Assessing Outcomes After Adrenalectomy for Primary Aldosteronism - Early is Accurate: Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the postoperative trend in blood pressure (BP)-related outcomes [BP and antihypertensive (AHT) drug use] during the year following adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism (PA) to determine the optimal timing for outcome assessment and to determine the necessary follow-up length. BACKGROUND: Since the course of BP-related outcomes after adrenalectomy is unknown, the optimal timing of outcome assessment and follow-up duration are not clear. METHODS: In this retrospective single center cohort study, we used a prospectively collected database with all patients referred for difficult-to-control-hypertension-analysis. All patients diagnosed with PA who underwent adrenalectomy were included. AHT drug use [in defined daily dose (DDD)] and home blood pressure measurements (HBPMs) during the first postoperative year were collected. A mixed-effects model was developed to assess the stability of DDD and HBPM over time and adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: In total 1784 patients were assessed for difficult-to-control-hypertension of whom 41 were included. Both the DDD and HBPM showed the strongest decrease in the first postoperative month (mean 1.6DDD; mean 140/85 mm Hg) compared with preoperative values (4.5DDD; 153/92 mm Hg). Thereafter, both outcomes showed a stable course from 4 to 6 months (1.6DDD; 136/86 mm Hg) up to 12 months postoperatively (2.0DDD; 136/83 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that AHT drug use and HBPM decreased substantially within the first month after adrenalectomy for PA and afterwards generally remained stable during the year following adrenalectomy. We propose that BP-related outcomes can be assessed reliably early after adrenalectomy and question the need for routine long-term follow-up in referral centers.

Complications After Major Surgery for Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with MEN1: Results from a Nationwide Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about complications after major duodenopancreatic surgery for duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (dpNETs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Therefore, the incidence and severity of complications after major surgery for MEN1-related dpNETs were assessed. METHODS: Patients were selected from the population-based Dutch MEN1 database if they had undergone a Whipple procedure or total pancreatectomy from 2003 to 2017. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (grade III or higher complications were considered a severe complication) and definitions from the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The Cumulative Complication Index (CCI®) was calculated as the sum of all complications weighted for their severity. Univariable logistic regression was performed to assess potential associations between predictor candidates and a severe complication. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (median age 43 years) underwent a major duodenopancreatic resection, including 14 Whipple procedures and 13 total pancreatectomies. Morbidity and mortality were 100% (27/27) and 4% (1/27), respectively. A severe complication occurred in 17/27 (63%) patients. The median CCI® was 47.8 [range 8.7-100]. Grade B/C pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, hemorrhage, and chyle leakage occurred in 7/14 (50%), 10/27 (37%), 1/27 (4%), 7/27 (26%), 3/27 (11%) patients, respectively. Patients with a severe complication had longer operative time and higher blood loss. After Whipple, new-onset endocrine and exocrine insufficiency occurred in 1/13 and 9/14 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Major duodenopancreatic surgery in MEN1 is associated with a very high risk of severe complications and cumulative burden of complications and should therefore be reserved for a select subgroup of patients with MEN1-related dpNETs.

Correction to: Validation of the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score Within Current Clinical Practice.

In the original article, two of the International CONNsortium Study Group collaborator's names are spelled wrong: Anton F. Engelsman and Els J.M. Nieveen van Dijkum. The spellings are correct as reflected here.

Adrenalectomy for Primary Aldosteronism: Significant Variability in Work-Up Strategies and Low Guideline Adherence in Worldwide Daily Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Various diagnostic tests are available to establish the primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis and to determine the disease laterality. Combined with the controversies in the literature, unawareness of guidelines and technical demands and high costs of some of these diagnostics, this could lead to significant differences in work-up strategies worldwide. Therefore, we investigated the work-up before surgery for PA in daily clinical practice within a multicenter study. METHODS: Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for PA within 16 centers in Europe, Canada, Australia and the USA between 2010 and 2016 were included. We did not exclude patients based on the performed diagnostic tests during work-up to make our data representative for current clinical practice. Adherence to the Endocrine Society Guideline and variables associated with not performing adrenal venous sampling (AVS) were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 435 patients were eligible. An aldosterone-to-renin ratio, confirmatory test, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and AVS were performed in 82.9%, 32.9%, 86.9%, 17.0% and 65.3% of patients, respectively. A complete work-up, as recommended by the guideline, was performed in 13.1% of patients. Bilateral disease or normal adrenal anatomy on CT (OR 16.19; CI 3.50-74.99), smaller tumor size on CT (OR 0.06; CI 0.04-0.08) and presence of hypokalemia (OR 2.00; CI 1.19-3.32) were independently associated with performing AVS. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to examine the daily clinical practice work-up of PA within a worldwide cohort of surgical patients. The results demonstrate significant variability in work-up strategies and low adherence to The Endocrine Society guideline.

Validation of the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score Within Current Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is far from a certainty. This stresses the importance of adequate preoperative patient counseling. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) is a simple and easy to use prediction model only including four variables: ≤ 2 antihypertensive medications, body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m2, duration of hypertension ≤ 6 years and female sex. However, because the model was developed and validated within the USA over a decade ago, the applicability in modern practice and outside of the USA is questionable. Therefore, we aimed to validate the ARS in current clinical practice within an international cohort. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy, between 2010 and 2016, in 16 medical centers from the USA, Europe (EU), Canada (CA) and Australia (AU) were included. Resolution of hypertension was defined as normotension without antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: In total, 514 patients underwent adrenalectomy and 435 (85%) patients were eligible. Resolution of hypertension was achieved in 27% patients within the total cohort and in 22%, 30%, 40% and 38% of patients within USA, EU, CA and AU, respectively (p = 0.015). The area under the curve (AUC) for the complete cohort was 0.751. Geographic validation displayed a AUC within the USA, EU, CA and AU of 0.782, 0.681, 0.811 and 0.667, respectively. DISCUSSION: The ARS is an easy to use prediction model with a moderate to good predictive performance within current clinical practice. The model showed the highest predictive performance within North America but potentially has less predictive performance in EU and AU.

Follow-up of patients with thyroglobulin-antibodies: Rising Tg-Ab trend is a risk factor for recurrence of differentiated thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: Differentiated thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Recurrences (5-20%) are the main reason for follow-up. Thyroglobulin (Tg) has proven to be an excellent disease marker, but thyroglobulin-antibodies (Tg-Ab) may interfere with Tg measurement, leading to over or underestimation. It is proposed that the Tg-Ab trend can be used as a marker for disease recurrence, yet few studies define trend and have a long-term follow-up. The objective of our study was to investigate the value of a well-defined Tg-Ab trend as a surrogate marker for disease recurrence during long-term follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients treated at the Nuclear Department of the University Medical Center Utrecht from 1998 to 2010 and the Netherlands Cancer Institute from 2000 to 2009. All patients with Tg-Ab 12 months after treatment were included. The definition of a rise was >50% increase of the Tg-Ab value in a 2 year time period. A decline as >50% decrease of the Tg-Ab value. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included. None of the patients with declining or stable Tg-Ab without a concomitant rise in Tg developed a recurrence. Four patients did suffer a recurrence. Three of these patients had a rising Tg-Ab trend, in two of these patients Tg was undetectable. CONCLUSIONS: Tg-Ab trend can be used as a crude surrogate marker for long-term follow-up of Tg-Ab patients. A rising trend in Tg-Ab warrants further investigation to detect recurrent disease. Stable or declining Tg-Ab levels do not seem to reflect a risk for recurrence.

Predictive factors for postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis in 225 patients.

BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, preoperative medical preparation has been widely applied in patients with pheochromocytoma to improve intraoperative hemodynamic instability and postoperative complications. However, advancements in preoperative imaging, laparoscopic surgical techniques, and anesthesia have considerably improved management in patients with pheochromocytoma. In consequence, there is no validated consensus on current predictive factors for postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine perioperative factors which are predictive for postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. STUDY DESIGN: It is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases in five medical centers from 2002 to 2013. Inclusion criteria were consecutive patients who underwent non-converted laparoscopic unilateral total adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twenty-five patients were included. All-cause and cardiovascular postoperative morbidity rates were 16% (n = 36) and 4.8% (n = 11), respectively. Preinduction blood pressure normalization after preoperative medical preparation had no impact on postoperative morbidity. However, past medical history of coronary artery disease (OR [CI95%] = 3.39; [1.317-8.727]) and incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability episodes (both SBP ≥ 160 mmHg and MAP < 60 mmHg) (OR [CI95%] = 3.092; [1.451-6.587]) remained independent predictors for postoperative all-cause morbidity. Similarly, past medical history of coronary artery disease (OR [CI95%] = 14.41; [3.119-66.57]), female sex (OR [CI95%] = 12.05; [1.807-80.31]), and incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability episodes (both SBP ≥ 200 mmHg and MAP < 60 mmHg) (OR [CI95%] = 4.13; [1.009-16.90]) remained independent predictors for postoperative cardiovascular morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies risk factors for cardiovascular and all-cause postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic adrenalectomy in current clinical setting. These data can help physicians to guide intra-operative blood pressure management and have to be taken into account in further studies.

SAME-DAY FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY DIAGNOSIS FOR THYROID NODULES ACHIEVES RAPID ANXIETY DECREASE AND HIGH DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY.

OBJECTIVE: The time between the moment of referral for the diagnostic workup for thyroid nodules and the outcome can be worrisome for patients. In general, patients experience high levels of anxiety during the evaluation of a lesion suspicious for cancer. Therefore, the implementation of same-day fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) diagnosis is becoming standard-of-care for many solid tumors. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of same-day FNAC diagnosis for thyroid nodules and to assess patient anxiety during the diagnostic process. METHODS: For feasibility of same-day FNAC diagnosis, we assessed the proportion of patients receiving a diagnosis at the end of the visit. Accuracy was measured by comparing histology with the FNAC result. Patient anxiety was measured by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory at 6 moments during the diagnostic workup. RESULTS: Of the 131 included patients, 112 (86%) were female, and the mean age was 53 years. All patients, except those with a nondiagnostic FNAC result (n = 26; 20%), had a diagnosis at the end of the day. There were only two discordant results. Anxiety levels at the beginning of the day were high throughout the group, State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score 43.1 (SD 2.0) and decreased significantly more in patients with a benign FNAC result (STAI score 30.2), compared to patients with a malignant or indeterminate result (STAI score 39.6). CONCLUSION: Distress of patients with a thyroid nodule undergoing same-day FNAC diagnostics was high. Same-day FNAC diagnosis is feasible and accurate for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Therefore, same-day FNAC diagnosis seems a safer, more patient-friendly approach to diagnose thyroid nodules.

A simplified primary aldosteronism surgical outcome score is a useful prediction model when target organ damage is unknown - Retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cure of hypertension after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is no certainty and therefore preoperative patient counseling is essential. The Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) Score is a useful prediction model with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. The PASO Score includes 'Target Organ Damage' (TOD) (i.e., left ventricular hypertrophy and/or microalbuminuria), which is often unavailable during preoperative counseling and might therefore limit its use in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the PASO score would still be useful if TOD is unknown at time of counseling. Therefore, we aimed to examine the predictive performance of the simplified PASO Score, without taking TOD into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy between 2010 and 2016 in 16 medical centers from North America, Europe and Australia were included. TOD was unknown in our database and therefore assigned as absent. Patients were classified as complete, partial or absent clinical success using the PASO consensus criteria. RESULTS: A total of 380 (73.9%) patients were eligible for analysis. Complete, partial and absent clinical success were observed in 29.5%, 55.8% and 14.7% of patients, respectively. The simplified PASO Score had an AUC of 0.730 (95% confidence interval 0.674-0.785) in our total cohort. CONCLUSION: Without taking TOD into account, the simplified PASO Score had a lower predictive value as compared to the original derivation cohort. Ideally, the complete PASO Score should be used, but when data on TOD are not readily available, the simplified PASO Score is a useful and reasonable alternative.

Trends in blood pressure-related outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Decrease in blood pressure (BP) is the major goal of adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism. Nevertheless, the optimal timing to assess these outcomes and the needed duration of follow-up are uncertain. We systematically reviewed the literature regarding trends in BP-related outcomes during follow-up after adrenalectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature search of medical literature from PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library regarding BP-related outcomes (i.e. cure of hypertension rates, BP and antihypertensives) was performed. The Quality In Prognosis Studies risk of bias tool was used. RESULTS: Of the 2057 identified records, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall study quality was low. In multiple studies, the biggest decrease in BP was shown within the first month(s) after adrenalectomy and afterwards BP often remained stable during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available studies one might suggest that long follow-up is unnecessary, since outcomes seem to stabilize within the first months.

[A man with lower left abdominal pain]. / Een man met pijn links onder in de buik.

A 57-year-old man presented with fever and lower left abdominal pain. The CT-scan showed thickening of the gallbladder wall with a fistula to the transverse colon, a laminated calcification in the descending colon and distended bowel loops. Resultantly, the patient was diagnosed with gallstone ileus. Sigmoidotomy was necessary to extract the stone and to prevent a blow-out of the colon.

Clinical outcomes after surgery for primary aldosteronism: Evaluation of the PASO-investigators' consensus criteria within a worldwide cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND: In a first step toward standardization, the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcomes investigators introduced consensus criteria defining the clinical outcomes after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism. Within this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the use of these consensus criteria in daily clinical practice in 16 centers in Europe, Canada, Australia, and the United States. METHODS: Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism between 2010 and 2016 were included. Patients with missing data regarding preoperative or postoperative blood pressure or their defined daily dose were excluded. According to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcomes criteria, patients were classified as complete, partial, or absent clinical success. RESULTS: A total of 380 patients were eligible for analysis. Complete, partial, and absent clinical success was achieved in 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. Evaluation of the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcomes criteria showed that in 11% and 47% of patients with partial and absent clinical success, this classification was incorrect or debatable (16% of the total cohort). This concept of a "debatable classification of success" was due mainly to the cutoff of ≥20 mmHg used to indicate a clinically relevant change in systolic blood pressure and the use of percentages instead of absolute values to indicate a change in defined daily dose. CONCLUSION: Although introduction of the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcomes consensus criteria induced substantial advancement in the standardization of postoperative outcomes, our study suggests that there is room for improvement in the concept for success given the observed limitations when the criteria were tested within our international cohort. In line, determining clinical success remains challenging, especially in patients with opposing change in blood pressure and defined daily dose.

Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral Adrenalectomy for Primary Aldosteronism.

Importance: In addition to biochemical cure, clinical benefits after surgery for primary aldosteronism depend on the magnitude of decrease in blood pressure (BP) and use of antihypertensive medications with a subsequent decreased risk of cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular morbidity and drug-induced adverse effects. Objective: To evaluate the change in BP and use of antihypertensive medications within an international cohort of patients who recently underwent surgery for primary aldosteronism. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was conducted across 16 referral medical centers in Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism between January 2010 and December 2016 were included. Data analysis was performed from August 2017 to June 2018. Unilateral disease was confirmed using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or adrenal venous sampling. Patients with missing or incomplete preoperative or follow-up data regarding BP or corresponding number of antihypertensive medications were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical success was defined based on postoperative BP and number of antihypertensive medications. Cure was defined as normotension without antihypertensive medications, and clear improvement as normotension with lower or equal use of antihypertensive medications. In patients with preoperative normotensivity, improvement was defined as postoperative normotension with lower antihypertensive use. All other patients were stratified as no clear success because the benefits of surgery were less obvious, mainly owing to postoperative, persistent hypertension. Clinical outcomes were assessed at follow-up closest to 6 months after surgery. Results: On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 435 patients (84.6%) from a cohort of 514 patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy were eligible. Of these patients, 186 (42.3%) were women; mean (SD) age at the time of surgery was 50.7 (11.4) years. Cure was achieved in 118 patients (27.1%), clear improvement in 135 (31.0%), and no clear success in 182 (41.8%). In the subgroup classified as no clear success, 166 patients (91.2%) had postoperative hypertension. However, within this subgroup, the mean (SD) systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly by 9 (22) mm Hg (P < .001) and 3 (15) mm Hg (P = .04), respectively. Also, the number of antihypertensive medications used decreased from 3 (range, 0-7) to 2 (range, 0-6) (P < .001). Moreover, in 75 of 182 patients (41.2%) within this subgroup, the decrease in systolic BP was 10 mm Hg or greater. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, for most patients, adrenalectomy was associated with a postoperative normotensive state and reduction of antihypertensive medications. Furthermore, a significant proportion of patients with postoperative, persistent hypertension may benefit from adrenalectomy given the observed clinically relevant and significant reduction of BP and antihypertensive medications.

Case detection in primary aldosteronism: high-diagnostic value of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio when performed under standardized conditions.

OBJECTIVE: The aldosterone-to-renin ratio is widely used and is the recommended screening modality for primary aldosteronism by the Endocrine Society Guideline. However, studies on its diagnostic accuracy have been inconsistent, which is mainly because of methodological limitations. We set out to evaluate this diagnostic value by using a highly standardized study protocol, which is in line with the Endocrine Society Guideline recommendations regarding indications for screening, testing conditions and reference standards in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In this prospective study, 233 consecutive patients referred to the University Medical Center Utrecht with difficult-to-control hypertension were enrolled. In addition to aldosterone-to-renin ratio measurements, all patients underwent a saline infusion test as a reference standard. A plasma aldosterone concentration greater than 280 pmol/l after saline infusion was considered diagnostic for aldosteronism and the plasma renin activity was assessed to exclude patients with secondary aldosteronism from the final primary aldosteronism diagnosis. RESULTS: Correlation of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (cut-off >5) with primary aldosteronism diagnosis showed 16 true positive, 29 false positive, 188 true negative and 0 false negative aldosterone-to-renin ratios, resulting in a sensitivity of 100% (CI 75.9-100), specificity of 86.7% (CI 81.2-90.7), positive-predictive value of 35.6% (CI 22.3-51.3) and negative-predictive value of 100% (CI 97.5-100.0). The corresponding area under the curve was 0.933 (CI 0.900-0.966). CONCLUSION: These findings show that the aldosterone-to-renin ratio is a good screening modality for primary aldosteronism and is without a high risk of missing a primary aldosteronism diagnosis whenever performed under well standardized conditions.

Hemodynamic instability during surgery for pheochromocytoma: comparing the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in a multicenter analysis of 341 patients.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hemodynamic instability is a major challenge during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Typically, pheochromocytoma is performed laparoscopically either through the retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach. We aimed to determine if the operative approach affects intraoperative hemodynamic instability during surgery for pheochromocytoma in a large multicenter multicenter cohort. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter analysis of consecutive patients with pheochromocytoma who underwent total unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy without conversion were included. Statistical analysis was performed using established intraoperative criteria for intraoperative hemodynamic instability: 1) systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg; 2) systolic blood pressure > 200 mm Hg; 3) mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg; 4) systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg + mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg; and 5) systolic blood pressure >200 mm Hg + mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg; and 6) intravenous vasopressor + vasodilator. RESULTS: In total, 341 patients met the inclusion criteria, 101 (29.6%) underwent retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and 240 (70.4%) transperitoneal adrenalectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that retroperitoneal adrenalectomy carries greater risk for mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (odds ratio 6.255, confidence interval 1.134-34.235, P = .035) compared with transperitoneal adrenalectomy. Overall and cardiovascular morbidity rates were comparable between the 2 approaches. The medical center was a significant independent influencing factor for all 6 intraoperative hemodynamic instability definitions. CONCLUSION: Variability in institutional management of pheochromocytoma intraoperatively has significant impact on all 6 intraoperative hemodynamic instability definitions. Standardization of anesthesia should be considered to reduce this variability.

Fluorine-18 fluorocholine PET-CT localizes hyperparathyroidism in patients with inconclusive conventional imaging: a multicenter study from the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown good performance of fluorine-18 fluorocholine (F-FCH) PET-computed tomography (CT) for parathyroid localization, although overall evidence remains scarce. We collected data from three institutions in the Netherlands and investigated the performance of F-FCH PET-CT as a second-line imaging modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients at least 18 years who underwent F-FCH PET-CT for biochemically proven hyperparathyroidism (HPT) and inconclusive ultrasound and sestamibi scintigraphy. Acquisition of PET images was performed 30 min after the administration of 2 MBq/kg F-FCH, together with a low-dose CT. RESULTS: PET-CT scans were performed in 33 (75%) women and 11 (25%) men with a mean age of 58.9 (range 31-80 years). Three patients had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, one patient had tertiary HPT because of Alport syndrome and the remaining patients had sporadic primary HPT. F-FCH PET-CT was positive in 34/44 (77.3%) cases. Of the 35 abnormal glands resected in 33 patients, F-FCH PET-CT could successfully localize 33/35 (94.3%), with only one false-positive result [positive predictive value (PPV)=97.1%]. Comparison of the 10 patients with negative PET-CT with the 34 patients with positive PET-CT showed no significant differences in age, sex, ratio of preoperative calcium, use of cinacalcet, history of neck surgery, and concomitant multinodular goiter. CONCLUSION: Our study shows excellent performance of F-FCH PET-CT in patients with HPT and inconclusive conventional imaging. Because of its favorable characteristics with high performance, prospective studies should be initiated to determine whether this new technique may replace conventional sestamibi scintigraphy as a first-line imaging modality.

Enabling minimal invasive parathyroidectomy for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism using Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT-CT, ultrasound and first results of (18)F-fluorocholine PET-CT.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US), single photon-emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) and (18)F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET-CT for preoperative localization of hyper-functioning parathyroid(s) in order to create a more efficient diagnostic pathway and enable minimal invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) in patients with biochemical proven non-familial primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of 63 consecutive patients with a biochemical diagnosis of non-familial pHPT who received a Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT-CT and neck ultrasound. Surgical findings were used in calculating the sensitivity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of both imaging modalities. Furthermore we present 5 cases who received additional FCH PET-CT. RESULTS: A total of 42 (66.7%) patients underwent MIP. The PPV and sensitivity of SPECT-CT, 93.0% and 80.3%, were significantly higher than those of US with 78.3% and 63.2%, respectively. Adding US to SPECT-CT for initial pre-operative localization did not significantly increase sensitivity but did significantly decrease PPV. Performance of US was significantly better when performed after SPECT-CT. (18)F-fluorocholine PET-CT localized the hyper-functioning parathyroid gland in 4/5 cases with discordant conventional imaging, enabling MIP. CONCLUSION: SPECT-CT is the imaging modality of choice for initial pre-operative localization of hyper-functioning parathyroid gland(s) in patients with biochemical pHPT. Ultrasound should be performed after SPECT-CT for confirmation of positive SPECT-CT findings and for pre-operative marking allowing MIP. In cases with negative or discordant imaging additional FCH PET-CT should be considered since this might enable the surgeon to perform MIP.