Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 59(17): 1509-18, 2012 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22405632

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of targeted left ventricular (LV) lead placement on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Placement of the LV lead to the latest sites of contraction and away from the scar confers the best response to CRT. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to compare a targeted approach to LV lead placement with usual care. METHODS: A total of 220 patients scheduled for CRT underwent baseline echocardiographic speckle-tracking 2-dimensional radial strain imaging and were then randomized 1:1 into 2 groups. In group 1 (TARGET [Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]), the LV lead was positioned at the latest site of peak contraction with an amplitude of >10% to signify freedom from scar. In group 2 (control) patients underwent standard unguided CRT. Patients were classified by the relationship of the LV lead to the optimal site as concordant (at optimal site), adjacent (within 1 segment), or remote (≥2 segments away). The primary endpoint was a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were clinical response (≥1 improvement in New York Heart Association functional class), all-cause mortality, and combined all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization. RESULTS: The groups were balanced at randomization. In the TARGET group, there was a greater proportion of responders at 6 months (70% vs. 55%, p = 0.031), giving an absolute difference in the primary endpoint of 15% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 28%). Compared with controls, TARGET patients had a higher clinical response (83% vs. 65%, p = 0.003) and lower rates of the combined endpoint (log-rank test, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard CRT treatment, the use of speckle-tracking echocardiography to the target LV lead placement yields significantly improved response and clinical status and lower rates of combined death and heart failure-related hospitalization. (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [TARGET] study); ISRCTN19717943).


Assuntos
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/mortalidade , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Causas de Morte , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego , Volume Sistólico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido , Remodelação Ventricular/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA