Comparative outcomes of pure laparoscopic and open donor right hepatectomy: the first report from a Southeast Asian transplant center.

BACKGROUND: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) can provide better operative outcomes for the donor than conventional open donor right hepatectomy (CODRH). However, the complexity of the procedure typically makes transplant teams reluctant to perform it, especially in low-volume transplant centers. We compared the outcomes of PLDRH and CODRH to demonstrate the feasibility of PLDRH in a low-volume transplant program. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of adult living donor liver transplantation in Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2015 to March 2021. The patients were divided into a PLDRH group and a CODRH group. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative complications of donors and recipients were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent donor hepatectomy between the dates selected (9 PLDRH patients and 21 CODRH patients). The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were not significantly different. The median graft volume of the PLDRH group was 693.8 mL, which was not significantly different from that of the CODRH group (726.5 mL) The PLDRH group had a longer operative time than the CODRH group, but the difference was not statistically significant (487.5 min vs 425.0 min, p = 0.197). The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups (33.3% vs 22.2%, p = 0.555). Additionally, for the recipients, the incidence of major complications was not significantly different between the groups (71.3 vs 55.6%, p = 0.792). CONCLUSION: Even in the context of this low-volume transplant program, whose staff have a high level of experience in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery, PLDRH showed similar results to CODRH in terms of perioperative outcomes for donors and recipients.

Outcomes of the Initial Phase of an Adult Living vs Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Program in a Low-Volume Transplant Center: Integration of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is clinically challenging, especially in a low-volume transplant program. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) to demonstrate the feasibility of performing LDLT in a low-volume transplant and/or high-volume complex hepatobiliary surgery program during the initial phase. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of LDLT and DDLT in Chiang Mai University Hospital from October 2014 to April 2020. Postoperative complications and 1-year survival were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Forty patients who underwent LT in our hospital were analyzed. There were 20 LDLT patients and 20 DDLT patients. The operative time and hospital stay were significantly longer in the LDLT group than in the DDLT group. The incidence of complications in both groups was comparable, except for biliary complications, which were higher in the LDLT group. Bile leakage, found in 3 patients (15%), is the most common complication in a donor. The 1-year survival rates of both groups were also comparable. CONCLUSION: Even during the initial phase of the low-volume transplant program, LDLT and DDLT had comparable perioperative outcomes. Surgical expertise in complex hepatobiliary surgery is necessary to facilitate effective LDLT, potentially increasing case volumes and promoting program sustainability.

Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Postoperative Outcomes and Quality of Life in Liver Donors: First Report in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor liver transplantation is a rare procedure in Northern Thailand because of cultural issues. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can decrease waiting list mortality for the patients who have end-stage liver disease. In Thailand, our center is the only active adult-to-adult LDLT program. This study is the first report of outcomes and health-related quality of life in liver donors. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes and health related quality of life in living liver transplant donors at the Transplant Center in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing liver resection for adult-to-adult LDLT at our center between March 2010 and July 2018 were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. The effect of donor demographics, operative details, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), hospitalization, and health related quality of life was evaluated through health-related quality of life questionnaires (short-form survey, SF-36) RESULTS: A total of 14 donor patients were included in this study with an age range from 26 to 51 years (mean 39.86 years, standard deviation [SD] = 8.59 years). The patients were 71.43% female and 28.57% male. The majority of patients had primary and secondary education (57.14%) and were married (64.29%). After hepatectomy, there was no mortality in the evaluated donors. The Clavien-Dindo classification of postoperative complications were as follows: Grade I (none), Grade II (50%), Grade IIIa (7.14%), and Grade IIIb (7.14%). The serum levels of total protein and albumin were decreased on postoperative day 5. The hospital stays averaged 11.5 days (SD = 4.9 days) and ranged from 5 to 22 days. After considering each aspect of the donors' postoperative quality of life, the highest mean score was related to physical composite scores in physical roles with a mean of 96.42 (SD = 13.36) and physical function with a mean of 95.35 (SD = 13.36). Moreover, the mental composite scores in social function was the highest mean of 91.96 (SD = 12.60) and role emotion was a mean of 90.47 (SD = 27.51). CONCLUSIONS: Living donor hepatectomy was safe, with an acceptable morbidity, and recognized as a safe procedure with an excellent long-term health quality of life.

Price to pay; Portal vein arterialization for hepatic artery thrombosis after living donor liver transplantation; A case report.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the most serious complications of liver transplantation that can potentially lead to loss of the allograft. Retransplantation is the only option when revascularization can't be performed but the donor may be not available in the short period of time. We report the technique of using portal vein arterialization (PVA) for bridging before retransplantation. There are few reports in living donor setting. CASE DESCRIPTION: The recipient of the liver was a 59 year old male who received an extended right lobe graft from his son. Post operative day 41, HAT was diagnosed from angiogram and liver function got rapidly worse. We decided to re-anastomose the hepatic artery but this was not possible due to a thrombosis in the distal right hepatic artery. So PVA by anastomosis of the common hepatic artery to splenic vein was performed. During the early postoperative period liver function gradually improved. Unfortunately, he died from massive GI hemorrhage one month later. DISCUSSION: PVA has previously been reported as being useful when revascularization was not successful. The surgical technique is not complicated and can be performed in sick patient. Liver graft may be salvaged with oxygenated portal flow and recover afterwards. However, portal hypertension after PVA seem to be an inevitable complication. CONCLUSIONS: PVA may be a bridging treatment for retransplantation in patients whom hepatic artery reconstruction is impossible after HAT. Regards to the high morbidity after procedure, retransplantation should be performed as definite treatment as soon as possible.