RESUMO
PURPOSE: Obesity is a public health problem worldwide. The eating habits of French workers need to be clarified. In particular, tachyphagia (meal lasting < 15 min) promotes weight gain. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of tachyphagia at lunchtime, the factors associated with tachyphagia, and the relationship between tachyphagia and obesity among workers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January and May 2016 in five departments of occupational medicine. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used to gather general declarative data, such as weight and height (to calculate body mass index [BMI]) and information about lunchtime habits, including the time spent eating. RESULTS: A total of 415 workers with a mean age of 41.1 ± 12.6 years were included. The mean BMI was 23.8 ± 4.6 kg/m2, and the prevalence of obesity was 15.9%. Tachyphagia occurred in 20.3% of the cases and was more frequent in younger workers. Multivariate analysis revealed that skipping meals, eating standing up, and eating fast food were positively associated with tachyphagia (p = 0.015, p = 0.028, and p = 0.027, respectively). Older age and eating with colleagues/friends were negatively associated with tachyphagia (p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). No significant association was observed between tachyphagia and obesity. CONCLUSION: Our study provides important information about the lunchtime habits of workers. Maintaining commensality is crucial, particularly in young workers. Companies should play a role in organising their employees' lunch breaks. Level III Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.
Assuntos
Almoço , Refeições , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Comportamento Alimentar , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy affects >50 million people worldwide, with 80% of them living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Studies with a standardized methodology are required to obtain comparable data on epilepsy and implement health policies in order to reduce the treatment gap and improve the diagnosis and management of epilepsy. In 2000, following the guidelines of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), the "questionnaire for investigation of epilepsy in tropical countries" (IENT questionnaire) was developed to promote epidemiological surveys on epilepsy using a standard methodology. This study aims to describe how, when, where, and why the IENT questionnaire has been used through epidemiological studies on epilepsy over the last 2 decades and to acquire users' opinions about the tool. METHODS: Studies that used the IENT questionnaire were searched through international and local bibliographic databases, including the gray literature. An online survey was carried out, including a snowball effect. Original research studies were included. Characteristics of the studies and populations and general information on the instrument and its use were collected. RESULTS: Eighty-two documents were selected referring to 61 studies that were mostly carried out on the African continent (n = 54). Most of them aimed to determine the prevalence (n = 31) and associated factors (n = 28) of epilepsy in LMICs. Among the 61 studies, 35 were population-based, and 30 included both adults and children. A methodological heterogeneity was found between studies, and in cases where the IENT questionnaire alone did not ensure complete data collection, other tools were used concomitantly (n = 40). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Over the last 2 decades, the IENT questionnaire has been continuously used in different LMICs. This result favors its promotion and updating, with the inclusion of new topics related to epilepsy (e.g., comorbidities, quality of life, and stigma), current ILAE guidelines, and digital versions.
Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Epilepsia , Adulto , Criança , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pobreza , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews were conducted on the existence of screening tools for epilepsy, quality of life or comorbidities tools, but not specifically in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the different tools developed and validated in low- and middle-income countries for the investigation of epilepsy. This to facilitate research in these regions and to identify needs in areas where few instruments are available. METHODS: This review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, MedLine, Google Scholar, Web of Science, SciELO, Neurology Asia, African Journal of Neurological Sciences and Institute of Epidemiology and Tropical Neurology bibliographic databases were investigated. Articles were included according to the following criteria: (1) to be validation studies on tool for investigating epilepsy, (2) to be conducted in a low- or middle-income country, (3) to be published between 1980 and 2021, and (4) to be written in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. The characteristics of the tools and validation methods were collected. The frequency of use of the tools was estimated. RESULTS: Ninety-three articles were retained, corresponding to 91 tools from 44 countries. The main tools targeted quality of life (n = 30), comorbidities (n = 19) and screening (n = 13). Instruments were mainly developed and validated in Asia (n = 43), then in Central and South America (n = 24). The IENT (Institute of Epidemiology and Tropical Neurology) questionnaire was developed in several tropical countries (Africa, South East Asia and Latin America). The development and validation methods were heterogeneous from one tool to another and some tools (e.g., QOLIE-31, NDDI-E, PATE, etc.) were culturally adapted. CONCLUSION: This review identifies geographic specificity regarding the creation, validation and use of tools for investigating epilepsy available in low- and middle-income countries. It will help investigators in the choice of tools in their future epidemiological studies on epilepsy in this context.
Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Epilepsia , Ásia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy is recommended in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in the presence of weight loss over 10% as compared to usual weight, repeated aspirations or meal time duration longer than 45 min. Currently, the impact of gastrostomy on survival of ALS patients is not clear. AIMS: i) to describe diagnosis factors associated with the indication for gastrostomy ii) to evaluate survival of ALS patients with gastrostomy indication according to their acceptance of feeding tube placement. METHODS: Patients with ALS were included and followed in the ALS referral centre of Limoges's teaching hospital between 2006 and 2017. Neurological, nutritional and respiratory status was assessed prospectively from diagnosis to death. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney test, Chi2 tests, Cox model and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five patients were included. Among the 182 for whom gastrostomy was indicated, 63.7% accepted the placement. The median time was 7.3 months [IQR: 3.2-15.0] and 2.7 months [IQR: 0.9-5.8] respectively from diagnosis to indication and from indication to placement. Weight loss >5% significantly increased the risk of death by 17% (p < 0.0001). At time of diagnosis, bulbar onset, a loss of one point in the body mass index or on the bulbar functional scale were all positively associated with indication for gastrostomy (aOR = 10.0 [95%CI: 1.96-25.0]; p = 0.002, aOR = 1.17 [95%CI: 1.02-1.36]; p = 0.025 and aOR = 1.19 [95%CI: 1.06-1.32]; p = 0.002, respectively). However, gastrostomy placement did not have any impact on survival (aHR = 1.25 [95%CI: 0.88-1.79]; p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Both neurological and nutritional criteria were associated with an indication for gastrostomy at diagnosis. Gastrostomy placement had no impact on survival. The study of earlier gastrostomy placement might be of interest in further prospective studies.