (87.0% vs. 52.6%), endoscopic response (91.4% vs. 47.4%) including mucosal healing (85.7% vs. 23.7%) at week 16. The superiority of BioEEN sustained in maintenance, with 84.7% (vs. 49.1%) clinical response, 77.8% (vs. 38.6%) clinical remission, 69.2% (vs. 32.6%) endoscopic response and 51.9% (vs. 18.6%) mucosal healing at week 52. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment of biologics and 16-week EEN was an efficient therapeutic strategy with affirmative effectiveness for small intestine diseases of active CD.

Efficacy of Ustekinumab Optimization by 2 Initial Intravenous Doses in Adult Patients With Severe Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Although increasing studies have reported that dose escalation can improve treatment response to ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), their strategies mainly focus on maintenance regimen. Evidence of ustekinumab dose escalation in induction regimen, particularly in severe CD, remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous ustekinumab with 2 initial doses in patients with severely active CD. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of 99 adult patients with severe CD treated with ustekinumab from 3 IBD centers included 48 patients with standard and 51 with optimized induction treatment. Clinical outcomes, inflammatory biomarkers including fecal calprotectin (FC) normalization, and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated at weeks 16 and 48. Adverse events and treatment decisions after initial induction were also collected. RESULTS: Compared with the standard group, 2 initial intravenous injections of ustekinumab achieved higher clinical response (92.2%, 47 of 51, P = .656), clinical remission (88.2%, 45 of 51, P = .221), endoscopic response (75.8%, 25 of 33, P = .125), and FC normalization (70.6%, 36 of 51, P = .138) at week 16. The mucosal healing rate at week 16 (63.6%, P = .022) was statistically higher in the optimization group. At week 48, patients with optimized treatment achieved higher clinical response (80.4%, 41 of 51, P = .003), clinical remission (70.6%, 36 of 51, P = .007), FC normalization (66.7%, 34 of 51, P = .031), endoscopic response (72.7%, 24 of 33, P = .006), and mucosal healing (57.6%, 19 of 33, P = .004). At the last follow-up, 82.4% of optimally treated patients adhered to continued treatment with ustekinumab (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of ustekinumab by 2 initial intravenous inductions is more effective than standard therapy for adult patients with severe CD.

This study used an optimization strategy in severe adult Crohn's disease with 2 initial intravenous doses of ustekinumab. This new strategy proved to be effective and safe.

An education-based telehealth group improves the management and clinical outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in China (THEIM study).

BACKGROUND: Although poor medication adherence has a negative impact on disease prognosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), finding proven solutions remains a challenge. In this study, we developed a telehealth management model based on education and patient-centered medical care (PCEB) using the social media platform WeChat. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of PCEB on adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, 543 IBD patients (274 in the PCEB group and 269 in the routine group) at the IBD center of Renmin Hospital (Wuhan University, Wuhan, China) were enrolled between January 2020 and September 2022. The routine group received routine follow-up and management, while for PCEB patients, a comprehensive IBD education program and PCEB were conducted. Medication adherence and clinical outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no differences between the PCEB and routine groups in terms of patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including disease classification, duration, biological treatment, and educational background at baseline. Compared with routine treatment, PCEB greatly improved patient medication adherence, as assessed by compliance with oral medication, enteral nutrition, biological infusion, and scheduled endoscopic assessment. Clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with PCEB increased during short-term (month 4) and long-term (month 12) follow-ups, along with a decrease in relapse rates for CD (13.3% vs. 31.8%) and UC (19.8% vs. 37.2%). CONCLUSION: The telehealth model applied to the PCEB group improved medication adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with IBD. This is a new and powerful solution for the long-term management of this chronic and progressive disease.