Low-level X Chromosome Mosaicism: A Common Finding in Women Undergoing IVF.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine the incidence of X chromosome mosaicism in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment and present preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) outcome of this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,058 women undergoing IVF and 154 women with no fertility problems were enrolled in the study. Karyotyping from peripheral blood lymphocytes was performed by conventional cytogenetics. Twenty-nine women with X mosaicism underwent PGT-A by array-comparative genomic hybridization from embryos at the blastocyst stage. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Out of 1,058 women undergoing IVF, 166 (15.7%) had an abnormal karyotype. The most common finding (14.6%) was X chromosome mosaicism. Its frequency was higher in women >35 years old and reached 46.1% in those >45 years of age. PGT-A results of 130 blastocysts tested showed that 29/117 (24.8%) were euploid; 17/29 (60%) were transferred and 10/17 (70%) were successfully implanted, indicating that PGT-A may be an option for women with low-level X chromosome mosaicism undergoing IVF in order to improve the likelihood of a successful pregnancy outcome.

Chromosome analysis and molecular cytogenetic investigations of an epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare, well-differentiated endothelial tumor with a wide spectrum of clinical behavior and for which genetic data are extremely limited. We present a case of an epithelioid hemangioendothelioma in a 22-year-old male, which was analyzed with multiple cytogenetic approaches. Conventional cytogenetic analysis detected structural abnormalities of 11q13 and 11q14, rings, and marker chromosomes. Multi-color FISH (mFISH) and high-resolution multi-color banding (mBAND) analyses demonstrated that the aberrations of chromosome 11 were deletions and that the ring and marker chromosomes consisted of 12(q14 approximately q21) material. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis revealed gains of 11(q13 approximately q14) and 12(q11 approximately q21), loss of 11(q21 approximately qter), and 2 amplicons at 12(q12 approximately q13) and 12(q14 approximately q21). Our data indicate that a subset of epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas may be characterized by complex rearrangements involving deletions and gains of 11q and 12q amplifications. The present case also shows that, in order to describe and understand such complex chromosome aberrations, chromosome analysis must be complemented with several molecular cytogenetic techniques.

Cytogenetic profile of unknown primary tumors: clues for their pathogenesis and clinical management.

Unknown primary tumors (UPTs) represent an entity of great clinical and biological interest, whose origin cannot be determined even after medical workup. To better understand their pathogenesis by outlining their genetic composition, 20 UPTs were investigated by G-banding, supplemented with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Comparative Genomic Hybridization analyses. The data obtained were sufficient to reach a diagnosis in five cases-four lymphomas and one Ewing sarcoma-demonstrating that in a subset of UPTs, cytogenetics can be an adjunct for differential diagnosis. In the remaining 15 UPTs, an aggressive cytogenetic pattern was revealed. The most frequently rearranged chromosome regions were 1q21, 3p13, 6q15-23, 7q22, 11p12-5, and 11q14-24, pinpointing gene loci probably associated with the peculiar pathogenesis of UPTs. The preferential involvement of 4q31, 6q15, 10q25, and 13q22 in adenocarcinomas (whereas 11q22 is involved in the rest of the carcinomas)-in addition to the marked divergence in the mean average of chromosomal changes, 16 and 3, respectively-demonstrates genotypic differences between the two histologic subgroups. Furthermore, the significantly shorter survival in cases displaying massive chromosome changes compared with those having a few changes indicates that the cytogenetic pattern might be used as a tool to assess prognosis in UPTs, even without the detection of their primary site.

Telomerase activity and genetic alterations in primary breast carcinomas.

It has been proposed that the structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities recorded in breast cancer could be the result of telomere dysfunction and that telomerase is activated de novo to provide a survival mechanism curtailing further chromosomal aberrations. However, recent in vivo and in vitro data show that the ectopic expression of telomerase promotes tumorigenesis via a telomere length-independent mechanism. In this study, the relation between telomerase expression and the extent of chromosomal aberrations was investigated in 62 primary breast carcinomas. Telomerase activity was measured using a polymerase chain reaction-based telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay and 92% of the tumors were found to express telomerase with a relative activity ranging from 0 to 3839.6. Genetic alterations were determined by G-banding and comparative genomic hybridization analysis and 97% of the tumors exhibited chromosomal aberrations ranging from 0 to 44 (average: 10.98). In the overall series, the relationship between telomerase activity levels and genetic changes could be best described by a quadratic model, whereas in tumors with below-average genetic alteration numbers, a significant positive association was recorded between the two variables (coefficient=0.374, P=.017). The relationship between telomerase activity levels and the extent of genetic alteration may reflect the complex effect of telomerase activation upon tumor progression in breast carcinomas.

Cytogenetic manifestations of multiple myeloma heterogeneity.

To investigate the genetic basis of the great heterogeneity observed in the clinical behavior of multiple myeloma (MM), a combined approach of G-banding, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and multicolor FISH (M-FISH) was employed to analyze 70 samples from 53 patients with MM. G-banding revealed abnormal karyotypes in 77% of the cases. The origin of 31 chromosome markers was identified or revised by M-FISH. Combined metaphase karyotypic data and interphase FISH findings, using the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IGH), IGH/cyclin D1 gene (CCND1), and D13S319 probes, revealed chromosome abnormalities in all evaluated patients and marked inter- and intratumor cytogenetic heterogeneity in the investigated MM samples. Cytogenetically unrelated clones were detected in 26% of the cases, mostly MM evaluated at diagnosis, whereas cytogenetic clonal evolution, manifested as related clones in 20% of the cases, was associated with disease progression. Among the 14q32 rearrangements, present in 66% of the cases, at least three cytogenetic subsets could be identified: one with t(11;14), usually without 13q14 deletion; another with other IGH changes, often 13q14 deletion, and hypodiploid modal chromosome number; and a third without changes in 14q32 but with abnormalities of chromosome 17. The correlation found between cytogenetic and clinicopathologic characteristics provided support for the concept that general genomic features in conjunction with specific chromosome rearrangements define the malignant phenotype in the various subsets of MM.

Genome profiling of breast cancer cells selected against in vitro shows copy number changes.

About 20% of breast carcinomas show no clonal chromosome abnormalities when analyzed after short-term culturing. An interesting question is whether this subset of breast carcinomas really is karyotypically normal or if selection for normal cells occurred in vitro. To address this issue, 26 breast carcinomas that had shown no cytogenetic changes by chromosome banding analysis were examined by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), a technique that does not require culturing or tumor metaphase cells. All but one case showed copy number changes by CGH (median, four). A comparison of these findings with those of a karyotypically abnormal series analyzed using the same CGH protocol found that the cytogenetically "normal" cases were typically genetically less complex (median, four and eight, respectively; P = 0.0058). Although largely the same alterations were found in both series, some differences with respect to the frequencies of specific imbalances were seen. Gains of 3p and 6q and losses of 10q, 14q, and 17p more often were found in the cytogenetically abnormal series than in the normal tumors. We conclude that in most instances cells found to be normal by chromosome banding analysis after short-term culture do not belong to the tumor parenchyma. Furthermore, when we compared the distribution of the number of imbalances detected by CGH in the total data set according to the mitotic index in vivo (scored from 1 to 3), the median values were three, seven, and 18, respectively (P < 0.001). These data indicate not only that karyotypically normal breast carcinomas may represent a genetically simpler subgroup that grows poorly in vitro but also that this subset of tumors already has a slow growth rate in vivo.