Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Acute onset supraventricular arrhythmias can contribute to haemodynamic compromise in septic shock. Both amiodarone and propafenone are available interventions, but their clinical effects have not yet been directly compared. METHODS: In this two-centre, prospective controlled parallel group double blind trial we recruited 209 septic shock patients with new-onset arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. The patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who had sinus rhythm 24 h after the start of the infusion, time to restoration of the first sinus rhythm and the proportion of patients with arrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: Out of 209 randomized patients, 200 (96%) received the study drug. After 24 h, 77 (72.8%) and 71 (67.3%) were in sinus rhythm (p = 0.4), restored after a median of 3.7 h (95% CI 2.3-6.8) and 7.3 h (95% CI 5-11), p = 0.02, with propafenone and amiodarone, respectively. The arrhythmia recurred in 54 (52%) patients treated with propafenone and in 80 (76%) with amiodarone, p < 0.001. Patients with a dilated left atrium had better rhythm control with amiodarone (6.4 h (95% CI 3.5; 14.1) until cardioversion vs 18 h (95% CI 2.8; 24.7) in propafenone, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propafenone does not provide better rhythm control at 24 h yet offers faster cardioversion with fewer arrhythmia recurrences than with amiodarone, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No differences between propafenone and amiodarone on the prespecified short- and long-term outcomes were observed.

Immature granulocytes as a sepsis predictor in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Usefulness of immature granulocyte percentage (IG%) to discriminate between postoperative non-infective systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis was tested in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 124 patients who developed non-infective SIRS and sepsis after elective cardiac surgery was performed. Predictive ability of IG% to predict sepsis was compared to procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell count, temperature and different biomarker combinations using receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression analysis. The optimal cut-off points, diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: There were 44 patients diagnosed with sepsis and 80 patients with non-infective SIRS. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under the curve was higher for IG% (0.71) and PCT (0.72) compared to white blood cell count (0.62) and temperature (0.58). The best cut-off value for IG% was 1.45% (sensitivity 70.5%, specificity 60%) and 1.43 µg/l for PCT (sensitivity 65.9%, specificity 75%). The combination of IG% and PCT provided the best sepsis prediction (area under the curve of 0.8, sensitivity 63.6% and specificity 88.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgical patients, IG% is a helpful marker with the moderate ability to discriminate between sepsis and non-infective SIRS, comparable to serum PCT. A combination of these parameters increased the test's overall predictive ability by improving its specificity.