Defining and mitigating the challenges of an older and obese population in minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery.

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) is steadily increasing due in large part to an aging world population and rise in rates of obesity. Patients with obesity and advancing age can be seen as vulnerable populations, as they are both often subject to physician bias regarding surgical choices and assumptions regarding long-term outcomes. As we operate on an older and/or obese patient population, it is increasingly important that we adopt peri-operative management strategies and surgical techniques to best serve this complex patient population. Careful orchestration pre-, intra- and postoperatively is key to successful outcomes in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. Here, we review existing literature regarding EC in women with older age and/or obesity, outline recommendations for peri-operative management and common intra-operative issues-specifically common anesthetic issues surrounding cardiovascular, respiratory and neuromuscular systems-that are of heightened importance in women with older age and/or obesity. The goal of this review is to help define and mitigate common complications for these vulnerable patients with an EC diagnosis who, in accordance with carefully assessed health risks, can and should be offered standard of care surgery and treatment.

A first step in determining appropriate amounts of obstetric anesthesia work.

Ginosar, et al. describe a new performance indicator, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index, to represent the current amount of obstetric anesthesia work done daily at each of 25 Israeli hospitals. The authors claim, correctly, that this index is a closer reflection of the anesthetic workload than simply looking at the number of deliveries at each hospital. However, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index could easily be refined to reflect more closely the actual obstetric anesthesia workload by using the average cesarean delivery time for each hospital rather than one value for all hospitals. Although the authors state that they developed the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index out of concern for inadequate obstetric anesthesia manpower in Israel, they have not compared the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index with the size of the patient population or any measure of patient satisfaction or patient safety. In its current form, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index describes the current work situation but does not evaluate the extent of the unmet need for additional anesthesia providers. Despite these shortcomings, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index is an important first step in developing a tool to assess unmet obstetric anesthesia needs.