Neurotrophic Factors as Regenerative Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Current Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury (SCI), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), are characterized by acute or chronic progressive loss of one or several neuronal subtypes. However, despite their increasing prevalence, little progress has been made in successfully treating these diseases. Research has recently focused on neurotrophic factors (NTFs) as potential regenerative therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we discuss the current state of knowledge, challenges, and future perspectives of NTFs with a direct regenerative effect in chronic inflammatory and degenerative disorders. Various systems for delivery of NTFs, such as stem and immune cells, viral vectors, and biomaterials, have been applied to deliver exogenous NTFs to the central nervous system, with promising results. The challenges that currently need to be overcome include the amount of NTFs delivered, the invasiveness of the delivery route, the blood-brain barrier permeability, and the occurrence of side effects. Nevertheless, it is important to continue research and develop standards for clinical applications. In addition to the use of single NTFs, the complexity of chronic inflammatory and degenerative diseases may require combination therapies targeting multiple pathways or other possibilities using smaller molecules, such as NTF mimetics, for effective treatment.

Engineering of regulatory T cells by means of mRNA electroporation in a GMP-compliant manner.

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are crucial in inducing and maintaining tolerance. This unique capacity of Tregs, in combination with proof-of-principle in preclinical studies, highlights the potential clinical use of Tregs for the treatment of autoimmunity and transplant rejection. Although proven to be safe and well tolerated in the first clinical trials, only modest clinical results were observed. In this regard, it has been hypothesized that current challenges lie in the development of antigen-specific Tregs. Here, we present an innovative, good manufacturing practices (GMP)-compliant manufacturing protocol for Tregs applicable in a clinical-grade setting, allowing efficient and safe redirection of Treg specificity. First, a soluble polymer conjugated with antibodies to CD3 and CD28 and high amounts of exogenous IL-2 for in vitro Treg expansion resulted in a >70-fold and 185-fold increase of a pure population of CD4+CD127-CD25hi Tregs and CD4+CD127-CD25+CD45RA+ Tregs, respectively. Next, as a proof-of-principle, expanded Tregs were engineered by means of TCR-encoding mRNA electroporation to generate antigen-specific Tregs. This resulted in an expression of the newly introduced TCR in up to 85% of Tregs. Moreover, we did not observe a negative effect on the phenotype of Tregs, as demonstrated by the expression of FOXP3, Helios, CTLA-4 and CCR4, nor on the TSDR methylation status. Importantly, mRNA-engineered Tregs were still able to induce in vitro suppression of effector T cells and produced anti-inflammatory, but not pro-inflammatory, cytokines when activated. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that high numbers of stable and functional Tregs can be obtained with high purity and successfully engineered for gain of function, in a GMP-compliant manner. We envisage that this clinical-grade protocol will provide solid basis for future clinical application of mRNA-engineered Tregs.

Are Cell-Based Therapies Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Over the past two decades, significant advances have been made in the field of regenerative medicine. However, despite being of the utmost clinical urgency, there remains a paucity of therapeutic strategies for conditions with substantial neurodegeneration such as (progressive) multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury (SCI), Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Different cell types, such as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), neuronal stem cells (NSC), olfactory ensheathing cells (OEC), neurons and a variety of others, already demonstrated safety and regenerative or neuroprotective properties in the central nervous system during the preclinical phase. As a result of these promising findings, in recent years, these necessary types of cell therapies have been intensively tested in clinical trials to establish whether these results could be confirmed in patients. However, extensive research is still needed regarding elucidating the exact mechanism of action, possible immune rejection, functionality and survival of the administered cells, dose, frequency and administration route. To summarize the current state of knowledge, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. A total of 27,043 records were reviewed by two independent assessors and 71 records were included in the final quantitative analysis. These results show that the overall frequency of serious adverse events was low: 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.08). In addition, several trials in MS and SCI reported efficacy data, demonstrating some promising results on clinical outcomes. All randomized controlled studies were at a low risk of bias due to appropriate blinding of the treatment, including assessors and patients. In conclusion, cell-based therapies in neurodegenerative disease are safe and feasible while showing promising clinical improvements. Nevertheless, given their high heterogeneity, the results require a cautious approach. We advocate for the harmonization of study protocols of trials investigating cell-based therapies in neurodegenerative diseases, adverse event reporting and investigation of clinical outcomes.