Tigecycline pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

The pharmacokinetic parameters of tigecycline were assessed in subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, n = 6), subjects receiving hemodialysis (4 received tigecycline before and 4 received tigecycline after hemodialysis), and subjects with age-adjusted, normal renal function (n = 6) after administration of single 100-mg doses. Serial serum and urine samples were collected and assayed using validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometer (LC/MS/MS) methods. Concentration-time data were then analyzed using noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Tigecycline renal clearance in subjects with normal renal function represented approximately 20% of total systemic clearance. Tigecycline clearance was reduced by approximately 20%, and area under the tigecycline concentration-time curve increased by approximately 30% in subjects with severe renal impairment. Tigecycline was not efficiently removed by dialysis; thus, it can be administered without regard to timing of hemodialysis. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, tigecycline requires no dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of a single intravenous dose of the antibiotic tigecycline in patients with cirrhosis.

Tigecycline belongs to a new class of tetracyclines, the glycylcyclines, less than 20% of which is metabolized in the liver. Twenty-five patients with cirrhosis with varying degrees of functional hepatic reserve (Child-Pugh A, n = 10; B, n = 10; C, n = 5) and 23 healthy adults, matched by age, sex, weight, and smoking habits, received 100 mg of tigecycline infused intravenously over 60 minutes. Serum and urine samples were collected up to 120 hours after dosing. Pharmacokinetic data were derived using noncompartmental methods. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in healthy volunteers were nausea (56.5%), vomiting (21.7%), and headache (21.7%) and in the patients with cirrhosis, albuminuria (12%). Mean (± 1 SD) tigecycline clearance values were 29.8 ± 11.3 L/h in healthy subjects and 31.2 ± 13.9 L/h (Child-Pugh A), 22.1 ± 9.3 L/h (Child-Pugh B), and 13.5 ± 2.7 L/h (Child-Pugh C) in the patients. A single intravenous dose of tigecycline 100 mg was safe and well-tolerated in patients with cirrhosis with varying degrees of hepatic functional reserve. No adjustment of tigecycline maintenance dosage is warranted in patients with compensated or moderately decompensated cirrhosis; doses should be reduced by 50%, to 25 mg, every 12 hours in patients with severely decompensated disease.

Effects of age and sex on single-dose pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in healthy subjects.

The pharmacokinetics of tigecycline was evaluated in 46 healthy young and elderly men and women. Except for the volumes of distribution at steady state (approximately 350 liters in women versus 500 liters in men), there were no significant differences in tigecycline pharmacokinetic parameters. Based on pharmacokinetics, no dosage adjustment is warranted based on age or sex.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between retigabine and phenobarbitone at steady-state in healthy subjects.

AIMS: To evaluate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between phenobarbitone and retigabine, a new antiepileptic drug. METHODS: Fifteen healthy men received 200 mg of retigabine on day 1. On days 4-32, phenobarbitone 90 mg was administered at 22.00 h. On days 26-32, increasing doses of retigabine were given to achieve a final dose of 200 mg every 8 h on day 32. The pharmacokinetics of retigabine were determined on days 1 and 32, and those for phenobarbitone on days 25 and 31. RESULTS: After administration of a single 200 mg dose, retigabine was rapidly absorbed and eliminated with a mean terminal half-life of 6.7 h, a mean AUC of 3936 ng x ml(-1) x h and a mean apparent clearance of 0.76 l x h(-1) x kg(-1). Similar exposure to the partially active acetylated metabolite (AWD21-360) of retigabine was observed. After administration of phenobarbitone dosed to steady-state, the pharmacokinetics of retigabine at steady-state were similar (AUC of 4433 ng x ml(-1) x h and t1/2 of 8.5 h) to those of retigabine alone. The AUC of phenobarbitone was 298 mg x l(-1) x h when administered alone and 311 mg x ml(-1) x h after retigabine administration. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the AUC were 1.11 (0.97, 1.28) for retigabine, 1.01 (0.88, 1.06) for AWD21-360 and 1.04 (0.96, 1.11) for phenobarbitone. Individual and combined treatments were generally well tolerated. One subject was withdrawn from the study on day 10 due to severe abdominal pain. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the electrocardiograms, vital signs or laboratory measurements. CONCLUSIONS: There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between retigabine and phenobarbitone in healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment is likely to be necessary when retigabine and phenobarbitone are coadministered to patients.