Postoperative adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen, tegafur plus uracil, or both in women with node-negative breast cancer: a pooled analysis of six randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: This article reports the results of a pooled analysis of six randomized trials conducted to study the efficacy of uracil and tegafur (UFT) in the adjuvant treatment of node-negative breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six randomized controlled trials on node-negative breast cancer patients were conducted from 1992 through 1995 in Japan that included the three, three-arm trials (control [no adjuvant], UFT, and tamoxifen [TAM] groups) and the three, four-arm trials (control, UFT, TAM, and UFT plus TAM groups). Pooled analysis was performed on the data obtained from these six trials (involving 2,934 patients). RESULTS: Overall survival was compared between the UFT group (including both the UFT group and the TAM plus UFT group) and the non-UFT group (control group and TAM group). A significant difference (P = .04) was observed in 5-year survival rates between the UFT (95.9%) and the non-UFT (94.0%) groups. Overall survival was also compared between the TAM group (TAM group and TAM plus UFT group) and the non-TAM group (control group plus UFT group). The 5-year survival rate (95.2%) in the TAM group was not significantly different from that (93.9%) in the non-TAM group, but the subset analysis showed a significant (P = .01) improvement in the estrogen receptor-positive subset. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant UFT improves the overall survival of node-negative breast cancer patients. Given that UFT has milder adverse effects, it is suggested that UFT can be a useful alternative to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in the adjuvant treatment for node-negative breast cancer.

The effect of adjuvant 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine in early stage breast cancer patients: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

To assess the efficacy of 5'-DFUR, an intermediate of capecitabine, for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer, we conducted an open-labeled multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative 5'-DFUR treatment with surgery alone. We enrolled 1217 primary breast cancer patients and randomly assigned them into two treatment groups; one received six-month postoperative 5'-DFUR treatment by consecutive or intermittent administration, and the other surgery alone. Follow-up surveys were conducted once a year for all subjects simultaneously and examined their outcome/presence or absence of the cancer recurrence. The central study committee reviewed all follow-up data and judged the recurrence data to be used for the analysis. Eight-year follow-up data showed no significant differences in relapse-free and overall survival between the two groups, and 5'-DFUR treatment regimen showed an extremely high tolerance. Possible explanations are discussed for the finding of no significant survival difference between adjuvant 6-month 5'-DFUR monotherapy and surgery alone in early breast cancer.

Ten-year results of a randomized trial on adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for stage II breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized multi-center study was undertaken for 2 years and 3 months from November 1982, with the aim of examining the significance of using a combination of futraful (FT) and tamoxifen (TAM) for postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage II breast cancer after curative surgery. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups and received one of the following treatment protocols: treatment A, intravenous administration of doxorubicin (DOX) 20 mg/body on the day of surgery and 10 mg/body the next day, followed by oral FT 600 mg/day for 2 years from the 14th day after surgery; treatment B, the same pattern of DOX administration followed by combined therapy with FT and TAM 20 mg/day for 2 years. The number of patients was 428 (treatment A 210 and treatment B 218), of whom 418 (97.7%) were followed for 10 years for analysis. RESULTS: Significantly higher 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were observed with treatment B compared with treatment A (p=0.0101 and 0.0219). Node-positive patients appeared to derive more benefit from TAM than node-negative patients. The difference in 10-year OS between treatment A and treatment B was more evident than that of the 5-year OS in patients with more than 4 positive nodes (p=0.0313 vs. 0.0479). No increase in adverse reactions was seen as a result of combining TAM with FT. CONCLUSION: The study results demonstrate that for stage II breast cancer concomitant administration of FT and TAM is superior to FT alone for postoperative adjuvant therapy, and administration of TAM for 2 years may contribute not only to 5-year survival rates but also to 10-year survival rates of node-positive patients.

Efficacy of UFT plus Tamoxifen for Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Tamoxifen plus UFT for Estrogen-Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer : Adjuvant Therapy after Administration of Mitomycin.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective multicentre, collaborative randomised study on postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with stage II primary breast cancer to evaluate the effect of a combination of tegafur and uracil (UFT) on tamoxifen (TAM) plus mitomycin (MM) in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive [ER(+)] breast cancer and TAM on UFT + MM in patients with estrogen-receptor-negative [ER(-)] breast cancer. METHODS: MM (13 mg/m(2)) was intravenously administered on the day of surgery for all patients, after which patients with ER(+) were randomised to TAM 20 mg/day (treatment A) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment B). Patients who were ER(-) were randomly allocated UFT 400 mg/day (treatment C) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment D). TAM and UFT were administered orally for 2 years, starting on day 14 after surgery. ENDPOINTS: 5-year disease-free survival (5y DFS), 5-year overall survival (5y OS), and safety. RESULTS: The study commenced in November 1988 and the data cut-off was May 1997 after follow-up of the last patient for 5 years. A total of 765 patients with stage II breast cancer were enrolled. 436 patients with ER(+) [group A: 213, group B: 223] and 317 patients with ER(-) [group C: 162, group D: 155] breast cancer were eligible for this study. The rate of 5y DFS was 83.1% for group A and 90.7% for group B (p = 0.020). There was a significant difference in 5y DFS between the two groups among postmenopausal and positive lymph node metastases patients. The incidence of adverse reactions was 4% for group A and 18% for group B (p < 0.05). The rate of 5y DFS was 77.1% for group C and 85.5% for group D (p = 0.063). The rate of 5y OS was 84.7% for group C and 89.8% for group D (p = 0.216). The incidence of adverse reactions was 18% in group C and 11% in group D (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: UFT in combination with TAM + MM showed higher efficacy than TAM + MM as a postoperative combination therapy for breast cancer in patients with ER(+) breast cancer. A trend was observed in favour of the addition of TAM to UFT + MM in postmenopausal and lymph node metastases-negative patients with ER(-) breast cancer.

Efficacy of adjuvant immunochemotherapy with OK-432 for patients with curatively resected gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of centrally randomized controlled clinical trials.

The benefit of immunochemotherapy employing a streptococcal preparation, OK-432 (Picibanil), in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer was reassessed by meta-analysis of data from 1,522 patients enrolled in six clinical trials with central randomization. All six trials began between 1985 and 1993, and patients were followed-up for at least 3 years after surgery and enrollment of the last patient. In these trials, standard chemotherapy was compared with the same chemotherapy plus OK-432. The endpoint was overall survival and intent-to-treat analysis was done without patient exclusion. Data were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The 3-year survival rate for all eligible patients in the six trials was 67.5% in the immunochemotherapy group versus 62.6% in the chemotherapy group. The 3-year overall survival odds ratio was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.99). The treatment effect was shown to be statistically significant (p = 0.044). The results of this meta-analysis suggest that immunochemotherapy after surgery with OK-432 can improve the survival of patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.

Meta-analysis of five studies on tegafur plus uracil (UFT) as post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Meta-analysis of 5 studies on postoperative breast cancer cases (2 studies on surgery alone vs. tegafur plus uracil (UFT) and 3 studies on tamoxifen (TAM) alone vs. TAM + UFT) were carried out to evaluate the anticancer drug UFT in oral postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 1973 patients enrolled, 1898 were eligible and 75 were excluded (exclusion rate 3.8%). There was no bias in major background factors in either the UFT-treated (965) or non-UFT-treated (933) groups. The reduction in the odds of death and the odds of recurrence were 17 +/- 17% (p = 0.33) and 21 +/- 11% (p = 0.060), respectively. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model emphasized the effectiveness of UFT treatment for suppression of recurrence compared with non-treatment with UFT (p = 0.038). Suppression of recurrence was remarkable in the group treated with UFT for 2 years. (the reduction in the odds of recurrence: 23 +/- 11%, p = 0.048) Stratified analysis was applied concerning recurrence, and improved results were obtained in premenopausal cases (the reduction in the odds of recurrence: 33 +/- 11%, p = 0.019). These results suggested that UFT treatment for 2 years was effective as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I - IIIA breast cancer for the prolongation of the recurrence-free survival period.

A randomized controlled study of immunochemotherapy with OK-432 after curative surgery for gastric cancer.

The effect of adjuvant immunochemotherapy including OK-432 (Picibanil) on survival was assessed in patients who underwent curative resection of gastric cancer. Patients enrolled in this randomized controlled study were randomly assigned to group A or group B. Group A patients received 800 mg/d 5'-DFUR (Furtulon) for 2 years from 2 weeks after the operation. Group B patients received OK-432 plus 5'-DFUR by the same regimen as in group A. This study enrolled 288 patients, and 1 patient with malignant lymphoma was excluded. Among the remaining 287 patients, 143 and 144 were allocated to group A and group B, respectively, and their data were included in statistical analysis. The 5-year survival rates for groups A and B were 62.9% and 63.8%, respectively, showing no significant difference (P = 0.7996).