Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the reliability of software-calculated doubling times for discerning malignant versus benign nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT lung analysis volumetric software was used to retrospectively calculate the doubling times of 63 solid noncalcified nodules by comparing nodule volumes on baseline and follow-up CT scans obtained a median of 3.7 months apart. A final diagnosis based on validated criteria was available for all 63 nodules. All CT examinations were performed with 1.25-mm-thick slices on a four-detector unit. Taking 500 days as the upper value for malignancies, we evaluated whether the software-calculated doubling times could be used to distinguish malignant from benign solid nodules. We also examined whether the relative volume variation of benign nodules correlated with initial nodule size, interscan interval, or differences in contrast administration or exposure parameters between baseline and follow-up CT. RESULTS: There were 52 benign and 11 malignant nodules. Benign nodules had a median doubling time of 947 days and a mean relative volume variation of -4.4% (range, -50% to 38%). Malignant nodules had a median doubling time of 117 days and a mean relative volume variation of 102% (22-462%). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the volumetric software for diagnosing malignancy were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.00), 90% (95% CI, 0.79-0.97), 98% (95% CI, 0.89-1.00), and 67% (95% CI, 0.38-0.88), respectively. No correlation was found between the relative volume variation of benign nodules and their initial size, the interscan interval, or differences in contrast administration or exposure parameters between the two CT examinations. CONCLUSION: Software-calculated pulmonary nodule doubling times of more than 500 days have a 98% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of solid malignant pulmonary nodules. This method may be useful for diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules on follow-up CT.

Is It possible to recognize pulmonary infarction on multisection CT images?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine sensitivity and specificity of four findings for distinguishing pulmonary infarction from other causes of peripheral pulmonary consolidations on multidetector computed tomographic (CT) images, with other CT and clinical findings as reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approved the study and waived informed consent. Three independent radiologists blindly analyzed selected multisection CT images of 50 pulmonary infarctions-not showing direct arterial signs of pulmonary embolism-and 100 peripheral consolidations of other origins. Readers analyzed four findings: triangular shape, vessel sign (defined as presence of an enlarged vessel at the apex of consolidation), central lucencies, and air bronchograms. Interobserver agreement; frequency on CT images with and without infarct; and sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR) for diagnosis of pulmonary infarction were assessed for each finding. RESULTS: One hundred fifty peripheral consolidations were analyzed in 134 (75 men, 59 women) patients (mean age, 55.9 years+/-17.4 [standard deviation] vs 54.7+/-19.9; P=.71). Interobserver agreement was good for central lucencies and air bronchograms and poor to moderate for the other two findings (kappa<0.61). Compared with CT images without infarct, CT images with infarct had a higher frequency of vessel sign (32% [16 of 50] vs 11% [11 of 100], P=.029) and central lucencies (46% [23 of 50] vs 2% [two of 100], P<.001) and a lower frequency of air bronchograms (8% [four of 50] vs 40% [40 of 100], P=.003). Frequency of triangular shape was similar in both groups (52% [26 of 50] vs 40% [40 of 100], P=.17). Positive LR was 23.0 for central lucencies, 2.9 for vessel sign, 1.3 for triangular shape, and 0.2 for air bronchograms. Presence of central lucencies had 98% specificity and 46% sensitivity for pulmonary infarction. When the vessel sign and negative air bronchogram were combined with central lucencies, specificity increased to 99% but sensitivity decreased to 14%. CONCLUSION: Central lucencies in peripheral consolidations are highly suggestive of pulmonary infarction.