Current status prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in the USA.

Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women in the United States. In the setting of a mastectomy, implant-based reconstruction (IBR) remains the most common type of breast reconstruction performed. IBR is typically performed in two-stages (tissue expander - implant) or one stage [direct-to-implant (DTI)]. As a consequence of the limitations associated with submuscular placement of implants, prepectoral implant placement has been gaining more acceptance worldwide. The prepectoral plane eliminates the need for chest wall muscle dissection, disinsertion and manipulation avoiding the muscle related complications of the subpectoral approach such as increased pain, spasm and animation deformity. In addition, prepectoral placement shortens the recovery time and provides greater control of breast shape and contour. With the latest generation form-stable silicone implants coupled with the wide use and acceptance of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and other meshes to support the implant, this technique is becoming the mainstay of implant-based reconstruction, under these circumstances the subpectoral technique will continue to be the benchmark to which the prepectoral technique will be compared to. The authors sought to review the literature emanating from North America that pertains to this topic and provide an up-to-date assessment of the current practices of the prepectoral and submuscular technique.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in a Patient with Previous Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum.

Pectus excavatum is a deformity of the chest wall characterized by a sternal depression and possibly cardiac and pulmonary compression. Procedures performed during infancy for its correction may disrupt local anatomy and pose challenges to breast and reconstructive surgeons during mastectomy and reconstruction. We present a case report of a 45-year-old woman who had a Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum correction in infancy who was diagnosed with right breast cancer undergoing bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction. A computed tomography angiography was used to study chest and abdominal anatomy before surgery. Patient safely underwent immediate breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps using the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels. This case highlights the importance of preoperative vascular imaging and proper communication between the breast and plastic surgery teams during reconstructive surgery. It also displays the safety of performing immediate breast reconstruction using free tissue transfer and the internal mammary vessels as recipients for microvascular anastomosis.

Delphi survey of intercontinental experts to identify areas of consensus on the use of indocyanine green angiography for tissue perfusion assessment during plastic and reconstructive surgery.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) has been used increasingly to assist tissue perfusion assessments during plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures, but no guidelines exist regarding its use. We sought to identify areas of consensus and non-consensus among international experts on the use of ICG-A for tissue-perfusion assessments during plastic and reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A two-round, online Delphi survey was conducted of 22 international experts from four continents asking them to vote on 79 statements divided into five modules: module 1 = patient preparation and contraindications (n = 11 statements); module 2 = ICG administration and camera settings (n = 17); module 3 = other factors impacting perfusion assessments (n = 10); module 4 = specific indications, including trauma debridement (n = 9), mastectomy skin flaps (n = 6), and free flap reconstruction (n = 8); and module 5 = general advantages and disadvantages, training, insurance coverage issues, and future directions (n = 18). Consensus was defined as ≥70% inter-voter agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 73/79 statements, including the overall value, advantages, and limitations of ICG-A in numerous surgical settings; also, on the dose (0.05 mg/kg) and timing of ICG administration (∼20-60 seconds preassessment) and best camera angle (61-90o) and target-to-tissue distance (20-30 cm). However, consensus also was reached that camera angle and distance can vary, depending on the make of camera, and that further research is necessary to technically optimize this imaging tool. The experts also agreed that ambient light, patient body temperature, and vasopressor use impact perfusion assessments. CONCLUSION: ICG-A aids perfusion assessments during plastic and reconstructive surgery and should no longer be considered experimental. It has become an important surgical tool.

Comparison of flow rates in the antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vein for free flap breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The internal mammary vein (IMV) is commonly used as a recipient vessel in the direction of antegrade flow for free flap breast reconstruction. Recent reports show that the distal IMV is valveless and can accommodate retrograde flow. We sought to quantify blood velocity and flow through the distal IMV following free tissue transfer. METHODS: Ten free flap breast reconstructions were performed. The larger vena comitans of the DIEA was anastomosed to the antegrade internal mammary vein (AIMV). The smaller vena comitans was anastomosed to the retrograde internal mammary vein (RIMV) in five free flaps, and the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) was anastomosed to the RIMV in five other free flaps. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the larger vena comitans (3.4 ± 0.5 mm) was significantly greater than that of the smaller vena comitans (2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P = 0.003). Mean velocity in the AIMV after anastomosis was 10.13 ± 5.21 mm/s compared with 7.01 ± 2.93 mm/s in the RIMV (P = 0.12). Mean blood flow in the AIMV and the RIMV was 81.33 ± 52.81 mm(3) /s and 57.84 ± 45.11 mm(3) /s, respectively (P = 0.30). Mean blood flow in the RIMV was not significantly affected by whether the donor vein was the smaller vena comitans (70.78 ± 61.43 mm(3) /s) or the SIEV (44.90 ± 19.70 mm(3) /s; P = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Blood flow in the RIMV was less but not significantly different from flow in the AIMV. The difference is likely due to the smaller-sized donor vein anastomosed to the RIMV. The RIMV is a reliable, useful option when the antegrade vein is not available, or when a second recipient vein is needed.

Revision Breast Reconstruction with Prepectoral Pocket Conversion of Submuscular Breast Implants.

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral reconstruction using prosthetic devices has demonstrated a notable increase in popularity and confers a number of advantages over subpectoral placement, including minimal animation, no pain secondary to muscle spasm, and less device displacement or malposition. As such, more women with implants in the dual-plane position are seeking a remedy for animation deformities, chronic pain caused by muscle spasm, and implant malposition. The purpose of this study was to review outcomes following the conversion from subpectoral to prepectoral implant placement. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 63 patients who underwent breast implant conversion from the subpectoral plane to the prepectoral plane from 2009 to 2019. RESULTS: A total of 73 implant pocket conversions from subpectoral to prepectoral were performed on 41 women who met inclusion criteria for this study. The mean time interval from the initial subpectoral operation to the prepectoral conversion was 1608.4 days. The reasons cited for prepectoral conversion was animation deformity (87.8 percent), significant levels of pain related to the implant (34.1 percent), capsular contracture (26.8 percent), or asymmetries and implant displacements (9.8 percent); 7.8 percent of individuals continued to experience their presenting symptom after plane conversion. Rippling and wrinkling were noted in 19.5 percent of individuals and edge visibility was documented in 4.9 percent. Complication rates were low, and no patients experienced necrosis of the mastectomy flap or nipple-areola complex. CONCLUSIONS: The use of prepectoral conversion for revision implant-based breast reconstruction successfully resolves animation deformity. This technique can be reliably and safely performed in a variety of patient demographics. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

A Strategic Approach to Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Reconstruction with a Wide-based Inframammary Fold Flap.

The single biggest advancement in the aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been the contribution of nipple-sparing mastectomy. By preserving the nipple-areolar complex, patients do not experience the same sense of loss that is observed in the setting of skin-sparing mastectomy. Despite this significant contribution, the challenge remains as to how surgeons can extend this option to larger-breasted patients or patients with significant breast ptosis. Several strategies have been described, including reduction mammoplasty before mastectomy, bipedicled simultaneous mastopexy with mastectomy, and free nipple grafting. The authors have developed a novel approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy that preserves the nipple-areolar complex on a wide-based inframammary fold (IMF) flap and uses indocyanine green perfusion imaging to successfully and reliably perform nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction in larger-breasted ptotic patients. Six patients underwent bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomies and immediate breast reconstruction with a wide-based IMF flap. All patients underwent immediate reconstruction with prepectoral placement of tissue expanders to treat either breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and all patients successfully completed exchange of expander to implant. There were no complications with infection, seroma, mastectomy flap, or nipple necrosis. Aesthetic results were in line with other nipple-sparing techniques. The wide-based IMF flap with nipple preservation is a viable option for larger-breasted ptotic patients who might not otherwise be candidates for nipple-sparing mastectomy. The approach described is a combination of surgical technique and indocyanine green perfusion technology to deliver reproducible results, with an emphasis on surgical safety and avoidance of complications.

Decreased narcotic use with an implantable local anesthetic catheter after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

This study evaluated narcotic use after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction when a local anesthetic catheter was used. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing 40 consecutive control patients (no catheter) to 40 consecutive study patients who had received a pain pump catheter. The catheter was left in the abdomen for 72 hours. Using an equianalgesic table, all narcotic doses (oral and intravenous) were converted to intravenous morphine equivalents. Initial average 24-hour morphine requirement for the control group was 42 mg compared with 33 mg for the study group (P = 0.04). Total hospitalization average morphine requirement for the control group was 71 mg compared with 55 mg for the catheter group (P = 0.03). The use of an implantable local anesthetic catheter placed in the abdomen can decrease narcotic use in the postoperative period after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Fistula after 2-flap palatoplasty: a 20-year review.

Oronasal fistula formation is a recalcitrant complication following palatoplasty, resulting in nasal emission during speech and deglutition. We review our series to identify factors associated with fistula incidence. A retrospective review of all children with nonsyndromic cleft palate who underwent 2-flap palatoplasty by the senior author from July 1983 to August 2004, was performed. Patient demographics, cleft characteristics, and operative techniques were recorded for each patient. The incidence rates of fistula, pharyngeal flap, and reoperation were used as primary outcomes. Statistical comparisons of frequencies were performed using Fisher exact test. Comparisons of means were performed using chi2 analysis. A total of 332 consecutive children met inclusion criteria. Mean age at palatoplasty was 10.8 months, and mean follow-up was 74.1 months. Eight children (2.4%) were found to have fistulae postoperatively, ranging in size from 2 to 15 mm. Four palatal fistulas occurred in the soft palate, 2 at the junction of the hard and soft palate, 1 in the hard palate, and 1 at the incisive foramen. Symptomatic nasal emission requiring reoperation occurred in 5 children. Two of these 5 children required a second operation to achieve fistula closure. Forty pharyngeal flaps were required for correction of velopharyngeal incompetence (12.0%). Two-flap palatoplasty remains a highly successful technique for closure of a variety of palatal clefts, with low fistula incidence. Surgical technique and experience are factors associated with low fistula incidence.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the plastic surgery patient: current guidelines and recommendations.

Over the last five years, there has been a groundswell of interest in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). An increased level of understanding of the disease process coupled with data documenting the alarmingly high incidence of VTE has prompted a global awareness of the disease. Consequently, prevention of VTE has been targeted by hospitals, both in the United States and abroad, as a top priority to improve patient care. VTE refers to a continuum of disease that begins with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and can progress to pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT is the more common form of VTE and is often silent, with only 33% of patients presenting with symptoms. As a result, VTE often goes undetected and, if allowed, can progress to PE. This typically delays treatment and results in high rates of morbidity and mortality. The combination of VTE being both difficult to detect and deadly if untreated makes it a disease that is best addressed with preventive rather than therapeutic measures.

Evaluating Postoperative Narcotic Use in Prepectoral Versus Dual-plane Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The majority of postmastectomy breast reconstruction performed in the United States is device-based. Typically, a tissue expander or implant is placed in the dual-plane (ie, subpectoral). Prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices following mastectomy is a relatively new technique that has favorable outcomes with minimal complications and satisfactory aesthetic results. Few studies have compared opioid use between the 2 approaches. This study compares duration of postoperative opioid use among patients undergoing prepectoral device-based breast reconstruction with those in whom dual-plane devices were placed. METHODS: We reviewed the records of adult female patients aged 18 years or older who underwent prepectoral or dual-plane device-based breast reconstructions following mastectomy by one of the 2 plastic surgeons (A.M. or M.V.) from 2015 to 2017 at a large tertiary care hospital. Patients with a history of substance abuse, chronic pain, or who were already receiving opioid medication were excluded. Electronic medical records were reviewed and patient surveys were conducted during postoperative visits to determine postoperative opioid requirements. RESULTS: During the study period, 58 patients underwent dual-plane breast reconstruction and 94 underwent prepectoral reconstruction. Demographics and comorbidities of the groups were similar. By multivariate regression analysis, the prepectoral reconstruction group required 33% fewer days on opioid analgesic medication (P = 0.016) and were 66% less likely to require opioid prescription refills (P = 0.027). There were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes or complications. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing prepectoral tissue expander or implant-based reconstruction required fewer days of opioid pain medication than those managed with the dual-plane technique.

SPY Elite's Ability to Predict Nipple Necrosis in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing techniques have improved the aesthetics of reconstruction following mastectomy, but nipple necrosis complicates up to 37% of procedures, distressing patients, delaying adjuvant therapy, and compromising outcomes. No method reliably detects nipple necrosis better than clinical assessment of tissue perfusion. We prospectively assessed the accuracy of intraoperative indocyanine green laser angiography to predict nipple necrosis. METHODS: Twenty consecutive women undergoing immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction following 32 nipple-sparing mastectomies underwent indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to assess nipple perfusion immediately before and after intraoperative tissue expansion. Imaging findings were correlated with postoperative nipple viability. RESULTS: Among the 32 nipple-sparing mastectomies (8 unilateral, 12 bilateral) in 20 women (mean age, 48 years), partial or full-thickness necrotic changes developed in 3 breasts of 2 patients (10%). Imaging identified impaired perfusion and predicted necrosis in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial series, intraoperative indocyanine green laser angiography correctly identified patients who developed nipple necrosis during mastectomy and tissue expander breast reconstruction.

Optimizing Outcomes of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Review of Recent Clinical Data.

Background: This article reports on the current use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction. Methods: A literature review of articles on acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction from January 1, 2010, through December 20, 2016, was performed and analyzed for trends in acellular dermal matrix use and differences between commonly used acellular dermal matrixes. Findings: Clinical findings varied but include improved cosmesis and more 1-stage reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix. Superiority of sterile versus aseptic acellular dermal matrixes was noted, and the increased incidence of red breast syndrome with AlloDerm was significant. The cost-effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix use despite increased upfront costs was also highlighted. Finally, the article emphasizes the importance of well-vascularized mastectomy flaps and the use of indocyanine green angiography as an adjunct in immediate reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.

Mechanisms and clinical applications of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) Device: a review.

The use of sub-atmospheric pressure dressings, available commercially as the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device, has been shown to be an effective way to accelerate healing of various wounds. The optimal sub-atmospheric pressure for wound healing appears to be approximately 125 mm Hg utilizing an alternating pressure cycle of 5 minutes of suction followed by 2 minutes off suction. Animal studies have demonstrated that this technique optimizes blood flow, decreases local tissue edema, and removes excessive fluid from the wound bed. These physiologic changes facilitate the removal of bacteria from the wound. Additionally, the cyclical application of sub-atmospheric pressure alters the cytoskeleton of the cells in the wound bed, triggering a cascade of intracellular signals that increases the rate of cell division and subsequent formation of granulation tissue. The combination of these mechanisms makes the VAC device an extremely versatile tool in the armamentarium of wound healing. This is evident in the VAC device's wide range of clinical applications, including treatment of infected surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, pressure ulcers, wounds with exposed bone and hardware, diabetic foot ulcers, and venous stasis ulcers. VAC has also proven useful in reconstruction of wounds by allowing elective planning of the definitive reconstructive surgery without jeopardizing the wound or outcome. Furthermore, VAC has significantly increased the skin graft success rate when used as a bolster over the freshly skin-grafted wound. VAC is generally well tolerated and, with few contraindications or complications, is fast becoming a mainstay of current wound care.

Practical guidelines for venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in elective plastic surgery.

Venous thromboembolism is a complication that results in a wide range of patient morbidity and potential mortality. Awareness of this risk has led to recent advances in both the perioperative planning of chemoprophylaxis and the stratification of risk factors. Together, these modifications have helped reduce the incidence and severity of venous thromboembolism. Major hospital-based initiatives to decrease the overall rate of venous thromboembolism and halt the progression of severe complications, including pulmonary embolism, are one such change. However, surgeon reluctance based on the potential for bleeding complications continues to decrease the use of these algorithms, despite several reports that fail to demonstrate an increase in postoperative bleeding or hematoma formation with chemoprophylaxis administered at appropriate dosages. This review summarizes the current recommendations and procedure-specific strategies for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with a focus on elective or aesthetic surgery-based procedures. The authors will recommend which patients are appropriate, what doses are appropriate, and when the doses should be administered for aesthetic and elective surgery.

Evaluating sterile human acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Human acellular dermal matrices have gained increasing use in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction. However, some studies suggest that these grafts may be associated with a higher incidence of infection and seroma. To evaluate complication rates after matrix-based breast reconstruction, the authors conducted a prospective, multicenter, cohort study to evaluate a sterile human acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction, specifically, to determine whether it offered a more favorable risk profile with respect to infection and seroma. A secondary purpose was to determine whether the sterilization process affects graft incorporation. METHODS: The authors performed 65 consecutive tissue expander-based breast reconstructions in a cohort of patients over a 1-year period using a single protocol. Sterile human matrix was used in all cases. The patients were evaluated for early complications (infection, seroma) and graft incorporation at the time of exchange or definitive reconstruction. Biopsies were performed in the first 20 reconstructions to provide histologic correlation of graft incorporation. RESULTS: Complications occurred in three breasts (4.6 percent), including one case of cellulitis (1.5 percent) and two cases of partial mastectomy flap necrosis (3.0 percent) that required débridement. There were no seromas or explantations. The grafts were incorporated in all cases and verified histologically in the first 20 biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Sterile human acellular dermal matrix can offer reliable matrix incorporation and a low complication rate. Sterilization does not negatively impact incorporation of the graft. The infection and seroma rates in this prospective study compare favorably to those in previous studies with nonsterilized (aseptic) acellular dermal matrix.

Efficacy and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in highest risk plastic surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to stratify plastic surgery patients into venous thromboembolism risk categories; identify patients at highest risk for venous thromboembolism; and quantify rates of postoperative all-cause mortality, venous thromboembolism, and hematoma/bleeding on different forms of thromboprophylaxis. Furthermore, this study aimed to determine the compliance and average duration of outpatient chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on a single plastic surgeon's experience. Venous thromboembolism risk stratification identified patients at highest risk. Records were reviewed for regimen of thromboprophylaxis and for occurrences of all-cause mortality, venous thromboembolism, and hematoma/bleeding. Outpatient compliance and duration of low-molecular-weight heparin chemoprophylaxis was also documented. RESULTS: During the study time period, 173 operations involved 120 patients at highest risk for venous thromboembolism. Among highest risk patients, one (0.8 percent) suffered a pulmonary embolism, eight (6.7 percent) experienced a deep vein thrombosis, and 15 (12.5 percent) endured a hematoma/bleed. Thirteen of 14 outpatients (92.9 percent) were compliant with low-molecular-weight heparin and remained on chemoprophylaxis for an average of 7.4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical prophylaxis plus subcutaneous heparin (unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin) conferred a statistically significant reduction in the rate of venous thromboembolism without a significant increase in bleeding versus mechanical prophylaxis alone. Subgroup analysis of patients placed on mechanical prophylaxis plus low-molecular-weight heparin revealed similar statistically significant findings. Outpatients placed on low-molecular-weight heparin chemoprophylaxis demonstrated excellent compliance and comfort with self-administration. Therefore, the use of mechanical prophylaxis supplemented with low-molecular-weight heparin is strongly recommended as the first-line regimen for thromboprophylaxis in plastic surgery patients at highest risk for venous thromboembolism.

Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate both clinical outcomes and satisfaction in patients who have undergone prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective analysis of the senior author's (S.L.S.) experience with breast reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy was performed. Timing, type of mastectomy and reconstruction, complications, and cancer occurrence/recurrence were examined. Patients reported their level of satisfaction and willingness to undergo the procedure again. Aesthetic outcomes were graded by an independent and blinded group of surgeons. RESULTS: There were 101 breast reconstructions performed in 74 patients following prophylactic mastectomy. With a mean follow-up of 31 months, there were three breast-site complications in this group (3 percent). Forty-seven patients in the study had a unilateral prophylactic mastectomy; on the contralateral side with cancer, there were five breast-site complications in reconstructions following therapeutic mastectomy (10 percent). Aesthetic outcome ratings by surgeons were higher in the bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction patients compared with the cancer patients who had undergone a therapeutic mastectomy and reconstruction along with a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patient satisfaction was higher in the bilateral prophylactic group, with all of the patients completing the survey stating they would undergo the procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy was as safe as or more safe than that following therapeutic mastectomy, which has been shown in other studies to result in a high percentage of patient satisfaction. Although not statistically significant, the results from reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy trended toward improved aesthetic outcome with a lower complication rate compared with reconstruction after therapeutic mastectomy.

A face lift approach for sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Management of head and neck melanoma has changed dramatically with the use of sentinel node biopsy for staging. Nodal dissection may now be delayed or deferred based on the results of the sentinel node biopsy. The authors suggest using a face lift incision to access the nodal basins for sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma. METHODS: A face lift incision was used successfully for sentinel node biopsy in 21 patients. The diagnosis of melanoma, histologic subtype, and depth of penetration were established by biopsy with permanent sections. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy on the morning of their surgery. If the scan showed multiple nodes at various levels of the neck or parotid, the patient was selected for a face lift incision for biopsy. RESULTS: The study comprised 14 men and seven women between the ages of 26 and 82 years (mean age, 55 years). The sites of melanoma included the temple in six patients, cheek in five, neck in four, and ear and scalp in two patients each. The average Clark's level and Breslow depth were 3.67 and 1.76 mm, respectively. The average number of basins involved was 2.14; the average number of nodes was 3.33, with an average of 1.56 nodes per basin. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 53 months (average, 26 months). Only two patients had sentinel nodes that were positive for metastatic melanoma. One complication, a transient paresis of the right marginal mandibular nerve, was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Using a face lift incision for sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma is a safe, reliable technique. It provides excellent access to multiple nodal basins, well-concealed incisions, wide exposure for delayed therapeutic nodal dissection, and local and regional flap options for reconstructing the excision site.

Breast augmentation.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the different variables that are inherent to breast augmentation. 2. Identify certain breast shape characteristics that make one approach more advantageous than others. 3. Take into account certain patient characteristics to develop a logical surgical plan for breast augmentation. SUMMARY: The optimal technique for breast augmentation has always been debated, and numerous variables fit the needs of the variously shaped patients in our population. The purpose of this article is to present the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques available in breast augmentation so that, in conjunction with the patient's physical examination, a sound surgical plan can be developed for aesthetic augmentation of the breast.