Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
World J Surg ; 37(10): 2348-52, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23811793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the face (GSWF) may produce life-threatening injuries. Our objective is to describe outcomes of and factors related to interventions for urgent airway control (UAC) and urgent bleeding control (UBC) as well as to analyze complications associated with GSWF. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 155 GSWF patients who were admitted to two Level 1 academic trauma centers over an 11-year period. Demographic details, injuries sustained, interventions performed, and timing of the interventions were recorded. Morbidity and mortality data were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 115 (74 %) patients suffered isolated GSWF, and none died. Of the 90 (58 %) patients requiring UAC, only three had a cricothyroidotomy. Of the 41 (26 %) patients requiring UBC, only four had angiographic embolization. Intraoral involvement and extrafacial injuries were associated with both UAC and UBC. Overall, 75 patients (48 %) required operations on the bones, eyes, or both. Complications developed in 14 and were treated successfully. CONCLUSIONS: UAC and UBC are required frequently after GSWF and are associated with intraoral involvement and injuries beyond the face. Simple methods, such as orotracheal intubation and packing, are typically sufficient for successful management. About half of the patients need further surgery, with infrequent morbidity.


Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Tratamento de Emergência , Traumatismos Faciais/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/estatística & dados numéricos , Boston , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos Faciais/complicações , Traumatismos Faciais/mortalidade , Feminino , Técnicas Hemostáticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/complicações , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Drugs ; 78(1): 111-121, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29159797

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic is an escalating health crisis. We evaluated the impact of opioid prescription rates and socioeconomic determinants on opioid mortality rates, and identified potential differences in prescription patterns by categories of practitioners. METHODS: We combined the 2013 and 2014 Medicare Part D data and quantified the opioid prescription rate in a county level cross-sectional study with data from 2710 counties, 468,614 unique prescribers and 46,665,037 beneficiaries. We used the CDC WONDER database to obtain opioid-related mortality data. Socioeconomic characteristics for each county were acquired from the US Census Bureau. RESULTS: The average national opioid prescription rate was 3.86 claims per beneficiary that received a prescription for opioids (95% CI 3.86-3.86). At a county level, overall opioid prescription rates (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.27) and especially those provided by emergency medicine (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.21), family medicine physicians (p = 0.11, Coeff = 0.008), internal medicine (p = 0.018, Coeff = 0.1) and physician assistants (p = 0.021, Coeff = 0.08) were associated with opioid-related mortality. Demographic factors, such as proportion of white (p white < 0.001, Coeff = 0.22), black (p black < 0.001, Coeff = - 0.19) and male population (p male < 0.001, Coeff = 0.13) were associated with opioid prescription rates, while poverty (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.41) and proportion of white population (p white < 0.001, Coeff = 0.27) were risk factors for opioid-related mortality (p model < 0.001, R 2 = 0.35). Notably, the impact of prescribers in the upper quartile was associated with opioid mortality (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.14) and was twice that of the remaining 75% of prescribers together (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.07) (p model = 0.03, R 2 = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription opioid rate, and especially that by certain categories of prescribers, correlated with opioid-related mortality. Interventions should prioritize providers that have a disproportionate impact and those that care for populations with socioeconomic factors that place them at higher risk.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/mortalidade , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estudos Transversais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part D , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA