The Prevalence and Histological Characteristics of the Double Capsule Phenomenon in Breast Augmentation With Implants.

BACKGROUND: Double capsule formation around breast implants is associated with implant rotation and seroma. However, the prevalence and histological characteristics remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the prevalence of double capsule formation between different implant surface textures and to explore the histological differences between the inner- and outer capsules from breast implant capsule biopsies. METHODS: The study was performed on data from the Copenhagen Breast Implant (COBI) Biobank comparing the prevalence of double capsule formation around Allergan Biocell implants (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland), Eurosilicone Cristalline implants (GC Aesthetics, Dublin, Ireland), and Mentor Siltex implants (Mentor, Irvine, CA). The histological characteristics of the inner and outer capsules was analyzed using a validated assessment tool. RESULTS: The study included data from 588 patients and 1128 implants. Double capsule formation was found around 25 implants resulting in an overall prevalence of 2.5% for textured implants. Mentor implants with a Siltex surface had a double capsule prevalence of 0.72%, which was significantly lower than the prevalence for Allergan implants with a Biocell surface (7.8%), (P<.001), and Eurosilicone implants with a Cristalline surface (3.4%), (P=.03). Histological analysis showed that inner capsules had lower cellular density (P=.04) and were more calcified (P=.03) compared with outer capsules. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of double capsule formation was highly correlated with the roughness of the breast implant texture, with the risk of double capsule formation around Mentor Siltex implants being significantly lower than that of macrotextured implants. The histological analysis implies that loss of vascularization to the inner capsule results in a lower cellular density and more frequently calcification.

Immunohistochemical Characteristics of Atypical Fibroxanthoma and Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) from pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) remains a challenge. Increasing the use of immunohistochemistry has led to the proposal of many immunomarkers that may aid in the diagnosis of AFX and PDS. In this meta-analysis, we investigate the immunohistochemical characteristics of AFX and PDS based on suggested immunomarkers in the literature. Second, we identify potential distinctive markers found in the tumors' respective immunohistochemical profiles. METHODS: We included studies using immunomarkers on at least 10 consecutive patients with clinically and histopathologically verified AFX or PDS. The positive rates of the immunomarkers were pooled across the included studies with random-effects models. The immunomarkers were further categorized by a priori-chosen cutoffs in positive rates as positive markers (>90%) or negative markers (<10%). Differences between AFX and PDS were compared with Wald tests. RESULTS: We included 45 studies (1516 tumors) reporting on 35 immunomarkers. CD10 was positive in 94% (95% confidence interval, 87-99) of AFX cases and 100% (95% confidence interval, 99-100) of PDS cases. In accordance with the literature, both AFX and PDS were mainly negative for epithelial markers, melanocytic markers, markers of smooth muscle differentiation, and endothelial markers. None of the examined immunomarkers could distinguish AFX from PDS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CD10 is a useful positive immunomarker for both AFX and PDS. We found no difference in immunohistochemical profile when comparing AFX with PDS. Our analysis suggests that CD10, AE1/AE3, CK5/CK6, p63, S100, SOX10, desmin, SMA, CD31, and ERG could be used to differentiate AFX and PDS from other spindle cell neoplasms.

Cryopreservation of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells using 1-2% Me2SO (DMSO) in combination with pentaisomaltose: An effective and less toxic alternative to comparable freezing media.

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow, umbilical cord and especially adipose tissue are increasingly being explored for their therapeutic potential to treat a wide variety of diseases. A prerequisite for most allogeneic off-the-shelf and some autologous MSC therapies is the ability to safely and efficiently cryopreserve cells during production or for storage prior to treatment. Dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) is still the commonly used gold standard cryoprotectant (CPA). However, undesirable cellular impacts and side effects of Me2SO have led to an increasing demand for the development of safe and effective alternatives. This study investigated the effect of pentaisomaltose as a CPA for cryopreservation of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs). We compared pentaisomaltose-based freezing media containing 1% Me2SO (PIM1) or 2% Me2SO (PIM2) to our in-house freezing media formulation containing 10% Me2SO (STD10) and to CryoStor freezing media containing 2% or 10% Me2SO (CS2 and CS10). We assessed the recovery of viable ASCs, their phenotype, differentiation potential, proliferation potential, and migratory potential. Further, their immunomodulatory potential was assessed by measuring their ability to suppress T cell proliferation and express immunomodulatory markers. The results showed that the post-thaw viability of ASCs cryopreserved with STD10, CS10 and PIM2 was improved compared to that of CS2. The recovery of ASCs with PIM1 and PIM2 was also improved compared to that of CS2. Proliferation and migration were comparable among the tested freezing media. The results showed no difference in the induction of PDL1, PDL2 or IDO1 expression. Nevertheless, the potential of cryopreserved ASCs to suppress T cell proliferation was reduced when the Me2SO concentration was reduced (CS10>STD10>CS2 and PIM2>PIM1). Altogether, the migratory and immunomodulatory potential combined with improved recovery indicate that the addition of pentaisomaltose in the freezing media may allow for the reduction of the Me2SO concentration to 2% while retaining a more potent cell product that what is recovered using comparable freezing media. With the desire to reduce the amount of Me2SO, these results suggest that 2% and potentially even 1% Me2SO in combination with 10% pentaisomaltose could be an effective and less toxic alternative to comparable freezing media.

Effect, Feasibility, and Clinical Relevance of Cell Enrichment in Large Volume Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review.

Large volume fat grafting is limited by unpredictable volume loss; therefore, methods of improving graft retention have been developed. Fat graft enrichment with either stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells or adipose tissue-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs) has been investigated in several animal and human studies, and significantly improved graft retention has been reported. Improvement of graft retention and the feasibility of these techniques are equally important in evaluating the clinical relevance of cell enrichment. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed to identify studies on fat graft enrichment that used either SVF cells or ASCs, and only studies reporting volume assessment were included. A total of 38 articles (15 human and 23 animal) were included to investigate the effects of cell enrichment on graft retention as well as the feasibility and clinical relevance of cell-enriched fat grafting. Improvements in graft retention, the SVF to fat (SVF:fat) ratio, and the ASC concentration used for enrichment were emphasized. We proposed an increased retention rate greater than 1.5-fold relative to nonenriched grafts and a maximum SVF:fat ratio of 1:1 as the thresholds for clinical relevance and feasibility, respectively. Nine studies fulfilled these criteria, whereof 6 used ASCs for enrichment. We found no convincing evidence of a clinically relevant effect of SVF enrichment in humans. ASC enrichment has shown promising results in enhancing graft retention, but additional clinical trials are needed to substantiate this claim and also determine the optimal concentration of SVF cells/ASCs for enrichment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.