Black Race, Hispanic Ethnicity, and Medicaid Insurance Are Associated With Lower Rates of Rotator Cuff Repair in New York State.

PURPOSE: To determine the use of operative rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff pathology in New York State and analyze the racial, ethnic, and income-based disparities in receiving rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System Database of New York State was conducted to include patients with a new diagnosis of rotator cuff tear between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, with at least 6 months of follow-up. Bivariate analysis using χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine racial, ethnic, and income-based disparities in the use of surgical treatment with rotator cuff repair. RESULTS: A total of 87,660 patients were included in the study. Of these, 36,422 patients (41.5%) underwent surgical treatment with rotator cuff repair. Multivariable analysis showed that Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.87; P < .001), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (aOR 0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.97); P = .004), and Medicaid (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.70-0.80; P < .001), or other government insurance (aOR 0.82; 95% CI 0.78-0.86; P < .001) were independently associated with lower rates of rotator cuff repair. Male sex (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.14-1.22; P < .001), Asian race (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62; P = .048), workers' compensation insurance (aOR 1.12; 95% CI 1.07-1.18; P < .001), and greater home ZIP code income quartile (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30; P < .001) were independently associated with greater rates of operative management. Although race was an independent covariate affecting rate of rotator cuff repair, the effects of race were altered when accounting for the other covariates, suggesting that race alone does not account for the differences in rate of surgery for rotator cuff pathology. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of all adult patients presenting with rotator cuff tears to New York hospital systems from 2017 to 2019, we identified significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the likelihood of rotator cuff repair surgery for patients with rotator cuff tears. These include lower rates of rotator cuff repair for those Black, Hispanic, and low-income populations as represented by Medicaid insurance and low home ZIP code income quartile. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study reports disparities in the use of rotator cuff repair for individuals with rotator cuff pathology.

Editorial Commentary: Long Head Biceps Tendon Autograft Is an Ideal and Cost-effective Graft Choice in Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Glenohumeral Joint.

Recent literature supports the concept of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. Tensor fascia lata autograft and dermal allograft have been used with reported improvement of clinical outcomes. Long head biceps (LHB) tendon autograft has been proposed as an alternative autograft source for SCR. The advantage of LHB autograft is its anatomic proximity, robust graft strength, and cost-effectiveness. The biomechanical data, as well as short-term clinical outcomes, support the use of LHB autograft for SCR.

Cemented versus uncemented fixation of second-generation Trabecular Metal glenoid components: minimum 5-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with second-generation Trabecular Metal™ implants (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) has shown good short-term outcomes. Differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented fixation are unknown. This study compared the clinical, radiographic, and patient-rated outcomes of TSA with cemented vs. uncemented TM glenoids at minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent anatomic TSA with second-generation TM glenoid components for primary osteoarthritis were identified for minimum 5-year follow-up. The patients were divided into 2 groups: cemented and uncemented glenoid fixation. Outcome measures included implant survival, patient-rated outcome scores (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores), shoulder range of motion, and radiographic analysis. Findings were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study included 55 shoulders: 27 in the cemented group (21 with full radiographic follow-up) and 28 in the uncemented group (22 with full radiographic follow-up). Both groups had similar follow-up times (6.6 years in cemented group vs. 6.7 years in uncemented group, P = .60). Moreover, the groups did not differ significantly in sex composition, age at the time of surgery, or preoperative Walch glenoid grade distribution. No patients required revision surgery. The 2 groups had similar preoperative range of motion, but patients in the uncemented group had greater follow-up forward flexion (P = .03), external rotation (P < .01), and lateral elevation (P = .03) than did patients in the cemented group. PROMIS scores were not significantly different between groups. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were similar (89.8 in cemented group vs. 94.1 in uncemented group, P = .21). Mid-term radiographs showed a metal debris rate of 24% in the cemented group and 27% in the uncemented group. Although these values were not significantly different (P = .90), the frequency of mild metal debris (grade 1-2), when present, was greater in the uncemented group (grade 2 in 6 shoulders) than in the cemented group (grade 1 in 4 and grade 2 in 1, P = .02). There was a greater presence of mild (grade 1) radiolucent lines in the uncemented group (64%) than in the cemented group (29%, P < .01). No glenoid had evidence of loosening (defined by a change in position or radiolucent lines > 2 mm). The presence of metal debris and radiolucent lines did not have a significant effect on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: At minimum 5-year follow-up, TSA patients with TM glenoids demonstrated excellent clinical and patient-reported outcomes with a 100% implant survival rate, regardless of cemented vs. uncemented fixation. However, the uncemented group showed a significantly higher rate of radiolucent lines and a higher frequency of mild metal debris. These radiographic findings did not affect the clinical outcomes, and their implications for long-term outcomes and prosthesis survival is unknown.

Editorial Commentary: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Is Important Part of Future Clinical Research.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is more efficient than legacy measures and is generalizable across all patients and diseases. Patient-reported outcome scores may eventually become related to physician reimbursement and give patients a voice in their care.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Metrics: Establishing Face, Content, and Construct Validity in a Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: To create and determine face validity and content validity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) performance metrics, to confirm construct validity of the metrics coupled with a cadaveric shoulder, and to establish a performance benchmark for the procedure on a cadaveric shoulder. METHODS: Five experienced arthroscopic shoulder surgeons created step, error, and sentinel error metrics for an ARCR. Fourteen shoulder arthroscopy faculty members from the Arthroscopy Association of North America formed the modified Delphi panel to assess face and content validity. Eight Arthroscopy Association of North America shoulder arthroscopy faculty members (experienced group) were compared with 9 postgraduate year 4 or 5 orthopaedic residents (novice group) in their ability to perform an ARCR. Instructions were given to perform a diagnostic arthroscopy and a 2-anchor, 4-simple suture repair of a 2-cm supraspinatus tear. The procedure was videotaped in its entirety and independently scored in blinded fashion by trained, paired reviewers. RESULTS: Delphi panel consensus for 42 steps and 66 potential errors was obtained. Overall performance assessment showed a mean inter-rater reliability of 0.93. Novice surgeons completed 17% fewer steps (32.1 vs 37.5, P = .001) and enacted 2.5 times more errors than the experienced group (6.21 vs 2.5, P = .012). Fifty percent of the experienced group members and none of the novice group members achieved the proficiency benchmark of a minimum of 37 steps completed with 3 or fewer errors. CONCLUSIONS: Face validity and content validity for the ARCR metrics, along with construct validity for the metrics and cadaveric shoulder, were verified. A proficiency benchmark was established based on the mean performance of an experienced group of arthroscopic shoulder surgeons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Validated procedural metrics combined with the use of a cadaveric shoulder can be used to accurately assess the performance of an ARCR.

Mapping physical functions of the shoulder to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores.

BACKGROUND: We sought to correlate physical functions of the shoulder to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. METHODS: We reviewed 3300 patient encounters with completed ASES scores, representing 2447 patients. Patients were seen for shoulder-related complaints. The most common diagnoses were rotator cuff disease (56%) and arthritis (9%); 54% and 46% of encounters were in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients, respectively. A total of 2632 PROMIS Physical Function (PF), 2574 PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and 959 PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE) scores were simultaneously collected with the ASES form. The ASES form specifically asks about the ability to perform 8 physical functions. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to determine 90% positive predictive value (PPV) and 90% negative predictive value (NPV) cutoffs for the ability to perform at high function for the ASES and PROMIS-PF, -UE, and -PI scores for the entire shoulder cohort and for rotator cuff disease and arthritis subgroups. RESULTS: ASES scores had consistently excellent ability, PROMIS-UE scores had reasonable to excellent ability, and PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI scores had overall reasonable ability to determine high- and low-function states. For reaching a high shelf in the rotator cuff disease subgroup, the 90% NPV and PPV cutoff scores were 41 and 66, respectively, for the ASES instrument. For reaching a high shelf in the arthritis subgroup, the cutoff scores were 50 and 78, respectively, for the ASES instrument. The 90% NPV and PPV cutoffs for each score, physical function, and diagnosis group were depicted by visual representations ("maps") for easier interpretation. CONCLUSION: Shoulder physical functions were mapped to outcome scores. Physical function mapping adds clinical meaning to the orthopedic literature, facilitating improved, more-informed decision making between physicians and patients.

Diversity among academic orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgery faculty in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a cross-sectional analysis of diversity among academic shoulder and elbow surgeons in the United States. METHODS: US shoulder and elbow surgeons who participated in shoulder and elbow fellowship and/or orthopedic surgery resident education as of November 2018 were included. Demographic data (age, gender, race), practice setting, years in practice, academic rank, and leadership roles were collected through publicly available databases and professional profiles. Descriptive statistics were performed and findings were compared between different racial and gender groups. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. RESULTS: A total of 186 orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgeons were identified as participating in shoulder and elbow fellowship and/or orthopedic surgery residency education. Overall, 83.9% were white, 14.5% were Asian, 1.1% were Hispanic, 0.5% were an other race, and 0% were African American. In addition, 94.6% of surgeons were male, whereas 5.4% were female. Further, 64.5% of all surgeons had been in practice for >10 years, and 39.2% worked in an urban setting. Less than half (40.3%) of the surgeons practicing primarily at academic institutions held a professor rank. White surgeons had a significantly greater time in practice vs. nonwhite surgeons (mean 18.8 vs. 12.6 years, P < .01) and were more likely to hold a professor rank (44.0% vs. 21.7%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Racial and gender diversity among US shoulder and elbow surgeons who participate in fellowship and residency education is lacking. Hispanic, African American, and female surgeons are underrepresented. Efforts should be made to identify the reasons for these deficiencies and address them to further advance the field of orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgery.

What Regions of the Distal Clavicle Have the Greatest Bone Mineral Density and Cortical Thickness? A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis of distal clavicle fractures can be challenging because of comminution, poor bone quality, and deforming forces at the fracture site. A better understanding of regional differences in the bone structure of the distal clavicle is critical to refine fracture fixation strategies, but the variations in BMD and cortical thickness throughout the distal clavicle have not been previously described. PURPOSE: /questions (1) Which distal clavicular regions have the greatest BMD? (2) Which distal clavicular regions have the greatest cortical thickness values? METHODS: Ten distal clavicle specimens were dissected from cadaveric shoulders. Eight specimens were female and two were male, with a mean (range) age of 63 years (59 to 67). The specimens were selected to match known epidemiology, as distal clavicular fractures occur more commonly in older patients with osteoporotic bone, and clavicular fractures in older patients are more common in females than males. The clavicles were then imaged using quantitative micro-CT to create 3-D images. The BMD and cortical thickness were calculated for 10 regions of interest in each specimen. These regions were selected to represent locations where distal clavicular fractures commonly occur and locations of likely bony comminution. Findings were compared between different regions using repeated measures ANOVA with Geiser-Greenhouse correction, followed by Bonferroni method multiple comparison testing. Effect size was also calculated to estimate the magnitude of difference between regions. RESULTS: The four most medial regions of the distal clavicle contained the greatest BMD (anterior intertubercle space 887 ± 31 mgHA/cc, posterior intertubercle space 879 ± 26 mgHA/cc, anterior conoid tubercle 900 ± 21 mgHA/cc, posterior conoid tubercle 896 ± 27 mgHA/cc), while the four most lateral regions contained the least BMD (anterior lateral distal clavicle 804 ± 32 mgHA/cc, posterior lateral distal clavicle 800 ± 38 mgHA/cc, anterior medial distal clavicle 815 ± 27 mgHA/cc, posterior medial distal clavicle 795 ± 26 mgHA/cc). All four most medial regions had greater BMD than the four most lateral regions, with p < 0.001 for all comparisons. For the BMD ANOVA, η was determined to be 0.81, representing a large effect size. The four most medial regions of the distal clavicle also had the greatest cortical thickness (anterior intertubercle space 0.7 ± 0.2 mm, posterior intertubercle space 0.7 ± 0.3 mm, anterior conoid tubercle 0.9 ± 0.2 mm, posterior conoid tubercle 0.7 ± 0.2 mm), while the four most lateral regions had the smallest cortical thickness (anterior lateral distal clavicle 0.2 ± 0.1 mm, posterior lateral distal clavicle 0.2 ± 0.1 mm, anterior medial distal clavicle 0.3 ± 0.1 mm, posterior medial distal clavicle 0.2 ± 0.1 mm). All four most medial regions had greater cortical thickness than the four most lateral regions, with p < 0.001 for all comparisons. For the cortical thickness ANOVA, η was determined to be 0.80, representing a large effect size. No differences in BMDs and cortical thicknesses were found between anterior and posterior regions of interest in any given area. CONCLUSIONS: In the distal clavicle, BMD and cortical thickness are greatest in the conoid tubercle and intertubercle space. When compared with clavicular regions lateral to the trapezoid tubercle, the BMD and cortical thickness of the conoid tubercle and intertubercle space were increased, with a large magnitude of difference. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Distal clavicular fractures are prone to comminution and modern treatment strategies have centered on the use of locking plate technology and/or suspensory fixation between the coracoid and the clavicle. However, screw pullout or cortical button pull through are known complications of locking plate and suspensory fixation, respectively. Therefore, it seems intuitive that implant placement during internal fixation of distal clavicle fractures should take advantage of the best-available bone. Although osteosynthesis was not directly studied, our study suggests that the best screw purchase in the distal clavicle is available in the areas of the conoid tubercle and intertubercle space, as these areas had the best bone quality. Targeting these areas during implant fixation would likely reduce implant failure and strengthen fixation. Future studies should build on our findings to determine if osteosynthesis of distal clavicular fractures with targeted screw purchase or cortical button placement in the conoid tubercle and intertubercle space increase fixation strength and decreases construct failure. Furthermore, our findings provide consideration for novel distal clavicular locking plate designs with modified screw trajectories or refined surgical techniques with suspensory fixation implants to reliably capture these areas of greatest bone quality.

Reconstruction of the Superior Glenoid Labrum With Biceps Tendon Autograft: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To describe 2 superior labral reconstruction techniques using long head of the biceps (LHB) autograft and to investigate the ability of the 2 reconstruction techniques to restore superior restraint to the glenohumeral joint compared with superior labrum-deficient models. METHODS: In this biomechanical study, 10 cadaveric shoulders were cycled on a servohydraulic machine while the force required to cause superior subluxation was recorded. Each specimen was cycled under 4 conditions: intact labrum, SLAP tear, posterior (9- to 12-o'clock position) labral reconstruction using LHB autograft (superior labral reconstruction 1 [SLR1]), and 180° (9- to 3-o'clock position) labral reconstruction using LHB autograft (superior labral reconstruction 2 [SLR2]). RESULTS: The mean peak force required to cause superior subluxation in the intact labrum was 32.75 N versus 19.75 N in the SLAP tear (P = .0120). SLR1 required a mean peak force of 31.23 N versus 44.09 N for SLR2 (P = .0175). SLR1 required 94.96% of the force needed in the intact labrum to cause subluxation, whereas SLR2 required 140.6%. SLR1 and SLR2 required 34.21% higher (P = .0074) and 79.84% higher (P = .0033) forces, respectively, to generate subluxation compared with the SLAP tear state. CONCLUSIONS: Both proposed superior labral reconstruction techniques increased the force needed for humeral head superior migration in the setting of a labral tear. SLR1 (posterior labral reconstruction) closely matched the constraint of an intact labrum, whereas SLR2 (180° labral reconstruction) provided greater superior constraint than an intact labrum. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The natural history of irreparable rotator cuff tears results in superior glenohumeral escape and eventual arthrosis. The superior glenoid labrum is an important contributor to superior glenohumeral constraint and is often degenerated in this setting. Clinical application of the 2 described superior labral reconstruction techniques may improve glenohumeral superior stability in patients with rotator cuff disease and superior labral deficiency.

Posterior Interosseous Nerve Proximity to Cortical Button Implant for Distal Biceps Repair With Single and 2-Incision Approaches.

PURPOSE: Fixation with a cortical button is the biomechanically strongest surgical approach for distal biceps repair, and utilization of the 2-incision approach may provide a more anatomical repair and improved terminal supination strength. The risk of injury to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) associated with this approach requires further investigation. METHODS: A distal biceps repair with a cortical button was performed on 10 cadavers, 5 utilizing the single-incision approach and 5 utilizing the 2-incision approach. Contrast was injected into the radial nerve and computed tomography scans were obtained. The distance between the drilled cortical perforation and the PIN was measured. RESULTS: The mean distance from the cortical perforation to the PIN was not significantly different between approaches (9.4 mm and 8.8 mm). A PIN entrapment was seen in 0 out of 5 for the single-incision approach and 1 out of 5 for the 2-incision approach. CONCLUSIONS: Distal biceps repair with cortical button fixation places the PIN at risk of injury regardless of the approach used. Methods of fixation that require bicortical drilling should be especially avoided when using the 2-incision approach. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Distal biceps repair utilizing bicortical drilling for fixation through a 2-incision approach poses high risk of injury to the PIN and should be avoided.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has recently been validated in orthopedic patients with upper-extremity disease. The purpose of this study was to describe preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients, compare PROMIS physical function (PF) scores with clinical functional measurements, and determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores could predict achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative (>3 months) PROMIS scores in patients who underwent primary anatomic TSA were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative shoulder forward flexion and external rotation were also collected. PROMIS PF, pain interference (PI), and depression scores were compared. Accuracy analyses determined whether preoperative PROMIS scores from each domain could predict postoperative achievement of the MCID in the same domain. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients. Significant improvements in PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores, as well as forward flexion and external rotation, were found postoperatively (P < .001). The multivariate model demonstrated that preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores were predictive of postoperative achievement of the MCID (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70-0.87). Ninety percent cutoff scores showed that patients with a preoperative PF score lower than 31.7, PI score greater than 66.9, and depression score greater than 55.5 were more likely to achieve the MCID. CONCLUSIONS: In TSA patients, preoperative PROMIS PF, depression, and PI scores demonstrated strong to excellent abilities to predict postoperative achievement of the MCID. PROMIS PF scores were responsive to the functional improvements observed clinically. The reported cutoff scores allow surgeons to identify patients with increased or decreased probabilities of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement after TSA.

Psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Test for subacromial impingement syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) was previously validated for rotator cuff disease and shoulder instability. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) CAT, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function Score for subacromial impingement syndrome. METHODS: PROMIS PF CAT, PI CAT, and ASES (Pain, Function, Total) were collected on all visits for 2 surgeons between January 2016 and August 2016. New patients, aged 18 years and older, were selected by International Classification of Diseases code for impingement syndrome of the shoulder. The mean number of questions answered determined efficiency. Person-item maps were created to determine ceiling and floor effects as well as person reliability. Convergent validity was determined by comparison of PROMIS domains to ASES scores with Pearson correlations. RESULTS: For PROMIS PF CAT, the mean number of items answered was 4.54 (range 4-12). The ceiling effect was 1.56%, and the floor effect was 3.13%. The person reliability was 0.94. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PF CAT and ASES were 0.664 (ASES Function), 0.426 (ASES Pain), and 0.649 (ASES Total). For PROMIS PI CAT, the mean number of items answered was 4.27 (range 3-11). The ceiling effect was 4.69%, and the floor effect was 8.33%. The person reliability was 0.92. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PI CAT and ASES were: 0.667 (ASES Function), 0.594 (ASES Pain), and 0.729 (ASES Total). CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of PROMIS PF and PI CATs were favorable for subacromial impingement syndrome.

Editorial Commentary: Complications of Shoulder Rotator Cuff Repair Are Relevant in Modern Health Care.

Understanding the type and rate of complications after shoulder rotator cuff repair could help surgeons to focus their quality improvement efforts. This is of great current relevance because value in health care is defined as the ratio of outcomes over cost, and complications increase cost significantly. A particular focus could be on lowering the rate of complications associated with "riskier" patients and "riskier" surgical techniques.

Computer Modeling Analysis of the Talar Dome as a Graft for the Humeral Head.

PURPOSE: To study the degree of surface congruency between the talar dome and humeral head, to determine the size of graft harvestable from the talar dome, and to determine if there are surrogate markers that correspond to a higher degree of surface congruency. METHODS: Computer models of 7 nonmatched humeral heads and 7 talar domes were generated by digital segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) images. Modeled defect regions of each humeral head were then aligned with medial and lateral surfaces of each talar dome using software to maximally limit surface mismatch. Modeled defect sizes ranging from 24 × 10 mm to 30 × 10 mm were tested. Congruence match of <1 mm separation was then measured. RESULTS: The average surface match between randomly selected talar domes to humeral head surfaces was 87.2% when 1 mm was selected as the maximal acceptable congruence difference. Congruence match was not affected by graft size or laterality of talar dome as source of graft. Matching radius of curvature of talar dome to humeral head and height of donor to recipient correlated with improved congruence match. Under best match conditions, a maximal congruence match of 95.2% was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that the talar dome can be a potential source of osteochondral allograft for Hill-Sachs lesions with a maximal defect size of 30 × 10 mm for a single graft. Larger graft sizes resulted in decreased success of actual graft harvest as a result of dimensional constraints of the talar dome. Additional studies are required to determine the biomechanical compatibility of this graft. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The talar dome has a high degree of surface congruency in comparison with the humeral head though the maximal graft size harvestable limits its clinical applicability.

Patient factors influencing return to work and cumulative financial claims after clavicle fractures in workers' compensation cases.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed workers' compensation patients after surgical or nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures to identify factors that influence the time for return to work and total health care reimbursement claims. We hypothesized that return to work for operative patients would be faster. METHODS: The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to retrospectively query the Workers' Compensation national database. The outcomes of interest were the number of days for return to full work after surgery and total reimbursement for health care-related claims. The primary independent variable was treatment modality. RESULTS: There were 169 claims for clavicle fractures within the database (surgical, n = 34; nonoperative, n = 135). The average health care claims reimbursed were $29,136 ± $26,998 for surgical management compared with $8366 ± $14,758 for nonoperative management (P < .001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between surgical (196 ± 287 days) and nonoperative (69 ± 94 days) treatment groups in their time to return to work (P = .06); however, there was high variability in both groups. Litigation was an independent predictor of prolonged return to work (P = .007) and higher health care costs (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Workers' compensation patients treated for clavicle fractures return to work at roughly the same time whether they are treated surgically or nonoperatively, with surgery being roughly 3 times more expensive. There was a substantial amount of variability in return to work timing by subjects in both groups. Litigation was a predictor of longer return to work timing and higher health care costs.

Distal biceps tendon history, updates, and controversies: from the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting-2015.

Understanding of the distal biceps anatomy, mechanics, and biology during the last 75 years has greatly improved the physician's ability to advise and to treat patients with ruptured distal tendons. The goal of this paper is to review the past and current advances on complete distal biceps ruptures as well as controversies and future directions that were discussed and debated during the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting in 2015.

An analysis of adult patient risk factors and complications within 30 days after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors of adult patients predisposing them to the most common complications that occur within 30 days after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for arthroscopic shoulder procedures. Complications and their frequency were calculated. Multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors of adult patients predisposing them to complications. Risk factors for reoperation and characteristics of patients undergoing repair procedures were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among 10,255 cases of shoulder arthroscopy, 119 complications were reported in 103 cases within 30 days of surgery. The rates of any, major, and minor complications were 1%, 0.57%, and 0.53%, respectively. Return to the operating room (29% of all complications) was the most frequent complication. With risk adjustment, the odds of complications developing were higher for patients older than 60 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.47; P = .03), patients with a surgical time greater than 1.5 hours (AOR, 1.93; P = .01), patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; AOR, 2.76; P = .03), patients with an inpatient status (AOR, 2.72; P < .01), patients with disseminated cancer (AOR, 21.9; P < .01), and current smokers (AOR, 1.94; P = .01). The presence of COPD (AOR, 4.67; P = .04) was a significant predictor for reoperation within 30 days. Repair procedures did not increase the risk of complications compared with non-repair. Male patients, patients aged younger than 30 years, nondiabetic patients, and nonsmokers were more likely to undergo repair procedures (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder arthroscopy has a 1.0% thirty-day complication rate, with the most common complication being return to the operating room (29% of all complications). Age older than 60 years, surgical time greater than 90 minutes, COPD, inpatient status, disseminated cancer, and current smoking all increased a patient's risk of complications. Patients undergoing repair procedures were not at increased risk. Pulmonary comorbidity increases the risk of reoperation within 30 days. Patients undergoing repair procedures tend to be younger and carry fewer risk factors for complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.

Assessing Diagnostic Arthroscopy Performance in the Operating Room Using the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET).

PURPOSE: To determine the validity and reliability of using the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) to assess arthroscopic skill in the operating room. METHODS: Eight orthopaedic residents, 1 sports medicine fellow, and 3 sports medicine faculty members recorded the diagnostic portion of 3 shoulder and 3 knee procedures in the operating room. Two blinded raters used the ASSET to assess each recorded procedure video. Criterion for a passing score on a procedure was attaining a 3 or greater in all 8 domains assessed. RESULTS: In total 70 videos (36 shoulder, 34 knee) were evaluated by each rater. The attending/fellow group was assigned significantly higher mean ASSET scores compared with resident groups for both procedures (P = .01). The attending/fellow group also had the highest passing percentage (95.8%). Raters were in agreement for total ASSET scores assigned to both diagnostic arthroscopy of the shoulder (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.84) and knee (ICC = 0.81). Agreement on individual ASSET domains was moderate (ICC = 0.61 to 0.80) for all domains except safety and difficulty of procedure. Raters concurred on the pass-fail evaluation in 62 of 70 (88.6%) of procedures evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ASSET to assess surgical skills in the operating room is feasible, reliable, and valid. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When combined with previously published results using the ASSET, the ASSET may provide a validated and reliable method for evaluating arthroscopic surgical skills in the surgical simulation lab and operating room.

Scapular dyskinesis following displaced fractures of the middle clavicle.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of scapular dyskinesis and resulting patient outcomes after treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. METHODS: Skeletally mature patients with isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated with or without surgery over a 16-month period were recruited. The minimum length of follow-up at study examination was 12 months. Patient outcomes were documented using the SICK (scapular malposition, inferomedial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition, and dyskinesis of scapular movement) Scapula Rating Scale, the Simple Shoulder Test, 3 visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, and shoulder range-of-motion and strength measurements. Of the 32 eligible patients, 24 (75%) were successfully recruited. RESULTS: The mean participant age was 46 ± 17 years, with a mean length of follow-up at study evaluation of 1.7 ± 1 years. Surgical fixation was performed in 12 patients (50%). Scapular dyskinesis was present in 37.5% of patients (n = 9). Patients with scapular dyskinesis had worse SICK scapula scores (5.8 ± 2.2 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, P = .01), worse Simple Shoulder Test scores (10.5 ± 1.6 vs 11.7 ± 0.8, P = .029), higher maximum VAS pain scores (4.1 ± 3.1 vs 0.97 ± 1.2, P = .002), and worse average VAS pain scores in the week before the examination (2.7 ± 2.5 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, P < .001) compared with patients without scapular dyskinesis. Range of motion and abduction strength were similar between the groups. Scapular dyskinesis developed in 1 patient treated with surgery (8% [1 of 12]) compared with 8 patients treated nonoperatively (67% [8 of 12]) (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Scapular dyskinesis is common after displaced middle-third clavicle fractures, and these patients have more pain and worse functional outcomes compared with patients without scapular dyskinesis. Surgical treatment may reduce a patient's risk of scapular dyskinesis developing and improve short-term outcomes.

High incidence of hemiarthroplasty for shoulder osteoarthritis among recently graduated orthopaedic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is a common indication for shoulder arthroplasty. Historically, both total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) have been used to treat primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The choice between procedures is a topic of debate, with HSA proponents arguing that it is less invasive, faster, less expensive, and technically less demanding, with quality of life outcomes equivalent to those of TSA. More recent evidence suggests TSA is superior in terms of pain relief, function, ROM, strength, and patient satisfaction. We therefore investigated the practice of recently graduated orthopaedic surgeons pertaining to the surgical treatment of this disease. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We hypothesized that (1) recently graduated, board eligible, orthopaedic surgeons with fellowship training in shoulder surgery are more likely to perform TSA than surgeons without this training; (2) younger patients are more likely to receive HSA than TSA; (3) patient sex affects the choice of surgery; (4) US geographic region affects practice patterns; and (5) complication rates for HSA and TSA are not different. METHODS: We queried the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery's database to identify practice patterns of orthopaedic surgeons taking their board examination. We identified 771 patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis treated with TSA or HSA from 2006 to 2011. The rates of TSA and HSA were compared based on the treating surgeon's fellowship training, patient age and sex, US geographic region, and reported surgical complications. RESULTS: Surgeons with fellowship training in shoulder surgery were more likely (86% versus 72%; OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.56-3.45, p<0.001) than surgeons without this training to perform TSA rather than HSA. The mean age for patients receiving HSA was not different from that for patients receiving TSA (66 versus 68, years, p=0.057). Men were more likely to receive HSA than TSA when compared to women (RR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.19-2.00, p=0.0012). The proportions of TSA and HSA were similar regardless of US geographic region (Midwest HSA 21%, TSA 79%; Northeast HSA 25%, TSA 75%; Northwest HSA 16%, TSA 84%; South HSA 27%, TSA 73%; Southeast HSA 24%, TSA 76%; Southwest HSA 23%, TSA 77%; overall p=0.708). The overall complication rates were not different with the numbers available: 8.4% (15/179) for HSA and 8.1% (48/592) for TSA (p=0.7555). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study are at odds with the recommendations in the current clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. These guidelines favor using TSA over HSA in the treatment of shoulder arthritis. Further investigation is needed to clarify if these practice patterns are isolated to recently graduated board eligible orthopaedic surgeons or if the use of HSA continues with orthopaedic surgeons applying for recertification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.