Is colchicine therapy effective in all patients with secondary amyloidosis?

OBJECTIVE: Although colchicine is effective on prevention and regression of amyloidosis in many cases, rate of unresponsiveness to colchicine therapy is not too low. However, there is no sufficient data about which factors effect to response of colchicine therapy on regression of amyloidosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 24 patients with renal amyloidosis were enrolled into the study. The patients were divided in two groups according to urinary protein excretions: non-nephrotic stage (14/24) and nephrotic stage (10/24). The patients were also categorized according to the etiology of amyloidosis; familial Mediterranean fever (FMF)-associated amyloidosis (15/24) versus rheumatoid disorders (RD)-associated amyloidosis (9/24). The changes of amount of proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rates were investigated after colchicine treatment started in these groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 27.7 ± 19.2 months. After initiating colchicine therapy, the degree of proteinuria was decreased higher than 50% in 11/14 (78%) of non-nephrotic patients and elevated only in three (22%) patients. In nephrotic group, proteinuria was increased in 5/10 (50%) of patients. Glomerular filtration rates were stable in nephrotic and non-nephrotic groups. Presenting with nephrotic syndrome was higher in RD-associated amyloidosis (RD_A) group (5/9) than FMF-associated amyloidosis (FMF_A) group (5/15) without statistical significance (p > 0.05). After colchicine treatment, proteinuria was decreased in 12/15 patients in FMF_A group, however, the significant decreasing of proteinuria was not observed in RD_A group (p = 0.05 vs. p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Colchicine therapy was found more effective in low proteinuric stage of amyloidosis. The beneficial effect of colchicine therapy was not observed in patients with RD- associated amyloidosis.

Long-term effect of masked hypertension management on cognitive functions in geriatric age: geriatric MASked hypertension and cognition follow-up study (G-MASH-cog MONITOR).

OBJECTIVES: Masked hypertension, defined as nonelevated clinic blood pressure with elevated out of clinic blood pressure, has been associated with increased cardiovascular events, mortality and cognitive impairment. No evidence exists regarding the effect of treating masked hypertension. In this study, we followed-up the patients in the G-MASH-cog study for 1 year and aimed to examine the effect of the management of masked hypertension on cognitive functions. METHODS: The G-MASH-cog study participants were followed-up for 1 year. In masked hypertensive individuals, lifestyle modification and antihypertensive treatment (perindopril or amlodipine) were initiated for blood pressure control. Measurements of cognitive tests and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at baseline and at 1-year follow-up were compared. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (30 in masked hypertension group; 31 in normotensive group) were included. Mean age was 72.3 ± 5.1 and 59% of the participants were female. Compared with baseline ambulatory blood pressure measurement results, patients with masked hypertension had significantly lower ambulatory blood pressure measurement results after 1-year follow-up. The quick mild cognitive impairment test (Q-MCI-TR) score increased with antihypertensive treatment (Q-MCI score at baseline = 41(19-66.5), at 1 year = 45.5 (22-70), P = 0.005) in masked hypertensive patients. In the final model of the mixed-effects analysis, when adjusted for covariates, interaction effect of the masked hypertension treatment with time was only significant in influencing the changes in Q-MCI scores over time in patients aged between 65 and 74 years (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of masked hypertension in older adults was associated with improvement in cognitive functions.