Hybrid-stenting with metallic and bioresorbable drug-eluting stents 2-year clinical outcomes in KUM ABSORB registry.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate and compare outcomes 2 years after Hybrid-stenting with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) and contemporary metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) within the same coronary lesion versus BVS alone. METHODS: Between 11/2012 and 7/2015 at our institution, 134 (33.2%) were treated with Hybrid-stenting for complex or long coronary lesions, 270 patients were treated by BVS alone. The primary outcome of interest was target lesion failure (TLF) at 2-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Patients treated by Hybrid-stenting were more frequently men (80% vs. 70%, p = 0.04) had extensive multivessel disease (84% vs. 71%, p < 0.01) including more complex (89% vs. 52%, p < 0.01) and longer lesions (28.9 mm vs 16.4 ± mm, p < 0.01) resulting in longer treated segments (47.3 mm vs 21.5 mm, p < 0.01) and more residual in-segment stenosis (12.3% vs 8.5%, p < 0.01) compared to BVS alone patients. At 2 years, cumulative incidence of TLF was 9.7% of Hybrid-stenting patients and 11.5% of BVS alone patients (p = 0.62), myocardial infarction (3.0% vs 4.1%, p = 0.59) and mortality (1.5% vs 4.1%, p = 0.17), respectively. Target lesion revascularization occurred in 9 Hybrid-stenting patients (2 located in DES) and in 20 BVS alone patients, cumulative incidence 6.7% vs. 7.4% (p = 0.80). Chronic kidney disease and residual in-segment stenosis >30% were identified as independent predictors of TLF at 2-years. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in clinical and angiographic profile, Hybrid-stenting performed similar to BVS alone at 2 years after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Combined therapy with sitagliptin plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with acute myocardial infarction - Long-term results of the SITAGRAMI trial.

BACKGROUND: Autologous progenitor cell therapy comprising granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of bone-marrow derived progenitor cells (BMPCs) into peripheral blood and inhibition of dipeptidylpeptidase-IV by sitagliptin for enhanced myocardial recruitment of circulating BMPCs has been shown to improve survival after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in preclinical studies. In the SITAGRAMI trial we found that during short-term follow-up G-CSF plus sitagliptin (GS) failed to show a beneficial effect on cardiac function and clinical events in patients with acute MI that underwent successful PCI. The objective of the present analysis was to assess the impact of GS versus placebo treatment on long-term clinical outcomes of the SITAGRAMI trial patient population. METHODS: In the randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled SITAGRAMI trial, 174 patients with acute MI were assigned to GS or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome for the present long-term analysis was the composite of death, MI or stroke on long-term follow-up. RESULTS: The median [IQR] follow-up duration was 4.50 [3.56-5.95] years. The primary outcome occurred in 12.8% of patients assigned to placebo and 9.2% assigned to GS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.28-1.69; p=0.42). The incidence of the combined cardiovascular outcome was 47.7% in the placebo- and 41.4% in the GS-group (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.18; p=0.21). Overall, there was no significant difference in MACCE rates between both treatment groups (p=0.41). CONCLUSION: These long-term follow-up data indicate that GS therapy does not improve clinical outcomes of patients with acute MI.

FDG-PET reveals improved cardiac regeneration and attenuated adverse remodelling following Sitagliptin + G-CSF therapy after acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Dual therapy comprising G-CSF for mobilization of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (BMPCs), with simultaneous pharmacological inhibition of dipeptidylpeptidase-IV for enhanced myocardial recruitment of circulating BMPC via the SDF-1α/CXCR4-axis, has been shown to improve survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Using an innovative method to provide non-invasive serial in vivo measurements and information on metabolic processes, we aimed to substantiate the possible effects of this therapeutic concept on cardiac remodelling after AMI using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). METHODS AND RESULTS: AMI was induced in C57BL/6 mice by performing surgical ligation of the left anterior descending artery in these mice. Animals were then treated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor + Sitagliptin (GS) or placebo for a duration of 5 days following AMI. From serial PET scans, we verified that the infarct size in GS-treated mice (n = 13) was significantly reduced at Day 30 after AMI when compared with the mice receiving placebo (n = 10). Analyses showed a normalized FDG uptake on Day 6 in GS-treated mice, indicating an attenuation of the cardiac inflammatory response to AMI in treated animals. Furthermore, flow cytometry showed a significant increase in the anti-inflammatory M2-macrophages subpopulation in GS-treated animals. In comparing GS treated with placebo animals, those receiving GS-therapy showed a reduction in myocardial hypertrophy and left ventricular dilatation, which indicates the beneficial effect of GS treatment on cardiac remodelling. Remarkably, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry showed an increase of myocardial c-kit positive cells in treated mice (n = 12 in both groups). CONCLUSION: Using the innovative method of micro-PET for non-invasive serial in vivo measurements of metabolic myocardial processes in mice, we were able to provide mechanistic evidence that GS therapy improves cardiac regeneration and reduces adverse remodelling after AMI.

Sitagliptin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction: A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial of efficacy and safety (SITAGRAMI trial).

OBJECTIVE: In animal models, G-CSF based progenitor cell mobilization combined with a DPP4 inhibitor leads to increased homing of bone marrow derived progenitor cells to the injured myocardium via the SDF1/CXCR4 axis resulting in improved ejection fraction and survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After successful revascularization in AMI, 174 patients were randomized 1:1 in a multi-centre, prospective, placebo-controlled, parallel group, double blind, phase III efficacy and safety trial to treatment with G-CSF and Sitagliptin (GS) or placebo. Diabetic and non-diabetic patients were included in our trial. The primary efficacy endpoint hierarchically combined global left and right ventricular ejection fraction changes from baseline to 6 months of follow-up (ΔLVEF, ΔRVEF), as determined by cardiac MRI. RESULTS: At follow-up ΔLVEF as well as ΔRVEF did not differ between the GS and placebo group. Patients in the placebo group had a similar risk for a major adverse cardiac event within 12 months of follow-up as compared to patients under GS. CONCLUSION: Progenitor cell therapy comprising the use of G-CSF and Sitagliptin after successfully revascularized acute myocardial infarction fails to show a beneficial effect on cardiac function and clinical events after 12 months. (EudraCT: 2007-003,941-34; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00650143, funding: Heinz-Nixdorf foundation).

Synergy between CD26/DPP-IV inhibition and G-CSF improves cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction.

Ischemic cardiomyopathy is one of the main causes of death, which may be prevented by stem cell-based therapies. SDF-1alpha is the major chemokine attracting stem cells to the heart. Since SDF-1alpha is cleaved and inactivated by CD26/dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP-IV), we established a therapeutic concept--applicable to ischemic disorders in general--by combining genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of DPP-IV with G-CSF-mediated stem cell mobilization after myocardial infarction in mice. This approach leads to (1) decreased myocardial DPP-IV activity, (2) increased myocardial homing of circulating CXCR-4+ stem cells, (3) reduced cardiac remodeling, and (4) improved heart function and survival. Indeed, CD26 depletion promoted posttranslational stabilization of active SDF-1alpha in heart lysates and preserved the cardiac SDF-1-CXCR4 homing axis. Therefore, we propose pharmacological DPP-IV inhibition and G-CSF-based stem cell mobilization as a therapeutic concept for future stem cell trials after myocardial infarction.

Primary hyperparathyroidism is associated with increased circulating bone marrow-derived progenitor cells.

Recently, parathyroid hormone (PTH) was shown to support survival of progenitor cells in bone marrow. The release of progenitor cells occurs in physiological and pathological conditions and was shown to contribute to neovascularization in tumors and ischemic tissues. In the present study we sought to investigate prospectively the effect of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) on mobilization of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells. In 22 patients with PHPT and 10 controls, defined subpopulations of circulating bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (BMCs) were analyzed by flow cytometry (CD45(+)/CD34(+)/CD31(+) cells indicating endothelial progenitor cells, CD45(+)/CD34(+)/c-kit(+) cells indicating hematopoietic stem cells, and CD45(+)/CD34(+)/CXCR4(+) cells indicating progenitor cells with the homing receptor CXCR4). Cytokine serum levels (SCF, SDF-1, VEGF, EPO, and G-CSF) were assessed using ELISA. Levels of PTH and thyroid hormone as well as serum electrolytes, renal and liver parameters, and blood count were analyzed. Our data show for the first time a significant increase of circulating BMCs and an upregulation of SDF-1 and VEGF serum levels in patients with PHPT. The number of circulating BMCs returned to control levels measured 16.7 +/- 2.3 mo after surgery. There was a positive correlation of PTH levels with the number of CD45(+)/CD34(+)/CD31(+), CD45(+)/CD34(+)/c-kit(+), and CD45(+)/CD34(+)/CXCR4(+) cells. However, there was no correlation between cytokine serum concentrations (SDF-1, VEGF) and circulating BMCs. Serum levels of G-CSF, EPO, and SCF known to mobilize BMCs were even decreased or remained unchanged, suggesting a direct effect of PTH on stem cell mobilization. Our data suggest a new function of PTH mobilizing BMCs into peripheral blood.