Diagnostic Accuracy of Hyperpigmented Microcircles in Dermatoscopy of Non-Facial Non-Acral Melanomas: A Pilot Retrospective Study using a Public Image Database.

BACKGROUND: Grey perifollicular circles are a dermatoscopic clue to melanoma, especially in facial skin. So far, no other adnexal clues than follicular have been investigated in this diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to analyse the prevalence of hyperpigmented periadnexal microcircles (HMs) in melanoma and its common simulators at non-facial non-acral sites, analyse the relation between the presence of HM, regression and hypopigmentation, and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this structure in melanoma. METHODS: International Skin Imaging Collaboration (69,445 images) was searched in April 2020 for the pathology-confirmed dermatoscopic images with metadata including sex, age bin, and declared non-acral non-facial anatomic site. The final study sample (5,408 images, 1,326 of which were melanomas) was evaluated by expert dermatoscopist blinded to the diagnosis and labelled for the presence of ≥3 HM distributed centrally (cHM) or peripherally (pHM), hypopigmentation, and classic dermatoscopic regression structures. A subset of 40 images was labelled by 7 raters (2 residents, 5 experts) to assess interobserver agreement. We compared the presence of pHM with the presence of regression as well as performed a set of independent χ2 tests to evaluate the discriminatory power and its fragility. Performance of the models was assessed using measures of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: HM were significantly more prevalent in melanomas than in non-melanomas and nevi. Fair/good interobserver agreement for HM was reached for all the raters, and moderate/good for experts only (single rater/average, respectively). Regardless of regression/hypopigmentation status, pHM were significantly more common in melanoma than in non-melanomas or nevi and were observed significantly more often in melanomas on sun-damaged skin (upper extremity, posterior torso). No significant differences between the groups were found for cHM. pHM proved a high odds ratio in the tests as to the classical indicators such as classic dermatoscopic regression structures. CONCLUSION: pHM could be considered a novel dermatoscopic clue to melanoma.

Dermoscopic Predictors of Benignity and Malignancy in Equivocal Lesions Predominated by Blue Color.

BACKGROUND: Blue color in dermoscopy can be seen in a wide range of benign and malignant lesions, melanocytic or not. Some blue-colored dermoscopic criteria have been associated with specific tumors, such as blue-white veil with melanoma and homogeneous blue with blue nevi. However, when blue color occupies a large part of the lesion's surface, the dermoscopic assessment might be particularly challenging. OBJECTIVE: To identify dermoscopic predictors associated with benignity and malignancy in tumors characterized by a predominant dermoscopic presence of blue color. METHODS: We retrospectively screened our institutional database for tumors exhibiting blue color in at least 50% of their surface with available histopathologic diagnosis. Lesions with blue color covering less than 50% of their extent and lesions not histopathologically assessed were excluded. The dermoscopic images were evaluated for the presence of predefined criteria, including the characteristics of the blue color, coexisting colors, and the vascular structures. RESULTS: Of 91 included tumors, 53 were benign (35 blue nevi, 10 angiomas, and 8 seborrheic keratoses) and 38 malignant (12 melanomas and 26 basal cell carcinomas). Our analysis revealed 3 potent dermoscopic predictors of benignity: extension of blue color in more than 75% of the surface, diffuse distribution of blue color, and absence of vessels, posing a 2.3-fold, 5.6-fold, and 6.7-fold increased probability of benignity, respectively. In contrast, asymmetric distribution of blue color, blue clods, coexistence of gray color and linear vessels were significantly predictive of malignancy, posing a 8.9-fold, 2.8-fold, 13.5-fold, and 10.4-fold increased probability, respectively. CONCLUSION: In predominantly blue tumors, the probability of malignancy is high when blue color is seen in clods or is asymmetrically distributed and when gray color or linear vessels coexist. In contrast, a diffuse distribution of blue color, its expansion in more than 75% of the surface, and the absence of vessels are highly suggestive of a benign tumor.

Differentiating Fordyce Spots from Their Common Simulators Using Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Dermatoscopy-Retrospective Study.

Fordyce spots (FS) are heterotopic sebaceous glands affecting mostly oral and genital mucosa, commonly misdiagnosed with sexually transmitted infections. In a single-center retrospective study, we aimed to assess the ultraviolet-induced fluorescencedermatoscopy (UVFD) clues of Fordyce spots and their common clinical simulants: molluscum contagiosum, penile pearly papules, human papillomavirus warts, genital lichen planus, and genital porokeratosis. Analyzed documentation included patients' medical records (1 September-30 October 2022) and photodocumentation, which included clinical images as well as polarized, non-polarized, and UVFD images. Twelve FS patients were included in the study group and fourteen patients in the control group. A novel and seemingly specific UVFD pattern of FS was described: regularly distributed bright dots over yellowish-greenish clods. Even though, in the majority of instances, the diagnosis of FS does not require more than naked eye examination, UVFD is a fast, easy-to-apply, and low-cost modality that can further increase the diagnostic confidence and rule out selected infectious and non-infectious differential diagnoses if added to conventional dermatoscopic diagnosis.