RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial due to variable postoperative outcomes and high failure rates. Second-generation (2G) onlay prostheses have been associated with improved postoperative outcomes. This systematic review was performed to assess the current overall survivorship and functional outcomes of 2G PFA. METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Thirty-three studies published in the last 15 years (2005-2020) were included; of these 22 studies reported patient-reported outcome measures. Operative and nonoperative complications were analyzed. Pooled statistical analysis was performed for survivorship and functional scores using Excel 2016 and Stata 13. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 59.7. When analyzing all studies, weighted survival at mean follow-up of 5.52 was 87.72%. Subanalysis of studies with minimum 5 years of follow up showed a survival of 94.24%. Fifteen studies reported Oxford Knee Score with a weighted mean postoperative Oxford Knee Score of 33.59. Mean American Knee Society Score pain was 79.7 while mean American Knee Society Score function was 79.3. The most common operative complication was OA progression for all implants. The percentage of revisions and conversions reported after analyzing all studies was 1.37% and 7.82% respectively. CONCLUSION: Safe and acceptable results of functional outcomes and PFA survivorship can result from 2G PFAs at both short and mid-term follow-up for patients with isolated patellofemoral OA. However, long-term follow-up outcomes are still pending for the newer implants. More extensive studies using standardized functional outcomes and long-term cost benefits should be evaluated.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Articulação Patelofemoral , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação Patelofemoral/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare recovery in a rat model of sciatic nerve injury using a novel polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit, which contains collagen fibers within the tube, as compared with both a hollow collagen conduit and nerve autograft. We hypothesize that a conduit with a scaffold will provide improved nerve regeneration over hollow conduits and demonstrate no significant differences when compared with autograft. METHODS: A total of 72 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into 3 experimental groups, in which a unilateral 10-mm sciatic defect was repaired using either nerve autograft, a hollow collagen conduit, or a PGA collagen-filled conduit. Outcomes were measured at 12 and 16 weeks after surgery, and included bilateral tibialis anterior muscle weight, voltage and force maximal contractility, assessment of ankle contracture, and nerve histology. RESULTS: In all groups, outcomes improved between 12 and 16 weeks. On average, the autograft group outperformed both conduit groups, and the hollow conduit demonstrated improved outcomes when compared with the PGA collagen-filled conduit. Differences in contractile force, however, were significant only at 12 weeks (autograft > hollow collagen conduit > PGA collagen-filled conduit). At 16 weeks, contractile force demonstrated no significant difference but corroborated the same absolute results (autograft > hollow collagen conduit > PGA collagen-filled conduit). CONCLUSIONS: Nerve repair using autograft provided superior motor nerve recovery over the 2 conduits for a 10-mm nerve gap in a murine acute transection injury model. The hollow collagen conduit demonstrated superior results when compared with the PGA collagen-filled conduit. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of a hollow collagen conduit provides superior motor nerve recovery as compared with a PGA collagen-filled conduit.
Assuntos
Colágeno , Regeneração Nervosa/fisiologia , Ácido Poliglicólico , Próteses e Implantes , Nervo Isquiático/lesões , Nervo Isquiático/cirurgia , Animais , Autoenxertos , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-DawleyRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are both viable treatment options for medial osteoarthritis (OA). However, it remains unclear when to choose for which arthroplasty treatment. Goals of this study were therefore to (1) compare outcomes after both treatments and (2) assess which treatment has superior outcomes in different patient subgroups. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 166 patients received the RESTORIS MCK Medial UKA and 63 patients the Vanguard TKA and were radiographically matched on isolated medial OA. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores were collected preoperatively and postoperatively (mean: 3.0 years, range: 2.0-5.0 years). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no differences were observed, but medial UKA patients reported better functional outcomes than TKA (89.7 ± 13.6 vs 81.2 ± 18.0, P = .001) at follow-up.Better functional outcomes were noted after medial UKA in patients younger than age 70 years (89.5 ± 14.2 vs 78.6 ± 20.0, P = .001), with body mass index below 30 (90.3 ± 11.4 vs 83.6 ± 14.9, P = .005), with body mass index above 30 (88.3 ± 17.5 vs 78.8 ± 21.0, P = .034) and in females (90.6 ± 11.0 vs 78.1 ± 19.4, P = .001) when compared with TKA. No differences were found in males and older patients between both arthroplasties. CONCLUSION: Superior functional outcomes were noted after medial UKA over TKA in patients presenting with medial OA with these prostheses. Subgroup analyses suggest that medial UKA is the preferred treatment in younger patients and females while no differences were noted in older patients and males after medial UKA and TKA. This might help the orthopedic surgeon in individualizing arthroplasty treatment for patients with medial OA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment for distal clavicle nonunions remains unknown. Small series have reported outcomes following distal fragment excision and various fixation techniques. We present the clinical, radiographic and functional outcomes after superior plating or double (superior and anteroinferior) plating in combination with bone grafting as treatment for distal clavicle nonunions. METHODS: We collected demographic and radiographic data from a consecutive series of ten patients with symptomatic nonunion of the distal clavicle treated since 1998. Functional outcomes were assessed, as well as the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: The mean clinical follow-up was 41.4 months (range of 12-158 months). The mean radiological follow-up was 30.6 months (range of 3-158 months). All nonunions healed as demonstrated by subsidence of clinical symptoms and radiographic criteria. The average time to union was 3.7 months (range of 2-8 months). The mean The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 11.9 (range of 0-62.5) and mean VAS score was 0.9 at follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates good clinical, radiologic and functional outcomes in ten patients with distal clavicle nonunion treated with superior or double (superior and anteroinferior) plating in combination with bone grafting. Double-plating can be considered an alternative to superior plating offering better resistance against the pulling effect of the arm with the use of smaller fixation plates.
Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Clavícula/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Radiografia/métodos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Clavícula/diagnóstico por imagem , Clavícula/lesões , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas do Ombro/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Culture-positive (CP) and culture-negative (CN) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a crucial area of research; however, current studies comparing these infections rely on unstandardized outcome reporting tools. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of two-stage revision of CP and CN PJI using the standardized Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) outcome reporting tool. We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients who were diagnosed with PJI and indicated for two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The majority of patients in both CP and CN cohorts achieved infection control without the need for reoperation (54.1% and 62.5%, respectively). There was a significant difference in the overall distribution of MSIS outcomes (p = 0.043), with a significantly greater rate of CN patients falling into Tier 1 (infection control without the use of suppressive antibiotics) (52.5% versus 29.6%, p = 0.011). There was also a significant difference in the distribution of septic versus aseptic reoperations after 2nd stage (p = 0.013), with more CP reoperations being septic and more CN reoperations being aseptic. The duration from first to second stage was significantly shorter in the CN cohort (p = 0.002). While overall infection control was similar between cohorts, these data suggest that the outcomes of two-stage rTKA are favorable in cases of CN PJI.
RESUMO
Larsen syndrome is a rare genetic disorder characterized by weak connective tissues and various musculoskeletal abnormalities. This is a case report of a 39-year-old patient with Larsen syndrome who presented with over a decade of bilateral hip pain and difficulty ambulating. This patient has a prior history of bilateral congenital hip dislocations that were treated with open reduction and spica casting as a child with good result. Years later, she went on to develop bilateral hip osteoarthritis with significant remodeling of the proximal femur. The goal of this case presentation is to demonstrate the utility of total hip arthroplasty for this patient and discuss surgical challenges and considerations.
RESUMO
Three-dimensional printing (3DP) has recently gained importance in the medical industry, especially in surgical specialties. It uses different techniques and materials based on patients' needs, which allows bioprofessionals to design and develop unique pieces using medical imaging provided by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore, the Department of Biology and Medicine and the Department of Physics and Engineering, at the Bioastronautics and Space Mechatronics Research Group, have managed and supervised an international cooperation study, in order to present a general review of the innovative surgical applications, focused on anatomical systems, such as the nervous and craniofacial system, cardiovascular system, digestive system, genitourinary system, and musculoskeletal system. Finally, the integration with augmented, mixed, virtual reality is analyzed to show the advantages of personalized treatments, taking into account the improvements for preoperative, intraoperative planning, and medical training. Also, this article explores the creation of devices and tools for space surgery to get better outcomes under changing gravity conditions.
Assuntos
Impressão Tridimensional , Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Sistema UrogenitalRESUMO
Introduction: Twenty-five percent to seventy-five percent of independent patients do not walk independently after hip fracture (HF), and many patients experience functional loss. Early rehabilitation of functional status is associated with better long-term outcomes; however, predictors of early ambulation after HF have not been well described. Purposes: To assess the impact of perioperative and patient-specific variables on in-hospital ambulatory status following low-energy HF surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 463 geriatric patients who required HF surgery at a metropolitan level-1 trauma center. The outcomes were time to transfer (out of bed to chair) and time to walk. Results: Three hundred ninety-two (84.7%) patients were able to transfer after surgery with a median time of 43.8 hours (quartile range: 24.7-53.69 hours), while 244 (52.7%) patients were able to walk with a median time of 50.86 hours (quartile range: 40.72-74.56 hours). Preinjury ambulators with aids (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.99), age >80 years (HR: 0.66, CI: 0.52-0.84), peptic ulcer disease (HR: 0.57, CI: 0.57-0.82), depression (HR: 0.66, CI: 0.49- 0.89), time to surgery >24 hours (HR: 0.77, CI: 0.61-0.98), and surgery on Friday (HR: 0.73, CI: 0.56-0.95) were associated with delayed time to transfer. Delayed time to walk was observed in patients over 80 years old (HR: 0.74, CI: 0.56-0.98), females (HR: 0.67, CI: 0.48-0.94), peptic ulcer disease (HR: 0.23, CI: 0.84-0.66), and depression (HR: 0.51, CI: 0.33-0.77). Conclusions: Operative predictors of delayed time to transfer were surgery on Friday and time to surgery >24 hours after admission. Depression is associated with delayed time to transfer and time to walk. These data suggest that is important to perform surgeries within 24 hours of admission identify deficiencies in care during the weekends, and create rehabilitation programs specific for patient with depression. Improving functional rehabilitation after surgery may facilitate faster patient discharge, decrease inpatient care costs, and better long-term functional outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To report outcomes and complications of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFF) treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using a plate construct, with or without endosteal augmentation. DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. SETTING: One Level I trauma center and one tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients with PPDFFs, treated by 3 surgeons, were identified using an institutional trauma registry. Thirty-two patients with 12 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up were included, and 8 patients were lost to follow-up before 12 months. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent ORIF of the PPDFF with lateral locked plating, and 11 received additional endosteal augmentation using allograft fibula. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were available for the final follow-up. Ninety-four percent of patients achieved union at an average of 6.5 months postoperatively. Twenty-one percent of patients underwent subsequent surgery, with more than half of those being for removal of implants. Anatomic limb alignment was achieved in all cases (no malunions). Almost half of the patients required assistive devices for ambulation in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of PPDFF with direct visualization using periarticular locking plates ± endosteal strut allograft resulted in a 94% union rate and no deep infections. There was no difference in outcomes between groups treated with or without additional endosteal fibular allograft. However, these are catastrophic injuries in frail patients, and 20% of patients either died or were lost to follow-up, and almost half required an assistive device for ambulation after surgery despite restoration of limb alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Redução Aberta/métodos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Placas Ósseas , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Fraturas Periprotéticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Prognóstico , Radiografia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although vascularity plays a critical role in healing after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction, intraosseous blood flow to the medial epicondyle (ME) and sublime tubercle remains undefined. PURPOSE: To quantify vascular disruption caused by tunnel drilling with the modified Jobe and docking techniques for UCL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight matched pairs (16 specimens) of fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were randomized to 1 of 2 study groups: docking technique or modified Jobe technique. One elbow in each pair underwent tunnel drilling by the assigned technique, while the contralateral elbow served as a control. Pregadolinium and postgadolinium magnetic resonance imaging were performed to quantify intraosseous vascularity within the ME, trochlea, and proximal ulna. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and gross dissection were performed to assess terminal vessel integrity. RESULTS: Ulnar tunnel drilling had minimal impact on vascularity of the proximal ulna, with maintenance of >95% blood flow for each technique. Perfusion in the ME was reduced 14% (to 86% of baseline) for the docking technique and 60% (to 40% of baseline) for the modified Jobe technique (mean difference, 46%; P = .029). Three-dimensional CT and gross dissection revealed increased disruption of small perforating vessels of the posterior aspect of the ME for the modified Jobe technique. CONCLUSION: Although tunnel drilling in the sublime tubercle appears to have a minimal effect on intraosseous vascularity of the proximal ulna, both the docking and modified Jobe techniques reduce flow in the ME. This reduction was 4 times greater for the modified Jobe technique, and these findings have important implications for UCL reconstruction surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As the rate of revision UCL reconstructions continues to rise, investigation into causes for failure of primary surgery is needed. One potential cause is poor tendon-to-bone healing due to inadequate vascularity. This study quantifies the amount of vascular insult that is incurred in the ME during UCL reconstruction. While vascular insult is only one of many factors that affects the surgical success rate, surgeons performing this procedure should be mindful of this potential for vascular disruption.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We compared different surgical techniques for nerve regeneration in a rabbit sciatic nerve gap model using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), electrophysiology, limb function, and histology. METHODS: A total of 24 male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups: autograft (n = 8), hollow conduit (n = 8), and collagen-filled conduit (n = 8). A 10-mm segment of the rabbit proximal sciatic nerve was cut, and autograft or collagen conduit was used to bridge the gap. DTI on a 3-T system was performed preoperatively and 13 weeks after surgery using the contralateral, nonoperated nerve as a control. RESULTS: Overall, autograft performed better compared with both conduit groups. Differences in axonal diameter were significant (autograft > hollow conduit > collagen-filled conduit) at 13 weeks (autograft vs. hollow conduit, p = 0.001, and hollow conduit vs. collagen-filled conduit, p < 0.001). Significant group differences were found for axial diffusivity but not for any of the other DTI metrics (autograft > hollow conduit > collagen-filled conduit) (autograft vs. hollow conduit, p = 0.001 and hollow conduit vs. collagen-filled conduit, p = 0.021). As compared with hollow conduit (autograft > collagen-filled conduit > hollow conduit), collagen-filled conduit animals demonstrated a nonsignificant increased maximum tetanic force. CONCLUSIONS: Autograft-treated rabbits demonstrated improved sciatic nerve regeneration compared with collagen-filled and hollow conduits as assessed by histologic, functional, and DTI parameters at 13 weeks.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pelvic radiographs are routinely used to assess acetabular fracture reduction. We compared radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with regard to their ability to detect residual fracture displacement. We also determined the association between the quality of reduction as assessed on CT and hip survivorship and identified risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Patients were included in the study who had undergone acetabular fracture fixation between 1992 and 2012, who were followed for ≥2 years (or until early THA), and for whom radiographs and a pelvic CT scan were available. Residual displacement was measured on postoperative radiographs and CT and graded according to Matta's criteria (0 to 1 mm indicating anatomic reduction; 2 to 3 mm, imperfect reduction; and >3 mm, poor reduction) by observers who were blinded to patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were plotted and log-rank tests were used to assess statistical differences in survivorship curves between adequate (anatomic or imperfect) and inadequate reductions on CT. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for conversion to THA. Two hundred and eleven patients were included. At mean of 9.0 years (standard deviation [SD], 5.6; median, 7.9; range, 0.5 to 23.3 years) postoperatively, 161 patients (76%) had retained their native hip. RESULTS: Compared with radiographs, CT showed worse reduction in 124 hips (59%), the same reduction in 79 (37%), and better reduction in 8 (4%). Of the 99 patients graded as having adequate reduction on CT, 10% underwent conversion to THA in comparison with 36% of those with inadequate reduction, and there was a significant difference between the survivorship curves (p < 0.001). Mean hip survivorship was shorter in patients ≥50 years of age (p < 0.001) and in those with an inadequate reduction on CT (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for conversion to THA were age (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.07 to 9.62; p < 0.001), inadequate reduction (HR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.71 to 7.45; p = 0.001), and posterior wall involvement (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.00 to 3.26; p = 0.049). Sex, fracture type (elementary versus associated), and year of surgery did not influence hip survivorship. CONCLUSIONS: CT is superior to radiographs for detecting residual displacement after acetabular fracture fixation. Hip survivorship is greater in patients with adequate (anatomic or imperfect) reduction on CT. Along with older age and posterior wall involvement, an inadequate reduction on CT is a risk factor for conversion to THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Acetábulo/lesões , Fixação de Fratura , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare blood loss, delay of surgery, and short-term adverse events in (1) patients admitted on warfarin versus nonanticoagulated controls and (2) warfarin patients with day of surgery (DOS) international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.5 or greater versus below 1.5. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Academic Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty four patients treated surgically for hip fractures including patients presenting on warfarin (n = 62) and matched controls (n = 62). INTERVENTION: Cephalomedullary nailing (CMN), hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, 30-day complication rate, and hours from emergency department presentation to surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in blood transfusion rates between the warfarin and control groups (P = 0.86). Blood transfusion was required in 58.1% of patients in the warfarin group (48.3% of arthroplasties and 65.5% of CMNs) compared with 56.6% of controls (41.9% of arthroplasties and 73.3% of CMNs). There were also no significant differences in calculated blood loss or in complication rates. Patients on warfarin had significantly longer time to surgery (P < 0.01). Subanalysis of the warfarin group showed that patients with DOS INR at or above 1.5 had similar transfusion rates, blood loss, and complications compared with patients with INR below 1.5. Treatment with CMN was the only covariate that was found to be a significant independent predictor of transfusion on multivariable analysis (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hip fractures admitted on warfarin seem to be at similar risk of transfusion or adverse events compared with nonanticoagulated patients. Awaiting normalization of INR delayed surgery without reducing bleeding or preventing complications. Within reason, surgeons may consider proceeding with surgery in patients with INR above 1.5 if patients are otherwise medically optimized. The upper limit above which surgery causes increased blood loss is currently unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/fisiopatologia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Varfarina/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Varfarina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are the most widely used treatment for osteoporosis. They accumulate in the bone for years, and therefore, their inhibitory effects on osteoclasts may persist after drug discontinuation. The ideal duration of therapy remains controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to review the literature to determine the (1) indications for drug holiday, (2) the duration of drug holiday, (3) the evaluation during drug holiday, and (4) the proper treatment and maintenance after drug holiday. METHODS: A review of two electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE) was conducted using the term "(Drug holiday)," in January 29, 2015. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) clinical trials and case control, (2) human studies, (3) published in a peer-review journal, and (4) written in English. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) case reports, (2) case series, and (3) in vitro studies. RESULTS: The literature supports a therapeutic pause after 3-5 years of bisphosphonate treatment in patients with minor bone deficiencies and no recent fragility fracture (low risk) and in patients with moderate bone deficiencies and/or recent fragility fracture (moderate risk). In these patients, a bone health reevaluation is recommended every 1-3 years. Patients with high fracture risk should be maintained on bisphosphonate therapy without drug holiday. CONCLUSION: The duration and length of drug holiday should be individualized for each patient. Evaluation should be based on serial bone mass measurements, bone turnover rates, and fracture history evaluation. If after drug therapy, assessments show an increased risk of fracture, the patient may benefit from initiating another treatment. Raloxifene, teriparatide, or denosumab are available options.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) remains controversial. Current reviews include low-level evidence studies evaluating the treatment of both pre-collapse and collapse stages of the disease. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of the current study is to systematically review the literature evaluating core decompression (CD) with bone marrow mesenchymal cells (BMMCs), CD alone, and bisphosphonate treatment in pre-collapse ONFH by focusing just on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting functional and radiologic outcomes. We aim to determine if the literature provides evidence supporting any single approach. METHODS: Using PubMed and EMBASE databases, we reviewed the clinical evidence of treatments for pre-collapse ONFH following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Twelve RCTs met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Results showed that CD with BMMCs has lower risk of femoral head collapse when compared to the CD alone excluding hips lost to follow-up (relative risk (RR) [95% CI]:0.25 [0.11, 0.60]; p = 0.002) and when assumed that hips lost to follow-up experienced collapse (RR [95% CI]: 0.11 [0.03, 0.47]; p = 0.003). Neither CD nor bisphosphonate treatments showed lower risk to femoral head collapse when compared to control treatments (p = 0.46 and 0.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: Current literature shows that there is a lower risk of femoral head collapse in patients with ONFH treated with CD combined with BMMCs when compared to CD alone; however, there is no robust evidence to determine the effect on functional outcomes. More RCTs assessing new combination therapies and using standardized outcome measures are required.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Several differences in kinematics, functional outcomes and alignment exist between medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was (1) to compare functional outcomes between both procedures with the hypothesis that both have equivalent outcomes and (2) to assess the role of preoperative and postoperative alignment on functional outcomes in both procedures. METHODS: Patients who underwent UKA were included when overall function - using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) score - and joint awareness - using Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) - were available preoperatively and at minimum two-year follow-up. A total of 143 medial UKA and 36 lateral UKA patients reported outcomes at mean 2.4-years follow-up (range 2.0 to 5.0year). RESULTS: Preoperatively and postoperatively, no differences were seen between medial and lateral UKA in overall function (89.8±11.7 vs. 90.2±12.4, respectively, p=0.855) and joint awareness (71.2±24.5 vs. 70.9±28.2, respectively, p=0.956). With neutral postoperative alignment (-1° to three degrees), less joint awareness was noted following medial UKA than lateral UKA (72.6±22.6 vs. 55.3±28.5, p=0.024). With undercorrection (three degrees to seven degrees), however, following lateral UKA less joint awareness (85.3±19.5 vs. 68.2±26.8, p=0.020) and better functional outcomes (96.0±5.4 vs. 88.5±11.6, p=0.001) were noted than medial UKA. CONCLUSION: Equivalent functional outcomes were noted between medial and lateral UKA at short-term follow-up but different optimal alignment angles seem to exist for both procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III therapeutic study.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Prótese do Joelho , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patients' walking speed. DESIGN: Four questions comprise the WSQ, and were derived using previously published questionnaires and expert opinion of 6 physician-researchers. SETTING: Four ambulatory clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulating individuals aged 60-95 (mean age, 73.2 ± 8.1 years, 86.1% female, n = 101). INTERVENTION: Participants completed the WSQ and underwent GS measurement for comparison. ANALYSIS: WSQ score correlation to true GS, receiver operating characteristics, and validation statistics were performed. RESULTS: All 4 questions of the WSQ independently predicted true GS significantly (P < 0.001). The WSQ sufficiently predicted true GS with r = 0.696 and ρ = 0.717. CONCLUSIONS: The WSQ is an effective tool for assessing baseline walking speed in patients aged 60 years and older in a self-reported manner. It permits gait screening in health care environments where conventional GS testing is contraindicated due to temporary immobilization and maybe used to provide baseline targets for goal-oriented post-trauma care. Given its ability to capture GS in patients who are unable to ambulate, it may open doors for frailty research in previously unattainable populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Marcha/fisiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Exame Físico/métodos , Autorrelato , Caminhada/classificação , Caminhada/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Idoso Fragilizado , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
It is estimated that 20000 to 30000 new patients are diagnosed with osteonecrosis annually accounting for approximately 10% of the 250000 total hip arthroplasties done annually in the United States. The lack of level 1 evidence in the literature makes it difficult to identify optimal treatment protocols to manage patients with pre-collapse avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and early intervention prior to collapse is critical to successful outcomes in joint preserving procedures. There have been a variety of traumatic and atraumatic factors that have been identified as risk factors for osteonecrosis, but the etiology and pathogenesis still remains unclear. Current osteonecrosis diagnosis is dependent upon plain anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs of the hip, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Generally, the first radiographic changes seen by radiograph will be cystic and sclerotic changes in the femoral head. Although the diagnosis may be made by radiograph, plain radiographs are generally insufficient for early diagnosis, therefore MRI is considered the most accurate benchmark. Treatment options include pharmacologic agents such as bisphosphonates and statins, biophysical treatments, as well as joint-preserving and joint-replacing surgeries. the surgical treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head can be divided into two major branches: femoral head sparing procedures (FHSP) and femoral head replacement procedures (FHRP). In general, FHSP are indicated at pre-collapse stages with minimal symptoms whereas FHRP are preferred at post-collapse symptomatic stages. It is difficult to know whether any treatment modality changes the natural history of core decompression since the true natural history of core decompression has not been delineated.