Centbucridine, a newer topical anaesthetic compared with lignocaine: a randomized double masked single drop instillation clinical trial.

A randomized double-masked single drop instillation clinical trial was conducted on 60 healthy volunteers divided into 3 equal groups to compare the efficacies of centbucridine and lignocaine. One eye of each volunteer was instilled with a single drop of either 0.5% centbucridine hydrochloride, 1% centbucridine hydrochloride or 4% lignocaine hydrochloride, with the other eye as an unanaesthetized control-side effects, if any, were also recorded. The onset of anaesthesia assessed both objectively and subjectively, was quickest with lignocaine 4% (P < 0.001) followed by centbucridine 0.5% and 1%. However, the period of peak activity as well as the total duration of surface anaesthesia, and also the depth of analgesia, were significantly highest with 1% centbucridine, followed by 0.5% centbucridine and 4% lignocaine respectively. Minor side effects like burning sensations were longest with 1% centbucridine--no significant adverse effects, local or systemic, were observed. Prolonged surface anaesthetic and analgesic actions of centbucridine 1% may be advantages for longer duration ophthalmic microsurgeries.

A prospective randomized double masked controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy of multiple drop centbucridine as an ocular surface anaesthetic.

In this study, the ocular surface anaesthetic and analgesic efficacies of 0.5% and 1% centbucridine both in saline were compared with 4% lignocaine drops in distilled water in normal healthy volunteers divided into three equal groups. In 99 healthy eyes, keeping one eye as an unanaesthetized control, one drop of any of the above three coded drugs was instilled in the contralateral eye, followed by one more drop of the same drug in the same eye after 3 minutes. The oneset of anaesthesia, achievement and duration of peak activity, total duration of action, the depth of analgesia, and period of burning sensation were all noted in this double-masked randomized controlled trial with the various drug solutions. Total peak duration of anaesthetic as well as analgesic effects in the 99 healthy normal eyes were found to be the highest with centbucridine 1%, followed by 4% lignocaine and 0.5% centbucridine respectively.

A prospective randomized double masked controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy of multiple drop centbucridine as an ocular surface anaesthetic.

In this study, the ocular surface anaesthetic and analgesic efficacies of 0.5% and 1% centbucridine both in saline were compared with 4% lignocaine drops in distilled water in normal healthy volunteers divided into three equal groups. In 99 healthy eyes, keeping one eye as an unanaesthetized control, one drop of any of the above three coded drugs was instilled in the contralateral eye, followed by one more drop of the same drug in the same eye after 3 minutes. The oneset of anaesthesia, achievement and duration of peak activity, total duration of action, the depth of analgesia, and period of burning sensation were all noted in this double-masked randomized controlled trial with the various drug solutions. Total peak duration of anaesthetic as well as analgesic effects in the 99 healthy normal eyes were found to be the highest with centbucridine 1%, followed by 4% lignocaine and 0.5% centbucridine respectively.

Centbucridine, a newer topical anaesthetic compared with lignocaine: a randomized double masked single drop instillation clinical trial.

A randomized double-masked single drop instillation clinical trial was conducted on 60 healthy volunteers divided into 3 equal groups to compare the efficacies of centbucridine and lignocaine. One eye of each volunteer was instilled with a single drop of either 0.5% centbucridine hydrochloride, 1% centbucridine hydrochloride or 4% lignocaine hydrochloride, with the other eye as an unanaesthetized control-side effects, if any, were also recorded. The onset of anaesthesia assessed both objectively and subjectively, was quickest with lignocaine 4% (P < 0.001) followed by centbucridine 0.5% and 1%. However, the period of peak activity as well as the total duration of surface anaesthesia, and also the depth of analgesia, were significantly highest with 1% centbucridine, followed by 0.5% centbucridine and 4% lignocaine respectively. Minor side effects like burning sensations were longest with 1% centbucridine--no significant adverse effects, local or systemic, were observed. Prolonged surface anaesthetic and analgesic actions of centbucridine 1% may be advantages for longer duration ophthalmic microsurgeries.