Optimal cutoff values of drain amylase for predicting pancreatic fistula are different between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Drainage fluid amylase (DFA) is useful for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, difference in optimal cutoff value of DFA for predicting CR-POPF between open DP (ODP) and laparoscopic DP (LDP) has not been investigated. This study aimed to identify the optimal cutoff values of DFA for predicting CR-POPF after ODP and LDP. METHODS: Data for 294 patients (ODP, n = 127; LDP, n = 167) undergoing DP at Kobe University Hospital between 2010 and 2021 were reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize treatment selection bias. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff values of DFA for predicting CR-POPF for ODP and LDP. Logistic regression analysis for CR-POPF was performed to investigate the diagnostic value of DFA on postoperative day (POD) three with identified cutoff value. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, CR-POPF rates were 24.7% and 7.9% after ODP and LDP, respectively. DFA on POD one was significantly lower after ODP than after LDP (2263 U/L vs 4243 U/L, p < 0.001), while the difference was not significant on POD three (543 U/L vs 1221 U/L, p = 0.171). ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff value of DFA on POD one and three for predicting CR-POPF were different between ODP and LDP (ODP, 3697 U/L on POD one, 1114 U/L on POD three; LDP, 10564 U/L on POD one, 6020 U/L on POD three). Multivariate analysis showed that DFA on POD three with identified cutoff value was the independent predictor for CR-POPF both for ODP and LDP. CONCLUSIONS: DFA on POD three is an independent predictor for CR-POPF after both ODP and LDP. However, the optimal cutoff value for it is significantly higher after LDP than after ODP. Optimal threshold of DFA for drain removal may be different between ODP and LDP.

Impact of bile leak on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have undergone liver resection.

PURPOSE: The impact of postoperative bile leak on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver resection is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of bile leak for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver resection. METHODS: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver resection between 2009 and 2019 at Kobe University Hospital and Hyogo Cancer Center were included. After propensity score matching between the bile leak and no bile leak groups, differences in 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 781 patients, including 43 with postoperative bile leak, were analyzed. In the matched cohort, 40 patients were included in each group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates after liver resection were 35% and 32% for the bile leak and no bile leak groups, respectively (P = 0.857). The 5-year overall survival rates were 44% and 54% for the bile leak and no bile leak groups, respectively (P = 0.216). CONCLUSION: Overall, bile leak may not have a profound negative impact on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have undergone liver resection.

Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for the ventral versus the dorsal areas of segment 8.

PURPOSE: The technical difficulties of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are greatly associated with the location of liver tumors. Since segment 8 (S8) contains a wide area, the difficulty of LLR for S8 tumors may vary depending on the location within the segment, such as the ventral (S8v) and dorsal (S8d) area, but the difference is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 30 patients who underwent primary laparoscopic partial liver resection for liver tumors in S8 at Kobe University Hospital between January 2018 and June 2023. RESULTS: Thirteen and 17 patients underwent LLR for S8v and S8d, respectively. The operation time was significantly longer (S8v 203[135-259] vs. S8d 261[186-415] min, P = 0.002) and the amount of blood loss was significantly higher (10[10-150] vs. 10[10-200] mL, P = 0.034) in the S8d group than in the S8v group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or postoperative length of hospital stay. Additionally, intraoperative findings revealed that the rate at which the case performed partial liver mobilization in the S8d group was higher (2[15.4%] vs. 8[47.1%], P = 0.060) and the median parenchymal transection time of the S8d group was longer (102[27-148] vs. 129[37-175] min, P = 0.097) than those in the S8v group, but there were no significant differences. CONCLUSION: The safety of LLR for the S8d was comparable to that of LLR for S8v, although LLR for S8d resulted in longer operative time and more blood loss. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: B230165 (approved at December 26, 2023).

Surgical interpretation of the WHO subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has been subclassified by its gross morphology into the mass-forming (MF), periductal-infiltrating (PI), and intraductal growth (IG) types and their combinations. This classification correlates well with clinical features; for example, MF-iCCA has less lymph-node metastasis and a better prognosis than PI-iCCA. According to the recently accumulated evidence from histological investigations, the WHO classification endorsed a subclassification scheme in which iCCA cases are classified into small- and large-duct types. Small-duct iCCA is considered to originate from septal or smaller bile ducts and is characterized by less frequent lymph-node metastasis, a favorable prognosis, and an MF appearance. Large-duct iCCA arises around the second branch of the biliary tree and has more aggressive biology and distinct genetic abnormalities. According to the practice guidelines for iCCA from the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, upfront surgery is recommended for iCCA without distant metastasis regardless of the morphological subtype, based on clinical experience. In consideration of the biological heterogeneity of iCCA, the treatment strategy for iCCA needs to be reconsidered based on the WHO subtypes.

Laparoscopic Medial-to-Lateral Approach for the Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Located at the Spiegel Lobe of the Liver.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic caudate lobe resection is a challenging procedure. Several researchers have reported the safety of laparoscopic liver resections;1.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1:56;2.Asian J Endosc Surg. 12:232-236;3.Ann Surg Oncol. 26:2980; however, a standardized procedure has not yet been established. Herein, we present a video showing laparoscopic Spiegel lobectomy in a patient with 6-cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a novel approach. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 63-year-old man with a caudate lobe HCC was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography showed a 5 × 6 cm2 HCC located in the Spiegel lobe, which profoundly displaced the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the lower right side, and mobilization of the Spiegel lobe was considered difficult. To perform the dissection between the Siegel lobe and IVC safely, we performed parenchymal transection along the ventral side of the IVC initially. The Spiegel lobe was then dislocated to the left side of the IVC. We dissected the left lateral side of the IVC, including the proper hepatic vein draining the caudate lobe and the left IVC ligament with a safe operative field, and successfully removed the Spiegel lobe with large HCC. RESULTS: The operation time was 383 min. The blood loss was 10 mL. The patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day without any complications. Histopathological examination revealed well-differentiated HCC with a negative surgical margin. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach with initial parenchymal transection at the medial side of the Spiegel lobe followed by dissection of the left lateral side of the IVC is considered as a safe and effective procedure for large tumors in the Spiegel lobe.

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in segment 8: a propensity score-matched two-center study.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have been reported worldwide. However, those of LLR for tumors located in Couinaud's segment 8 are not sufficiently investigated. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in segment 8 at Kobe University Hospital and Hyogo Cancer Center between January 2010 and December 2021. The patients were categorized in LLR and open liver resection (OLR) groups, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare surgical outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: Forty-seven and 61 patients underwent LLR and OLR, respectively. After PSM, each group contained 34 patients. There was no significant difference in operation time between the groups (331 min vs. 330 min, P = 0.844). Patients in the LLR group had significantly less blood loss (30 mL vs. 468 mL, P < 0.001) and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (10 days vs. 12 days, P = 0.015) than those in the OLR group. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the groups (12% vs. 9%, P = 0.690). Further, the 1-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was not significantly different between the groups (16% vs. 19%, P = 0.734). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical outcomes and short-term prognosis of LLR were similar or better than those of OLR. LLR could be an effective and safe procedure, even for lesions located in segment 8, which is considered a difficult anatomical location for LLR.

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Cholangitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Comparison of Stents in Hepaticojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cholangitis is a common complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Frequent cholangitis impairs patients' quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the risk factors for recurrence of cholangitis remain unclear. Hence, this retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence of cholangitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2015 and 2019 in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. At least two episodes of cholangitis a year after pancreaticoduodenectomy were defined as 'recurrence of cholangitis' in the present study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: The recurrence of cholangitis occurred in 40 of 207 patients (19.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that internal stent (external, RR: 2.16, P = 0.026; none, RR: 4.76, P = 0.011), firm pancreas (RR: 2.61, P = 0.021), constipation (RR: 3.49, P = 0.008), and postoperative total bilirubin>1.7 mg/dL (RR: 2.94, P = 0.006) were risk factors of recurrence of cholangitis. Among patients with internal stents (n = 54), those with remnant stents beyond 5 months had more frequent recurrence of cholangitis (≥5 months, 75%; <5 months, 30%). CONCLUSIONS: Internal stents, firm pancreas, constipation, and postoperative high bilirubin levels are risk factors for cholangitis recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy. In addition, the long-term implantation of internal stents may trigger cholangitis recurrence.

Use of a short cartridge stapler is beneficial in pancreatic transection at the neck during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Stapling is the standard method for pancreatic transection during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Although most surgeons use a 60 mm cartridge stapler, space limitations created by laparoscopic surgery make the instrument difficult to handle, especially during pancreatic transection at the neck. Therefore, we currently use a 45 mm cartridge stapler for laparoscopic pancreatic transection at the neck. Between October 2019 and December 2020, we performed pancreatic transection using a 45 mm cartridge stapler in 27 patients. Fifteen patients experienced biochemical leakage, but no patients developed clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. The compactness of the 45 mm cartridge has several benefits: (1) less space is required for flexing, opening, and closing the device; (2) it enables easy insertion of the lower jaw behind the pancreas, even if the dissected space behind the pancreas is narrow; (3) less obstruction of the surgeons' view prevents accidental injury to the surrounding tissues and vessels. These benefits may enable safe pancreatic transection.

Transarterial chemoembolization for liver metastases of a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a single-center experience.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNEN) liver metastases; however, the safety and efficacy of TACE procedures, especially for patients who have undergone previous pancreatic surgery, have not been established. We reviewed 48 TACE procedures (1-6 procedures/patient) performed on 11 patients with PanNEN liver metastases, including 16 TACE procedures (4-6 procedures/patient) for 3 patients with a history of biliary-enteric anastomosis. The overall tumor objective response rate was 94%. The incidence of Clavien‒Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications was 1/16 (6%) and 1/32 (3%), and the median time to untreatable progression was 31 (14-41) and 27 (2-60) months among patients with and without a history of biliary-enteric anastomosis, respectively. Although validation is needed in future studies, our experiences have shown that TACE treatment is a viable treatment option for PanNEN liver metastases, even after biliary-enteric anastomosis with experienced teams and careful patient follow-up.

[A Case of Ampullary Carcinoma with Celiac Axis Stenosis That Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Arterial Reconstruction].

A 72-year-old male patient presented with obstructive jaundice and was diagnosed with ampullary carcinoma. Contrast- enhanced computed tomography(CT)showed stenosis of the common hepatic artery and dilatation of the pancreaticoduodenal arcade(PDA)due to celiac axis stenosis(CAS)at the origin, suggesting that hepatic artery blood flow was supplied from the superior mesenteric artery via the PDA. Since calcification of the arterial wall was observed at the origin of the celiac artery(CA), the cause of the CAS was diagnosed as atherosclerotic. An intraoperative gastroduodenal artery(GDA) clamp test showed no obvious decrease in hepatic arterial blood flow. However, because of concerns about the postoperative patency of the CA, an inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery-GDA bypass using the left great saphenous vein and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. When pancreaticoduodenectomy is performed in patients with atherosclerotic CAS, this arterial reconstruction method can be considered as an option.

Standardization of laparoscopic anatomic liver resection of segment 2 by the Glissonean approach.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic liver resection (ALR) has been established to eliminate the tumor-bearing hepatic region with preservation of the remnant liver volume for liver malignancies. Recently, laparoscopic ALR has been widely applied; however, there are few reports on laparoscopic segmentectomy 2. This study aimed to present the standardization of laparoscopic segmentectomy 2 with surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study included seven patients who underwent pure laparoscopic segmentectomy 2 by the Glissonean approach from January 2020 to December 2021. Four of them had hepatocellular carcinoma, two had colorectal liver metastasis, and one had hepatic angiomyolipoma, which was preoperatively diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma. In all patients, preoperative three-dimensional (3D) simulation images from dynamic CT were reconstructed using a 3D workstation. The layer between the hepatic parenchyma and the Glissonean pedicle of segment 2 (G2) was dissected to encircle the root of G2. After clamping or ligation of the G2, 2.5 mg of indocyanine green was injected intravenously to identify the boundaries between segments 2 and 3 with a negative staining method under near-infrared light. Parenchymal transection was performed from the caudal side to the cranial side according to the demarcation on the liver surface, and the left hepatic vein was exposed on the cut surface if possible. RESULTS: The mean operative time for all patients was 281 min. The mean blood loss was 37 mL, and no transfusion was necessary. Estimated liver resection volumes significantly correlated with actual liver resection volumes (r = 0.61, P = 0.035). After the operation, one patient presented with asymptomatic deep venous and pulmonary thrombosis, which was treated with anticoagulant therapy. The mean length of hospital stay was 8.9 days. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic segmentectomy 2 by the Glissonean approach is a feasible and safe procedure with the preservation of the nontumor-bearing segment 3 for liver tumors in segment 2.

Space-Making Particle Therapy for Unresectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Although the primary treatment option for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has been surgical resection, most patients present with unresectable advanced tumors at the time of diagnosis. Particle therapy (PT) holds great potential for HC, even though the anatomical proximity to the gastrointestinal tract prevents delivering a radical dose to the tumor. Space-making PT (SMPT), consisting of spacer placement surgery and subsequent PT, has been developed to minimize complications and maximize the therapeutic benefit of dose escalation for HC. This study aimed to conduct a dosimetric evaluation and examine the effectiveness of SMPT for the treatment of HC. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2018, 12 patients with unresectable HC treated with SMPT were enrolled. The treatment outcomes and effectiveness of spacer placement surgery were evaluated through analyses of pre- and post-surgical parameters of dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: All patients completed the planned SMPT protocol. The median survival time was 29.6 months, and the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 82.5% and 45.8%, respectively. The mean V95% value (volume irradiated with 95% of the planned treatment dose) of the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume after spacer placement surgery improved to 98.5% and 96.6% from preoperative values of 85.6% and 78.1%, respectively (p = 0.0196 and p = 0.0053, respectively). Grade 3 or higher adverse events after SMPT were seen in 6 patients. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: SMPT led to improvements in dosimetric parameters and showed good feasibility and excellent outcomes. SMPT can be a promising novel alternative for unresectable HC.

Prognostic Impact of Inflammation-Based Scores for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Although the relationship between systemic inflammatory responses and prognosis has been known in various cancers, it remains unclear which scores are most valuable for determining the prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We aimed to verify the usefulness of various inflammation-based scores as prognostic factors in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at our institution between January 2000 and December 2019. The usefulness of the following inflammation-based scores as prognostic factor was investigated: glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified GPS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, prognostic nutrition index, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), controlling nutritional status (CONUT), and prognostic index. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were enrolled in this study. Of the nine scores, CAR and CONUT indicated prognostic value. Furthermore, multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that high CAR (>0.23) was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 1.816, 95% confidence interval: 1.135-2.906, p = 0.0129), along with lymph node metastasis and curability. There was no difference in tumor staging and short-term outcomes between the low CAR (≤0.23) and high CAR groups. CONCLUSIONS: CAR was the most valuable prognostic score in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

[Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Metastasis of Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma-A Case Report].

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma(UPS)is a non-epithelial malignant tumor with a high rate of recurrence and metastasis. The frequent metastasis site is lung, lymph node, liver and bone. Pancreatic metastasis is rare. 71-year-old woman whose course after right foot UPS resection had been followed up at our hospital. But multiple bone and muscle metastasis occurred 1 year after operation. She had resection or radiation for the recurrence. 3 years after the first operation, PET-CT and EUS-FNA revealed pancreatic tail metastasis. The tumor grew up in 6 months, so we performed laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on post-operative day 14. Currently 5 years and 6 months have passed since the first surgery and she is alive. Function-preserving and minimally invasive surgery for UPS pancreatic metastasis is considered to be essential.

[A Case of Pancreatic Cancer with Gastric Wall Recurrence after Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Due to Needle Tract Seeding following EUS-FNA].

A woman in her 80s was diagnosed with pancreatic tail cancer by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We performed laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 6 months. One year after surgery, contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a 15 mm mass in the posterior wall of the gastric body. EUS showed a hypoechoic mass in the muscular layer in the gastric wall, which was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma by FNA. We diagnosed gastric wall recurrence due to needle tract seeding(NTS)following EUS-FNA and performed partial gastrectomy. Histopathological diagnosis was gastric wall recurrence of pancreatic cancer. Since NTS following EUS-FNA can be proven only by the presence of gastric wall recurrence after surgery for pancreatic body or tail cancer, the actual risk of NTS including peritoneal dissemination is not clear and may have been underestimated. In case of resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer, indication for EUS-FNA should be carefully considered.

Clinical Significance of Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Extrahepatic Metastases.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastases who can undergo hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 32 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC with extrahepatic metastases, including lymph node and/or distant metastases were recruited for this study. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had lymph node metastasis only, 16 had distant metastasis only, and 2 had both metastasis types during preoperative diagnosis. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of all patients was 17.9%, and the median survival time (MST) was 11.8 months. Univariate analysis revealed that intrahepatic maximal tumor size, intrahepatic tumor number, and intrahepatic tumor control after hepatectomy were significant factors influencing OS (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that independent risk factors for OS were intrahepatic maximal tumor size and intrahepatic tumor number (p < 0.05). The MST and 3-year OS rate of patients with maximal tumor size <100 mm and intrahepatic tumor number ≤2 were 39.0 months and 51.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy is not recommended for HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis with ≥3 intrahepatic tumors, even when all intrahepatic tumors can be eliminated via hepatectomy. Aggressive surgery may be justified for HCC patients with ≤2 intrahepatic tumors and maximal tumor size <100 mm, irrespective of vascular invasion.

Predictors of postoperative early recurrence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer.

PURPOSES: Resected bile duct cancers often relapse during postoperative follow-up. The aim of this study was to detect predictors of early recurrence in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer. METHODS: Consecutive cases (n = 162) of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in which R0 or R1 resection was achieved in Kobe University Hospital between 2000 and 2016 were divided into three groups [early recurrence (ER), within 6 months of surgery, late recurrence (LR), and no recurrence (NR)] and their clinicopathological features were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (14%) developed ER and 69 (43%) developed LR after surgery. The rates of lymph node metastasis and residual cancer status were similar in all three groups. Liver metastasis was more common in the ER group than in the LR group (59% vs. 32%, p = 0.02). ER had a significantly worse prognosis than LR and NR (7% vs. 44% vs. 85% at 1 year, p < 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that age > 75 years, serum CA19-9 > 1008 U/ml and perineural invasion were independent predictors of early recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: High serum CA19-9 values (> 1008 U/ml) were an independent predictor of early recurrence. Neoadjuvant therapy and aggressive adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for patients who show highly elevated CA19-9 values before surgery.

Benefits and limitations of middle bile duct segmental resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a standardized strategy for patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers. The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological features of bile duct segmental resection (BDR) with PD in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: Consecutive cases with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent BDR (n = 21) or PD (n = 84) with achievement of R0 or R1 resection in Kobe University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in the present study. RESULTS: Patients who underwent PD were significantly younger than those receiving BDR. The frequency of preoperative jaundice, biliary drainage and cholangitis was not significantly different between the two groups. The duration of surgery was longer and there was more intraoperative bleeding in the PD than in the BDR group (553 vs. 421 min, and 770 vs. 402 mL; both P<0.01). More major complications (>Clavien-Dindo IIIa) were observed in the PD group (46% vs. 10%, P<0.01). Postoperative hospital stay was also longer in that group (30 vs. 19 days, P = 0.02). Pathological assessment revealed that tumors were less advanced in the BDR group but the rate of lymph node metastasis was similar in both groups (33% in BDR and 48% in PD, P = 0.24). The rate of R0 resection was significantly higher in the PD group (80% vs. 38%, P<0.01). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered to patients in the BDR group (62% vs. 38%, P = 0.04). Although 5-year overall survival rates were similar in both groups (44% for BDR and 51% for PD, P = 0.72), in patients with T1 and T2, the BDR group tended to have poorer prognosis (44% vs. 68% at 5-year, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: BDR was comparable in prognosis to PD in middle bile duct cancer. Less invasiveness and lower morbidity of BDR justified this technique for selected patients in a poor general condition.

Clinical Relevance of Reductive Hepatectomy for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stages B and C Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience of 102 Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of hepatectomy for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages B and C advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 314 patients (149 and 165 BCLC stages B and C, respectively) who underwent hepatectomy were included. Complete hepatectomy (without residual tumors after hepatectomy) and reductive hepatectomy (apparent residual tumors after hepatectomy) were performed for 212 and 102 patients, respectively. Short-term operative and postoperative outcomes, as well as long-term outcomes, were evaluated. RESULTS: The median survival times of patients with stage B disease undergoing complete hepatectomy and reductive hepatectomy were 48.9 and 20.1 months, respectively (p = 0.0075), whereas those of patients with stage C disease were 19.5 and 17.6 months, respectively (p = 0.0140). The 3-year overall survival rates of patients with stage B disease undergoing reductive hepatectomy with and without subsequent local treatments after surgery were 47.5% and 0%, respectively, whereas those of patients with stage C diseases were 18.6% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefits are obvious for both BCLC stages B and C HCC when complete hepatectomy can be performed safely. Reductive hepatectomy is also acceptable for BCLC stages B and C when subsequent local treatment for remnant liver tumors can be performed safely after reductive hepatectomy. Without subsequent local treatment, reductive hepatectomy has little clinical relevance. Thus, a cautious approach to patient selection is required for this aggressive strategy.

[Analysis of Hepatectomy for Extreme Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

Although the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is hepatectomy, extreme elderly(80 years or older) patients often tend to have a variety of underlying diseases and decreased cardiopulmonary function, which means that surgery involves a high risk. In this case, we examined the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy performed in an extreme elderly patient with HCC. Of the patients with HCC that underwent initial hepatectomy at Kobe University Hospital(n=348)between 2009 and 2015, 23 patients aged 80 years or older at the time of surgery(Group 1, n=23)and those younger than 80 years at the time(Group 2, n=325)were compared, based on parameters related to safety and prognosis. We did not identify differences between the 2 groups with respect to blood loss and operating time. Intraoperative blood transfusion was more common in Group 1. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to complications of Grade Ⅲ or higher. The median survival of Group 2 patients following hepatectomy(42 months)was better than that of Group 1 patients(34 months), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups(p=0.429). Furthermore, when the same parameters were compared after adjusting for and matching propensity scores, there were no significant differences in complications, hospitalization periods, and prognosis between the 2 groups. Through proper assessment of oncologic factors and patient risk factors, hepatectomy can be performed safely and effectively even for extreme elderly patients with HCC. If there is no other disease regulating the prognosis, we can expect to achieve similar prognosis in non-extreme elderly patients. Hence, treatments should not be limited solely based on a patient being extremely elderly; rather, proactive treatments should be considered.