RESUMO
Aortic paravalvular leakage (PVL) is a recognised complication of surgically replaced valves which is often treated using vascular plugs. Whilst transcatheter valve-in-valve therapy has been increasingly used for failed surgical bioprostheses, it is not considered as a treatment option for aortic PVL. However, the newer design of transcatheter aortic valves has a fabric skirt to create a more effective seal around the annulus. To our best knowledge, for the first time, we report successful adoption of the valve-in-valve therapy for the treatment of PVL in surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves such that the fabric skirt is placed immediately below the regurgitant orifice resulting in significant reduction in the PVL.
Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valvuloplastia com Balão/métodos , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Idoso , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores , Ecocardiografia Tridimensional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , ReoperaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter therapies are a recognized alternative intervention in patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high surgical risk. The purpose of this study was to characterize patients screened for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), establish the clinical and anatomic reasons for unsuitability, and determine clinical course and early outcomes. METHODS: International multicentre registry was conducted of consecutive patients screened for TMVR at 12 centres in Europe, the United States, and Canada between April 2015 and September 2018. Patient-level retrospective data were collected for all patients screened. RESULTS: From a total of 294 patients, 87 (30%) patients were suitable for and underwent TMVR, whereas 207 (70%) patients were unsuitable for TMVR. There was no difference in Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (6.3% ± 4.3% vs 6.7 ± 6.1%, P = 0.52) for mitral valve replacement between the groups. The most common reasons for TMVR unsuitability were mitral annular size outside therapeutic range (28%) and small predicted neo-LVOT (25%). Preprocedural multidetector computed tomographic demonstrated that patients unsuitable for TMVR had smaller predicted neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area (318 ±192 mm2 vs 495 ± 202 mm2, P = 0.04). At 30 days, there was no difference in rates of rehospitalization (8% vs 8%, P = 0.21), stroke (1% vs 2%, P = 0.42), or mortality (4% vs 10%, P = 0.10), unadjusted for procedural risk, between unsuitable for TMVR and TMVR groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients failed screening as anatomically unsuitable for TMVR. The findings of this study have important clinical implications, highlighting an unmet clinical need and provide a target for design innovation in future iterations of TMVR devices.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo , Humanos , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (sTRAIL) has been shown to exert protective action against atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations of coronary sTRAIL levels with indices of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. METHODS: 67 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent were followed up at approximately 12 months with determination of coronary sTRAIL concentration, angiography and intravascular ultrasound evaluation of the stent sites. RESULTS: Mean sTRAIL concentration was 72.2 ± 2.8 pg/ml. sTRAIL was negatively correlated to indices of neointimal hyperplasia and positively correlated to in-stent minimum lumen area (p < 0.001). Neointimal obstruction and maximal in-stent cross-sectional neointima burden in patients in the upper sTRAIL quartile were 3.8 ± 1.2 and 12.6 ± 3.3%, respectively, versus 14.0 ± 0.7 and 49.8 ± 2.7% in the lower quartile (p < 0.001 for both). sTRAIL levels were significantly lower in patients with binary restenosis (48.7 ± 3.0 vs. 75.2 ± 2.9 pg/ml; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, sTRAIL was an independent predictor of neointimal hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a negative association of sTRAIL to in-stent neointima formation. The potential pathophysiologic substrate of this effect implicates modulation of apoptosis in various cell types. These observations should prompt further evaluation of the link between sTRAIL and in-stent restenosis.
Assuntos
Reestenose Coronária/sangue , Stents Farmacológicos , Neointima/patologia , Ligante Indutor de Apoptose Relacionado a TNF/metabolismo , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Reestenose Coronária/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/sangue , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/patologia , Humanos , Hiperplasia/sangue , Masculino , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Ligante Indutor de Apoptose Relacionado a TNF/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the ACURATE neo device has been associated with a non-negligible incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR). The new-generation ACURATE neo2 has been designed to mitigate this limitation. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare TAVR with the ACURATE neo and neo2 devices. METHODS: The NEOPRO and NEOPRO-2 registries retrospectively included patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with self-expanding valves at 24 and 20 centres, respectively. Patients receiving the ACURATE neo and neo2 devices (from January 2012 to December 2021) were included in this study. Predischarge and 30-day VARC-3 defined outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was predischarge moderate or severe paravalvular AR. Subgroup analyses per degree of aortic valve calcification were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2,026 patients (neo: 1,263, neo2: 763) were included. Predischarge moderate or severe paravalvular AR was less frequent for the neo2 group (2% vs 5%; p<0.001), resulting in higher VARC-3 intended valve performance (96% vs 90%; p<0.001). Furthermore, more patients receiving the neo2 had none/trace paravalvular AR (59% vs 38%; p<0.001). The reduction in paravalvular AR with neo2 was mainly observed with heavy aortic valve calcification. New pacemaker implantation and VARC-3 technical and device success rates were similar between the 2 groups; there were more frequent vascular and bleeding complications for the neo device. Similar 1-year survival was detected after TAVR (neo2: 90% vs neo: 87%; p=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR with the ACURATE neo2 device was associated with a lower prevalence of moderate or severe paravalvular AR and more patients with none/trace paravalvular AR. This difference was particularly evident with heavy aortic valve calcification.
Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/etiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , HemodinâmicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the benefits of routine use of 2D-US in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) reduces access-related vascular complications (VCs) and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via transfemoral approach. Potential similar benefits in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR have not been systemically investigated. METHODS: Rates of access-related VCs or bleeding were compared using 5-year retrospective observational data from 2 neighboring high-volume UK TAVR centers systemically using 2 different techniques (center 1: fluoroscopy and contralateral angiography [FCA], center 2: 2D-US) for femoral puncture at the time of transfemoral TAVR. RESULTS: Overall, 1,171 patients were included in the study (FCA, n = 624; 2D-US, n = 529). Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the risk of VCs, bleeding, or their composite according to femoral puncture technique (FCA vs. 2D-US: 6.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9% to 8.9%] vs. 6.8% [95% CI: 4.8% to 9.3%]; p = 0.63; 6.1% [95% CI: 4.4% to 8.2%] vs. 6.4% [95% CI: 4.8% to 9.3%]; p = 0.70; and 9.8% [95% CI: 7.6% to 12.4%] vs. 9.8% [95% CI: 7.4% to 12.7%]; p = 0.76, respectively) and no difference when analysis was restricted to a composite of major VCs or major and life-threatening bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular and bleeding complications can be achieved using either FCA or 2D-US guidance. Further studies are required to identify and assess alternative strategies to reduce periprocedural VCs and bleeding in this patient population.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Intervencionista , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Punções , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/efeitos adversos , Doenças Vasculares/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Congestion can worsen outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but can be difficult to quantify non-invasively. We hypothesised that preprocedural plasma volume status (PVS), estimated using a validated formula that enumerates percentage change from ideal PV, would provide prognostic utility post-TAVI. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent TAVI (2007-2017) from a prospectively collected database. Actual ([1-haematocrit] × [a + (b × weight (Kg))] and ideal (c × weight (Kg)) PV were quantified from equations where a, b and c are sex-dependent constants. Calculated PVS was then derived (100% x [(actual - ideal PV)/ideal PV]). RESULTS: In 564 patients (mean age 82±7 years, 49% male), mean PVS was -2.7±10.2%, with PV expansion (PVS >0%) evident in 39%. Only logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) independently predicted a PVS >0% (OR 1.85, p=0.002). On Cox analyses, a PVS >0% was associated with greater mortality at 3 (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.74, p=0.03) and 12 months (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.26, p=0.006) after TAVI, independently of, and incremental to, the EuroSCORE and New York Heart Association class. A PVS >0% was also independently associated with more days in intensive care (coefficient: 0.41, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.78, p=0.03) and in hospital (coefficient: 1.95, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.41, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: Higher PVS values, calculated simply from weight and haematocrit, are associated with greater mortality and longer hospitalisation post-TAVI. PVS could help refine risk stratification and further investigations into the utility of PVS-guided management in TAVI patients is warranted.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Volume Plasmático/fisiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/sangue , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Safety and feasibility of transfemoral Acurate neo implantation without systematic predilatation are not fully investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the use and impact of pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty (pre-BAV) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with Acurate neo. The NEOPRO Registry retrospectively included 1,263 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI with Acurate neo at 18 centers between January 2012 and March 2018. Information on pre-BAV was available for 1,262 patients (99.9%). Primary end points were pre-discharge moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR II+), 30-day new permanent pacemaker implantation, and 30-day all-cause mortality or stroke. A total of 1,262 patients who underwent TAVI with (nâ¯=â¯1,051) or without predilatation (nâ¯=â¯211) were included. A reduction in the pre-BAV rate was observed during the study period (from 95.7% in the first date quintile to 78.4% in the last date quintile). Patients who underwent pre-BAV had higher degrees of aortic valve (AV) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification. Primary endpoints were similar between pre-BAV and no pre-BAV groups (PAR II+ 5.5% vs 3.4%, pâ¯=â¯0.214; 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation 9.0% vs 8.0%, pâ¯=â¯0.660; 30-day death or stroke 4.9% vs 4.4%, pâ¯=â¯0.743). The need for postdilatation and other procedural outcomes were comparable between groups. Predilatation did not have a significant impact on primary endpoints across AV and LVOT calcification subgroups (subgroup analyses) and was not independently associated with primary endpoints (multivariate analyses). In conclusion, transfemoral Acurate neo implantation without predilatation appears to be feasible and safe, especially in patients with milder degrees of AV and LVOT calcification.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valvuloplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Dilatação/instrumentação , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pré-Operatório , Sistema de Registros , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the ACURATE neo device has been associated with a non-negligible incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR). The new-generation ACURATE neo2 has been designed to mitigate this limitation. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare TAVR with the ACURATE neo and neo2 devices. METHODS: The NEOPRO and NEOPRO-2 registries retrospectively included patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with self-expanding valves at 24 and 20 centres, respectively. Patients receiving the ACURATE neo and neo2 devices (from January 2012 to December 2021) were included in this study. Predischarge and 30-day VARC-3 defined outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was predischarge moderate or severe paravalvular AR. Subgroup analyses per degree of aortic valve calcification were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2,026 patients (neo: 1,263, neo2: 763) were included. Predischarge moderate or severe paravalvular AR was less frequent for the neo2 group (2% vs 5%; p<0.001), resulting in higher VARC-3 intended valve performance (96% vs 90%; p<0.001). Furthermore, more patients receiving the neo2 had none/trace paravalvular AR (59% vs 38%; p<0.001). The reduction in paravalvular AR with neo2 was mainly observed with heavy aortic valve calcification. New pacemaker implantation and VARC-3 technical and device success rates were similar between the 2 groups; there were more frequent vascular and bleeding complications for the neo device. Similar 1-year survival was detected after TAVR (neo2: 90% vs neo: 87%; p=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR with the ACURATE neo2 device was associated with a lower prevalence of moderate or severe paravalvular AR and more patients with none/trace paravalvular AR. This difference was particularly evident with heavy aortic valve calcification.
Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , HemodinâmicaAssuntos
Trombose Coronária , Infarto do Miocárdio , Vasos Coronários , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Safety and feasibility of transfemoral Acurate neo implantation without systematic predilatation are not fully investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the use and impact of pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty (pre-BAV) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with Acurate neo. The NEOPRO Registry retrospectively included 1,263 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI with Acurate neo at 18 centers between January 2012 and March 2018. Information on preBAV was available for 1,262 patients (99.9%). Primary endpoints were pre-discharge moderate-tosevere paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR II+), 30-day new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), and 30-day all-cause mortality or stroke. A total of 1,262 patients who underwent TAVI with (n=1,051) or without predilatation (n=211) were included. A reduction in the pre-BAV rate was observed during the study period (from 95.7% in the first date quintile to 78.4% in the last date quintile). Patients who underwent pre-BAV had higher degrees of aortic valve (AV) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification. Primary endpoints were similar between pre-BAV and no pre-BAV groups (PAR II+ 5.5% vs. 3.4%, p=0.214; 30-day PPI 9.0% vs. 8.0%, p=0.660; 30-day death or stroke 4.9% vs. 4.4%, p=0.743). The need for postdilatation and other procedural outcomes were comparable between groups. Predilatation did not have a significant impact on primary endpoints across AV and LVOT calcification subgroups (subgroup analyses) and was not independently associated with primary endpoints (multivariate analyses). In conclusion, transfemoral Acurate neo implantation without predilatation appears to be feasible and safe, especially in patients with milder degrees of AV and LVOT calcification. (AU)
Assuntos
Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Valva AórticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of remote ischemic post-conditioning (RIPC) by repeated intermittent balloon inflations in preventing acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: AKI complicating PCI is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Remote ischemic preconditioning, using cycles of upper limb ischemia-reperfusion as a conditioning stimulus, has been recently shown to prevent AKI in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive RIPC by cycles of inflation and deflation of the stent balloon during PCI or a sham procedure (control patients). The primary endpoint was AKI, defined as an increase of ≥ 0.5 mg/dl or ≥ 25% in serum creatinine within 96 h from PCI. The 30-day rate of death or re-hospitalization for any cause was one of the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were included (median age, 68 years; 36% female). The AKI rate in the RIPC group was 12.4% versus 29.5% in the control group (p = 0.002; odds ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 0.71). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 case of AKI was 6 (95% confidence interval: 3.6 to 15.2). The 30-day rate of death or re-hospitalization for any cause was 22.3% in the control group versus 12.4% in RIPC patients (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RIPC by serial balloon inflations and deflations during PCI was found to confer protection against AKI in patients with a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI. The reduction in the rate of AKI translated into a clear trend (of borderline significance) toward better 30-day clinical outcome.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Pós-Condicionamento Isquêmico , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Abstract OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Acurate neo (NEO) and Evolut PRO (PRO) devices. BACKGROUND: The NEO and PRO bioprostheses are 2 next-generation self-expanding devices developed for TAVR. METHODS: The NEOPRO (A Multicenter Comparison of Acurate NEO Versus Evolut PRO Transcatheter Heart Valves) registry retrospectively included patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with either NEO or PRO valves at 24 centers between January 2012 and March 2018. One-to-one propensity score matching resulted in 251 pairs. Pre-discharge and 30-day Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 defined outcomes were evaluated. Binary logistic regression was performed to adjust the treatment effect for propensity score quintiles. RESULTS: A total of 1,551 patients (n = 1,263 NEO; n = 288 PRO) were included. The mean age was 82 years, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 5.1%. After propensity score matching (n = 502), VARC-2 device success (90.6% vs. 91.6%; p = 0.751) and pre-discharge moderate to severe (II+) paravalvular aortic regurgitation (7.3% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.584) were comparable between the NEO and PRO groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any 30-day clinical outcome between matched NEO and PRO pairs, including all-cause mortality (3.2% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.221), stroke (2.4% vs. 2.8%; p = 1.000), new permanent pacemaker implantation (11.0% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.565), and VARC-2 early safety endpoint (10.6% vs. 10.4%; p = 1.000). Logistic regression on the unmatched cohort confirmed a similar risk of VARC-2 device success, paravalvular aortic regurgitation II+, and 30-day clinical outcomes after NEO and PRO implantation. CONCLUSIONS: (AU)