Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Radiol Case Rep ; 18(5): 1949-1953, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36970238

RESUMO

Mammary fibromatosis is a rare neoplastic proliferation of fibroblastic cells. Usually seen in abdominal and extra-abdominal sites, it is rarely seen in the breast. Patients with mammary fibromatosis usually present with a firm palpable mass with or without dimpling and skin retraction-often mimicking breast carcinoma. Here, we present a case of mammary fibromatosis in a 49-year-old woman who presented with a palpable lump in her right breast. Mammography tomosynthesis revealed architectural distortion which was seen on ultrasonography as a hypoechoic area. The patient underwent a wire-guided excision where the histology of this specimen showed irregular spindle cell proliferation with hemosiderin deposition, confirming mammary fibromatosis. Further re-excision of margins revealed no evidence of residual fibromatosis, and the patient underwent subsequent surveillance mammograms to ensure there was no recurrence.

2.
Ir J Med Sci ; 189(4): 1155-1157, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32394153

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: COVID19 pandemic poses a global threat, with many unknowns. The potential for resource limited countries to suffer huge mortality is of major concern. Prevention and risk reduction strategies are paramount in the current absence of effective treatment or a vaccine. There is a global shortage of personal protective equipment. AIMS: This short paper describes the rationale for and development of a cloth homemade mask and has a step by step video. RESULTS: The template is reproducible around the world and is both washable and cheap. CONCLUSION: This article describes a simple way to make a cloth mask, suitable if medical masks are not available.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Máscaras , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Têxteis , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Equipamentos Descartáveis , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 43(2): 118-24, 2007.
Artigo em Lt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17329946

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare operative and postoperative results and differences among laparoscopic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomies performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical histories was performed for women who had undergone three different types of hysterectomies (laparoscopic, vaginal, and abdominal) at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital during 2004-2005. RESULTS: A total of 602 hysterectomies were performed: 51 (8.5%) laparoscopic, 203 (33.7%) vaginal, and 348 (57.8%) abdominal. The lowest complication rate occurred in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=5, 9.8%) and the highest--abdominal hysterectomy (n=88, 25.2%) (P<0.05). More complication occurred after abdominal as compared to vaginal hysterectomy (n=88, 25.2% vs. n=20, 9.9%, respectively; P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate comparing laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies (P=0.26). The amount of blood loss depended on the type of hysterectomy--less blood was lost during laparoscopic and more during abdominal hysterectomy (123.4 vs. 308.5 mL, respectively; P<0.01). A significantly higher blood loss was observed during abdominal hysterectomy as compared to vaginal (195.3 mL) and vaginal as compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (P<0.01). The mean length of hospital stay differed comparing all three types of hysterectomies: the shortest stay of 8.6 days was after laparoscopic, the longest of 13.7 days--after abdominal hysterectomy. The mean hospital stay was statistically significant shorter for vaginal hysterectomy compared to abdominal hysterectomy (9.1 vs. 13.7 days, P<0.01). The difference in mean length of hospital stay was insignificant comparing laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal hysterectomy was the most common procedure performed. The type of hysterectomy influenced the rate of complications--the lowest complication rate was after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies. The amount of blood loss depended on the type of hysterectomy--the lowest was during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Abdominal hysterectomy required on average a longer hospital stay compared with laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Laparotomia , Tempo de Internação , Menopausa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paridade , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 19: 45-50, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28649377

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly encountered emergency surgical conditions. An understanding of the most highly cited research works in this field is key to good evidence based clinical practice. AIMS: To perform a bibliometric analysis on the 100 most frequently cited articles in the field of acute appendicitis. METHODS: The database of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science Expanded citation index was searched to identify the 100 most frequently cited articles in the field of acute appendicitis. The web of science expanded citation index tracks article citations made since 1946. RESULTS: The top 100 most frequently cited articles were selected for analysis in this series. The most frequently cited article was cited 649 times and the least cited three article 93 times. The average number of citations per article was 167.74. The top 100 cited articles originated from 17 countries. Over half of the papers originated from the USA. Fifty-one of the papers concentrated on diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Thirty-six papers looked at the treatment of acute appendicitis with 30 of these dealing with the surgical management of the disease. There were 6 studies at level 1a, 20 studies at level 1b and 43,5,17 and 9 studies at levels 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bibliometric analysis of the citation classics in a given field can provide interesting insights into the relationship between the quality of research outputs and clinical practice. The study of acute appendicitis remains an active field of research with a growing body of higher quality evidence underpinning our clinical practice.

5.
Biores Open Access ; 6(1): 58-62, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28736688

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the top 50 most cited articles in cartilage regeneration. The impact of a scientific journal can be gauged by the total number of citations it has accrued. The top 50 most cited articles involving cartilage regeneration represent the most quoted level of evidence among this new subspecialty. This study aims to identify and analyze the 50 most cited articles in cartilage regeneration. The Web of Science™ citation indexing service was utilized to determine the most frequently cited articles published after 1956 containing "cartilage regeneration" in the "topic" or "title." The 50 most cited articles were included. The number of citations, year of publication, country of article origin, article institution, journal of publication, publication format, and authorship were then calculated for each article. The span of citations ranged from 1287 to 203 citations, with a mean of 361.02 citations per article in question. The articles originated from 11 countries, with the United States contributing 34 articles, followed by Japan with 5 articles. The articles were distributed across 34 high-impact journals. Biomaterials was the journal with the highest number of publications (seven articles) followed by the Journal of Orthopaedic Research (three articles). Of the 50 articles, 2 were clinical observational studies, 47 concerned basic science, and 1 was review article. The most cited articles involving cartilage regeneration are detected in both experimental and clinical research fields. The high ratio of basic science to clinical articles reflects the infancy of this relatively new specialty and that further clinical research is required in this area.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA