Clinicopathological characteristics of de novo and secondary myeloid sarcoma: A monocentric retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosing myeloid sarcoma remains challenging, and we aimed to provide clinicopathological features to facilitate diagnosis. METHOD: Clinicopathological data from 41 patients with de novo and 31 with secondary myeloid sarcoma were reviewed. RESULTS: Most de novo cases presented with isolated myeloid sarcoma (n = 19) or myeloid sarcoma with concurrent acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15). Most secondary cases presented after acute myeloid leukemia (n = 11), myeloproliferative neoplasm (n = 9), or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 8). Most frequent localizations were skin and lymph nodes. Immunohistochemistry showed immature and/or aberrant antigenic expression in 29% of de novo and 39% of secondary cases. Most genetic abnormalities were RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (n = 4), CBFB-MYH11 (n = 2), KMT2A-MLLT3 (n = 2), and JAK2 V617F (n = 2) mutations in de novo myeloid sarcoma, and BCR-ABL1 (n = 5) and KMT2A rearrangements (n = 2) in secondary cases. A complex karyotype was seen in 17% of de novo and 39% of secondary cases. Most prevalent treatment was induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (n = 10) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n = 9) for de novo and radiotherapy (n = 11) for secondary cases. CONCLUSION: De novo myeloid sarcoma mostly presented isolated. Lesions were often localized at skin and lymph nodes. Genetic aberrations frequently involved core-binding factor rearrangements in de novo cases and a complex karyotype in secondary cases.

Hemoglobin S monitoring on TOSOH G8 in hemoglobin A1c mode in case of urgent red blood cell exchange.

BACKGROUND: Pre- and post-transfusion hemoglobin S (HbS) levels are used to document the efficacy of red blood cell exchange (RCE) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). In case of urgent RCE a 24/7 short turn-around time (STAT) analysis, with the ability to identify and quantify HbS, is warranted. The use of TOSOH G8 (Tosoh Europe) is evaluated for this purpose, using the variant HbA1c mode. METHODS: Analytical performance of the HbS analysis on TOSOH G8 in variant HbA1c mode was evaluated, including assessment of imprecision and linearity for HbS. In addition, a comparison study between TOSOH G8 and Minicap Flex Piercing (FP) system CZE (Sebia) using 32 HbS samples (HbS range: 9%-93%) was carried out to evaluate analytical and clinical concordance. RESULTS: Total HbS imprecision was 1.77% and 0.31% for a sickle cell trait and a sickle cell anemia sample, respectively. An acceptable linearity (HbS range: 6%-88%) was observed (R2  > .99). Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed a significant proportional bias; however, a good analytical concordance (r > .95) was found. Our results suggested that TOSOH G8 underestimated HbS results compared with those of Minicap FP system (mean difference: -3.54%), especially in samples with a high HbS concentration. CONCLUSION: Hemoglobin S results obtained with TOSOH G8 in variant HbA1c mode are clinically acceptable to monitor urgent RCE. The observed underestimation will not alter clinical decision-making.

Pancreas Islet Cell-Specific Antibody Detection by ELISA.

BACKGROUND: Islet cell-specific autoantibodies are useful to classify diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of commercially available ELISAs to detect autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase 65-kDa isoform (GADA), tyrosine phosphatase-related islet antigen 2 (IA-2A), zinc transporter protein 8 (ZnT8A), and insulin (IAA). The performance of ELISA was compared to the performance of RIA. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 76 newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus patients (median age 27 years, female/male: 0.65) and 131 disease controls (median age 45 years, female/male: 0.60). The ELISAs were from Medipan. RIAs were in-house methods from the Belgian Diabetes Registry or from Medipan or DIASource. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were, respectively, 97% and 97% for GADA, 61% and 99% for IA-2A, 1% and 96% for IAA, and 70% and 98% for ZnT8A. The likelihood ratio for type 1 diabetes increased with increasing antibody levels for GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A measured by ELISA. The positive predictive value of double positivity for either GADA, IA-2A, or ZnT8A was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The ELISAs to detect GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A have good performance characteristics. Combining autoantibody assays and taking into account antibody levels improves the interpretation of autoantibody testing.